請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22309完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳忠仁 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Han Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王俐涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:15:18Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Arranz, N. & Fdez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation 28(1/2): 88-100.
Aschhoff, B. & Schmidt, B.T. (2008). Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation--Happy Together? Review of Industrial Organization 33(1): 41-62. Bai, Y. & O’Brien, G. C. (2008). The strategic motives behind firm’s engagement in cooperative research and development: A new explanation from four theoretical perspectives. Journal of Modelling in Management 3(2): 162-181. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and start-ups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21: 267-294. Bayona, C., Garcsa-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy 30: 1289-1307. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy 33(10): 1477-1492. Brockhoff, K. (1992). R&D cooperation between firms – a perceived transaction cost perspective. Management Science 38(4): 514-524. Cantner, U. & Graf, H. (2004). Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 543-562. Chang, Y. C. (2003). Benefits of co-operation on innovation performance: Evidence from integrated circuits and biotechnology firms in the UK and Taiwan. R & D Management 33(4): 425-437. Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152. Cowan, R., Jonard, N., & Zimmermann, J. B. (2006). Evolving networks of inventors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16: 155-174. Daft, R. (1983). Organization theory and design. West: New York. Darrow, A. L. & Kahl, D. R. (1982). A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect. Journal of Management 8(2): 35-47. Das, T. K. & Teng, B. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 26(1):31-61. Decarolis, D. M. & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 20:953-968. Deeds, D. L. & Hill, C. W. L. (1996). Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing 11: 41-55. George, G., Zahra, S. Α., Wheatley, Κ. K., & Khan, R. (2001). The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12: 205-226. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. M., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: a transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 49(3): 519-543. Goerzen, Α. & Beamish, P. W. (2005). The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 26: 333-354. Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choices. Academy of Management Journal 35(4): 85–112. Hagedoorn, J. & Schakenraad, J.(1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal 15: 291-309. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14: 371-385. Hagedoorn, J. (2003). Sharing intellectual property rights－an exploratory study of joint patenting among companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(5): 1035-1050. Hagedoorn, J., Kranenburg, H. V., & Osborn, R. N. (2003) Joint patenting amongst companies－exploring the effects of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience. Managerial and Decision Economics 24: 71-84. Hair, J. F. Jr. & Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. C., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hilbe, J. M., (2007). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40: 767– 798. Hoang, H. & Rothaermel, F. T. (2005). The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal 48(2): 332–345. Kim, C. & Song, J. (2007). Creating new technology through alliances: an empirical investigation of joint patents. Technovation 27: 461-470. Kleinknecht, A. & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1992). Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study. Research Policy 21: 347-360. Lai, W. H. & Chang, P. L. (2010). Corporate motivation and performance in R&D alliances. Journal of Business Research 63: 490–496. Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19(5): 461-477. Lavie, D. & Miller, S. R. (2008). Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science 19(4): 623-646. Lavie, D. (2007). Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1187-1212. Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2008). Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal 51(2): 315-334. Lichtenthaler, U. & Lichtenthaler, E. (2004). Alliance functions: implications of the international multi-R&D-alliance perspective. Technovation 24: 541–552. Miotti, L. & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy 32(8): 1481-1499. Nielsen, B. B. (2003). An empirical investigation of the drivers of international strategic alliance formation. European Management Journal 21(3): 301–322. Oerlemans, L. A. G. & Meeus, M. T. H. (2001). R&D cooperation in a transaction cost perspective. Review of Industrial Organization 18(1): 77-90. Oxley, J. & Sampson, R. C. (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal 25: 723-749. Pastor, M. & Sandonis, J. (2002). Research joint ventures vs. cross licensing agreements: An agency approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20(2): 215-249. Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 153–176. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116–145. Rindfleisch, A. & Heide J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing 61(4): 30-54. Rothaermel, F. T. & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 21: 429-460. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive strategic management: 556-570. Sakakibara, M. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal 18:143-164. Sakakibara, M. (2002). Formation of R&D consortia: Industry and company effects. Strategic Management 23: 1033–1050. Sampson, R. C. (2004a). Organizational choice in R&D alliances: knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives. Managerial and Decision Economics 25: 421-436. Sampson, R. C. (2004b). The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. Journal of Law and Economics and Organization 20(2): 484-526. Sampson, R. C. (2005). Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal 26: 1009-1031. Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 15: 387-394. Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research 18(3): 291-300. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th). New York: Routledge. Teece, D. J. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18(1): 1–25. Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533. Wassmer, U. (2010). Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 36(1): 141-171. Yamin, M. & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management 10: 239-258. Yasuda, H. (2005). Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: comparative study of the resource-based theory and the transaction-cost theory. Technovation 25: 763-770. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22309 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 全球化競爭時代下，創新成為企業重要的競爭優勢。然而，創新過程的高風險與資本投入，使得企業難以全憑一己之力投入創新研發，因此企業尋求研發合作成為普遍現象。企業的研發合作現象激發廣泛的研究興趣，然而企業重複進行研發合作的行為卻鮮少被關注。因此本研究企圖透過資源基礎觀點與交易成本理論，分析企業進行重複合作對其創新績效的影響，並討論重複合作行為模式—平均合作間隔與跨國合作比例對重複合作強度與其創新績效的調和效果。並透過美國專利資料庫中，78家進行重複研發合作的臺灣與中國企業資料，為本研究提供實證證據。
研究結果顯示，重複合作強度和創新績效呈現倒U關係，即隨著合作強度的增加，企業創新績效也呈正向成長；然而當合作強度超過其最適程度，企業創新績效反而呈負向成長。此外，實證研究亦證實，平均合作間隔與跨國合作比例會負向調和重複合作強度對其創新績效的影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Globalization leads keen competitions among firms, and innovation becomes an important competitive advantage for firms to survive. However, due to the high uncertainties and capital investment during the innovative process, firms are less able to do R&D and innovating alone. Therefore, there are more and more firms engaging in R&D cooperation. This phenomenon encourages plenty of related research; however, repeated R&D cooperation has merely been explored. Hence, this study aims to explore the effect of repeated R&D cooperation intensity on innovation performance of the focal firm and the moderating effects of the patterns of repeated R&D cooperation behavior, average cooperation interval and foreign partnership, from perspectives of RBV and TCE.
The empirical evidence comes from the data of 78 Taiwanese and Chinese firms from USPTO. The result shows that the relationship between repeated R&D cooperation intensity and innovation performance of the focal firm is inverted U-shape, that is, innovation performance increases initially, and decreases beyond the optimal level of repeated R&D cooperation intensity. Besides, empirical evidence also shows that both average cooperation interval and foreign partnership negatively moderate the relationship between repeated R&D cooperation intensity and innovation performance of the focal firm. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:15:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97741019-1.pdf: 700315 bytes, checksum: 1fff6ea322e5b86758431f5ced19aaec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii CHAPTER1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motives 1 1.2 Research Objective 4 1.3 Research Procedure 5 1.3.1 The Organization of This Study 5 1.3.2 Research Flow 6 CHAPTER2 LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESIS 7 2.1 Literature Background 7 2.1.1 R&D cooperation 7 2.1.2 Research topics on Joint Patents 13 2.2 Theoretical Framework: RBV and TCE 17 2.2.1 Resource-based View 17 2.2.2 Transaction Cost Economics 19 2.3 Hypotheses Development 22 2.3.1 Repeated R&D Cooperation Intensity and Innovation Performance 22 2.3.2 Moderating role of Average Cooperation Interval 24 2.3.3 Moderating role of Foreign Partnership 26 CHAPTER3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 28 3.1 Research Framework 28 3.2 Research Hypotheses 29 3.3 Variable Measurement 30 3.3.1 Dependent Variable 30 3.3.2 Independent Variable 31 3.3.3 Moderating Variable 31 3.3.4 Control Variable 32 3.4 Data Collection and Sample 36 3.5 Statistical Method 38 3.5.1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis 38 3.5.2 Regression Analysis 39 CHAPTER4 RESEARCH RESULT 41 4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis 41 4.2 Regression Analysis 43 4.2.1 Direct effect of Repeated R&D Cooperation Intensity 44 4.2.2 Moderating effect of Average Cooperation Interval 44 4.2.3 Moderating effect of Foreign Partnership 45 4.2.4 Diagrams of moderating effect 47 CHAPTER5 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 50 5.1 Research Conclusion 50 5.2 Managerial Implication 52 5.3 Limitation and Future Research Direction 53 REFERENCES 55 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 企業重複研發合作對創新績效之影響：合作間隔與跨國合作比例之調和效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effect of Repeated R&D Cooperation on Firm’s Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Average Cooperation Interval and Foreign Partnership | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 賴宏誌,黃怡芬 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 創新績效,重複研發合作,合作間隔,跨國合作,臺灣,中國, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Innovation Performance,Repeated R&D Cooperation Intensity,Average Cooperation Interval,Foreign Partnership,Taiwan,China, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 683.9 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。