Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22168
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳琮璠(Chung-Fern Wu)
dc.contributor.authorHai-Chou Wangen
dc.contributor.author王海舟zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T04:06:13Z-
dc.date.copyright2018-08-06
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-26
dc.identifier.citation[1] Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2012. Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 3 (4): 3–20.
[2] Asare, S. K., G. M. Trompeter, and A. M. Wight. 2000. The effect of accountability and time budgets on auditors’ testing strategies. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (4): 539–560.
[3] Asare, S. K., and A. M. Wright. 2012. Investors', auditors', and lenders' understanding of the message conveyed by the standard audit report on the financial statements. Accounting Horizons 26 (2): 193–217.
[4] Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 611–639.
[5] Ashton, R. H., J. J. Willingham, and R. K. Elliott. 1987. An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (2): 275–292.
[6] Audit Quality Forum. 2007. Audit Quality Fundamentals- Auditor Reporting. London, U.K.: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
[7] Backof, A. G., K. Bowlin, and B. M. Goodson. 2014. The Impact of Proposed Changes to the Content of the Audit Report on Jurors’ Assessments of Auditor Negligence. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2446057
[8] Badertscher, B., B. Jorgensen, S. Katz, and W. Kinney. 2014. Public equity and audit pricing in the United States. Journal of Accounting Research 52 (2): 303–339.
[9] Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary accounting research 15(1): 1–24.
[10] Bédard, J., P. Coram, R. Espahbodi, and T. J. Mock. 2016. Does recent academic research support changes to audit reporting standards? Accounting Horizons 30 (2): 255–275.
[11] Bell, T. B., W. R. Landsman, and D. A. Shackelford. 2000. Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (1): 35–43.
[12] Beneish, M. D., and E. Press. 1995. Interrelation among events of default. Contemporary Accounting Research 12 (1): 57–84.
[13] Boolaky, P. K., and R. Quick. 2016. Bank directors' perceptions of expanded auditor's reports. International Journal of Auditing 20 (2):158–174.
[14] Bradbury, M. E., and M. Almulla. 2018. Auditor, Client, and Investor Consequences of the Enhanced Auditor's Report. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3165267
[15] Brasel, K., M. M. Doxey, J. H. Grenier, and A. Reffett. 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91 (5):1345–1362.
[16] Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99–126.
[17] Burgstahler, D., and M. Eames. 2006. Management of earnings and analysts' forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 33 (5-6): 633–652.
[18] Cade, N., and F. Hodge. 2014. The effect of expanding the audit report on managers' communication openness. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2433641
[19] Carcello, J. V. 2012. What do investors want from the standard audit report? CPA Journal 82 (1): 22–28.
[20] Carcello, J. V., and C. Li. 2013. Costs and Benefits of Requiring an Engagement Partner Signature: Recent Experience in the United Kingdom. The Accounting Review 88 (5):1511–1546.
[21] Carslaw, C. A. P. N., and S. E. Kaplan. 1991. An examination of audit delay: Further evidence from New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research 22 (85): 21–32.
[22] Carver, B. T., and B. S. Trinkle. 2017. Nonprofessional Investors’ Reactions to the PCAOB's Proposed Changes to the Standard Audit Report. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2930375
[23] Chambers, A. E., and S. H. Penman. 1984. Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1): 21–47.
[24] Chan, P., M. Ezzamel, and D. Gwilliam. 1993. Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 20 (6): 765–86.
[25] Chi, H. Y., and C. L. Chin. 2011. Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 30 (2): 201–229.
[26] Chi, W., E. B. Douthett, and L. L. Lisic. 2012. Client importance and audit partner independence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31 (3): 320–336.
[27] Choi, J. H., and T. J. Wong. 2007. Auditors’ governance functions and legal environments: An international investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (1): 13–46.
[28] Christensen, B. E., S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 33 (4): 71–93.
[29] Church, B. K., S. M. Davis, and S. A. McCracken. 2008. The auditor’s reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1): 69–90.
[30] Cordoş, G.S., and M-T Fülöpa. 2015. Understanding audit reporting changes:
introduction of Key Audit Matters. Accounting and Management Information Systems 14(1): 128–152.
[31] DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183–199.
[32] DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. Skinner. Accounting Choices in Troubled Companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 113–143.
[33] Dechow, P. M., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 35–59.
[34] Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193–225.
[35] DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of accounting and economics 17 (1): 145–176.
[36] DeFond, M., and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58 (2): 275–326.
[37] Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business 72 (1): 1–33.
[38] Deng, M., N. Melumad, and T. Shibano. 2012. Auditors’ liability, investments, and capital markets: A potential unintended consequence of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (5): 1179–1215.
[39] DeZoort, T., P. Harrison, and M. Taylor. 2006. Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (4–5): 373–390.
[40] Doyle, J. T., and M. J. Magilke. 2013. Decision Usefulness and Accelerated Filing Deadlines. Journal of Accounting Research 51 (3): 549–581.
[41] Ettredge, M. L., L. Sun, and C. Li. 2006. The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOX Era. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 25 (2): 1–23.
[42] Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2013. Standard. The independent auditor’s report on financial statements. International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700. Revised 2013.
[43] Francis, J. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133–51.
[44] Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18 (2): 17–34.
[45] Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditor’s fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 71–105.
[46] Geiger, M. A., and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Going-concern opinions in the ‘‘new’’ legal environment. Accounting Horizons 16 (1): 17–26.
[47] Geiger, M. A., K. Raghunandan, and D. V. Rama. 2006. Auditor decision-making in different litigation environments: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, audit reports and audit firm size. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25 (3): 332–353.
[48] Ghosh, A., and R. Pawlewicz. 2009. The impact of regulation on auditor fees: evidence from the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 28 (2): 171–197.
[49] Gimbar, C., B. Hansen, and M. E. Ozlanski. 2016. Early evidence on the effects of critical audit matters on auditor liability. Current Issues in Auditing 10 (1): A24–A33.
[50] Gray, G. L., J. L. Turner, P. J. Coram, and T. J. Mock. 2011. Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor’s report by financial statement preparers, users, and auditors. Accounting Horizons 25 (4): 659–684.
[51] Gul, F. A., S. Y. K. Fung, and B. Jaggi. 2009. Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics 47 (3): 265–287.
[52] Gul, F. A., and J. Goodwin. 2010. Short-term debt maturity structures, credit ratings, and the pricing of audit services. The Accounting Review 85 (3): 877–909.
[53] Gul, F. A., S. G. Lynn, and J.S.L. Tsui. 2002. Audit quality, management ownership, and the informativeness of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 17 (1): 25–49.
[54] Gutierrez, E., M. Minutti-Meza, K.W. Tatum, and M. Vulcheva. 2018. Consequences of changing the auditor’s report: Evidence from the U.K. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741174
[55] Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141–191.
[56] Hoffman, V. B., and J. M. Patton. 1997. Accountability, the dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors’ fraud judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (2): 227–237.
[57] Investor Advisory Group (IAG). 2011. Report from the Working Group on: Auditor's Report and The Role of the Auditor. PCAOB.
[58] International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2013. IAASB proposes standards to fundamentally transform the auditor's report; focuses on communicative value to users.
[59] International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015a. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700 (Revised), Forming an opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements.
[60] International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015b. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701, Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
[61] International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015c. IAASB Issues Final Standards to Improve Auditor’s Report.
[62] International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015d. The new auditor’s report: enhancing auditor communications, greater transparency into the financial statement audit.
[63] Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2): 193–228.
[64] Kachelmeier, S., J. Schmidt, and K. Valentine. 2014. The Disclaimer Effect of Disclosing Critical Audit Matters in the Auditor’s Report. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2481284
[65] KPMG. 2015. The New Auditor’s Report: Greater Transparency, More Relevant. Available at: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/cn/pdf/en/2016/12/the-new-auditor-report.pdf
[66] Kim, J. B., R. Chung, and M. Firth. 2003. Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (2): 323–359.
[67] Kim, S., and K. T. Trotmen. 2015. The comparative effect of process and outcome accountability in enhancing professional scepticism. Accounting and Finance 55 (4): 1015–1040.
[68] Knechel, R.W., G. Krishnan, M. Pevzner, L. Shefchik, and U. Velury. 2013. Audit quality: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 32 (Supplement 1): 385–421.
[69] Knechel, W. R., and J. L. Payne. 2001. Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20 (1): 137-146.
[70] Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163–197.
[71] Kross, W., and D. A. Schroeder. 1984. An empirical investigation of the effect of quarterly earnings announcement timing on stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1): 153–176.
[72] Lawson, B., and W. Schwartz. 2014. The PCAOB proposes significant changes
to the auditor’s reporting model. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance 26 (1): 53–60.
[73] Lee, H. Y., V. Mande, and M. Son. 2009. Do lengthy auditor tenure and the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor reduce audit report lags? International Journal of Auditing 13 (2): 87–104.
[74] Lennox, C. 2005. Audit quality and executive officers’ affiliations with CPA firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (2): 201-231.
[75] Lennox C. S., J. J. Schmidt, and A. M. Thompson. 2017. Is the Expanded Model of Audit Reporting Informative to Investors? Evidence from the UK. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2619785
[76] Lerner, J. S., P. E. Tetlock. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 255–275.
[77] Li, H., D. Hay., and D. Lau. 2018. Assessing the Impact of the New Auditor's Report. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3120822
[78] Mock, T. J., J. Bédard, P. J. Coram, S. M. Davis, R. Espahbodi, and R. C. Warne. 2013. The audit reporting model: Current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 32 (Supplement 1): 323–351.
[79] Newton, J. D., and R. H. Ashton. 1989. The association between audit technology and audit delay. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 8 (Supplement): 22–49.
[80] Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (1): 97–110.
[81] Peecher, M. E., I. Solomon, and K. T. Trotman. 2013. An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 (8):596–620.
[82] Press, E. G., and J. B. Weintrop. 1990. Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (1-3): 65–95.
[83] Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2011. Concept release on possible revisions to PCAOB standards related to reports on audited financial statements and related amendments to PCAOB standards. Release No. 2011-003. Washington D.C
[84] Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2013. Proposed Auditing Standards – The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements when the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion. Release No. 2013-005. Washington D.C.
[85] Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2014. PCAOB Public Meeting on Auditor’s Reporting Model. Washington D.C.
[86] Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2016a. Proposed Auditing Standards – The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements when the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards. Release No. 2016-003. Washington D.C.
[87] Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2016b. Comment Letters for Docket 034. Washington D.C.
[88] Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2017. The auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion and related amendments to PCAOB Standards. Release No. 2017-001. Washington, D.C.
[89] Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (3): 647–686.
[90] Reid, L.C., J. V. Carcello, C. Li, and T. L. Neal. 2016 Impact of Auditor Committee Changes on Audit Quality and Costs: Evidence form the United Kingdom. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2647507
[91] Seetharaman, A., F.A. Gul, and S. G. Lynn. 2002. Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from U.K. firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (1): 91–115.
[92] Sikka, P. 2009. Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6-7): 868–873.
[93] Simnett, R., E. Carson, and A. Vanstraelen. 2016. International archival auditing and assurance research: Trends, methodological issues, and opportunities 35 (3): 1–32.
[94] Simunic, D. A. 1980. The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1):161-190.
[95] Sirois, L., J. Bédard, and P. Bera. 2014. The Informational Value of Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Auditor Commentaries: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2469905
[96] Smith, K. 2017. Tell Me More: A Content Analysis of Expanded Auditor Reporting in the United Kingdom. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821399
[97] Stice, J. D. 1991. Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review 66 (3): 516–33.
[98] Titman, S., and B. Trueman. 1986. Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics 8 (2): 159–172.
[99] Vanstraelen, A., C. Schelleman, R. Meuwissen, and I. Hofmann. 2012. The audit reporting debate: Seemingly intractable problems and feasible solutions. European Accounting Review 21(2): 193–215.
[100] Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 721–744.
[101] Williams, D. D., and M. W. Dirsmith. 1988. The effects of audit technology on auditor efficiency: auditing and the timeliness of client earnings announcements. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 (5): 487–508.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22168-
dc.description.abstract臺灣主管機關規定上市櫃公司應於2016年財務報表查核開始適用新式查核報告準則。本研究探討實施新式查核報告是否影響審計品質及查核成本,並使用異常應計數與達到盈餘門檻之機率作為審計品質之代理變數;查核成本衡量指標則為審計公費與查核報告延遲。實證結果顯示,新式查核報告實施後,審計品質顯著改善。至於查核成本方面,並未發現審計公費顯著提高或下降;然而,會計師出具查核報告之日期顯著縮短。綜上所述,本研究認為實施新式查核報告之效益大於其成本。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe regulators in Taiwan have recently implemented a new auditing standard that became effective after December 31, 2015, which required that auditors issue extended audit reports for listed companies. This thesis examines the impact of extended audit reports on audit quality and audit cost. Using absolute abnormal accruals and the probability to meet earnings threshold as audit quality measures, I find evidence that audit quality is significantly improved in the first year after the introduction of the new standard. As for audit costs measures, I do not find a significant change in audit fees. However, audit report lag has been significantly shortened in the post-regime period. These results suggest that the benefits of the new auditing standard outweigh its cost.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:06:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R03722040-1.pdf: 1449132 bytes, checksum: 34b37080ff1ebb43a962defddaaea3ef (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 1
ABSTRACT 2
目錄 3
圖表目錄 4
第一章 緒論 5
第二章 文獻回顧與假說發展 11
第一節 新式查核報告相關背景、規定與意見 11
第二節 新式查核報告相關文獻 16
第三節 假說發展 19
第三章 研究設計 23
第一節 變數衡量 23
第二節 實證模型 26
第三節 樣本選取與資料來源 30
第四章 實證結果 34
第一節 敘述性統計 34
第二節 相關係數與單變量分析 34
第三節 迴歸結果 44
第五章 研究結論、限制與建議 49
第一節 研究結論 49
第二節 研究限制與建議 50
參考文獻 52
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject查核成本zh_TW
dc.subject新式查核報告zh_TW
dc.subject審計品質zh_TW
dc.subjectextended audit reporten
dc.subjectaudit costen
dc.subjectaudit qualityen
dc.title實施新式查核報告對審計品質及查核成本之影響zh_TW
dc.titleImpact of Extended Audit Report on Audit Quality and Audit Costen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林世銘(Su-Ming Lin),劉心才(Hsin-Tsai Liu)
dc.subject.keyword新式查核報告,審計品質,查核成本,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordextended audit report,audit quality,audit cost,en
dc.relation.page60
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201802035
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2018-07-27
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.42 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved