請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19420完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 高偉娟(Wei-Chuan Kao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ren-Yu Yao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 姚人鈺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:58:12Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-06-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
宋曜廷、陳茹玲等,2013,「中文文本可讀性探討:指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證」,中華心理學刊,第55卷第1期:75-106。 荊溪昱,1995,「中文國文教材的適讀性研究:適讀年級值的推估」,教育研究資訊,第3卷第3期:113-127。 楊孝濚,1971,「影響中文可讀性語言因素的分析」,報學,第4卷第7期:58-67。 二、 英文部分 Bakar, A. S. A., and Ameer, R. 2010. Readability of corporate social responsibility communication in Malaysia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (11): 50-60. Baghi, I., Rubaltelli, E., and Tedeschi, M. 2008. A strategy to communicate corporate social responsibility: cause related marketing and its dark side. Corporate Social and Environmental Management 16 (1): 15-26. Baker, H. E., and Kare, D. D. 1992. Relationship between annual report readability and corporate financial performance. Management Research News 15 (4): 1-4. Biddle, G., Hilary, G., and Verdi, R. 2009. How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2): 112–131. Blouin, M. C. 2010. What types of firms send a clear signal in the MD&A? Determinants of annual report readability. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics 10 (6): 15-26. Chen, T. J., Shiu, Y. M., and Chang, N. 2015. The risk management effect of corporate social responsibility on shareholder value. NTU Management Review 26 (1): 153-179. Clatworthy, M., and Jones, M. J. 2001. The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14 (3): 311-326. Core, J. 2001. A review of the empirical disclosure literature: A discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (2): 441-456. Coupland, N. 2010. Is readability real? Communication of Scientific and Technical Information 35 (2): 15-17. Courtis, J. K. 1986. An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk return relationships. Accounting and Business Research 16 (64): 285-294. Courtis, J. K. 1995. Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 (2): 4-17. Courtis, J. K. 1998. Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 11 (4): 459-471. Courtis, J. K. 2004. Corporate report obfuscation: artefact or phenomenon. The British Accounting Review 36 (5): 291-312. Dale, E., and Chall, J. S. 1949. The concept of readability. Elementary English 26 (4): 19-26. DuBay, W. H. 2004. The principles of readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information. Flesch, R. 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32 (3): 221-233. Gunning, R. 1952. The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill. Jensen, M. C. 1994. Self-interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7 (2): 1-17. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360. Klare, G. R. 2000. The measurement of readability: Useful information for communicators. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation 24 (5): 107-121. Kristina, M., and Rennekamp, S. 2012. Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (5): 50-64. Kumar, G. 2014. Determinants of readability of financial reports of U.S. listed Asian companies. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting 6 (21): 122-145. Li, F. 2008. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2): 221-247. McDonald, B. 2011. When is a liability not a liability? Journal of Finance 66 (12): 35-65. McLaughlin, G. H. 1969. SMOG grading - A new readability formula. Journal of Reading 22 (4): 639-646. Mitchell, M. L., and Mulherin, J. H. 1994. The impact of public information on the stock market. The Journal of Finance 7 (2): 77-91. Milne, M. J., and Chan, C. C. C. 1999. Narrative corporate social disclosures: how much of a difference do they make to investment decision-making? British Accounting Review 31 (4): 439-457. Nik Ahmad, N. N., Sulaiman, M., and Siswantoro, D. 2003. Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Malaysia: An analysis of annual reports of KLSE listed companies. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 11 (1): 1–37. Rutherford, B. A. 2003. Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance 7 (8): 187-210. Schroeder, N., and Gibson, C. 1990. Readability of management’s discussion and analysis. Accounting Horizons 4 (4): 78-87. Smith, J. E., and Nora, P. 1971. Readability: A measure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting. The Accounting Review 46 (3): 552-561. Smith, M., and Taffler, R. 1992. The Chairman’s Statement and corporate financial performance. Accounting and Finance 32 (2): 75-90. Smith, M., Jamil, A., Johari, Y. C., and Ahmad, S. A. 2006. The Chairman’s Statement in companies - A test of the Obfuscation Hypothesis. Asian Review of Accounting 14 (2): 49-65. Spence, A. M. 1974. Market signalling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Subramanian, R., Insley, R. G., and Blackwell, R. D. 1993. Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. The Journal of Business Communication 30 (2): 49-61. Sun Y., Wang X., and Yu Y. 2014. Readability to financial report: A comparative study of Chinese and foreign countries. Computational Sciences and Optimization 12 (3): 223-227. van den Broek, P., and Kremer, K. E. 2000. The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association 261 (3): 1-31. Ziek, P. 2009. Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16 (3): 137-145. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19420 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 既有文獻多探討財務資訊與可讀性之關聯,較少去了解較多文字紀錄的非財務資訊,故本研究欲探討強制揭露企業社會責任報告書與報告書可讀性之關聯。首先,本研究測試在我國強制規範的情況下,企業社會責任報告書之可讀性是否受公司財務績效所影響。本研究亦進而測試企業社會責任報告書之遵循準則與確信準則與可讀性之關聯。本研究透過可讀性分數與稅前息前盈餘之間的關係,發現公司財務績效越好,其企業社會責任報告書之可讀性越高,驗證了Subramanian在1993年提出的模糊性假說(Obfuscation Hypothesis)。另外,不同的遵循準則亦影響企業社會責任報告書的可讀性,當公司揭露相關的資訊越完整,企業社會責任報告書之可讀性越高,不同的確信準則亦影響企業社會責任報告書之可讀性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | While most prior literature focuses on the relationship between financial information and readability, little research examines the readability of nonfinancial information which contains more textual contents. Therefore, this research investigates the relationship of mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and its readability. First, we test whether the financial performance affects the readability of CSR report under the mandatory environment. Second, we also examine whether the readability of CSR reports is correlated with in-accordance framework and standards of assurance. We find that when a company’s performance is better, its readability of CSR report is better. This is consistent with Obfuscation Hypothesis (Subramanian 1993). We also find that the readability of CSR reports various with different in-accordance standards and different assurance standards. Readability of CSR reports is higher when the In Accordance-Comprehensive Standard or the AA1000 Assurance Standard is used. This thesis was wrote in Chinese. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:58:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03722053-1.pdf: 1185597 bytes, checksum: b236bc7e49233a58b46a7a2d9fbe83b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………………i
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 可讀性公式的相關文獻 5 第二節 財務資訊可讀性的相關文獻 7 第三節 非財務資訊可讀性的相關文獻 8 第四節 企業社會責任報告書可讀性的相關文獻 10 第三章 研究假說與方法 11 第一節 研究假說 11 第二節 變數衡量 14 第三節 實證模型 18 第四節 樣本與資料 19 第四章 實證結果 20 第一節 敘述性統計 20 第二節 實證結果與分析 24 第三節 額外測試 30 第五章 研究結論、研究限制與建議 35 第一節 研究結論 35 第二節 研究限制與建議 36 參考文獻 37 附錄 41 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 強制揭露企業社會責任報告書與可讀性之關聯 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relationship of Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Readability | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林世銘(Su-Ming Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃美祝(Mei-Juh Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 強制揭露,永續性報告指南,企業社會責任,可讀性,模糊性假說, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Mandatory Disclosure,Global Reporting Initiative Guideline,CSR,Readability,Obfuscation Hypothesis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600574 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-06-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.16 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
