Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20771
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳耀宗
dc.contributor.authorGuan-Jie Suen
dc.contributor.author蘇冠杰zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T03:02:43Z-
dc.date.copyright2017-07-27
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-07-17
dc.identifier.citation司薈文,2014,審計委員會與財務報表公佈時間落差,輔仁大學會計學研究所碩士論文
李建然、廖秀梅與張卉諭,2016,審計委員會設置及其品質對公司價值的影響,中華會計學刊,第12卷第2期:231-265。
范宏書、林彥廷與陳慶隆,2013,財務會計準則第35號公報與財務報表公佈時效性,臺大管理論叢,第23卷第2期:97-131。
范宏書與陳慶隆,2007,會計師異動、存在最終家族控制股東與財務報表公佈時效性之探討,當代會計,第8卷第1期:1-33。
范宏書、陳慶隆、李淑華與謝永明,2008,總審計調整數對公司財務報表公佈時效性之影響,輔仁管理評論,第15卷,第1期:73-105。
葉銀華與林志豪,2014,上市櫃公司要設置審計委員會?審計委員會與盈餘管理之研究,輔仁管理評論,第21卷第3期:1-21。
廖秀梅與廖益興,2002,會計師更換時機對年報揭露時效及資本市場之影響,當代會計第3卷第2期:211-230。
劉若蘭、劉政淮與游博凱,2016,審計委員會對公司績效與資訊揭露品質之影響,評價學報,第10期:1-30。
蔡彥卿,1996,家族控股集團企業財務報表公告期間之研究,管理與系統第3卷第1期:1-16。
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1):69-87.
Abdelsalam, O. H., and D. L. Street. 2007. Corporate governance and the timeliness of corporate internet reporting by UK listed companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 16 (2):111-130.
Abdullah, S.-N. 2006. Board composition, audit committee and timeliness of corporate financial reports in Malaysia. Corporate ownership & control 4 (2):33-45.
Abernathy, J. L., B. Beyer, A. Masli, and C. Stefaniak. 2014. The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness. Advances in Accounting 30 (2):283-297.
Agrawal, A., and S. Chadha. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. The Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2):371-406.
Aldamen, H., K. Duncan, S. Kelly, R. McNamara, and S. Nagel. 2012. Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance 52 (4):971-1000.
Ashton, R. H., P. R. Graul, and J. D. Newton. 1989. Audit delay and the timeliness of corporate reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research 5 (2):657-673.
Ashton, R. H., J. J. Willingham, and R. K. Elliott. 1987. An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of Accounting Research:275-292.
Baatwah, S. R., Z. Salleh, and N. Ahmad. 2013. Whether audit committee financial expertise is the only relevant expertise: a review of audit committee expertise and timeliness of financial reporting. Social and Environmental Accounting 7(2): 86-101.
Baatwah, S. R., Z. Salleh, and N. Ahmad. 2015. Corporate governance mechanisms and audit report timeliness: Empirical evidence from Oman. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 11 (3-4):312-337.
Bamber, E. M., L. S. Bamber, and M. P. Schoderbek. 1993. Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag - An empirical-analysis. Auditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory 12 (1):1-23.
Bedard, J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2):13-35.
Behn, B. K., D. L. Searcy, and J. B. Woodroof. 2006. A within firm analysis of current and expected future audit lag determinants. Journal of Information Systems 20 (1):65-86.
Blankley, A. I., D. N. Hurtt, and J. E. MacGregor. 2014. The relationship between audit report lags and future restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (2):27-57.
Chan, K. C., and J. Li. 2008. Audit committee and firm value: Evidence on outside top executives as expert‐independent directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16 (1):16-31.
Courtis, J. K. 1976. Relationships between timeliness in corporate reporting and corporate attributes. Accounting and Business Research 7 (25):45-56.
Davies, B., and G. P. Whittred. 1980. The association between selected corporate: Attributes and timeliness in corporate: Reporting: Further analysis. Abacus 16 (1):48-60.
DeZoort, F. T. 1998. An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (1):1-21.
DeZoort, F. T., D. R. Hermanson, and R. W. Houston. 2003. Audit committee support for auditors: The effects of materiality justification and accounting precision. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (2):175-199.
Dhaliwal, D. A. N., V. I. C. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2010. The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees*. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3):787-827.
Dyer, J. C., and A. J. McHugh. 1975. Timeliness of Australian annual-report. Journal of Accounting Research 13 (2):204-219.
Ettredge, M. L., C. Li, and L. Sun. 2006. The impact of SOX Section 404 internal control quality assessment on audit delay in the SOX era. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (2):1-23.
Francis, J. R., and D. T. Simon. 1987. A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market. Accounting review:145-157.
Gilling, D. M. 1977. Timeliness in corporate reporting: some further comment. Accounting and Business Research 8 (29):34-36.
Givoly, D., and D. Palmon. 1982. Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. The accounting review 57 (3):486-508.
Henderson, B. C., and S. E. Kaplan. 2000. An examination of audit report lag for banks: A panel data approach. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (2):159-174.
HO, S. W., and P. P. NG. 1996. The deteminants of audit fees in HongKong: An empirical study. Asian Review of Accounting 4 (2):32-50.
Ika, S. R., and N. A. M. Ghazali. 2012. Audit committee effectiveness and timeliness of reporting: Indonesian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal 27 (4):403-424.
Jaggi, B., and J. Tsui. 1999. Determinants of audit report lag: Further evidence from Hong Kong. Accounting and Business Research 30 (1):17-28.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3):375-400.
Knechel, W. R., and J. L. Payne. 2001. Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (1):137-146.
Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The accounting review 80 (2):649-675.
Kross, W., and D. A. Schroeder. 1984. An empirical investigation of the effect of quarterly earnings announcement timing on stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1):153-176.
Naimi, M., M. Nor, S. Rohami, and W. N. Wan-Hussin. 2010. Corporate governance and audit report lag in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance 6(2): 57-84.
Salleh, Z., S. Baatwah, and N. Ahmad. 2015. Audit committee financial expertise and audit report lag: Malaysia further insights. Paper read at SASE 27th Annual Meeting.
Schmidt, J., and M. S. Wilkins. 2013. Bringing darkness to light: The influence of auditor quality and audit committee expertise on the timeliness of financial statement restatement disclosures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (1):221-244.
Schwartz, K. B., and B. S. Soo. 1996. The association between auditor changes and reporting lags*. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1):353-370.
Sharma, V. D., D. S. Sharma, and U. Ananthanarayanan. 2011. Client importance and earnings management: The moderating role of audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (3):125-156.
Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research:161-190.
Sultana, N., H. Singh, and J. L. W. M. Van der Zahn. 2015. Audit committee characteristics and audit report lag. International Journal of Auditing 19 (2):72-87.
Trueman, B. 1990. Theories of earnings-announcement timing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13 (3):285-301.
Wan-Hussin, W. N., and H. M. Bamahros. 2013. Do investment in and the sourcing arrangement of the internal audit function affect audit delay? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 9 (1):19-32.
Whittred, G. P. 1980. The timeliness of the Australian annual-report - 1972-1977. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (2):623-628.
Woidtke, T., and Y.-H. Yeh. 2013. The role of the audit committee and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 23:1-24.
Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of corporate finance 9 (3):295-316.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20771-
dc.description.abstract本研究以2007至2015年設置審計委員會之台灣上市(櫃)公司為研究樣本,探討審計委員會具備財務或會計專長與審計報告時效性之關聯性。實證結果顯示,審計委員會成員財會專家比例愈高則審計報告時間落差愈短。本研究進一步探討審計委員會召集人財會背景與審計報告時效性之關係,發現審計委員會召集人具備財務或會計專長與審計報告時間落差呈顯著負向關係。
本研究額外測試發現審計委員會之財務或會計專長也能顯著縮短財務報表公布時間落差,顯示審計委員會之財會專業有助於提升財務報表之時效性。另外,本研究探討證券交易法第36條修法縮短財務報表公告期限是否影響主要實證結果,發現修法後減緩審計委員會財會專業對於審計報告時間落差之影響。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the association between firms with audit committee financial experts and audit report timeliness. Using a sample of Taiwanese listed companies with an audit committee from 2007 to 2015, I find that audit report lag is negatively associated with the percentage of financial experts in an audit committee. I also find a negative relationship between audit committee chair’s financial expertise and audit report lag.
Further analyses show that firms with audit committee financial experts also lead to a shorter financial report lag, indicating an improvement in the timeliness of financial reporting. Moreover, I investigate whether the main results are driven by the amendment of Article 36 of Securities Exchange Act which intends to accelerate the deadline for listed companies to submit financial reports, and my results find that the effect of audit committee financial expertise on audit report lag is mitigated by the amendment of Securities Exchange Act.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T03:02:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-R04722034-1.pdf: 1597245 bytes, checksum: 52ae3fd75f2023f90ff3cc294bc8a594 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 i
Abstract ii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第二章 我國法規制度 5
第一節 我國審計委員會設置沿革 5
第二節 財務資訊公告及申報 7
第三章 文獻探討與假說建立 9
第一節 審計委員會與財會專家 9
第二節 會計資訊時效性 11
第三節 審計委員會與會計資訊時效性 15
第四節 假說建立 17
第四章 研究設計 19
第一節 模型設計與變數定義 19
第二節 樣本選取與資料來源 25
第五章 實證結果與分析 27
第一節 敘述性統計 27
第二節 相關性分析 28
第三節 迴歸分析結果 30
第四節 額外測試 32
第六章 結論與建議 43
第一節 研究結論 43
第二節 研究限制 44
第三節 研究建議 45
第七章 參考文獻 46
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject財務報表時效性zh_TW
dc.subject審計委員會zh_TW
dc.subject財會專家zh_TW
dc.subject審計報告時間落差zh_TW
dc.subjectFinancial Reporting Timelinessen
dc.subjectAudit Committeeen
dc.subjectFinancial Expertsen
dc.subjectAudit Report Lagen
dc.title審計委員會財會專家與審計報告時間落差之關聯性zh_TW
dc.titleThe Association between Audit Committee Financial Experts and Audit Report Lagen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee洪聖閔,曾智揚
dc.subject.keyword審計委員會,財會專家,審計報告時間落差,財務報表時效性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAudit Committee,Financial Experts,Audit Report Lag,Financial Reporting Timeliness,en
dc.relation.page51
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201701593
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2017-07-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.56 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved