請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20022
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張文亮 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chin-Ling Wei | en |
dc.contributor.author | 魏晉翎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:38:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 向高世, 李鵬翔, & 楊懿如. (2009). 臺灣兩棲爬行類圖鑑: 貓頭鷹出版.
2. 朱慧, 彭媛媛, & 王德利. (2008). 植物对昆虫多样性的影响. 生态学杂志, 27(12), 2215-2221. 3. 呂光洋, 林政彥, & 莊國碩. (1990). 臺灣區野生動物資料庫(一)兩棲類(Ⅱ): 行政院農委會. 4. 呂光洋, 陳添喜, 高善, 孫承矩, 朱哲民, 蔡添順, 何一先, & 鄭正寬. (1996). 台灣野生動物資源調查─ 兩棲類動物資源調查手冊: 行政院農業委員會. 台北. 5. 呂光洋, & 賴俊祥. (2003). 阿里山地區阿里山山椒魚的分布和棲地利用之研究(一) (pp. p.1-44): 行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計劃系列. 6. 呂彥聰. (2012). 新北市大桶山靜止水域 6 種共棲蛙類資源分配利用之研究. (碩士), 國立臺北教育大學. 7. 沈明來. (2007). 實用多變數分析, 第二版: 九州圖書文物有限公司. 台北, 台灣. 8. 卓瓊玫. (2002). 霧社地區拉都希氏赤蛙的族群生態研究. (在職進修碩士班), 國立臺灣師範大學. 9. 林中一. (2002). 台北縣雙溪河流域褐樹蛙之生殖生態與族群分布. (碩士), 國立臺灣大學. 10. 施心翊, 張育菁, & 楊懿如. (2006). 花蓮縣低海拔地區兩棲類組成與棲地利用之研究. 生物科學, 49(1), 51-64. 11. 徐勝輝. (1991). 臺灣中部拉都希氏蛙的年生殖型式. (碩士), 東海大學. 12. 高保齡. (1994). 臺灣北部地區共棲蛙種間資源分配利用之研究. (碩士), 國立臺灣師範大學. 13. 郭暐媺. (2004). 小雨蛙生殖生態學之研究. (碩士), 國立屏東科技大學. 14. 黃榮千, & 楊懿如. (2013). 太魯閣國家公園砂卡礑溪流域斯文豪氏赤蛙(Odorrana swinhoana)移動及棲地利用研究. 國家公園學報, 23(1), 1-12. 15. 楊育昌. (1996). 酸鹼度對兩生類蝌蚪和胚胎發育的影響. (碩士), 國立臺灣大學. 16. 賴俊祥, & 呂光洋. (2007). 阿里山地區阿里山山椒魚的分布與族群監測. Bio Formosa, 42(2), 105-117. 17. 謝煒智. (2004). 諸羅樹蛙群集展示行為之研究. (碩士), 國立臺灣師範大學. 18. 蘇緯宸. (2015). 營造都市生態溝為蛙類棲地-以臺北市永建生態園區為例. (碩士), 國立臺灣大學. 19. Adolph, E. F. (1932). The vapor tension relations of frogs. The Biological Bulletin, 62(1), 112-125. 20. Ballantyne, J. S., & George, J. C. (1978). An ultrastructural and histological analysis of the effects of cold acclimation on vertebrate skeletal muscle. Journal of Thermal Biology, 3(3), 109-116. 21. Bellis, E. D. (1962). The influence of humidity on wood frog activity. American Midland Naturalist, 139-148. 22. Brainerd, E. L., & Owerkowicz, T. (2006). Functional morphology and evolution of aspiration breathing in tetrapods. Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 154(1), 73-88. 23. Brattstrom, B. H. (1979). Amphibian temperature regulation studies in the field and laboratory. American Zoologist, 19(1), 345-356. 24. Bruce, R. C., Castanet, J., & Francillon-Vieillot, H. (2002). Skeletochronological analysis of variation in age structure, body size, and life history in three species of desmognathine salamanders. Herpetologica, 58(2), 181-193. 25. Burbrink, F. T., Phillips, C. A., & Heske, E. J. (1998). A riparian zone in southern Illinois as a potential dispersal corridor for reptiles and amphibians. Biological conservation, 86(2), 107-115. 26. Carroll, R. L. (2007). The Palaeozoic ancestry of salamanders, frogs and caecilians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 150(suppl_1), 1-140. 27. Chang, Y. -H., & Wu, B. -Y. (2015). Designation of amphibian corridor referring to the frog’s climbing ability. Ecological Engineering, 83, 152-158. 28. Chang, Y. -M., & Hou, P. -C. L. (2005). Thermal Acclimation of Metabolic Rate May be Seasonally Dependent in the Subtropical Anuran Latouche’s Frog (Rana latouchii, Boulenger). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 78(6), 947-955. 29. Collins, J. P., & Storfer, A. (2003). Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. Diversity and distributions, 9(2), 89-98. 30. Drayer, A. N., & Richter, S. C. (2016). Physical wetland characteristics influence amphibian community composition differently in constructed wetlands and natural wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 93, 166-174. 31. Eterovick, P. C., & Sazima, I. (2000). Structure of an anuran community in a montane meadow in southeastern Brazil: effects of seasonality, habitat, and predation. Amphibia-Reptilia, 21(4), 439-461. 32. Freiburg, R. E. (1951). An ecological study of the narrow-mouthed toad (Microhyla) in northeastern Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science (1903-), 54(3), 374-386. 33. Gallant, A. L., Klaver, R. W., Casper, G. S., & Lannoo, M. J. (2007). Global rates of habitat loss and implications for amphibian conservation. Copeia, 2007(4), 967-979. 34. Hamer, A. J., & McDonnell, M. J. (2008). Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biological conservation, 141(10), 2432-2449. 35. Hillyard, S. D. (1976). The movement of soil water across the isolated amphibian skin. Copeia, 314-320. 36. Johnson, P. T. J., Lunde, K. B., Ritchie, E. G., & Launer, A. E. (1999). The effect of trematode infection on amphibian limb development and survivorship. Science, 284(5415), 802-804. 37. Köhler, A., Sadowska, J., Olszewska, J., Trzeciak, P., Berger-Tal, O., & Tracy, C. R. (2011). Staying warm or moist? Operative temperature and thermal preferences of common frogs (Rana temporaria), and effects on locomotion. The Herpetological Journal, 21(1), 17-26. 38. Kiesecker, J. M. (2002). Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: a link to amphibian limb deformities in nature? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(15), 9900-9904. 39. Kuan, S. ‐H., & Lin, Y. K. (2011). Bigger or faster? Spring and summer tadpole cohorts use different life‐history strategies. Journal of Zoology, 285(3), 165-171. 40. Lagerspitz, K. Y. H. (1977). Interactions of season and temperature acclimation in the control of metabolism in Amphibia. Journal of Thermal Biology, 2(4), 223-231. 41. Laurin, M. (2002). Tetrapod phylogeny, amphibian origins, and the definition of the name Tetrapoda. Systematic Biology, 51(2), 364-369. 42. Li, K. -W., Lee, D. -N., Huang, W. -T., & Weng, C. -F. (2006). Temperature and humidity alter prolactin receptor expression in the skin of toad (Bufo bankorensis and Bufo melanostictus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 145(4), 509-516. 43. Marco, A., & Blaustein, A. R. (1999). The effects of nitrite on behavior and metamorphosis in Cascades frogs (Rana cascadae). Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 18(5), 946-949. 44. Myers, N. (1996). The rich diversity of biodiversity issues. Biodiversity II: Understanding and protecting our biological resources, 125-138. 45. Pechmann, J. H. K., Estes, R. A., Scott, D. E., & Whitfield Gibbons, J. (2001). Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands, 21(1), 93-111. 46. Rannap, R., Lõhmus, A., & Briggs, L. (2009). Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story. Hydrobiologia, 634(1), 87-95. 47. Smith, T. M., & Smith, R. L. (2015). Elements of ecology: Pearson Education. 48. Stille, W. T. (1952). The nocturnal amphibian fauna of the southern Lake Michigan beach. Ecology, 33(2), 149-162. 49. Tripp, J. B., & Lustick, S. (1974). The effects of heating and cooling in water on the heart rate of the bullfrog. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 48(3), 547-554. 50. Tyler, M. J., Shearman, D. J. C., Franco, R., O'Brien, P., Seamark, R. F., & Kelly, R. (1983). Inhibition of Gastric Acid Secretion in the Gastric Brooding. Science, 220, 609-610. 51. Vitt, L. J., & Caldwell, J. P. (2013). Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles: Academic Press. 52. Wake, D. B. (1991). Declining amphibian populations. Science, 253(5022), 860-861. 53. Walker, R. F., & Whitford, W. G. (1970). Soil water absorption capabilities in selected species of anurans. Herpetologica, 411-418. 54. Werner, E. E., & Glennemeier, K. S. (1999). Influence of forest canopy cover on the breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species. Copeia, 1-12. 55. Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3). 56. Williams, P. J., Robb, J. R., & Karns, D. R. (2012). Habitat selection by Crawfish Frogs (Lithobates areolatus) in a large mixed grassland/forest habitat. Journal of Herpetology, 46(4), 682-688. 57. Willmer, P., Stone, G., & Johnston, I. (2009). Environmental physiology of animals: John Wiley & Sons. 58. Wyman, R. L. (1988). Soil acidity and moisture and the distribution of amphibians in five forests of southcentral New York. Copeia, 394-399. 59. Wyman, R. L., & Hawksley-Lescault, D. S. (1987). Soil acidity affects distribution, behavior, and physiology of the salamader Plethodon Cinereus. Ecology, 68(6), 1819-1827. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20022 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 人類社會發展造成許多天然濕地的消失,也使得許多水生及水陸兩棲生物失去賴以維生的家園,為進行物種復育,以人工濕地營造作為棲地補償已逐漸受到重視。臺灣有相當多兩棲生物相關研究,但對於人工棲地內兩棲物種的族群分布與棲地偏好等研究相當少。為了解兩棲類生物在都市人工濕地中的族群分布以及環境因子偏好,作為日後棲地管理及棲地營造之參考,本研究以永建生態教育園區作為研究樣區,以樣區內的六種地棲蛙類為研究對象,探討這些地棲蛙類對於生態草溝的棲地偏好性。
整體調查結果顯示澤蛙及拉都希氏赤蛙為主要的蛙類族群。其中以澤蛙族群在四個水域分布最平均,拉都希氏赤蛙主要分布於P1及P2,腹斑蛙、貢德氏赤蛙及小雨蛙主要分布於P1,黑眶蟾蜍則主要分布於P4。以常態分佈方式探討地棲蛙類對於環境溫度與相對濕度的偏好,結果顯示澤蛙、腹斑蛙、貢德氏赤蛙及黑眶蟾蜍偏好氣溫介於23 °C至28 °C之間,且以貢德氏赤蛙與腹斑蛙偏好溫度最高,澤蛙與黑眶蟾蜍居中;拉都希氏赤蛙的偏好氣溫介於20 °C至25 °C之間;小雨蛙偏好溫度介於23 °C至25 °C之間。 微棲地調查中以因素分析共萃取四個共同因素:植株高度因素、土壤因素、小礫石因素與含水量因素。拉都希氏赤蛙與腹斑蛙在空間分布上有相當高的重疊,偏好坡度高、植株高的樣點;黑框蟾蜍則偏好坡度低、植株低的樣點;澤蛙與貢德氏赤蛙在各樣點內分布相當平均,並沒有特別偏好的微棲地因子。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In Taiwan, There are many studies related to amphibians, but quite few focus on the species distribution and habitat preference of them in artificial habitats. The loss of many natural wetlands caused by the development of human society, and also making many aquatic and amphibious animals lose their habitat. For the purpose of species diversity, the construction of the created wetlands as a compensation way for habitat loss will get more and more attention. In order to understand the species distribution of amphibians in urban constructed wetlands and the environmental factors affecting their habitat, as a reference for habitat management and habitat construction in future. This research takes Yongjian Ecological Education Park in Taipei as the study area, where the amphibians were selected as research objects to investigate their habitat preference.
The overall survey showed that Fejervarya limnocharis and Hylarana latouchii are the main populations in this study area. Among them, the population of the F. limnocharis distributed evenly in these four wetlands. H. latouchii was mainly distributed in P1 and P2. Babina adenopleura, Hylarana guentheri and Microhyla fissipes were mainly distributed in P1, while Duttaphrynus melanostictus was mainly distributed in P4. The results of normal distribution for ambient temperature and the related humidity showed that F. limnocharis, B. adenopleura, H. guentheri and D. melanostictus preferred the temperature ranging from 23 °C to 28 °C. And the preference temperature of B. adenopleura, H. guentheri were the highest, the preference temperature of F. limnocharis and D. melanostictus were lower than these two species. The preference temperature of H. latouchii was between 20 °C and 25 °C. And M. fissipes preferred the temperature ranging from 23 °C to 25 °C. We used factor analysis to find their micro-habitat preference, and there are four common factors, including the factor of plant height, soil, gravel and water content. The results showed that H. latouchii and B. adenopleura in the wetland are highly overlap in the spatial scale. Both of them preferred the sites with deep slope and higher height of plants. And D. melanostictus preferred the sites with gentle slope and lower height of plants. We found no particular preference factor of F. limnocharis and H. guentheri, because both of them distributed evenly in all sites. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:38:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04622047-1.pdf: 6892959 bytes, checksum: 099ad577d1efed7a3120d02ebcd27ed1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
謝誌 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 一、 前言 1 1.1 兩棲類之緣起與發展 1 1.2 兩棲類面臨之衝擊 3 1.3 影響兩棲類生存之環境因子 5 1.4 兩棲類之棲地復育 7 1.5 研究目的 9 二、 理論分析 10 2.1 因素分析 ( Factor analysis ) 10 2.2 物種多樣性指數 14 三、 材料與方法 15 3.1 調查區域 15 3.2 物種調查 20 3.3 環境因子調查 24 四、 結果與討論 28 4.1 北區整體調查 28 4.2 蛙類的微棲地偏好 50 五、 結論與建議 71 5.1 結論 71 5.2 建議 72 參考文獻 73 附錄 78 附錄一、整體調查:各月內各濕地中目標物種之數量 78 附錄二、整體調查:各月內各濕地中現地環境監測 82 附錄三、整體調查:季節差異分析資料 86 附錄四、微棲地偏好:各樣點之歷次蛙類調查結果加總 88 附錄五、微棲地偏好:土壤因子分析 89 附錄六、微棲地偏好:各篩號礫石之重量百分比 90 附錄七、微棲地偏好:植物及其他環境因子 91 附錄八、微棲地偏好:因素分析之因素荷量結果 92 附錄九、微棲地偏好:現地檢測結果 93 附錄十、微棲地偏好:實驗室分析結果 95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 地棲蛙類對都市近郊生態草溝之棲地偏好 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Habitat Preference of Frogs at Sub-urban Ecological Ditch | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 任秀慧,尤少彬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 兩棲類,人工生態草溝,氣溫,相對濕度,因素分析,微棲地偏好, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | amphibians,created ecological ditch,ambient temperature,relative humidity,factor analysis,micro-habitat preferences, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801390 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.73 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。