請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21594完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林世銘 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Chian Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳柏謙 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:39:06Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 汪瑞芝（2018）。反避稅機制與有效抑制盈餘管理行為對企業有效稅率之影響研究。中華管理評論國際學報，21（1），1-32。
范宏書、林彥廷與陳慶隆（2017）。財稅差異與會計資訊價值攸關性。管理與系統，24（4），539-564。 陳明進與蔡麗雯（2006）。財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究。管理學報，23（6），739-763。 黃美祝與李映茹（2009）。最低稅負制對企業租稅負擔影響之研究。當代會計，10（2），189-224。 黃美祝與楊佩璇（2011）。集團企業與非集團企業避稅程度之比較。會計學報，4（2），1-22。 黃德芬與陳瑋杰（2016）。移轉訂價與避稅行為及租稅負擔之關聯。財稅研究，45（2），20-46。 譚慧芳（2012）。非營利醫院的避稅動機與盈餘管理。公司與會計治理，8（2），1-25。 Bankman, J. (1999). The new market in corporate tax shelters. Tax Notes 83: 1775-1794. Blaylock, B., Shevlin, T., & Wilson, R. J. (2011). Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 91-120. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61. Christensen, D. M., Dhaliwal, D. S., Boivie, S., & Graffin, S. D. (2015). Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers' personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1918-1938. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting review, 193-225. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163-1189. Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496. Gebhart, M. S. (2017). Measuring Corporate Tax Avoidance–An Analysis of Different Measures. Junior Management Science, 2(2), 43-60. Graham, J. R., & Tucker, A. L. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563-594. Hanlon, M. What can we infer about a firm’s taxable income from its financial statements? National Tax Journal, 56(4):831–863, 2003. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178. Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025-2059. Hope, O. K., Ma, M. S., & Thomas, W. B. (2013). Tax avoidance and geographic earnings disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 170-189. Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of accounting research, 29(2), 193-228. Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662. Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86-108. Lee, B. B., Dobiyanski, A., & Minton, S. (2015). Theories and Empirical Proxies for Corporate Tax Avoidance. Journal of Applied Business & Economics, 17(3). Lin, S. (2000). CPA attested tax returns and tax evasion. Taiwan Accounting Review, 1, 15-36 Lisowsky, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1693-1720. Lisowsky, P., Robinson, L., and Schmidt, A. Do publicly disclosed tax reserves tell us about privately disclosed tax shelter activity? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3):583–629, 2013. Manzon Jr, G. B., & Plesko, G. A. (2001). The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income. Tax Law Review, 55, 175. Phillips, J. D. (2003). Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 847-874. Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. (2012). Equity risk incentives and corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775-810. Salihu, I. A., Sheikh Obid, S. N., & Annuar, H. A. (2013). Measures Of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Empirical Evidence From An Emerging Economy. International Journal of Business & Society, 14(3). Shevlin, T. (2002). Symposium on Corporate Tax Shelters Part II: Commentary: Corporate Tax Shelters and Book-Tax Differences. Tax L. Rev., 55, 427 Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. Journal of diagnostic medical sonography, 6(1), 35-39. Weisbach, D. A. (2001). Thinking outside the little boxes: A response to Professor Schlunk. Tex. L. Rev., 80, 893. Wilson, R. (2009). An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969-999. Yang, Y. W., Evans, A., Hannah, S. & Kelton, A. (2018). Diversity at the Top and Firm Risk-Taking: The Conditional Effects of Executive and Board Gender on Risk Tradeoffs. Working Paper, Wake Forest University. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21594 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究期望驗證臺灣文獻利用有效率（ETR）與財稅差異（BTD）作為衡量租稅逃漏代理變數之一致性，並探討利用或發展Wilson租稅逃漏預測公式值（Wilson Value）以適用於臺灣研究資料之可行性。本研究利用2011至2017年資料完整的台灣上市櫃公司作為研究樣本，並透過ETR、BTD與Wilson Value兩兩間的相關係數顯著性檢定尋找證據。實證結果顯示ETR與BTD呈負相關，雖與預期方向相同，但僅為低度負相關，因此認為若同時利用ETR與BTD作為租稅逃漏的代理變數，將難以獲致一致之研究發現。而ETR與Wilson Value呈正相關，與預期方向相反；BTD與Wilson Value呈正相關，與預期方向相同，且為中度正相關，這說明Wilson Value捕捉到的公司租稅逃漏結果較偏向BTD，因此同時使用BTD與Wilson Value能使主要分析與敏感性分析獲致一致的研究發現。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines whether effective tax rate (ETR) and book-tax difference (BTD), two major proxy variables of tax evasion using in Taiwanese researches, could reach a consistent conclusion when used in main analysis and sensitivity analysis respectively, and also investigates whether Wilson Value from Wilson (2009) is a feasible proxy variable of measuring tax evasion for Taiwanese companies. To figure out the relationship, listed companies in Taiwan from 2011 to 2017 are used as samples to perform a hypothesis test of the significance of correlation coefficient between the two of ETR, BTD and Wilson Value. The empirical result shows that ETR and BTD are in a weak negative relationship, which indicates that ETR and BTD could not come to a consistent conclusion when used in main analysis and sensitivity analysis respectively. Furthermore, ETR and Wilson Value are positively related, which does not meet the expectation, but BTD and Wilson Value is in a moderate positive relationship under expectation. This helps the study come to the conclusion that the result generated from Wilson Value is closer to BTD than to ETR, showing that by using Wilson Value and BTD in main analysis and sensitivity analysis respectively, they can reach a consistent conclusion. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:39:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06722010-1.pdf: 968127 bytes, checksum: eeed02956ffa259b18c1e8335f92d239 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 ii
中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究架構與流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 有效稅率文獻探討 5 第二節 財稅差異文獻探討 8 第三節 Wilson租稅逃漏預測公式值文獻探討 10 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究假說 18 第二節 變數計算 20 第三節 樣本選取 24 第四節 資料分析方法 25 第四章 實證結果與分析 26 第一節 敘述性統計分析 26 第二節 Pearson相關係數分析 27 第三節 單尾相關係數顯著性檢定 27 第五章 結論與建議 31 第一節 研究結論 31 第二節 研究建議 32 參考文獻 33 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 租税逃漏代理變數之比較研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Comparisons of Proxy Variables for Tax Evasion | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳坤志,陳韻珊 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 有效稅率,財稅差異,Wilson租稅逃漏預測公式值,租稅逃漏,相關係數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | effective tax rate,book-tax difference,Wilson Value,tax evasion,correlation coefficient, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 35 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901450 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 945.44 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。