請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22444
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曾惠斌(Hui-Ping Tserng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jia-Yi You | en |
dc.contributor.author | 游家懿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:17:56Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文部份
Altshuler, E., Ramos1 O., Núñez1 Y., Fernández J., Batista-Leyva1 A.J., and Noda1 C., 2005,“Symmetry breaking in escaping ants, ”The American Naturalist, Vol. 166, No. 6, pp. 643-649. An, Q. X., 2006, “Instance and Analysis- Performance-based Fire Safety Egress Design of Modern Sports Architecture,” Huazhong Architecture, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 82-85. Arthur, P. and Passini, R., 1992, “Wayfindings: People, Sings and Architecture,” McGraw Hill, Inc., New York. Ashe, B. and Shields, T.J., 1999, “Analysis and Modeling of the Unannounced Evacuation of a Large Retail Store,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 333-336. Thompson, B., Hinks, J., Green., P.,1998, “Human Behaviour in Fire:Escape Syntax,”, pp.799-808. BuildingEXODUS操作手冊,2004年 Butcher, E. G., and Parnell, A. C., 1983, “Designing for Fire Safety,” Wiley, New York. Charters D., Holborn P., and Townsend N., 2001,“Analysis of the Number of Occupants, Detection Times and Pre-movement Times,” Human Behaviour in Fire, Second International Symposium. Chudley, R., 1990,”Building Finishes, Fittings, and Domestic Services,” Construction Press, 2nd edition, London. David, E. M., 1978,“Concepts in Building Fire Safety, Wiley,” New York. De Cicco, P. R., 1990,“Fire Hazard: Reducing the Consequence, Making Buildings Safer For People During Hurricanes, Earthquakes, and Fires,” Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 142-167. Donald I. and Canter D., 1990, ”Behavioural Aspects of the King's Cross Disaster,” In:Canter D, editor. Fires and Human Behaviour, 2nd ed. Fulton, pp.15-30. Fruin JJ., 2005, “The cause and prevention of crowd disasters,” http://crowddynamics.com/Myriad/Fruin%20-%20causes.htm (2005). Graat, E., Midden, C. and Bockholts, P., 1999, “Complex evacuation; effects of motivation level and slope of stairs on emergency egress time in a sports stadium,” Safety Science, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 127-141. Grbich, C., 1999, Qualitative Research in Health: An Introduction. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Gwynne, S. and Galea, E.R., 1997, ”A Review of the Methodologies and Critical Appraisal of Computer Model Used in the Simulation of Evacuation From the Built Environment,” Society of Fire Protection Engineers, pp.4-5。 Gwynne, S.and Galea, E. R., 1998, “A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment,” The Society of Fire Protection Engineers. Gwynne, S., Gales, E. R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P. J. and Filippidis, L., 1999, “A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment,” Building and Environment, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 741-749. HE, J. and Yang, H., 2005, “A Research on audiences’ Evacuation in Olympic Game Gyms, in: Proc. EASTS’05,” Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, Bangkok, pp. 2494-2503. Henry Weckman., 1998, “Evacuation of a Theatre:Exercise vs. Calculation” In: Shields J, editor., Human Behaviour in Fire-Proceedings of the First International Symposium, 1998,p.485 Hillier F.S. and Lieberman G.J., 1980, “Introductions to operations research,” 3rd ed. Holden-Dav: Oakland. Hoskin K., 2004,”Fire protection and evacuation procedures of stadia venues in New Zealand,” Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 3–7. Integrated Environmental Solutions Ltd., 2001, “SIMULEX User’s Manual,” 2001 International Standards Organization, 1997, “Fire Safety Engineering-Life Safety,” ISO/CD 13394. Jennings, C. R., 1999,“Socioeconmic characteristics and their relationship to fire incidence: a review of the literature,” Fire Technology, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 7-34. Jessica R., 2005,“Small Minds Think Alike,” Discover, Mind & Brain, Vol. 26, No. 12, http://discovermagazine.com/2005/dec/ants-stampede. Johan Lundin., 1998,“Different Fire Safety Design Methods Applied on A High Rise Building, ” Lund University, Sweden. Liu, Q., Lu, H., Yang, H. and Zhang, W., 2005, “Study on The Evacuation of People Flow in The Venue of Olympic Games,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 4365-4380. Lo, S.M., Fang, Z., Lin,P., Zhi,G.S., 2004, “An evacuation model: the SGEM package,” Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.169–190. McMillan, J.M., 2001, “A guideline for The Fire Design of Shopping Centres”, Canterbury University, New Zealand. Merton R., 1968, “Social Theory and Social Structure: Part One on Theoretical Sociology: Five Essays Old and New.” New York: Free Press. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L., 1995, “In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition.” South Melbourne: Longman. Nicholson, A., 1999, “Fire Safety Engineering the Millennium dome-Escape and Smoke Management Design in Practice,” International Annual General Meeting Conference and Exhibition, Institution of Fire Engineers, Edinburgh, pp. 22-23. Ronald Oldengarm., 2003, “Simulating Building Evacuations With a Model,” Netherlands. Olsson, P. A. and Regan, M. A., 2001, “A comparison between actual and predicted evacuation times,” Safety Science, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 139-145. Pan, X. S., Han, C. S., Dauber, K., Law, K. H., 2006, “Human and social behavior in computational modeling and analysis of egress,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 448 – 461. Paul, J., 1984,“The movement of people in buildings and design solutions for means of egress,” Fire Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 27-47. Pauls J., 1990, “Building evacuation research findings and recommendations,” In: Canter D, editor. Fires and Human Behaviour, 2nd ed. Fulton, 1990, pp.251-75. Paulsen T., Soma H., Schneider V., Wiklund J., Lovas, G., 1995, “Evaluation of Simulation Models of Evacuation From Complex Spaces,” Sintef Report, STF75 A95020, ISBN 82-595-8583-9. Pelechano N. and Malkawi A., 2008, “Evacuation simulation model: Challenges in modeling high rise building evacuation with cellular automata approaches,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 377-385. Poole, T. G. and Szymankiewicz, J. Z., 1977, “Using Simulation to Solve Problems,” McGraw-Hill book Company, UK. Sime, J., and Kimyra, M., 1988,“The timing of escape: exit choice behaviour in fires and building evacuations,” Safety in the Built Environment, pp. 48-61. Sime J. and Kimura M., 1989, “Exit choice behaviour during the evacuation of two lecture halls,” In: Wakamatsu T, Hasemi Y, Seizawa A, Seeger P, Pagni P, Grant C. editors. Proceedings of The Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, pp.510-550. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 1995, “SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineers,” Second Edition, pp.3-269~3-270 Song, W. G., Yu, Y. F. and Zhang, H. P., 2005, “Evacuation Analysis of a Large Shopping Mall,” Engineering Science, Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 78-83. Stewart, D. W. and Shamdasani, P. N., 1990, “Focus Group: Theory and Practice,” Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications. Still, G. K., 1993, “New computer system can predict human response to building fires,” Fire, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 40-41. Turner R.H. and Killian L.M., 1957, “Collective Behaviour,” Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Walker, H. M., 1994,”The Limits of Computing,” Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston. Wang, X. G., 2001, “An occupant evacuation model for the underground shopping mall during fire incidents,” Fire Safety Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 57-62. Weckman, H., Lehtimaki, S. and Mannikko, S., 1999, “Evacuation of a Theatre: Exercise vs. Calculations,” fire and materials, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 357-361. Winerman L., 2004, “Fighting fire with psychology.” Monitor on Psychology; Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 28–31 Wong, L.T. and Cheung, T.F., 2006, “Evaluating probable risk of evacuees in institutional buildings, Safety Science,” Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 169–181. Xie, D. Y., Tang, H. and Li, T., 2005, “Application of people evacuation analyzing in design of stadiums and gymnasiums,” Fire Science and Technology, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 301-304. Zhang, Q., Liu, M., Wu, C. and Zhao, G., 2007, “A stranded-crowd model (SCM) for performance-based design of stadium egress,” Building and Environment, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 2630-2636. 日文部份 建設省建築研究所,1977,大震時における総合的被害予測モデルに関する研究,日本. 室崎益輝,1993,建築防災.安全,鹿島出版社,日本. 繁體中文部份 丁育群,1998,「建築技術規則性能防火法規轉換之研究」,內政部建築研究所,陳火炎、簡賢文共同主持。 丁育群、江崇誠,2000,「複合用途建築物認定基準與防火避難設施設置規定之研究」,內政部建築研究所,臺北. 江柏助,2002,「建築物避難設計先期評估研究」,國立交通大學碩士論文。 行政院體育委員會, 2005, 2005年統計年報。 林元祥、呂和樹,2000,「建築物火災人員逃生危險度之電腦模擬評估」,中央警察大學學報,Vol. 36, pp. 457 – 470。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花,2005,「質性研究訪談模式與實施」,身心障礙研究, Vol.3, No.2,pp 122-136 陳鴻勝,2003 ,「空間疏散效率之個體式模擬方法」,博士論文,國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,臺北。 陳俊青,2003,「運用buildingEXODUS與Simulex進行避難所需時間驗算比較─以南港地下車站為例」,中央警察大學碩士論文。 陳榮進,2000,「新型捷運車站性能式煙控與避難系統設計分析」,國立中山大學碩士論文。 鄭震崇,2001,「地下捷運車站火災之人員避難安全性評估」,中央警察大學碩士論文。 吳俊毅,2000,「運用buildingEXODUS 避難軟體進行避難所需時間之驗算-以地下車站為對象」,中央警察大學碩士論文。 鄭震崇,2001,「地下捷運車站火災之人員避難安全性評估」,中央警察大學碩士論文。 趙勇維,2001,「運用buildingEXODUS 驗證地下捷運車站人員避難安全之研究-以捷運新店站為例」,中央警察大學碩士論文。 楊靖威,2001,「建築物性能式防火設計程序之研究─以地下街為例」,國立交通大學碩士論文。 楊艷禾,2002,「建築物火災避難安全性能評估方法之研究—以辦公大樓為例」,中央警察大學碩士論文。 賴葦芸,2000,「高科技廠房防火安全性能研究-避難安全評估」,國立交通大學碩士論文。 網站部份 光明日報,2002,不走闊路行窄路工程師憑直覺逃命,http://www.sinchew-i.com/special/nywtc/subject.phtml?sec=302&artid=200209061185. 蕭慧芬,2002,待查證之新聞對新聞媒體及社會造成的影響兼探現場連線可能引發之錯誤報導, http://www.gio.gov.tw/info/2002html/11new/3.htm. 內政部營建署,2004,大型空間(購物中心、巨蛋等)避難安全管理,公共安全管理國際研討會,http://www.ndppc.nat.gov.tw/Show.aspx?MID=673&UID=727&PID=673. 內政部消防署,2004,大型活動安全管理,公共安全管理白皮書,http://www.ndppc.nat.gov.tw/Show.aspx?MID=673&UID=727&PID=673 http://www.stadiumguide.com/disasterspecial.htm http://fseg.gre.ac.uk/fire. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22444 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著經濟活動的轉型,台灣商業活動頻繁,大型集會活動的需求日益增加,除了提供民眾日常活動使用外,亦可舉辦其它各種藝文活動。大型的活動場所涵蓋了舉辦音樂會、體育競賽、展覽…及商業性活動等設施,為進行不同表演節目之空間利用,其內部空間皆具可變性,加上近年來交通、經濟之發展,建築材料、構法等技術之革新,新建築已具大型化、高層化及複合使用化特性,各式大型空間之建築物,其容留人數眾多,成為許多大規模建築物興建時的利基。
臺灣自40年代起開始推動體育活動,各縣市政府大量投資興建體育設施,如田徑場、游泳池、網球場、足球場及小型活動空間,其中包含許多大型的體育設施,如可容納多人之體育館,至1999年底止,全臺灣所有之體育場和體育館總數已有2780座。其中可容納人數8000人以上者共有34座(行政院體育委員會, 2005),臺灣因缺乏大型活動之專設空間,所以經常租用大型體育館來舉辦活動。以1999年為例,某田徑場總共舉辦56場活動,其中包含45場體育活動,9場演唱會,2場廣告拍攝活動,因此在體育館的高使用率及多數為大型活動的情形下,避難規劃不良時,存在災害高傷亡的風險與危機,因此,大規模建築物空間的避難設計及安全管理亦為重要之課題。 避難行為決定了災難發生時人員是否能安全逃生的關鍵因素,但建築物設計時考量之避難安全評估與營運時期實際之避難行為特性間,經常無法滿足實務性之操作驗證。大型建築物由於收容人數多,避難設計不良即可能造成巨大的傷亡,歷史上有許多災例都是緊急情形下的人潮避難所引起的;目前有限的研究仍普遍存在全尺寸(full-scale)避難實驗(evacuation exercise)不易與實驗經濟性的限制,以及真人模擬道德性與未重視軟體分析過程等問題。本研究以大型體育館(large gymnasium)為研究對象,利用官方要求體育館業者營運前進行之避難演練機會,以問卷調查及錄影觀測方法,了解所有參與演練人員之避難行為特性;並透過Simulex與buildingEXODUS兩個知名的軟體進行電腦模擬分析。研究結果顯示不同軟體分析過程間存在極高之風險承受值;本研究另以焦點團體(Focus Groups)之方式,提出了「Hot Area」概念,以序位法進行建築物中最危險區「Hot Area」的選取評估,以Hot Area evacuation exercise 取代Full-scale evacuation exercise 的方式進行研究。利用一場客滿(15000人)之歌舞劇結束時,進行2089人(Hot Area)人員散場之實地觀察與紀錄,並採用buildingEXODUS軟體對臺北市立體育館(Taipei Arena)的Hot Area避難進行軟體模擬,並將結果與軟體進行分析比對,藉以了解人員散場情形與電腦避難軟體模擬時之差異性。最後,本研究根據調查與分析結果進行改善評估,並將改善建議提供予設計與營運者參考設計與管理,並提出建議及作為未來該類型建築物完工驗證時之檢視參考參考基準。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With a shift in economic and business activities in Taiwan, the demand for large, concentrated events has increased. These venues can be used for artistic events as well as residents’ daily activities. Large event venues have facilities for music concerts, sports tournaments, exhibits, and business activities. Different indoor space utilization makes for versatility in varied events. Recent years, with the developments and revolutions in transportation, economics, building material and construction technique, most new buildings are large, multi-storied and complex, and the ability of large buildings to contain a large number of people also becomes a niche.
In the 1940s, Taiwan began to promote physical activities and the county and city governments invested a great deal of funds in athletic facilities such as athletic fields, swimming pools, tennis courts, soccer fields and smaller spaces. A lot of the large athletic facilities are gymnasiums that can hold many people; by the end of 1999, there were 2780 stadiums and gymnasiums in Taiwan, 34 of which could accommodate over 8000 people (Executive Yuan Sports Affairs Council, 2005). Taiwan lacks specific spaces designated for large events, so large gymnasiums are often used. For instance, in 1999, there were 56 events held in a particular athletic field, including 45 athletic activities, 9 concerts, and 2 commercial productions. As gymnasiums are frequently used for large events, evacuation plans should be well planned due to the dangerous risks of injury and death. Hence, evacuation design and safety management in large buildings are important topics. Evacuation behavior is a key factor to whether people can escape safely during a disaster, but when a building is designed the considerations and evaluation of safety often cannot meet the requirements of actual practice due to evacuation behavior. Large buildings hold many people, so badly designed evacuation facilities can lead to large scale injuries and deaths; historically, many disasters are caused by evacuating crowds. Currently, the body of studies still remains limited by the difficulty and experimental cost of full-scale evacuation exercises or the ethics of human simulation and less emphasis on software analysis processes. This study focuses on large gymnasiums and uses the opportunity that the government requires gymnasiums to complete evacuation drills before opening to the public, as well as surveys and video observations, to understand the evacuation behaviors of evacuees, and also uses the well known software Simulex and buildingEXODUS for simulation and analysis. Research shows that a high risk factor exists between the analysis process of different software; this study proposes the concept of the Hot Area based on the concept of Focus Groups, selecting and estimating in order the most dangerous Hot Areas in the building, and using the Hot Area evacuation exercise to replace the a full-scale evacuation exercise for research purposes. In Taipei Arena, at the end of a sold-out musical (15,000 people), a Hot Area evacuation was performed with 2,089 people, observed and recorded and also simulated by buildingEXODUS software. The actual results were compared to software analysis in order to understand the difference between real evacuations and computer simulation. Finally, this study analyzes investigation and analysis results and provides an evaluation for improvement, also providing recommendations for building designers and operators in designing and managing buildings, and also providing suggestions for future evaluation standards after similar type buildings are constructed in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:17:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-D91521026-1.pdf: 3638166 bytes, checksum: 896c0194e63b7ee525072e1ab1aeff4a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 I
Abstract III 目錄 V 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究對象與範圍 2 1.3 研究方法與架構 3 1.3.1 研究方法 3 1.3.2 研究架構與流程 4 1.4 研究限制 5 1.5 研究假設 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 建築物避難法規現況與問題 7 2.1.1 建築物避難法規特性 7 2.1.2 現有設計規範之問題 9 2.2 性能式設計現況與問題 11 2.2.1 避難電腦模式之評估方法探討 11 2.3 buildingEXODUS避難模擬軟體之探討 18 2.4 Simulex避難模擬軟體之探討 20 2.5 小結 22 第三章 體育館建築物現況分析 24 3.1 體育館建築物之特性 25 3.1.1體育館建築物之使用特性 25 3.1.2 體育館建築物的火災特性 26 3.2 大型體育活動災例回顧 28 3.3國內外體育館避難相關研究 32 3.3.1國內體育館避難相關研究 32 3.3.2 大型建築物軟體模擬與實際避難演練分析文獻 34 3.3.3 體育館相關的避難分析研究 36 3.4 小結 38 第四章 案例調查與模擬 39 4.1 案例介紹 39 4.2 避難特性調查與規劃 41 4.2.1 體育館避難特性調查規劃 41 4.2.2 問卷調查結果 43 4.2.3 問卷分析討論 45 4.3 避難演練觀測規劃與結果分析 48 4.3.1避難演練觀測規劃 48 4.3.2 避難演練觀測結果分析 50 4.4 避難模擬差異性比較分析 51 4.4.1.系統模擬研究設計 51 4.4.2系統模擬數值設定 52 4.4.3 系統模擬結果比較 54 4.5 小結 56 4.5.1 問卷部份 56 4.5.2 演練部份 58 4.5.3 模擬比較部份 58 第五章 Hot Area指標建立與模擬 59 5.1 Hot Area指標建立方法 60 5.1.1焦點團體法介紹 61 5.1.2 Focus Groups for Hot Area 63 5.1.3 Criteria of Hot Area 63 5.1.4 選取Hot Area評估方法 66 5.2 Hot Area 散場觀測規劃 67 5.3 Hot Area 出口散場觀察分析與演練比較 73 5.3.1 Hot Area 出口散場觀察分析 73 5.3.2 Hot Area 出口散場觀察與演練分析 76 5.4 Hot Area 散場與模擬結果分析 76 5.5 小結 78 第六章 結論與建議 80 6.1 結論 80 6.1.1 問卷、演練與模擬部份 80 6.1.2 Hot Area部份 81 6.2 建議 82 6.2.1問卷與演練部份 82 6.2.2 Hot Area部份 82 參考文獻 84 附件一 90 附件二 103 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 大規模建築物避難時間評估方法之研究─以臺北市立體育館為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Research on the Evaluation Method for Emergency Evacuation Time of Large Scale Architecture- A Case Study on Taipei Arena | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 荷世平(Shih-Ping Ho),陳亮全(Liang-Chun Chen),熊光華(Kuang-Hua Hsiung),丁育群(Yu-Qun Ding),簡賢文(Shen-Wen Chien) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 避難行為,避難模擬,避難演練,Hot Area,大規模建築物,焦點團體,消防安全, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Evacuation Behavior,Evacuation Simulation,Evacuation Exercise,Hot Area,Large-scale Architecture,Focus Group,Fire Safety, | en |
dc.relation.page | 104 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。