經濟部國營事業員工貪瀆與業務特性之研究

Abstract

國營事業掌握龐大的公共資源，並扮演龐大資源的分配者，所以國營事業發生不法弊端，常引起社會高度矚目。本研究透過文獻及第一審法院判決之67個個案，將統計期間內之經濟部國營事業貪瀆起訴案件，以分析、歸納等方式建立基礎，進而找出經濟部國營事業員工貪瀆與業務特性之關聯性，最後提出防制國營事業貪瀆弊案或不法違失之相關建議。 整體而言，國營事業貪瀆犯罪仍以採購案件類型為主，行為態樣主要為不違背職務收受賄賂罪和違背職務收受賄賂罪，並且發現下列結果：一、單位採購金額、員工人員多寡與不法弊端發生有正向影響。二、台水公司貪瀆犯罪身分趨於人事組織結構的兩端。三、審判機關對於台水公司和台電公司的公共任務性認定有差異，影響判刑結果。本研究建議，一、審判機關應檢討國營事業公共事務性認定標準。二、國營事業機構各層首長應以身作則，樹立機關廉潔風尚。三、建立標準作業程序後，容許適度經營彈性。四、採購易滋弊端業務，應加強稽核監督。五、分眾實施廉政教育，以提升廉潔意識。

State-owned enterprises play the roles to distribute the huge public resources, so the state-owned enterprises often illegally abuse their privilege and attract extremely high attention from the communities. Through this literature, 67 cases of court decisions of the first instance court have be surveyed. By studying the corruption prosecution cases in the enterprises owned by the Ministry of Economy, the correlation between the enterprise employees’ corruption and business characteristics is found. Further, the solutions and relevant recommendations to prevent state-owned enterprises corruption and malfeasance are investigated in this study. In a short word, the crime of corruption and malfeasance in the state-owned enterprises is still mainly based upon the type of public procurement. Two behavior patterns were found, including bribing with violation of duty and bribing with non-violation of duty. The following results are found. First, the public procurement amount, the number of staff and illegal abuses are highly correlated. Second, the corruption and malfeasance often occurs at top and bottom ends of the personnel organization structure in Taiwan Water Company. Third, the differences in the mandate determination between Taishui Company and Tai Electric Company, which affect the results of sentencing. The following recommendations are given at this study: First, the judicial organs should review the determination of public affairs standards for state-owned enterprises. Second, the heads of all levels of state-owned institutions should lead as a normal and establish an integrity culture in each institutes. Third, after establishing standard operating procedures, and allowing moderate flexibility if necessary indeedly. Fourth, the government purchasing should increase audit supervision. Fifth, increasing the integrity education to enhance the awareness of integrity.Body of abstract starts here.