請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21791
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳學良 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Ping Yeh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 葉峻賓 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:46:58Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-01-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179-198.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social research update, 33(1), 1-4. Bae, J.-H., & Salomon, R. (2010). Institutional distance in international business research The past, present and future of international business & management (pp. 327-349): Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative science quarterly, 459-489. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. Banerjee, S., & Venaik, S. (2017). The Effect of Corporate Political Activity on MNC Subsidiary Legitimacy: An Institutional Perspective. Management International Review, 1-32. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Baron, D. P. (1995). The nonmarket strategy system. MIT Sloan Management Review, 37(1), 73. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (2002). Managing across borders: The transnational solution: Harvard Business Press. Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460-1480. Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of management review, 36(1), 151-179. 76 Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of management review, 40(1), 49-75. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., & Saffar, W. (2012). THE IMPACT OF POLITICAL CONNECTIONS ON FIRMS’ OPERATING PERFORMANCE AND FINANCING DECISIONS. Journal of Financial Research, 35(3), 397-423. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1475-6803.2012.01322.x Brouthers, L. E., Marshall, V. B., & Keig, D. L. (2016). Solving the single-country sample problem in cultural distance studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(4), 471-479. Brown, J. R., & Huang, J. (2017). All the President’s Friends: Political Access and Firm Value. Retrieved from Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 233-259. Bucheli, M., & Salvaj, E. (2013). Reputation and political legitimacy: ITT in Chile, 1927– 1972. Business History Review, 87(4), 729-756. Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative science quarterly, 50(2), 167-199. Chao, M. C.-H., & Kumar, V. (2010). The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity–performance relationship. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 93-103. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 807-822. Darendeli, I. S., & Hill, T. (2016). Uncovering the complex relationships between political risk and MNE firm legitimacy: Insights from Libya. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), 68-92. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and 77 institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22-39. Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 45-66. Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597-2635. Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of financial economics, 84(2), 330-357. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382-388. Frye, T. (2002). Capture or exchange? Business lobbying in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(7), 1017-1036. Funk, R. J., & Hirschman, D. (2017). Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Academy of management review, 42(1), 32-52. Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84-110. Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990). Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 1-22. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge Flow Patterns, Subsidiary Strategic Roles, and Strategic Ccontro Within MNCs. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns 78 on corporate political investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 165-181. Henisz, W. J. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and corporate change, 11(2), 355-389. Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. (2004). Information or influence? The benefits of experience for managing political uncertainty. Strategic Organization, 2(4), 389-421. Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of management review, 30(2), 361-382. Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of management review, 24(4), 825-842. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837-857. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41. Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., Bakker, F. G., & Lankveld, H. K. v. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of management studies, 51(5), 790-813. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838-849. Kettunen, E. (2017). On MNC-Host Government Relations: How Finnish Firms Respond to National and Regional Policies in ASEAN. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 34(2), 54-76. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 215-233. 79 Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of management review, 24(1), 64-81. Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of financial economics, 81(2), 411-439. Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L.-A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of development economics, 87(2), 283-299. Liedong, T. A., Rajwani, T., & Mellahi, K. (2017). Reality or Illusion? The Efficacy of Non‐ market Strategy in Institutional Risk Reduction. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 609-628. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of applied psychology, 86(1), 114. Luo, Y. (2001). Toward a cooperative view of MNC-host government relations: Building blocks and performance implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 401-419. Luo, Y. (2004). A coopetition perspective of MNC–host government relations. Journal of International Management, 10(4), 431-451. Luo, Y., & Zhao, H. (2013). Doing business in a transitional society: Economic environment and relational political strategy for multinationals. Business & society, 52(3), 515-549. Lux, S., Crook, T. R., & Woehr, D. J. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1), 223-247. Malesky, E., & Taussig, M. (2017). The danger of not listening to firms: Government responsiveness and the goal of regulatory compliance. Academy of management journal, 60(5), 1741-1770. Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016). A review of the nonmarket strategy 80 literature: toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143-173. Moon, C. W., & Lado, A. A. (2000). Mnc-host government bargaining power relationship: a critique and extension within the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 26(1), 85-117. Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., Bell, R. G., & Davis, J. L. (2015). Institutional Distance and Cross-Border Venture Capital Investment Flows. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 482-500. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12079 Ni, A., & Van Wart, M. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well and Doing Good Building Business-Government Relations (pp. 175-196): Routledge. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of economic perspectives, 5(1), 97-112. Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of social research methodology, 11(4), 327-344. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16(1), 145-179. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of management review, 28(2), 275-296. Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of management journal, 43(3), 486-501. Perkins, S. E. (2014). When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the multinational corporation. Administrative science quarterly, 59(1), 145-181. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. NY: Harper and Row Publishers. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. 81 Puck, J., Lawton, T., & Mohr, A. (2018). The Corporate Political Activity of MNCs: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Management International Review, 58(5), 663-673. doi:10.1007/s11575-018-0364-0 Rajwani, T., & Liedong, T. A. (2015). Political activity and firm performance within nonmarket research: A review and international comparative assessment. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 273-283. Ramamurti, R. (2001). The obsolescing'bargaining model'? MNC-host developing country relations revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, 23-39. Salomon, R., & Wu, Z. (2012). Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 343-367. Schuler, D. A., Rehbein, K., & Cramer, R. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of management journal, 45(4), 659-672. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series. Sojli, E., & Tham, W. W. (2017). Foreign political connections. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2), 244-266. doi:10.1057/s41267-016-0059-3 Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Van Trijp, H. C. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in marketing, 8(4), 283-299. Stevens, C. E., Xie, E., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Toward a legitimacy‐based view of political risk: The case of Google and Yahoo in China. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 945-963. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610. Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Thun, E. (2010). The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1161-1182. Szeto, M., & Kim, Y.-C. (2018). Costs and Benefits of Business-Government Relations: Empirical Analysis of Former-Communist Transition Economies. International 82 Journal of Business and Society, 19(1), 219-232. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative science quarterly, 35-67. Vachani, S. (1995). Enhancing the obsolescing bargain theory: A longitudinal study of foreign ownership of US and European multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 159-180. van Hoorn, A., & Maseland, R. (2016). How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 374-381. Waters, J. (2015). Snowball sampling: a cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. International Journal of social research methodology, 18(4), 367-380. Xu, D., Pan, Y., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies. MIR: Management international review, 285-307. Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of management review, 27(4), 608-618. Yan, J. Z., & Chang, S.-J. (2018). The contingent effects of political strategies on firm performance: A political network perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2152-2177. doi:doi:10.1002/smj.2908 Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of management journal, 38(2), 341-363. Zhang, Y., Zhao, W., & Ge, J. (2016). Institutional duality and political strategies of foreign-invested firms in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 451-462. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21791 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 多國籍企業的政商關係被視為是雙面刃,政商關係一方面能降低企業所面臨的政治 風險,但另一方面也可能因為母國與地主國之間的體制衝突,進而對多國籍企業造成負 面衝擊。如是的學術爭論仍持續著,而政商關係會如何影響多國籍企業在地主國的子公 司績效表現,這議題亦尚無定論。本研究根據資源相依理論的觀點,主張正當性的形成 是橋接多國籍企業到政商關係上的機制,而政商關係是能幫助多國籍企業降低外在環境 影響的緩衝機制,並進一步全面性地檢視多國籍企業之政商關係的行為面前置因素與該 政商關係對於績效影響會如何受到三種環境差異所干擾。透過分析於 2016 年所收集自 155 間多國籍企業子公司的問卷資料發現,相較於社會行為或政治行為,多國籍企業在 不同環境差異的影響下較能透過經濟行為來形塑良好的政商關係。然而,除了在那些經 濟上相對於多國籍企業之母國較落後的地主國之外,多國籍企業的政商關係對於提升其 地主國子公司的績效表現上卻沒有明顯的助益;相反的,當母國與地主國的非正式體制 距離越大時,政商關係反而不利於當地子公司的績效表現。本研究針對多國籍企業之政 商關係的成因與影響在對於外部環境差異的敏感度上提出了新的發現,並且也對於那些 想透過建立政商關係來降低環境不確定性或爭取外部機會的多國籍企業帶來實務上的 意涵。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The relations between multinational enterprise (MNE) and host government (i.e., MGRs), are viewed as a double-edge sword that can either benefit MNE by reducing political risks or harm MNE by creating institutional conflicts across the home and host countries. This scholarly debate continues, and the relationship between MGRs and the MNE’s subsidiary performance is still inconclusive. In response to the recent call for including the institutional perspective and mediating mechanism of organizational boundary spanning into the MGRs research, this study, departing from resource dependence theory, introduces the legitimacy formation as a bridging mechanism to MGRs and MGRs as a buffering mechanism against external environment to holistically examine the behavioral types of antecedents and performance consequence of MGRs in contingency with three critical contextual influences. The findings from analyzing a survey dataset of 155 MNE subsidiaries during 2016 show that MNE’s economically-good behaviors perform better than socially-good and politically-good behaviors in shaping better MGRs under contextual influences. However, MGRs are not beneficial to the MNE subsidiary performance, but may be even detrimental when the informally institutional distance between the MNE’s home and host countries is larger.This study sheds new light on the sensitivity of behavioral antecedents and consequences of MGRs in contingency with contextual influences, and provides practical implications to MNE particularly when they expect to reduce external uncertainties or capturing opportunities by MGRs. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:46:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-D01724007-1.pdf: 2782353 bytes, checksum: 32ede3ee14845b76952fc2488f966e0e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書................................................................................................i 摘 要...............................................................................................................ii ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................1 2. THEORY AND HYPOTHESES..................................................................13
2.1. Resource Dependence Theory and MGRs.................................................................13 2.2. Legtimacy formation as a bridging mechanism to MGRs.........................................15 2.3. Economic distance influences resource importance ..................................................21 2.4. Host-country attractiveness influences on concentration of resource control ...........23 2.5. Institutaional distance influences discretion over resource allocation.......................25 2.6. MGRs as a buffering mechanism to non-market environment..................................30 2.7. Performance consequence of MGRs in contingency with contextual difference......31 3. RESEARCH METHODS.............................................................................35 3.1. Sample ..................................................................................................................... 35 3.2. Constructs, Variables, and Measures .........................................................................40 3.3. Reliability and Validity of Latent Variables ............................................................... 43 3.4. Common Method Bias...............................................................................................49 4. RESULTS.......................................................................................................51 i 4.1. Behavioral antecedents of MGRs ..............................................................................51 4.2. Performance consequence of MGRs..........................................................................57 4.3. Robustness Test..........................................................................................................61 5. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSION ........................................................66 6. LIMITATIONS..............................................................................................74 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 76 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 做得好就夠了嗎? 多國籍企業的政府關係在跨國環境差異下的變化 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Is Doing Economically Good Enough? Contextual Influences on the MNE’s Governmental Relations | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳厚銘,劉顯仲,李振宇,陳俊忠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 政商關係,行為面前置因素,子公司績效,正當性,體制距離, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | MGRs,behavioral antecedents,subsidiary performance,legitimacy,institutional distance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 83 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900334 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.72 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。