請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20003
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 顏瑞泓(Jui-Hung Yen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Bo-You Liao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 廖柏宥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:38:39Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 三輪勇四郎。1939。農業用殺蟲劑要覽。臺北:臺灣農會。
行政院農委會農業藥物毒物試驗所。2014。安全資材-昆蟲費洛蒙農民應用的輔導與推廣。臺北:臺灣大學。網址:http://www.tactri.gov.tw/wSite/ct?xItem= 7598&ctNode =1059&mp=11#A。上網日期:2016-11-12。 李文蓉.。1988.。東方果實蠅之防治。中華昆蟲特刊。第二號:51-60.。 林軒毅。2016。植物油鉀鹽及植物精油對東方果實蠅產卵行為之影響。碩士論文。臺北:臺灣大學農業化學所。 邱煇宗.。1987.。利用滅雄法處理防治東方果實蠅之模擬試驗.。博士論文。臺北:國立臺灣大學植物病蟲害研究所. 邱煇宗、朱耀沂。1987。東方果實蠅之產卵行為 (I) 產卵潛能.。中華昆蟲特刊 7:119-126.。 徐茂樟、蕭榮福.。1977。果實蠅之防治工作摘要。東方果實蠅研討會論文集:39-49.。 陳祈融。2010。台灣鋏蠓非藥劑防治機制之研究。碩士論文。臺北:國立臺灣大學昆蟲研究所。 植物保護資訊系統。2018。植物保護資訊系統。臺北:臺灣大學。網址:http: //otserv. tactri.gov.tw/ ppm/main.asp。上網日期:2018-04-22。 袁盛勇、肖春、孔琼、陳斌、李正躍、高永紅。2005。桔小實蠅的產卵選擇性. 江西農業大學學報 27:80-84.。 黃毓斌、高靜華、周桃美、江明耀、謝雨蒔、洪裕堂、陳保良、張瑞璋.。2013.。東方果實蠅整合性管理與防治策略。農業試驗所特刊172:1-24.。 劉玉章。 1987。東方果實蠅之防治方式。興大農業第四期:8-12。 劉玉章。 1991。臺灣東方果實蠅之現況與防治。 果實蠅之生物學及其防治國際研討會。日本琉球。 鄭明發。2005。東方果實蠅防治策略。台灣柑橘產業發展研討會專刊:197-205。 賴信順。2009。東方果實蠅之生態及防治技術。花蓮區農業專訊 68:17-20.。 Addesso, K. M., H. J. McAuslane, P. A. Stansly, and D. J. Schuster. 2007. Host-marking by female pepper weevils, Anthonomus eugenii. Entomol Exp Appl 125:269-276. Aluja, M. and F. Diaz-Fleischer. 2006. Foraging behavior of Anastrepha ludens, A-Obliqua, and A. Serpentina in response to feces extracts containing host marking pheromone. J Chem Ecol 32:367-389. Sigma-Aldrich®.2018.Material safety data sheet. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. Available at: https:// www.sigmaaldrich.com / catalog /search? term = MSDS&interface= All&N=0&mode= match%20partialmax&l ang= en®ion= TW&focus=product. Accessed 7 April 2018. Aluja, M. and R. L. Mangan. 2008. Fruit fly (Diptera : tephritidae) host status determination: Critical conceptual, methodological, and regulatory considerations. Annu Rev Entomol 53:473-502. Anderson, P., M. Hilker, B. S. Hansson, S. Bombosch, B. Klein, and H. Schildknecht. 1993. Oviposition deterring components in larval frass of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) - a behavioral and electrophysiological Evaluation. J Insect Physiol 39:129-137. Arredondo, J. and F. Diaz-Fleischer. 2006. Oviposition deterrents for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera : Tephritidae) from fly faeces extracts. B Entomol Res 96:35-42. Boller, E. F. and J. Hurter. 1985. Oviposition deterring pheromone in Rhagoletis cerasi - behavioral laboratory test to measure pheromone activity. Entomol Exp Appl 39:163-169. Brevault, T. and S. Quilici. 2010. Interaction between visual and olfactory cues during host finding in the tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens. J Chem Ecol 36:249-259. Broce, A. B. 1980. Sexual-behavior of screwworm flies stimulated by Swormlure-2(Diptera, Calliphoridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 73:386-389. Buttery, R. G., L. C. Ling, R. Teranishi, and T. R. Mon. 1983. Insect attractants - volatiles of hydrolyzed protein insect baits. J Agr Food Chem 31:689-692. CABI. (June 2013). Bactrocera dorsalis. distribution maps of plant pests. http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/17685 (12 November 2016). Chiu, H. T. 1978. Studies on the improvement of mass rearing for oriental fruit flies. Plant Protection Bulletin Taiwan20:87-92. Chiu, H. T. 1983. Movement of oriental fruit flies in the field. Chinese Journal of Entomology 3:93-102. Chow, Y. S. 1982. Insect sex pheromone research in Taiwan. Shing Nung Farm Magazine 158:6-7. Cornelius, M. L., L. Nergel, J. J. Duan, and R. H. Messing. 2000. Responses of female oriental fruit flies (Diptera : Tephritidae) to protein and host fruit odors in field cage and open field tests. Environ Entomol 29:14-19. Cosse, A. A., J. L. Todd, J. G. Millar, L. A. Martinez, and T. C. Baker. 1995. Electroantennographic and coupled gas chromatographic electroantennographic responses of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata, to male-produced volatiles and mango odor. J Chem Ecol 21:1823-1836. Cruz-Lopez, L., E. A. Malo, J. Toledo, A. Virgen, A. del Mazo, and J. C. Rojas. 2006. A new potential attractant for Anastrepha obliqua from Spondias mombin fruits. J Chem Ecol 32:351-365. DeMilo, A. B., C. J. Lee, V. A. Levi, and D. S. Moreno. 1997. Volatile components of a chicken feather hydrolysate that is highly attractive to the West Indian and Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Entomol Sci 32:245-256. Faraone, N., N. K. Hillier, and G. C. Cutler. 2016. Collection of host-marking pheromone from Rhagoletis mendax (Diptera: Tephritidae). Can Entomol 148:552-555. Fitt , G. P. 1984. Oviposition behaviour of two tephritid fruit flies, Dacus tryoni and Dacus jarvisi, as influenced by the presence of larvae in the host fruit. Oecologia 62:37-46. Frias-Lasserre, D. 2015. Effects of female fruit-marking pheromones on oviposition, mating, and male behavior in the neotropical species Rhagoletis conversa Brethes and Rhagoletis brncici Frias (Diptera: Tephritidae). Neotrop Entomol 44:560-564. Genç, H. 2006. General principles of insect nutritional ecology. Trakya University Journal of Social Science 7:53-57. Girard, J. E., F. J. Germino, J. P. Budris, R. A. Vita, and M. P. Garrity. 1979. Pheromone of the male flesh fly, Sarcophaga bullata. J Chem Ecol 5:125-130. Girolami, V., A. Vianello, A. Strapazzon, E. Ragazzi, and G. Veronese. 1981. Ovipositional deterrents in Dacus oleae. Entomol Exp Appl 29:177-188. Hemptinne, J. L., G. Lognay, M. Doumbia, and A. F. G. Dixon. 2001. Chemical nature and persistence of the oviposition deterring pheromone in the tracks of the larvae of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 11:43-47. Hidayat, Y., N. Heather, and E. Hassan. 2013. Repellency and oviposition deterrence effects of plant essential and vegetable oils against female Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Aust J Entomol 52:379-386. Hidayat, Y., N. Heather, and E. Hassan. 2014. Mechanism and effectiveness of safflower oil against female Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni. Entomol Exp Appl 152:175-181. Howell, J. F., M. Cheikh, E. J. Harris, H. Bensalah, S. Allaya, and P. Crnjanski. 1975. Mediterranean fruit-fly - control in tunisia by strip treatment with a bait spray of technical malathion and protein-hydrolyzate. J Econ Entomol 68:247-249. Howse, E. P. 2003. Insect attractant. European Patent Specification EP 0 838998 B1. Hurter, J., E. F. Boller, E. Stadler, B. Blattmann, H. R. Buser, N. U. Bosshard, L. Damm, M. W. Kozlowski, R. Schoni, F. Raschdorf, R. Dahinden, E. Schlumpf, H. Fritz, W. J. Richter, and J. Schreiber. 1987. Oviposition-deterring pheromone in Rhagoletis cerasi L - Purification and determination of the chemical constitution. Experientia 43:157-164. Ishikawa, Y., T. Ikeshoji, Y. Matsumoto, M. Tsutsumi, and Y. Mitsui. 1983. 2-Phenylethanol - an attractant for the onion and seed-corn flies, Hylemya antiqua and Hylemya platura (Diptera, Anthomyiidae). Appl Entomol Zool 18:270-277. Jang, E. B. and D. M. Light. 1991. Behavioral-responses of female oriental fruit-flies to the odor of papayas at 3 ripeness stages in a laboratory flight tunnel (diptera, tephritidae). J Insect Behav 4:751-762. Kachigamba, D. L., S. Ekesi, M. W. Ndung'u, L. M. Gitonga, P. E. A. Teal, and B. Torto. 2012. Evidence for potential of managing some african fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) using the mango fruit fly host-marking pheromone. J Econ Entomol 105:2068-2075. Karlson, P. and A. Butenandt. 1959. Pheromones (Ectohormones) in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 4:39-58. Karlson, P. and M. Luscher. 1959. Pheromones - new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183:55-56. Kydonieus, A. F., M. Beroza, G. Zweig. 1982. Insect suppression with controlled release pheromone systems. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida 1-2:274-312. Lawrence, P. O. 1981. Host Vibration -A cue to host location by the Parasite, Biosteres longicaudatus. Oecologia 48:249-251. Lee, C. J., A. B. Demilo, D. S. Moreno, and A. J. Martinez. 1995. Analysis of the volatile components of a bacterial fermentation that is attractive to the mexican fruit-fly, Anastrepha ludens. J Agr Food Chem 43:1348-1351. Liang, G. H., J. H. Chen, and J. Q. Yang. 2003. Advance in research of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in China. Entomological Journal of East China 12:90-98. Light, D. M. and E. B. Jang. 1987. Electroantennogram responses of the oriental fruit-fly, Dacus dorsalis, to a Spectrum of Alcohol and Aldehyde Plant Volatiles. Entomol Exp Appl 45:55-64. Lin, H., H. P. Zhou, L. Y. Xu, H. P. Zhu, and H. H. Huang. 2016. Effect of surfactant concentration on the spreading properties of pesticide droplets on Eucalyptus leaves. Biosyst Eng 143:42-49. Lukowska-Chojnacka, E., J. Mierzejewska, M. Milner-Krawczyk, M. Bondaryk, and M. Staniszewska. 2016. Synthesis of novel tetrazole derivatives and evaluation of their antifungal activity. Bioorgan Med Chem 24:6058-6065. Meagher, R. L. and P. J. Landolt. 2008. Attractiveness of binary blends of floral odorant compounds to moths in Florida, USA. Entomol Exp Appl 128:323-329. Ministry of Agriculture, Agrifood and Forestry (2014) Ten keys to understanding agroecology.http://agriculture.gouv.fr/telecharger/58145?token=5c5d2aed24cfa6eb 606b3628027b7f80 Minks, A. K. 1986. List of sex pheromones of Lepidoptera and related attractants. Entomol Exp Appl 43:244. Muryati, Y. A. Trisyono, Witjaksono, and Wahyono. 2017. Oviposition deterrent of Bactrocera carambolae resulted from eggs deposition on mango. Agrivita 39:201-213. Nachman, R. J., J. A. Fehrentz, J. Martinez, K. Kaczmarek, J. Zabrocki, and G. M. Coast. 2007. A C-terminal aldehyde analog of the insect kinins inhibits diuresis in the housefly. Peptides 28:146-152. Nachman, R. J., J. Zabrocki, J. Olczak, H. J. Williams, G. Moyna, A. I. Scott, and G. M. Coast. 2002. cis-peptide bond mimetic tetrazole analogs of the insect kinins identify the active conformation. Peptides 23:709-716. Nguyen, V. L., A. Meats, G. A. C. Beattie, R. Spooner-Hart, Z. M. Liu, and L. Jiang. 2007. Behavioural responses of female Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, to mineral oil deposits. Entomol Exp Appl 122:215-221. Niogret, J., W. S. Montgomery, P. E. Kendra, R. R. Heath, and N. D. Epsky. 2011. Attraction and electroantennogram responses of male mediterranean fruit fly to volatile Chemicals from Persea litchi and Ficus wood. J Chem Ecol 37:483-491. Nowinska, P. and I. Kasacka. 2017. Changes in the pancreas caused by different types of hypertension. Acta Biochim Pol 64:591-595. Nufio, C. R. and D. R. Papaj. 2001. Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 99:273-293. Nufio, C. R. and D. R. Papaj. 2004. Host-marking behaviour as a quantitative signal of competition in the walnut fly Rhagoletis juglandis. Ecol Entomol 29:336-344. Ouyang, G.-C., Y.-P. Yang, G.-L. Zhong, J.-J. Xiong, M.-D. Huang, and G.-W. Liang. 2008. Oviposition repellency and EAG responses of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) to mineral spray oils. Acta Entomologica Sinica 51:390-394. Papaj, D. R. and M. Aluja. 1993. Temporal dynamics of host-marking in the tropical tephritid fly, Anastrepha ludens. Physiol Entomol 18:279-284. Pritchard, G. 1969. The ecology of a natural population of Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni II. The distribution of eggs and its relation to behaviour. Aust J Zool 17:293-311. Prokopy, R. J., T. A. Green, W. A. Olson, R. I. Vargas, D. Kanehisa, and T. T. Y. Wong. 1989. Discrimination by Dacus dorsalis Females (Diptera, Tephritidae) against Larval-Infested Fruit. Fla Entomol 72:319-323. Prokopy, R. J. and J. Koyama. 1982. Oviposition Site partitioning in Dacus cucurbitae. Entomol Exp Appl 31:428-432. Prokopy, R. J., J. R. Ziegler, and T. T. Y. Wong. 1978. Deterrence of repeated oviposition by fruit-marking pheromone in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera-Tephritidae). J Chem Ecol 4:55-63. Rehman, J. U., G. Jilani, M. A. Khan, R. Masih, and S. Kanvil. 2009. Repellent and oviposition deterrent effects of indigenous plant extracts to peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pak J Zool 41:101-108. Ridgway, R. L., R. M. Silverstein,Inscoe. M. N. . 1990. Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect management. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York:761. Roitberg, B. D., R. S. Cairl, and R. J. Prokopy. 1984. Oviposition deterring pheromone influences dispersal distance in tephritid fruit-flies. Entomol Exp Appl 35:217-220. Roitberg, B. D. and M. Mangel. 1988. On the Evolutionary ecology of marking pheromones. Evol Ecol 2:289-315. Roitberg, B. D. and R. J. Prokopy. 1987. Insects that mark host plants. bioscience 37:400-406. Ronald Prokopy J., T. A. G., Wavel A. Olson. 1989. Discrimination by Dacus dorsalis females ( Diptera tephritidae ) against larval-infested friit. The Florida Entomologist 72:319-223. Ruzicka, Z. and J. Havelka. 1998. Effects of oviposition-deterring pheromone and allomones on Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera : Cecidomyiidae). Eur J Entomol 95:211-216. Sakai, A., H. Honda, K. Oshima, and I. Yamamoto. 1986. Oviposition marking pheromone of 2 bean weevils, Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of Pesticide Science 11:163-168. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.2016. Safety data sheet. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Available at: http://datasheets.scbt.com/sds/aghs/en/sc-227007.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2018. Schoonhoven, L. M., T. Sparnaay, W. Vanwissen, and J. Meerman. 1981. 7th-week persistence of an oviposition-deterrent pheromone. J Chem Ecol 7:583-588. Shelly, T. E. 1999. Defense of oviposition sites by female oriental fruit flies (Diptera : Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 82:339-346. Siderhurst, M. S. and E. B. Jang. 2010. Cucumber volatile blend attractive to female melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). J Chem Ecol 36:699-708. Sondheimer, E., Simeon, J. B. 1970. Chemical ecology. A. P., New York:336. Stelinski, L. L., C. Rodriguez-Saona, and W. L. Meyer. 2009. Recognition of foreign oviposition-marking pheromone in a multi-trophic context. Naturwissenschaften 96:585-592. Tunon, H., W. Thorsell, and L. Bohlin. 1994. Mosquito Repelling Activity of Compounds Occurring in Achillea millefolium L (Asteraceae). Econ Bot 48:111-120. Ugliano, M. and L. Moio. 2006. The influence of malolactic fermentation and Oenococcus oeni strain on glycosidic aroma precursors and related volatile compounds of red wine. J Sci Food Agr 86:2468-2476. Vargas, R. I. and J. R. Carey. 1990. Comparative survival and demographic-statistics for wild oriental fruit-fly, mediterranean fruit-fly, and melon fly (Diptera, Tephritidae) on Papaya. J Econ Entomol 83:1344-1349. Ye, H. 2001. Distribution of the oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Yunnan province. Insect Science. 8:175-182. Zhu, H. P. and J. L. Lin. 2016. Coverage area and fading time of surfactant-amended herbicidal droplets on cucurbitaceous leaves. T Asabe 59(3):829-838. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20003 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的為探討已被雌性東方果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis) 產卵後之果實對其後續其他果實蠅雌蠅的產卵行為影響,並探討產卵忌避效果現象發生的原因。並針對會造成產卵忌避現象的果實分析其可能活性物質並以該活性物質成份進行生物性試驗,以開發東方果實蠅的新型防治資材以及防治策略,藉由此資材及防治策略之應用期能達到有效防治東方果實蠅且能有效減少化學藥劑之使用。試驗結果顯示番石榴經東方果實蠅產卵後會減少後續東方果實蠅進行產卵行為及產下的卵數,於選擇性試驗中產卵忌避指數可達 82.7%。由結果顯示東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便是主要影響東方果實蠅後續產卵行為之原因,以其糞便進行之選擇性試驗中發現產卵忌避指數可達68.2% 且具有劑量效應,以非選擇性方式的試驗結果,產卵忌避指數亦可達 53.0%。透過氣相層析質譜儀 (GC-MS) 分析東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便成分,其中 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol (5-苯基四氮唑) 於人工產卵器的選擇性試驗中產卵忌避指數可達 47.0% 且具有劑量效應,直接施用5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol 溶液於番石榴果實的產卵忌避指數為 33.6%,產卵忌避指數降低的原因應為藥劑無法於番石榴果實上良好展著。於添加市售商品展著劑進行選擇性試驗,發現單獨使用 5 mg mL-1 展著劑Tween-20 亦有防治效果,其產卵忌避指數為 34.7%。以 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol 混合 5 mg mL-1 Tween-20浸泡番石榴果實進行選擇性試驗,5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol 濃度 0.1 mg mL-1,產卵忌避指可達為 51.6%,於非選擇性試驗中 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol 濃度 0.5 mg mL-1,其產卵忌避指數亦可達 30.1%,以 0.5 mg mL-1之 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol 混合 5 mg mL-1 Tween-20 噴施 400 µL 於番石榴上,其產卵忌避指數可達 50.9%。本研究結果顯示東方果實幼蟲糞便中的 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol 會影響干擾東方果實蠅之產卵行為。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of oviposition affecting subsequent oviposition behavior of female Bactrocera dorsalis on the same fruit, and to search for the cause of this phenomenon. Subsequent analysis of active substances and biological tests are then used to further the development new control materials and stratagies for the prevention of B. dorsalis, while reducing the need for chemical pesticides.The results showed that oviposition of B. dorsalis on guava will reduce subsequent oviposition behavior and the number of deposited eggs of B. dorsalis. The oviposition deterrence index is 82.7%. Further experimentation showed that the feces of B. dorsalis larvae was the main cause of the reduction in oviposition behavior of B. dorsalis. In choice tests, the oviposition repellency index of the B. dorsalis larvae was 68.2% with dose dependency, and similar results were observed in non-choice test, with an oviposition deterrence index of 53%. Of the compounds found through GC-MS analysis of the B. dorsalis larvae, 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol solution in choice tests using artificial ovipositor showed an oviposition deterrence index of 47.0% and was dose-dependent. The oviposition deterrence index using 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol on guava fruits was 33.6%, which was due to the fact that the agent exhibited low adhesion on the guava fruit. Therefore, choice tests were performed using a surfactant commonly used in commercial products. It was found that the use of 5 mg mL-1 of Tween-20 also had a control effect, and its oviposition deterrence index was 34.7%. Follow-up tests will be performed with the combination of 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol solution and Tween-20 at 5 mg mL-1. In choice tests using a soaking method of application can reduce the effective concentration of 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol to 0.1 mg mL-1, with an oviposition deterrence index of 51.6%. For non-choice tests, the 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol concentration was reduced to 0.5 mg mL-1 and the oviposition deterrence index was 30.1%.. Using a spraying method of application, the combination of 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol at a concentration of 0.5 mg mL-1 and 5 mg mL-1 of Tween-20 was applied on guava with a volume of 400 μL, resulting in an oviposition deterrence index of 50.9%. Therefore, the results of the present study show that 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol, a fecal component of the B. dorsalis larvae, can effectively affect the oviposition behavior of B. dorsalis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:38:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05623001-1.pdf: 2567425 bytes, checksum: adc1528c770453e39d65fe8237e7f135 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
壹、 前言 1 一、 東方果實蠅 1 二、 東方果實蠅防治技術 4 三、 農藥減量 6 四、 費洛蒙 7 五、 宿主標記費洛蒙於實蠅科害蟲之管理 9 六、 果實先受產卵對性成熟雌蟲產卵行為之影響 11 貳、 研究目的 12 參、 材料與方法 13 一、 東方果實蠅之馴養 13 二、 人工產卵器對東方果實蠅產卵行為之影響 15 三、 果實先受東方果實蠅產卵影響後續產卵行為 20 四、 果實先受東方果實蠅產卵影響後續產卵行為原因之探討 21 五、 東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便中有效忌避物質之分析 27 六、 藉由 GC-MS 分析出東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便之化合物忌避試驗 28 七、 統計分析 35 肆、 結果與討論 36 一、 人工產卵器對東方果實蠅產卵數之影響 36 二、 果實先受東方果實蠅產卵影響後續產卵行為 38 三、 果實先受東方果實蠅產卵影響後續產卵行為原因之探討 41 四、 以GC-MS分析東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便中成分分析 51 五、 以 GC-MS 分析出東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便之化合物於人工產卵器忌避試驗 67 六、 以 GC-MS 分析出東方果實蠅幼蟲糞便之化合物於番石榴忌避試驗 77 伍、 結論 87 陸、 參考文獻 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 東方果實蠅產卵行為干擾之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Studies of Deterrent Effect on Oviposition Behavior of Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王一雄(Yei-Shung Wang),費雯綺(Wen-Chi Fei),蕭旭峰(Shiuh?Feng Shiao),林乃君(Nai-Chun Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 5-苯基四氮唑,東方果實蠅,幼蟲糞便,產卵行為,費洛蒙, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | 5-phenyl-1H-tetrazol,Bactrocera dorsalis,Larvae feces,Oviposition behavior,Pheromone, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801576 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業化學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業化學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.51 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。