請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19260完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥(Andy Ruey-Shan Guo),蔣明晃(David Ming-Huang Chiang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chuan Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉育銓 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:51:00Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 古政倫 (2015),考量不同碳稅與載具載運量之存貨模式。臺灣大學工業工程所未發表論文
2. 类偉李、李萌(2011)《低碳經濟規劃:理論,方法,模型》。社會科學文獻出版社 3. 林嘉驊(2007),國際複合式運輸路線規劃策略之研究。逢甲大學 4. 陳良華、李文(2004)供應鏈管理的演進與研究框架的解析。東南大學學報, NO.1 Jan 5. 錢弘道(2005) 《經濟分析法學》。法律出版社 6. 蕭代基(2010),碳稅與碳交易:政府減碳管理的重要政策如何搭配?,永續產業發展雙月刊,NO.49 Apr.36-42 7. Baumol, W.J. & Oates, W.,(1975). The theory of environment policy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J(1975) 8. Bae, S. H., Sarkis, J., & Yoo, C. S.(2011). Greening transportation fleets: Insights from a two-stage game theoretic model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transprotation Review, 47(6), 793-807. 9. Bouchery, Y., Ghaffari, A., Jemai, Z., & Dallery, Y.(2011). Adjust or invest: What is the best option to green a supply chain.Tech. rep., Labpratpire Genie Industriel, Ecole Centrale Paris. 10. Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M.(2013). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 10(1), 99-116 11. Carbontrust.(2006). Carbon footprint in supply chain: the next step for businesss 12. Carolyn C. Pertsova(2007)Ecological Economics Research Trends 13. Chen, X., Benjaafar, S. & El Omri, A.,(2013). The carbon-constrained EOQ. Operations Research Letters. 41(2), 172-179 14. Cholette, S. & Venkat, K.,(2009). The energy and carbon intensity of wine distribution: a study of logistical options for delivering wine to consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production. 17(16), 1401-1413. 15. David, J.C., Cheri, S. & Nathan M.,(2011). Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: the role of supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39(1),101-116 16. DiPeso, J. (2009). Carbon tax versus cap-and-trade. Environmental Quality Management. 18(4), 95-100. 17. Forrester, J., 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Wiley, New York 18. Ganeshan, R., & Harrison, T.P.(1995). An introduction to supply chain management. Department of Management Science and Information Systems, Penn State University. 19. Harris, I., Naim, M., Palmer, A., Potter, A., & Mumford C.(2011). Assessing the impact of cost optimization based on infrastructure modeling on CO2 emissions. International Journal of Production Economics. 131(1), 313-321. 20. Harris, I., Mumford C., Naim M.,(2009). Multi-objective uncapacitated facility location model for Green Logistics, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Trondheim, Norway, May 18-2 21. Herck, J.B., Miner, R.B.,(1940).Distribution Costs.(New York: Ronald) 22. Hua, G., Cheng, T.C.E., Wang, S.,(2011)Managing carbon footprints in inventory management, International Journal of Production Economics, 132(2), 178~18 23. IPCC(2007) Technical Summary. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 24. ISO14040(2006)Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework 25. Kutanoglu, E., Lohiya, D.,(2008). Integrated inventory and transportation mode selection: A service parts logistic system. Transprtation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5), 665-683 26. Liu, B., Holmbom, M., Segerstedt, A., & Chen, W.(2015). Effects of carbon emission regulations on remanufacturing decisions with limited information of demand distribution. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 532-548 27. Liu, Z. L., Anderson, T.D., & Cruz, J. M.(2012). Consumer environmental awarenesss and competition in two-stage supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(3), 602-613 28. Letmathe, P., Balakrishnan, N.,(2005). Environmental considerations on the optimal product mix. European Journal of Operational Research 167(2), 398-412 29. Lewis, H. T., (1956). The Role of Air Freight in Physical Distributio. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of research 30. Marintek, T., (2000) Study of Greenhouse gas emiisions from ships. 31. McKinnon, A.C., Cullinane, S., Browne, M. and Whiteing, A.(2010)Green Logistics: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics. London, United Kingdom: Kogan Page. 32. Penkuhn, T., Spengler, T., Puchert, H. & Rentz, O., (1997). Environmental integrated production planning for the ammonia synthesis. European Journal of Operational Research 97(2), 327-336. 33. Posner, R. A. (1998). Creating a legal framework for economic development. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 1-11. 34. Srivastava, S.K., (2007) Green supply-chain management: A state-of the-art literature review. International Journal of management Reviews 9(1), 53-80. 35. Stock, K.R., Boyer, S.L. & Harmon, T., (2010). Research opportunities in supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38(1), 32-41 36. Toomey, J. W. (2000). Cost Concepts. In Inventory Management(pp. 13-27). Springer US. 37. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W.(1998). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth(NO.9). New Society Publishers. 38. Wu, L. C., & Wu, L. H. (2015). Improving the global supply chain through service engineering: a services science, management, and engineering-based framework. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(1), 24-31. 網路資料 行政院環保署台灣產品碳足跡資訊網(2016) https://cfp.epa.gov.tw/carbon/defaultPage.aspx Accenture (2009). Only one in 10 companies actively manage their supply chain carbon footprints. Accenture Study Finds | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19260 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 由於溫室效應日益嚴重,使得關於全球暖化的議題越來越受重視,企業為了符合社會期望及政府政策,也須將碳排放量考慮進決策議題裡。有別於傳統存貨機制總是將最小化總成本為導向,現在的管理機制除了考慮成本外,還需考慮對環境的影響,故將碳稅考慮進存貨管理模式有其發展的必要。
在過去使用最適經濟訂購量(EOQ)模型對零售方面的研究,大多只考慮碳交易系統的構面或未將載具大小載運量限制考慮進去。而有將載具大小限制考慮進最適經濟訂購量模型的研究中,卻只有討論單種載具的變化,但在現實中的廠商卻並非只能擁有一種載具來載運貨物。 本論文將從零售商的觀點建構兩種載具下的EOQ碳稅模型,並以碳稅中的從量稅機制為代表,來探討零售商面臨碳稅壓力及兩種載具大小限制下如何分配載具車輛數以及如何進行存貨管理,使企業可以達到總成本最小化的目標,並解釋其背後的管理意涵,可幫助企業發展存貨管理。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Due to the growing greenhouse effect, issues about global warming are more important. Retailers must take carbon emission into the decision-making, in order to meet the social expectation and the government policy.
The study of inventory management used to implement EOQ model, but most of studies just engaged into carbon-trade system or didn’t consider vehicle loadings. Studies include considering vehicle loadings only discussed one type of vehicle loading, but it can have many types of vehicle loadings in real world. In this thesis, we first put two types of vehicle loadings into build inventory models with unit tax of carbon emission. Next, we use an example to explain how we apply these models to observe inventory management operation. Finally, we use experiment data to provide recommendations for retailers as references. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:51:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03546008-1.pdf: 2836545 bytes, checksum: 692f546af9d5f660d7319103e2a1ac15 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 目錄 III 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 1 1.2研究目的 4 1.3研究架構 4 1.4 論文架構 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 2.1供應鏈管理 7 2.1.1綠色供應鏈 8 2.1.2 綠色營運 9 2.1.3 貨物運輸 10 2.2碳足跡 11 2.2.1 減碳政策 12 2.2.2 碳交易 12 2.2.3碳稅 13 2.2.4 碳交易與碳稅之比較 14 2.3存貨管理 14 2.3.1 碳排放相關之經濟最適訂購模型 15 2.4小結 16 第三章、模型建構與求解 18 3.1研究問題描述 18 3.2 模型假設 19 3.3 模型符號說明 19 3.4模型建構 21 3.4.1 碳排放量之評估方式 21 3.4.2.1 從量稅管制最小化總成本模型 22 3.5 求解辦法 23 第四章 數值範例與分析 25 4.1 數據資料: 25 4.2 從量稅管制下兩種載具之個案分析 26 4.2.1 模型求解 26 4.2.2 數據資料分析小結 28 4.3 敏感度分析 32 4.3.1 固定派車成本K對於兩種載具派出組合的影響 33 4.3.2 持有成本h對於兩種載具派出組合的影響 35 4.3.3 從量稅稅率τ對於兩種載具派出組合的影響 38 4.3.4 載具二與載具一固定派車成本比值A對於兩種載具派出組合的影響 40 4.4 小結 43 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 44 5.1研究結論與管理意涵 44 5.2 研究貢獻 45 5.3研究限制 46 5.4未來發展方向 46 參考文獻 47 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 考量在碳從量稅下兩種載具之存貨模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Inventory Model of Two Vehicle Loadings With Unit Tax of Carbon Emission | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪一薰(I-Hsuan Ethan Hong),吳政鴻(Cheng-Hung Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 存貨管理,最適經濟訂購量模型,載運量,多種載具組合,碳稅, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Inventory management,Economic Order Quantity,Carbon Tax,Multiple combinations of vehicles,Vehicle carrying capacity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 51 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601323 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.77 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
