Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19473
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林世銘(Su-Ming Lin),高偉娟(Wei-Chuan Kao)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Ting Chengen
dc.contributor.author鄭羽婷zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T02:00:48Z-
dc.date.copyright2016-07-25
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-06-15
dc.identifier.citation陳 明 進,2012,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,第34 期:57-75。
黃美祝,2010,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響,會計評論,第50 期:23-55。
Allingham, M., and A. Sandmo. 1972. Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1: 323–338.
Berk, J. B., R. C. Green, and V. Naik, 2004. Valuation and return dynamics of new ventures. Review of Financial Studies 17: 1-35.
Bozanic, Z., J. Hoopes, J. Thornock, and B. Williams. 2016. IRS attention. Working Paper, Ohio State University and University of Washington.
Chambers, D. J., R. Jennings, and R. B.,Thompson. 2002. Excess returns to R&D intensive firms. Review of Accounting Studies 7:133–158.
Chan, L., J. Lakonishok, and T. Sougiannis. 2001. The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance 56: 2431- 2456.
Chen, S. D., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2008. Long‐run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review 83: 61-82.
Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95: 41–61.
Choudhary, P., A. Koester, and T. Shevlin. 2016. Measuring income tax accrual quality. Review of Accounting Studies 21: 89-139.
Ciftci, M., and W. M. Cready. 2011. Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 52: 62-80.
Cohen, W. M., and S. Klepper. 1996.A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal 106: 925–951.
Crocker, K., and J. Slemrod. 2005. Corporate tax evasion with agency costs. Journal of Public Economics 89: 1593–1610.
Dechow, P. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18: 3-42.
Dechow, P., and C. Schrand. 2004. Earnings quality. New York: The Research Foundation of CFA Institute.
Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77: 35–59.
Desai, M., and D. Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 79: 145–179.
Dunbar, A., and R. Sansing. 2002. Measuring corporate tax preferences. Journal of the American Taxation Association 24 (Fall): 1–17.
Dyeng, S. D., and B. P. Lindsey. 2009. Using financial accounting data to examine the effect of foreign operations located in tax havens and other countries on U.S. multinational firms’ tax rates. Journal of Accounting Research 47: 1283-1316.
Dyreng, S. D., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2010. The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review 85: 1163-1189.
EL Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, and J. Pittman. 2011. The role of IRS monitoring in equity pricing in public firms. Contemporary Accounting Research 28: 643-674.
Erickson, M., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2004. How much will firms pay for earnings that do not exist? Evidence of taxes paid on allegedly fraudulent earnings. The Accounting Review 79: 387–408.
Frank, M. M., L. Lynch, and S. Rego. 2009. Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review 84: 467–496.
Fullerton, D., and A. Lyon. 1988. Tax neutrality and intangible capital. Tax Policy and the Economy (2), edited by L. Summers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grubert, H., and J. Slemrod. 1998. The effect of taxes on investment and income shifting to Puerto Rico. The Review of Economic and Statistics 80:365-373.
Guedhami, O., and J. Pittman. 2008. The importance of IRS monitoring to debt pricing in private firms. Journal of Financial Economics 90: 38-58.
Gupta, S., and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16:1-34.
Hanlon, M. 2003. What can we infer about a firm’s taxable income from its financial statements? National Tax Journal 56: 831–863.
Hanlon, M., and J. Slemrod. 2009. What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public
Economics 93: 126–141.
Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman. 2010. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50:127–178.
Hanlon, M., J. L. Hoopes, and N. Shroff. 2014. The effect of tax authority monitoring and enforcement on financial reporting quality. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 36: 137-170.
Hebous, S., M. Ruf, and A. J. Weichenrieder. 2010. The effects of taxation on the location decision of multinational firms: M&A vs. greenfield Investments. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3076.
Hines, J., and E. Rice. 1994. Fiscal paradise: Foreign tax havens and American business. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 149-182.
Ho, Y. K., Z. Xu, and C. M. Yap. 2004. R&D investment and systematic risk. Accounting and Finance 44: 393–418.
Hoopes, J., D. Mescall, and J. Pittman. 2012. Do IRS audits deter corporate tax avoidance? The Accounting Review 87: 1603-1639.
Hribar, P., and D. W. Collins. 2002. Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 105-134.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2008. Internal revenue service data book, 2008. Washington, D.C.: Internal Revenue Service.
Jacob, J. 1996. Taxes and transfer pricing: Income shifting and the volume of intrafirm transfers. Journal of Accounting Research 34:301–312.
Jensen, M. and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
Klassen, K. J., and S. K. Lassen. 2012. Are U.S. multinational corporations becoming more aggressive income shifters? Journal of Accounting Research 50: 1245-1286.
Kothari, S.P., T. E. Laguerre, and A. J. Leone. 2002. Capitalization versus expensing: evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies 7: 355-382.
Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis.1996. The capitalization, amortization and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting & Economics 21: 107−138.
Lisowsky, P. 2010. Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. The Accounting Review 85: 1693.
Lisowsky, P., L. Robinson, and A. Schmidt. 2011. Do publicly disclosed tax reserves tell us about privately disclosed tax shelter activity? Working paper, University of Illinois.
McGill, G., and E. Outslay, 2004. Lost in translation: Detecting tax shelter activity in financial statements. National Tax Journal 57: 739–756.
Mills, L. 1996. Corporate tax compliance and financial reporting. National Tax Journal 49: 421–435.
Mills, L. 1998. Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36: 343–356.
Mills, L., and R. C. Sansing. 2000. Strategic tax and financial reporting decisions: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 17: 85–106.
Mills, L., S. Nutter, and C. Schwab. 2013. The effect of political sensitivity and bargaining power on taxes: Evidence from federal contractors. The Accounting Review 88: 977-1005.
Pandit, S., C. E. Wasley, and T. Zach. 2009. The effect of R&D inputs and outputs on the relation between the uncertainty of future operating performance and R&D expenditures. Unpublished Working Paper.
Penman, S., and X. J. Zhang. 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings and stock returns. The Accounting Review 77: 237−264.
Phillips, J. D. 2003. Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. The Accounting Review 78: 847–874.
Rego, S. 2003. Tax-avoidance activities of U.S. multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research 20: 805-833.
Robinson, J. R., S. A. Sikes, and C. D. Weaver. 2010. Performance measurement of corporate tax departments. The Accounting Review 85:1035-1064.
Robinson, L., and R. Sansing. 2008. The effect of ‘‘invisible’’ tax preferences on investment and tax preference measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46: 366–388.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942.Capitalism, socialism, democracy. Harper, New York, NY.
Slemrod, J. 2004. The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal 57: 877–899.
Slemrod, J., and S,Yitzhaki. 2002. Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In: Auerbach, A., Feldstein, M.(Eds.). Hand book of Public Economics 3: 1423-1470.
Sougiannis, T. 1994. The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review 69: 44−68.
Stickney, C. P., and V. E., McGee. 1982. Effective corporate tax rates the effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1: 125-152.
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). 2009. IRS at work. http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/atwork/current/irsHistory.html
U.S. Department of the Treasury. 1999. The Problem of Corporate Tax Shelters: Discussion, Analysis and Legislative Proposals. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Wilson, R. J. 2009. An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review 84: 969-999.
Zimmerman J. L. 1983. Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5:119-149.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19473-
dc.description.abstract本論文之研究主旨在於探討美國國稅局對具有研發費用及境外收入的跨國企業避稅行為之監督能力。由於現有部份學者認為美國國稅局對跨國企業避稅行為之監督對企業的稅務政策是有所影響的,為進一步瞭解箇中事實,本研究以美國上市櫃公司作為探討標的,且以美國國稅局對各資產組別的抽查機率作為美國國稅局監督之代理變數,並以設置虛擬變數及交乘項之方式,進行美國公司之有效稅率是否因國稅局監督而發生變化之檢驗,文內取用樣本之期間為2004年至2014年;另外,在敏感性分析所得稅應計數時,所取用樣本之期間則為2003年至2013年。由本研究之實證結果發現,美國國稅局對具有研發費用及境外收入的跨國公司確實具有監督能力,且此項監督行為確實能使公司減少避稅行為,公司所得稅應計數品質雖未因此提升,但對研發比重較高的跨國公司言,國稅局的監督效果反而降低,由於無法有效落實監督的結果,反而使跨國公司的避稅行為明顯增加,不過公司所得稅應計數品質卻因而上升。本研究之實證結果可增加社會大眾對國稅局對公司監督的了解。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the effect of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits on multinational companies with research and development expenditures (R&D). We find that the IRS audits more positively affect multinational R&D companies’ effective tax rate (ETR) compared with other companies’, suggesting that the IRS audits trigger these companies to have less tax avoidance than others. Additionally, we examine the IRS audit impacts on multinational companies’ R&D spending level. We find that the IRS monitoring does not trigger multinational firms with higher R&D scale to have higher ETR. This implies that IRS has more monitoring impact on multinational R&D companies, but the monitoring impacts are negatively related to the companies R&D spending. Surprisingly, after replacing ETR with tax accrual quality, we find that IRS audits trigger multinational R&D companies with higher R&D spending to have higher tax accrual quality. Overall, this study provides some evidence of IRS monitoring on multinational R&D companies’ tax avoidance and tax accrual quality. Hopefully, the evidence could provide implications on companies’ tax planning.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03722007-1.pdf: 1232101 bytes, checksum: 9fee281a6de5ea13b4644dc100570ec2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說建立 5
第一節 企業避稅行為 5
第二節 國稅局監督效果 7
第三節 企業研發費用 8
第四節 跨國企業 9
第五節 研究假說 10
第三章 研究設計 13
第一節 企業避稅政策之衡量:有效稅率(ETR) 13
第二節 研究模型 14
第三節 樣本選取及資料來源 19
第四章 實證結果與分析 27
第一節 敘述性統計 27
第二節 迴歸分析 30
第三節 敏感性分析 35
第四節 額外分析 40
第五章 研究結論、限制與建議 49
第一節 研究結論 49
第二節 研究貢獻與限制 49
參考文獻 51
附錄 57
變數定義 57
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title美國國稅局稅務查核對公司避稅行為之影響 - 以研發支出及境外收入為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of the IRS Audits on Tax Avoidance of the U.S. Firms with R&D Expenditures and Foreign Operationsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear104-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳坤志(Kun-Chih Chen),黃美祝(Mei-Juh Huang)
dc.subject.keyword避稅行為,國稅局審查,研發支出,境外收入,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTax avoidance,IRS monitoring,R&D expenditures,Foreign operations,en
dc.relation.page57
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201600347
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2016-06-15
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:會計學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.2 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved