請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21046完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 練乃華 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pin-Yu Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳品伃 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T03:17:28Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-01-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
1. 丘新華(2001)，廣告訴求及產品類型對廣告效果影響之研究。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 2. 周晉生(1997)，台灣電子報初探─中時電子報個案研究。世界新聞傳播學院傳 播研究所碩士論文。 3. 翁明祥、陳俋叡(2007)。報導式廣告之混淆效應對廣告效果的影響—識破效應之 干擾作用。行銷評論，4(4)，449-480。 4. 張卿卿(2007)。雜誌廣編稿的內容形式與效果。管理評論，26(4)，53-75。 二、 英文部分 1. Baker, M. J. and G. A. Churchill, 1977. The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4)：538-555. 2. Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1990). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing letters, 2(2), 159-170. 3. Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing letters, 2(2), 159-170. 4. Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. The Journal of Marketing, 69-81. 5. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103. 6. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103. 7. Bridges, E., & Florsheim, R. (2008). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience. Journal of Business Research, 61(4), 309-314. 8. Cameron, G. T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising? An experimental test of the third-party endorsement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(3), 185-207. 9. Cameron, G. T., Ju-Pak, K. H., & Kim, B. H. (1996). Advertorials in magazines: Current use and compliance with industry guidelines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(3), 722-733. 10. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 48-63. 11. Crowley, A. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Hughes, K. R. (1992). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 239-249. 12. D'Astous, A., & Seguin, N. (1999). Consumer reactions to product placement strategies in television sponsorship. European journal of Marketing, 33(9/10), 896-910. 13. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of marketing research, 37(1), 60-71. 14. Dholakia, U., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). Consumer behavior in digital environments. Digital marketing, 163-200. 15. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of consumer research, 1-31. 16. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people's and researchers' beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 62-74. 17. Gardner, M. P., Mitchell, A. A., & Russo, J. E. (1985). Low involvement strategies for processing advertisements. Journal of advertising, 14(2), 4-56. 18. Geuens, M., De Pelsmacker, P., & Faseur, T. (2011). Emotional advertising: Revisiting the role of product category. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 418-426. 19. Gollwitzer, Peter M. (1996). “The Volitional Benefits of Planning.” In Peter M. Gollwitzer and John A. Bargh (Eds.), The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior (pp. 287-312). New York: Guilford Press. 20. Hair, Jr., J. F., Anderson, R., R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th Edition, N. J.: Prentice Hall International Editions. 21. Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and emotion, 11(2), 101-120. 22. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American psychologist,52(12), 1280. 23. Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention experiences: Relating emotions to nonemotional motivational states. 24. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 132-140. 25. Homer, P. M., 1990. The Mediating Role of Attitude Toward the Ad：Some Additional Evidence, Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1)：78-86. 26. Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 974-981. 27. Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: A social adaptation perspective. Journal of consumer research, 954-961. 28. Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of advertising, 19(1), 4-13. 29. Kempf, D. S. (1999). Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psychology & Marketing, 16(1), 35-50. 30. Lim, E. A. C., & Ang, S. H. (2008). Hedonic vs. utilitarian consumption: A cross-cultural perspective based on cultural conditioning. Journal of business research, 61(3), 225-232. 31. Lord, K. R., & Putrevu, S. (1993). Advertising and publicity: An information processing perspective. Journal of economic psychology, 14(1), 57-84. 32. Lutz et al., 1986. The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanation, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2)：130-143. 33. Lutz, R. J., 1985. Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad：A conceptual framework, Psychological processes and advertising effects：Theory research and application, L. F. Alwitt and A. A. Mitchell, eds. Hillsdale. 34. Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Center for Human Information Processing Report, 101. 35. Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer research, 451-466. 36. Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of consumer research, 39-54. 37. Mitchell, A. A. and J. C. Olsen, 1981. Are Product Attitude Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitudes？, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3)：318-332. 38. Muehling, D. D., & Laczniak, R. N. (1988). Advertising's immediate and delayed influence on brand attitudes: Considerations across message-involvement levels. Journal of advertising, 17(4), 23-34. 39. Norris, C. E., & Colman, A. M. (1992). Context effects on recall and recognition of magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 21(3), 37-46. 40. Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & McCabe, D. B. (2004). The effect of a delay between choice and consumption on consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 502-510. 41. Petty, R.E., & J.T. Cacioppo (1981), Attitude and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Dubuque Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co. 42. Petty, R.E., J.T. Cacioppo & D. Schumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146. 43. Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of consumer research, 25(2), 144-159. 44. Raghunathan, R., & Irwin, J. R. (2001). Walking the hedonic product treadmill: Default contrast and mood‐based assimilation in judgments of predicted happiness with a target product. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 355-368. 45. Raghunathan, R., & Irwin, J. R. (2001). Walking the hedonic product treadmill: Default contrast and mood‐based assimilation in judgments of predicted happiness with a target product. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 355-368. 46. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 47. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1983). Representation in memory (No. CHIP-116). CALIFORNIA UNIV SAN DIEGO LA JOLLA CENTER FOR HUMAN INFORMATION PROCESSING. 48. Safko, L., & Brake, D. K. (2009). The Social Media Bible: Tactics. Tools & for Business Success, Hoboken, New Jersey. 49. Stayman, D. M., Alden, D. L., & Smith, K. H. (1992). Some effects of schematic processing on consumer expectations and disconfirmation judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 240-255. 50. Strahilevitz, M. A., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3). 51. Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of advertising, 29(3), 1-13. 52. Van Reijmersdal, E., Neijens, P., & Smit, E. (2005). Readers' reactions to mixtures of advertising and editorial content in magazines. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 27(2), 39-53. 53. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of marketing research, 40(3), 310-320. 54. Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect.Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(6), 989. 55. Wirtz, J., & Lee, M. C. (2003). An examination of the quality and context-specific applicability of commonly used customer satisfaction measures. Journal of Service Research, 5(4), 345-355. 56. Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. The Journal of Marketing, 15-19. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/21046 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近幾年，強調「視覺整合、不干擾閱聽歷程且提供具價值性內容」的原生廣告引起熱烈討論，並在數位行銷領域被廣泛運用。本研究旨在探討廣告元素間，包括廣告設計型式、廣告產品屬性與廣告媒介的瀏覽心態，三者間配適程度的高低對廣告效果的影響。本研究以2（廣告設計型式：原生廣告、非原生廣告）X 2（廣告產品屬性：功能型、享樂型）X 2（廣告媒介的瀏覽心態：審慎型、體驗型）的實驗設計進行假設檢定，八種情況下依變數間的配適程度可分為高度一致、中度一致與低度一致三組。
研究結果顯示，當當廣告整體配適度處於中度一致時，會有最佳的廣告態度與購買意願，廣告回憶效果與產品態度則無顯著影響。 而廣告設計型式與頁面型式相容度高低（即為廣告設計型式屬於原生廣告或非原生廣告）則對廣告效果有以下影響：原生廣告普遍具有較佳的廣告訴求回憶效果、產品態度及廣告態度，在產品類型與品牌名稱的回憶效果則無顯著影響；相較於享樂型產品，搭配原生廣告的功能型產品明顯導致較強烈之購買意願；對於處於審慎型心態的消費者，原生廣告確實能導致較佳之廣告回憶效果，而非原生廣告對產品類型與廣告訴求的回憶效果則不會受廣告媒介的瀏覽心態有顯著差異，品牌名稱的回憶效果則是審慎型心態優於體驗型心態。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Native advertising, which is a form of advertising that matches and blends in with the medium it appears on and offer valuable information, is getting a ton of attention and expected to be the trend of the digital media communications. This present study was designed to demonstrate how the congruity among the type of advertisement design, the product attribute and the experiencing mind-set could affect the advertising effectiveness.
This study conducted a 2(native advertising vs. non-native advertising) x 2(utilitarian product vs. hedonic product) x 2(deliberative mind-set vs. hedonic mind-set) experiment to test hypothesis. The 8 experiment conditions constitute 3 different groups on the degree of congruity: high congruity, moderate congruity and low congruity. The results showed that moderate congruity led to more favorable attitude toward advertisements and purchase intention. Native advertising, which matches the form and function of the platform upon which it appears, led to higher levels of recall toward advertising appeals and attitude toward both product and advertisements. Native advertising also led to better purchase intention for utilitarian product. Furthermore, native advertising led to greater advertising recall when consumers are under deliberative mind-sets than hedonic mind-sets, while non-native advertising has no significant influence on the advertising recall toward product type and advertising appeals neither under deliberative mind-sets nor hedonic mind-sets. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:17:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03741009-1.pdf: 2852453 bytes, checksum: 06ea3eacec0cd7c49532e0c004c3a89b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 II Abstract III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 原生廣告 5 第二節 產品屬性 7 第三節 消費者心態 8 第四節 一致性理論 10 第三章 研究架構與實驗方法 12 第一節 研究架構 12 第二節 研究假設 12 第三節 研究方法 15 第四章 實驗結果與分析 23 第一節 樣本分布 23 第二節 信度分析 25 第三節 操弄檢定 25 第四節 假說檢定 28 第五章 結論與建議 38 第一節 研究結論 38 第二節 學術意涵 40 第三節 管理意涵 41 第四節 研究限制 42 第五節 未來研究建議 43 參考文獻 45 一、 中文部分 45 二、 英文部分 45 附錄 52 附錄一 前測問卷 52 附錄二 正式問卷 55 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 廣告效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 原生廣告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 產品屬性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 一致性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Advertising Effect | en |
| dc.subject | Native Advertising | en |
| dc.subject | Product Attribute | en |
| dc.subject | Mind-Set | en |
| dc.subject | Schema Congruity | en |
| dc.title | 廣告設計型式、產品類型與廣告媒介瀏覽心態間一致性對廣告效果之影響─以原生廣告為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Advertising Effects of Congruity among Native Advertising, Product Type and Experiencing Mind-Set | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 簡怡雯,陳建維 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 原生廣告,產品屬性,心態,一致性,廣告效果, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Native Advertising,Product Attribute,Mind-Set,Schema Congruity,Advertising Effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 68 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700079 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-01-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.79 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。