請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21855
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉啟群(Chi-Chun Liu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Han-Chung Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳漢鐘 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:49:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-11-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-11-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
Acharya, V., and S. Ryan. 2016. Banks’ Financial Reporting and Financial System Stability. Journal of Accounting Research 54 (2):277-340. Allen, F., and D. Gale. 2017. How Should Bank Liquidity be Regulated? In Achieving Financial Stability: WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 135-157. Armstrong, C. S., and J. D. Kepler. 2018. Theory, research design assumptions, and causal inferences. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Forthcoming Badertscher, B. A., J. J. Burks, and P. D. Easton. 2012. A Convenient Scapegoat: Fair Value Accounting by Commercial Banks during the Financial Crisis. The Accounting Review 87 (1):59-90. Banerjee, R. N., and H. Mio. 2017. The impact of liquidity regulation on banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation. Barth, M. E., J. Gomez-Biscarri, R. Kasznik, and G. López-Espinosa. 2017. Bank earnings and regulatory capital management using available for sale securities. Review of Accounting Studies 22 (4):1761-1792. Beatty, A. 1995. The effects of fair value accounting on investment portfolio management: How fair is it? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (Jan):25-39. Beatty, A. L., B. Ke, and K. R. Petroni. 2002. Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review 77 (3):547-570. Beatty, A., and S. Liao. 2014. Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58 (2-3):339-383. Bech, M., and T. Keister. 2017. Liquidity regulation and the implementation of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 92:64-77. Becker, B., and V. Ivashina. 2015. Reaching for yield in the bond market. The Journal of Finance 70 (5):1863-1902. Black, D. E. 2016. Other comprehensive income: a review and directions for future research. Accounting & Finance 56 (1):9-45. Buehler, K., P. Noteboom, and D. Williams. 2013. Between Deluge and Drought: The Future of US Bank Liquidity and Funding; Rebalancing the Balance Sheet During Turbulent Times: McKinsey. Chircop, J., and Z. Novotny-Farkas. 2016. The economic consequences of extending the use of fair value accounting in regulatory capital calculations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 62 (2–3):183-203. Deloitte. 2014. U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III liquidity coverage ratio final rule. Derrien, F., and A. Kecskés. 2013. The real effects of financial shocks: Evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage. The Journal of Finance 68 (4):1407-1440. Dewatripont, M., and J. Tirole. 1994. The prudential regulation of banks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Diamond, D. W., A. K. Kashyap, and R. G. Rajan. 2017. Banking and the Evolving Objectives of Bank Regulation. Journal of Political Economy 125 (6):1812-1825. Easton, P., and X.-J. Zhang. 2017. Mixing fair-value and historical-cost accounting: predictable other-comprehensive-income and mispricing of bank stocks. Review of Accounting Studies 22 (4):1732-1760. Flannery, M. J., and S. M. Sorescu. 1996. Evidence of bank market discipline in subordinated debenture yields: 1983–1991. The Journal of Finance 51 (4):1347-1377. Fuhrer, L. M., B. Müller, and L. Steiner. 2017. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and security prices. Journal of Banking & Finance 75:292-311. Gete, P., and M. Reher. 2017. Non-Banks and Lending Standards in Mortgage Markets. The Spillovers from Liquidity Regulation. Working paper. Hamilton, D. 2018. Fear of (Capital) Commitment: Strategic Accounting Classifications and the Consequences for Fixed Income Dealer Inventories. Working paper. Hanson, S. G., A. Shleifer, J. C. Stein, and R. W. Vishny. 2015. Banks as patient fixed-income investors. Journal of Financial Economics 117 (3):449-469. Heaton, J. C., D. Lucas, and R. L. McDonald. 2010. Is mark-to-market accounting destabilizing? Analysis and implications for policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (1):64-75. Hodder, L., M. Kohlbeck, and M. L. McAnally. 2002. Accounting Choices and Risk Management: SFAS No. 115 and U.S. Bank Holding Companies. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (2):225-270. Ihrig, J. E., A. Kumbhat, G. C. Weinbach, and C. M. Vojtech. 2017. How have banks been managing the composition of high-quality liquid assets? Working paper. Irani, R. M., and D. Oesch. 2013. Monitoring and corporate disclosure: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Financial Economics 109 (2):398-418. Iselin, M., J. K. Kang, and J. Madsen. 2017. Regulatory Treatment of Changes in Fair Value and the Composition of Banks' Investment Portfolios. Working paper. Iselin, M., and A. Nicoletti. 2017. The effects of SFAS 157 disclosures on investment decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 63 (2-3):404-427. Julie, S., R. Bain, and G.-N. Kellie. 2013. Basel III AOCI Rule Win for Mid-Tier and Community Banks. Fitch Ratings. Justin, F., and N. Matthew. 2014. Bank Liquidity Rules May Boost Demand for USTs and GNMAs. Fitch Ratings. Kim, S., S. Kim, and S. Ryan. 2017. Economic Consequences of the AOCI Filter Removal for Advanced Approaches Banks. Working paper. Laux, C. 2016. The economic consequences of extending the use of fair value accounting in regulatory capital calculations: A discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 62 (2–3):204-208. Lu, T., H. Sapra, and A. Subramanian. 2011. Agency conflicts, prudential regulation, and marking to market. Working paper. Nathan, S., and A. Tahir. 2015. Liquidity coverage ratio challenges covered banks. SNL Report. Nathan, S., and I. Venkatesh. 2016. Banks build HTM portfolios even as rates decline. SNL S&P Global. Nicoletti, A., M. Iselin, and H. Ballew. 2018. Bright Lines: How Regulatory Asset Thresholds Change the Banking Industry. Working paper. PwC. 2014. Liquidity coverage ratio: No blood, but sweat and tears. Rezende, M., M.-F. Styczynski, and C. M. Vojtech. 2016. The effects of liquidity regulation on bank demand in monetary policy operations. Working paper. Ryan, S. G. 2017. Do the Effects of Accounting Requirements on Banks’ Regulatory Capital Adequacy Undermine Financial Stability? Annual Review of Financial Economics 9 (1):1-20. Ryan, T., and M. Victoria. 2014. Liquidity Rules Coming to Wall Street. The Wall Street Journal. Saunders, A., and M. Cornett. 2008. Financial Institutions Management: A Risk Management Approach. Shipman, J. E., Q. T. Swanquist, and R. L. Whited. 2017. Propensity Score Matching in Accounting Research. The Accounting Review 92 (1):213-244. Wang, J. C. 2017. Banks' search for yield in the low interest rate environment: a tale of regulatory adaptation. FRB of Boston Working Paper 17 (3). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21855 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文檢視兩個金融海嘯後的重要管制是否影響美國大型銀行之債券投資及其會計分類方式。首先,流動性覆蓋比率要求大型銀行持有足夠的高品質流動性資產以支應預期未來淨現金流出。我們以差異中之差異法分析發現,在流動性管制之後,大型銀行將債券投資組合配置更多的比例於符合高品質流動性資產定義之債券,因此債券投資組合的整體信用風險下降。此外,大型銀行債券投資的平均到期日也增加。另外,以進階法計算資本適足率的大銀行則更進一步被要求將分類為備供出售的債券,其公允價值變動計入核心資本。實證結果發現,這些大銀行因此將更高比例的債券分類為持有到期,以降低該管制對資本比率帶來的衝擊。再者,我們也發現進階法銀行將更高比例的高品質流動性債券分類為持有到期。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines whether two crucial post-crisis regulations affect US banks’ debt securities investments and accounting classification. First, the new liquidity coverage ratio regulation requires large bank holding companies to hold adequate high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) relative to their expected net cash outflows. Using a difference-in-differences design, we find that banks affected by this requirement remarkably recompose their securities in favor of HQLA and thus improve the credit quality of securities holdings. Moreover, banks subject to the requirement favor longer maturity securities when trading off between motives to reduce volatility caused by fair value and search for yield incentives.Second, huge banks (advanced approach banks) are further required to include unrealized gains and losses of available-for-sale debt securities (accumulated other comprehensive income) in their regulatory capital. Empirical evidence shows advanced approach banks classify additional securities as held to maturity (HTM) in response to the regulation. In addition, we further show advanced banks classify additional HQLA as HTM when they increase HQLA holdings. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:49:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-D00722005-1.pdf: 1302539 bytes, checksum: e926b09cac39a0331b1ae14f17757dd5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments I
Chinese Abstract II English Abstract III Contents IV List of Figures V List of Tables IV Section 1 Introduction 1 Section 2 Institutional background 4 2.1. US LCR regulation 4 2.2. AOCI filter removal 5 Section 3 Related literature and development of hypotheses 7 3.1. The economic consequences of LCR regulation 7 3.2. Influence of regulatory capital rule changes on investment composition 7 3.3. Hypothesis development 9 Section 4 Empirical analysis 13 4.1. Research design 13 4.2. Sample selection 17 4.3. Descriptive statistics 18 4.4. Results 20 Section 5 Robustness tests 20 Section 6 Conclusion 30 References 32 Appendix A Variable definitions 35 Appendix B US Regulation schedule 38 Appendix C The lists of banks subject to the related regulations 39 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 銀行業如何因應政府監管?流動性管制及公允價值變動計入資本之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | How Do Banks React to Government Regulation? The Effects of Liquidity Regulation and the AOCI Filter Removal | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王泰昌(Tay-Chang Wang),吳清在(Tsing-Zai Wu),陳聖賢(Sheng-Syan Chen),尤琳蕙(Lin-Hui Yu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 流動性管制,公允價值,巴塞爾資本協定 III,備供出售證券,資本管制, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Liquidity regulation,Fair value,Basel III reforms,Available-for-Sale Securities,Capital regulation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 73 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201804261 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-11-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。