Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 微生物學科所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19064
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor孫錦虹(Chin-Hung Sun)
dc.contributor.authorHuai Chuangen
dc.contributor.author莊淮zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T01:43:53Z-
dc.date.copyright2016-08-26
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-08-16
dc.identifier.citation1. Adam RD: Biology of Giardia lamblia. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001, 14:447-475.
2. DuPont HL: Giardia: both a harmless commensal and a devastating pathogen. J Clin Invest 2013, 123:2352-2354.
3. Nash TE: Surface antigenic variation in Giardia lamblia. Mol Microbiol 2002, 45:585-590.
4. Luján HD, Mowatt MR, Conrad JT, Bowers B, Nash TE: Identification of a novel Giardia lamblia cyst wall protein with leucine-rich repeats. Implications for secretory granule formation and protein assembly into the cyst wall. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:29307-29313.
5. Sun C-H, McCaffery JM, Reiner DS, Gillin FD: Mining the Giardia lamblia genome for new cyst wall proteins. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:21701-21708.
6. Corbett KD, Berger JM: Structure, molecular mechanisms, and evolutionary relationships in DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2004, 33:95-118.
7. Champoux JJ: DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem 2001, 70:369-413.
8. Forterre P, Gribaldo S, Gadelle D, Serre M-C: Origin and evolution of DNA topoisomerases. Biochimie 2007, 89:427-446.
9. Stewart L, Redinbo MR, Qiu X, Hol WG, Champoux JJ: A model for the mechanism of human topoisomerase I. Science 1998, 279:1534-1541.
10. Wang JC: Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3:430-440.
11. Mankouri HW, Hickson ID: The RecQ helicase-topoisomerase III-Rmi1 complex: a DNA structure-specific 'dissolvasome'? Trends Biochem Sci 2007, 32:538-546.
12. Zhu CX, Tse-Dinh YC: The acidic triad conserved in type IA DNA topoisomerases is required for binding of Mg(II) and subsequent conformational change. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:5318-5322.
13. Zhang HL, Malpure S, Li Z, Hiasa H, DiGate RJ: The role of the carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues in Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase III-mediated catalysis. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:9039-9045.
14. Changela A, DiGate RJ, Mondragón A: Crystal structure of a complex of a type IA DNA topoisomerase with a single-stranded DNA molecule. Nature 2001, 411:1077-1081.
15. Maftahi M, Han CS, Langston LD, Hope JC, Zigouras N, Freyer GA: The top3(+) gene is essential in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the lethality associated with its loss is caused by Rad12 helicase activity. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27:4715-4724.
16. Wallis JW, Chrebet G, Brodsky G, Rolfe M, Rothstein R: A hyper-recombination mutation in S. cerevisiae identifies a novel eukaryotic topoisomerase. Cell 1989, 58:409-419.
17. Wu J, Feng L, Hsieh T-s: Drosophila topo IIIalpha is required for the maintenance of mitochondrial genome and male germ-line stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:6228-6233.
18. Mönnich M, Hess I, Wiest W, Bachrati C, Hickson ID, Schorpp M, Boehm T: Developing T lymphocytes are uniquely sensitive to a lack of topoisomerase III alpha. Eur J Immunol 2010, 40:2379-2384.
19. Viard T, de la Tour CB: Type IA topoisomerases: a simple puzzle? Biochimie 2007, 89:456-467.
20. Li Z, Mondragón A, Hiasa H, Marians KJ, DiGate RJ: Identification of a unique domain essential for Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase III-catalysed decatenation of replication intermediates. Mol Microbiol 2000, 35:888-895.
21. Wu L, Hickson ID: The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 2003, 426:870-874.
22. L. J-Y: The effect of topoisomerase Ⅲalpha on the cyst wall gene expression of Gardia lamblia. 2014.
23. Aravind L, Leipe DD, Koonin EV: Toprim--a conserved catalytic domain in type IA and II topoisomerases, DnaG-type primases, OLD family nucleases and RecR proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1998, 26:4205-4213.
24. Bristow RG, Hill RP: Hypoxia and metabolism. Hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability. Nat Rev Cancer 2008, 8:180-192.
25. Lindahl T, Barnes DE: Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2000, 65:127-133.
26. Chlebowicz E, Jachymczyk WJ: Repair of MMS-induced DNA double-strand breaks in haploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which requires the presence of a duplicate genome. Mol Gen Genet 1979, 167:279-286.
27. Beranek DT: Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. Mutat Res 1990, 231:11-30.
28. Lindahl T, Wood RD: Quality control by DNA repair. Science 1999, 286:1897-1905.
29. Krogh BO, Symington LS: Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2004, 38:233-271.
30. Myung K, Kolodner RD: Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003, 2:243-258.
31. Keister DB: Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1983, 77:487-488.
32. Goulaouic H, Roulon T, Flamand O, Grondard L, Lavelle F, Riou JF: Purification and characterization of human DNA topoisomerase IIIalpha. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27:2443-2450.
33. Mah L-J, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC: gammaH2AX: a sensitive molecular marker of DNA damage and repair. Leukemia 2010, 24:679-686.
34. Fritz E, Elsea SH, Patel PI, Meyn MS: Overexpression of a truncated human topoisomerase III partially corrects multiple aspects of the ataxia-telangiectasia phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:4538-4542.
35. Mimitou EP, Symington LS: Nucleases and helicases take center stage in homologous recombination. Cell press, 34.
36. Christmann M, Kaina B: Transcriptional regulation of human DNA repair genes following genotoxic stress: trigger mechanisms, inducible responses and genotoxic adaptation. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:8403-8420.
37. Yuan J, Adamski R, Chen J: Focus on histone variant H2AX: to be or not to be. FEBS Lett 2010, 584:3717-3724.
38. Ramsay RG, Gonda TJ: MYB function in normal and cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 2008, 8:523-534.
39. Sun C-H, Palm D, McArthur AG, Svärd SG, Gillin FD: A novel Myb-related protein involved in transcriptional activation of encystation genes in Giardia lamblia. Mol Microbiol 2002, 46:971-984.
40. Sunter NJ, Cowell IG, Willmore E, Watters GP, Austin CA: Role of Topoisomerase IIβ in DNA Damage Response following IR and Etoposide. J Nucleic Acids 2010, 2010.
41. Gupta RS, Aitken K, Falah M, Singh B: Cloning of Giardia lamblia heat shock protein HSP70 homologs: implications regarding origin of eukaryotic cells and of endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91:2895-2899.
42. Liu K, Lin F-T, Ruppert JM, Lin W-C: Regulation of E2F1 by BRCT domain-containing protein TopBP1. Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23:3287-3304.
43. Ng SW, Liu Y, Hasselblatt KT, Mok SC, Berkowitz RS: A new human topoisomerase III that interacts with SGS1 protein. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27:993-1000.
44. Cho YH, Park JY, Han SY, Chung IK: Identification of the functional elements in the promoter region of human DNA topoisomerase IIIbeta gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004, 1679:272-278.
45. Yamane K, Wu X, Chen J: A DNA damage-regulated BRCT-containing protein, TopBP1, is required for cell survival. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:555-566.
46. Mordes DA, Glick GG, Zhao RX, Cortez D: TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes & Development 2008, 22:1478-1489.
47. Germann SM, Oestergaard VH, Haas C, Salis P, Motegi A, Lisby M: Dpb11/TopBP1 plays distinct roles in DNA replication, checkpoint response and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10:210-224.
48. Yamane K, Kawabata M, Tsuruo T: A DNA-topoisomerase-II-binding protein with eight repeating regions similar to DNA-repair enzymes and to a cell-cycle regulator. Eur J Biochem 1997, 250:794-799.
49. Lusetti SL, Cox MM: The bacterial RecA protein and the recombinational DNA repair of stalled replication forks. Annu Rev Biochem 2002, 71:71-100.
50. Hodgson A, Terentyev Y, Johnson RA, Bishop-Bailey A, Angevin T, Croucher A, Goldman ASH: Mre11 and Exo1 contribute to the initiation and processivity of resection at meiotic double-strand breaks made independently of Spo11. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10:138-148.
51. Gali H, Juhasz S, Morocz M, Hajdu I, Fatyol K, Szukacsov V, Burkovics P, Haracska L: Role of SUMO modification of human PCNA at stalled replication fork. Nucleic Acids Research 2012, 40:6049-6059.
52. Pan YJ, Kao, Y. Y., & Sun, C. H.: A Novel WRKY-like protein involved in transcriptional activation of cyst wall protein genes in Giardia lamblia. J Biol Chem 2009.
53. Sun CH, Palm D, McArthur AG, Svard SG, Gillin FD: A novel Myb-related protein involved in transcriptional activation of encystation genes in Giardia lamblia. Molecular Microbiology 2002, 46:971-984.
54. Huang YC, Su LH, Lee GA, Chiu PW, Cho CC, Wu JY, Sun CH: Regulation of Cyst Wall Protein Promoters by Myb2 in Giardia lamblia. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2008, 283:31021-31029.
55. Pedersen RT, Kruse T, Nilsson J, Oestergaard VH, Lisby M: TopBP1 is required at mitosis to reduce transmission of DNA damage to G1 daughter cells. Journal of Cell Biology 2015, 210:565-582.
56. Mäkiniemi M, Hillukkala T, Tuusa J, Reini K, Vaara M, Huang D, Pospiech H, Majuri I, Westerling T, Mäkelä TP, Syväoja JE: BRCT domain-containing protein TopBP1 functions in DNA replication and damage response. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:30399-30406.
57. Hong S, Cheng S, Iovane A, Laimins LA: STAT-5 Regulates Transcription of the Topoisomerase IIβ-Binding Protein 1 (TopBP1) Gene To Activate the ATR Pathway and Promote Human Papillomavirus Replication. MBio 2015, 6:e02006-02015.
58. Kim J-E, McAvoy SA, Smith DI, Chen J: Human TopBP1 ensures genome integrity during normal S phase. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25:10907-10915.
59. Broderick R, Nieminuszczy J, Blackford AN, Winczura A, Niedzwiedz W: TOPBP1 recruits TOP2A to ultra-fine anaphase bridges to aid in their resolution. Nat Commun 2015, 6:6572.
60. Araki H, Leem SH, Phongdara A, Sugino A: Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92:11791-11795.
61. Saka Y, Esashi F, Matsusaka T, Mochida S, Yanagida M: Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev 1997, 11:3387-3400.
62. Fenech M, Carr AM, Murray J, Watts FZ, Lehmann AR: Cloning and characterization of the rad4 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe; a gene showing short regions of sequence similarity to the human XRCC1 gene. Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19:6737-6741.
63. Glover CCYLaJNM: BRCT domains
Easy as one, two, three. Cell Cycle 10:15, 2461-2470 2011.
64. Zhang X, Moréra S, Bates PA, Whitehead PC, Coffer AI, Hainbucher K, Nash RA, Sternberg MJ, Lindahl T, Freemont PS: Structure of an XRCC1 BRCT domain: a new protein-protein interaction module. EMBO J 1998, 17:6404-6411.
65. Glover JNM, Williams RS, Lee MS: Interactions between BRCT repeats and phosphoproteins: tangled up in two. Trends Biochem Sci 2004, 29:579-585.
66. Rodriguez MC, Songyang Z: BRCT domains: phosphopeptide binding and signaling modules. Front Biosci 2008, 13:5905-5915.
67. Bork P, Hofmann K, Bucher P, Neuwald AF, Altschul SF, Koonin EV: A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J 1997, 11:68-76.
68. Gong Z, Kim J-E, Leung CCY, Glover JNM, Chen J: BACH1/FANCJ acts with TopBP1 and participates early in DNA replication checkpoint control. Mol Cell 2010, 37:438-446.
69. Kobayashi M, Ab E, Bonvin AMJJ, Siegal G: Structure of the DNA-bound BRCA1 C-terminal region from human replication factor C p140 and model of the protein-DNA complex. J Biol Chem 2010, 285:10087-10097.
70. Burbelo PD, Utani A, Pan ZQ, Yamada Y: Cloning of the large subunit of activator 1 (replication factor C) reveals homology with bacterial DNA ligases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993, 90:11543-11547.
71. Tsurimoto T, Stillman B: Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. II. Switching of DNA polymerase alpha and delta during initiation of leading and lagging strand synthesis. J Biol Chem 1991, 266:1961-1968.
72. Allen BL, Uhlmann F, Gaur LK, Mulder BA, Posey KL, Jones LB, Hardin SH: DNA recognition properties of the N-terminal DNA binding domain within the large subunit of replication factor C. Nucleic Acids Res 1998, 26:3877-3882.
73. Kobayashi M, Figaroa F, Meeuwenoord N, Jansen LET, Siegal G: Characterization of the DNA binding and structural properties of the BRCT region of human replication factor C p140 subunit. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:4308-4317.
74. Yamane K, Katayama E, Tsuruo T: The BRCT regions of tumor suppressor BRCA1 and of XRCC1 show DNA end binding activity with a multimerizing feature. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000, 279:678-684.
75. Yamane K, Tsuruo T: Conserved BRCT regions of TopBP1 and of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 bind strand breaks and termini of DNA. Oncogene 1999, 18:5194-5203.
76. Sharma S, Helchowski CM, Canman CE: The roles of DNA polymerase ζ and the Y family DNA polymerases in promoting or preventing genome instability. Mutat Res 2013, 743-744:97-110.
77. Pan Y-Jea: A Novel WRKY-like Protein Involved in Transcriptional Activation of Cyst Wall Protein Genes in Giardia Lamblia. The Journal of Biological Chemistry PMC 2009, 284.27:17975-17988.
78. al. B-CLe: Characterization and Functional Study of Topoisomerase II in Giardia lamblia. 2011.
79. Greenberg RA, Sobhian B, Pathania S, Cantor SB, Nakatani Y, Livingston DM: Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes. Genes & Development 2006, 20:34-46.
80. Budd ME, Campbell JL: DNA polymerases required for repair of UV-induced damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15:2173-2179.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19064-
dc.description.abstract梨形鞭毛蟲是一種真核單細胞的原蟲類人畜共通寄生蟲,感染區域遍布全球。在生活史上分為滋養體以及囊體兩種型態:囊體透過水源或受汙染的食物進入人體,在小腸上壁形成較活躍的滋養體型態,大量分裂產生疾病,最後再次形成囊體排出體外。其主要症狀為輕微腹瀉、腹痛,脫水和營養不良等。無論是細胞複製,或是從染色體套數16N的囊體轉變為4N的滋養體的過程,遺傳物質DNA的複製、重組、轉錄等步驟都是極為重要且需要精準表現的,而DNA從原本穩定的超螺旋結構解開時,會因為緊密纏繞而遇到許多拓樸學上的問題,這時便需要拓樸異構酶的協助,才能使DNA表現正常的功能。此篇研究分為兩個部分:
第一部分為梨形鞭毛蟲拓樸異構酶IIIα (後面皆簡稱為gTOP3α)之研究。拓樸異構酶IIIα具有第一型拓樸異構酶功能,能夠切割單股DNA緩解DNA纏繞。在大部分真核生物體內,則會與RecQ family、RMI蛋白質形成RTR complex,協助增強DNA同源染色體交換以及DNA的修復作用。實驗室在先前發現了梨形鞭毛蟲的gTOP3α基因。先前已發現在大量表現gTOP3α後會降低囊體化時期的重要蛋白質cyst wall protein(cwp)表現量,且在gTOP3α的突變株中也會減緩對囊體壁蛋白質的抑制作用。此研究中,經過體外測試發現,gTOP3α蛋白質能夠與DNA進行結合,但在將gTOP3α C端的zinc finger結構刪除後,造成對DNA的結合能力大幅下降。我們發現在大量表現gTOP3α的梨形鞭毛蟲滋養體內,作為DNA損傷標記物Phospho-Histone H2A.X (ser139) (γH2AX)表現量上升,因此我們懷疑gTOP3α的大量表現和造成DNA損傷有關。於是我們在梨形鞭毛蟲WB蟲株的培養液中,加入導致DNA損傷的methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)藥物,發現在加入MMS的實驗組細胞產生明顯的死亡。透過realtime PCR發現,梨形鞭毛蟲體內和細胞ER stress的bip和mlf 的RNA及蛋白質表現量均有上升的現象;在參與減數分裂之同源重組(homologous recombination, HR)有關的梨形鞭毛蟲dmc1b基因的RNA也有顯著上升。由於真核生物在進行雙股DNA斷裂修復作用時,進行同源重組會需要topoisomerase IIIα的參與,而我們也發現gTOP3α及gTOP3β的RNA在加入MMS後表現出些微上升;而與DNA修復相關的TOPBP1也表現出上升,而協助斷裂DNA接合的Spo11 RNA也表現出些微上升。將大量表現gTOP3α的細胞株中加入MMS後,以免疫沉澱法(Immunoprecipitation, IP)也發現gTOP3α會與轉錄因子Myb2和轉錄因子WRKY進行直接或間接的結合。
我們的研究結果顯示,梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α參與在DNA修復作用,並能與調控囊體化相關轉錄因子產生交互作用。
第二部分為梨形鞭毛蟲拓樸異構酶II結合蛋白1 (gTOPBP1)之研究。首先我們從梨形鞭毛蟲基因體資料庫中找到了一標記為DNA修復基因,編號為6918。經過物種親緣關係和胺基酸結構預測後,發現這個基因與其他物種的拓樸異構酶II結合蛋白1 (Topoisomerase II-binding protein1, TOPBP1)的序列相似度較高,因此我們稱之為gTOPBP1。為了了解梨形鞭毛蟲 gTOPBP1是否具有我們已知的TOPBP1功能,像是活化DNA受損反應的重要上游蛋白質進行DNA修復、聚集並協助拓樸異構酶II活化等功能,以及在演化較早期的梨形鞭毛蟲體內,扮演什麼樣的角色。首先我們使用RT-PCR來偵測gTOPBP1 RNA在滋養體及囊體化時期的RNA表現量,發現gTOPBP1 RNA表現量在囊體化時期有增加。於是建構了gTOPBP1重組蛋白質的質體,轉染至梨形鞭毛蟲體內,以免疫螢光染色的方式觀察,發現在囊體化時期gTOPBP1會大量表現於細胞核內。我們也設計了將BRCT結構刪除的gTOPBP1m1,發現在滋養體及囊體化時期,gTOPBP1m1皆表現於細胞質內。接著利用西方墨點法分析在大量表現gTOPBP1和gTOPBP1m1的梨形鞭毛蟲滋養體及囊體化時期,對囊體壁蛋白質cwp1的影響,發現在滋養體時期gTOPBP1會抑制cwp1蛋白質的表現量,gTOPBP1m1也會抑制cwp1,但抑制效果較gTOPBP1低;在囊體時期,gTOPBP1會增加cwp1蛋白質的表現量,gTOPBP1m1也會增加cwp1表現,但效果較gTOPBP1低;在形成囊體的數量也得到與cwp1蛋白質改變相同的結果。而在電泳位移實驗中,也發現gTOPBP1能夠結合被EcoRI切割過的直線狀DNA,而gTOPBP1m1的結合能力則較gTOPBP1弱。
我們的研究結果顯示,梨形鞭毛蟲的gTOPBP1會在囊體化大量表現,能活化囊體化相關基因的表現,並且具有DNA結合的能力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractGiardia lamblia is a kind of eukaryotic protozoan zoonosis parasite that belongs to Excavata and spreads all over the world. Through the life cycle of Giardia, there are two forms, trophozoite and cyst. When cyst form transmits to host by contaminated water or food, it turns into the more active trophozoite form in duodenum. Trophozoite divides and causes symptom on hosts. Finally, the life cycle ends by turning into cyst again and pass to the environment. Disease that caused by Giardia called giardiasis. General symptoms are mild diarrhea, stomach, dehydration and malnutrition. During the replication of cell or transformation between cysts and trophozoites, there should be very precise control in the process of DNA replication, recombination and transcription. There will be some topology problems when DNA is relaxed from supercoiled form. Therefore, topoisomerase is needed to make a regular function for DNA. The thesis includes two parts:
The first part is the research of Giardia Topoisomerase IIIα (gTOP3α). Topoisomerase IIIα has the type I topoisomerase functions, because it is able to cut single strand DNA to relax DNA. In most of eukaryotic creatures, topoisomerase IIIα will interact with RecQ family and RMI protein forming RTR complex to induce DNA homologous recombination and DNA damage repair. We have identified the gTOP3α gene of G. lamblia. According to previous study, overexpression of gTOP3α will reduce cyst wall protein (cwp), an important protein of encystation in Giardia. In this study, with Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA), we found that gTOP3α protein has DNA binding function in vitro. The ability of DNA binding reduced when the C-terminal zinc finger domain was deleted. Furthermore, the amount of DNA damage marker Phospho-Histone H2A.X ser139 (γH2AX) increased by overexpression of gTOP3α. We wondered if there is a connection between gTOP3α expression and DNA damage. So we treated methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) that induced DNA damage in Giardia WB isolate and found MMS caused cell death obviously. Then we used realtime PCR to detect the expression changes, we found the product of bip and mlf genes which increase after ER stress also increased in both RNA and protein level. Dmc1b that plays a role in homologous recombination also increased in RNA level. Topoisomerase IIIα is required in eukaryotes when DNA double strand break is repaired by homologous recombination, we found gTOP3α and gTOP3β RNA increased slightly. The DNA repair gene TOPBP1, also increased in RNA level after treatment of MMS to Giardia. Spo11 which has functions in repairing of DNA breaks also increased in RNA level after treatment of MMS to Giardia. We suggest that gTOP3α has function in DNA repairing and interacts with encystation transcription factors.
The second part is research of Giardia Topoisomerase II-binding protein 1 (gTOPBP1). We found a gene number 6918 is labeled as DNA repair gene by Giardia database. And we found this gene has similarity sequence with Topoisomerase II-binding protein1 (TOPBP1), therefore we named it as gTOPBP1. In most of eukaryotic creatures, TOPBP1 helps activation of ATM-ATR pathway to help DNA repair and interacts with Topoisomerase II. In order to know the role of gTOPBP1 in Giardia lamblia. First, we used RT-PCR to determine the RNA expression of gTOPBP1 in trophozoite and encystation stages. We found gTOPBP1 RNA was expressed more in encystation. Immunofluorescence assay revealed that gTOPBP1 was major localized in nucleus in encystation. We also designed a mutant with a deletion of BRCT domain, gTOPBP1m1. Immunofluorescence assay revealed that gTOPBP1m1 was major localized in cytosol in trophozoite and encystation stage. In the result of western blot, we found overexpression of gTOPBP1 reduced the expression of cwp1 in trophozoite stage. gTOPBP1m1 reduced less cwp1 than gTOPBP1 in trophozoite stage. Overexpression of gTOPBP1 induced the expression of cwp1 in encystation stage. gTOPBP1m1 induced less cwp1 than gTOPBP1 in encystation stage. The cyst formation test reveals the same results as cwp1 protein changing. By electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we found that gTOPBP1 have ability to bind linear form DNA cut with EcoRI. gTOPBP1m1 has less ability to bind DNA. To sum up, this study suggests that gTOPBP1 plays an important role in DNA damage repair and in induction of the cwp1 protein and encystation relating transcription factors.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:43:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03445203-1.pdf: 7941595 bytes, checksum: 3ce0c3ba901e1defc6e1532e60b01d88 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 i
中文摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iv
目錄(CONTENTS) vi
第一部分. 梨形鞭毛蟲拓樸異構酶IIIα之分析與功能鑑定 xi
第一章 前言(Introduction) 1
1.1 梨形鞭毛蟲簡介 1
1.2 拓樸異構酶 2
1.3 梨形鞭毛蟲拓樸異構酶IIIα 3
1.4 梨形鞭毛蟲的DNA修復功能 3
1.5 Methyl methane sulfonate(MMS)藥物作用 4
1.6 研究動機 4
第二章 材料與方法(Materials and Methods) 6
2.1 梨形鞭毛蟲之細胞株培養(G. lamblia Culture) 6
2.2 轉殖質體之轉型與萃取 6
2.2.1 質體轉型(Transform) 6
2.2.2 質體萃取(Plasmid preparation) 6
2.2.3 質體轉染(Transfection) 6
2.3 重組蛋白質純化 7
2.4 電泳位移實驗 (Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, EMSA) 7
2.5 西方墨點法(Western Blot Analysis)與Coomassie Blue染色 8
2.5.1 TCA蛋白質沉澱 8
2.5.2 西方墨點法(Western Blot Analysis) 8
2.5.3 Coomassie Blue染色 8
2.6 免疫沉澱法(Immunoprecipitation, IP) 9
2.7 反轉錄聚合酶鍊式反應(Semi-quantitative RT-PCR Analysis, RT-PCR) 9
2.8 即時定量反轉錄聚合酶鍊式反應(Quantitive real-time polymerase chain reaction, qPCR) 11
2.9 染色質免疫沉澱(Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, ChIP) 12
2.10 Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)藥物測試 14
2.10.1 梨形鞭毛蟲MMS藥物致死率測試 14
2.10.2 梨形鞭毛蟲 MMS藥物處理 14
第三章 實驗結果(Results) 15
3.1 梨形鞭毛蟲之gTOP3α的DNA結合能力及突變對於DNA的結合能力的影響 15
3.2 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α會增加DNA損傷標記γH2AX蛋白質的表現量 15
3.3 梨形鞭毛蟲WB蟲株在囊體化時期γH2AX表現量下降 16
3.4 梨形鞭毛蟲在MMS藥物作用下會導致細胞死亡 16
3.5 梨形鞭毛蟲滋養體在MMS作用下mRNA的表現量改變 16
3.6 梨形鞭毛蟲滋養體在MMS作用下蛋白質表現量的改變 17
3.7 MMS對於gTOP3α蛋白質表現量的影響 17
3.8 gTOP3α大量表現對於MMS作用的影響 17
3.9 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α蛋白質在MMS作用下能與轉錄因子Myb2及WRKY進行交互作用 18
3.10 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α蛋白質在MMS作用下能與囊體壁蛋白質基因和轉錄因子基因啟動子進行交互作用 19
第四章 討論(Discussion) 20
4.1 梨形鞭毛蟲之gTOP3α對於DNA的結合能力分析 20
4.2 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α增加DNA損傷標記γH2AX蛋白質 21
4.3 梨形鞭毛蟲在MMS作用後的影響 21
4.4 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α蛋白質在MMS作用後與轉錄因子的交互作用 22
4.5 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α蛋白質在MMS作用後與囊體化相關基因啟動子的交互作用 22
附圖 24
圖一、梨形鞭毛蟲gTOP3α與突變蛋白質的DNA結合能力 25
圖二、gTOP3α可誘導DNA損傷標記物γH2AX表現量增加 27
圖三、梨形鞭毛蟲WB蟲株在不同時期的γH2AX表現量 28
圖四.梨形鞭毛蟲WB蟲株在MMS作用後的改變 30
圖五. MMS作用後對於gTOP3α蛋白質表現量的影響不變 32
圖六.gTOP3α大量表現會減緩MMS所造成的DNA損傷反應 33
圖七.在MMS作用後gTOP3α會與轉錄因子Myb2及WRKY產生交互作用 34
圖八.在MMS作用後gTOP3α蛋白質能與囊體壁蛋白質基因及轉錄因子基因啟動子結合 35
附表 36
表一.梨形鞭毛蟲在MMS作用下mRNA及蛋白質改變趨勢比較 36
第二部分. 梨形鞭毛蟲拓樸異構酶II結合蛋白1之分析與功能鑑定 37
第一章 前言(Introduction) 38
1.1 梨形鞭毛蟲簡介 38
1.2 拓樸異構酶II結合蛋白1 (TOPBP1) 39
1.3 BRCT domain 39
1.4 研究動機 40
第二章 實驗方法與材料(Materials and Methods) 41
2.1 梨形鞭毛蟲之細胞株培養(G. lamblia Culture) 41
2.2 轉殖質體的建構 41
2.2.1 5'Δ5N-pac 41
2.2.2 pPTOPBP1 41
2.2.3 pPTOPBP1m1 41
2.3 質體轉型與萃取 42
2.3.1 質體轉型(Transform) 42
2.3.2 質體萃取(Plasmid preparation) 42
2.4 質體轉染(Transfection) 43
2.5 反轉錄聚合酶鍊式反應(Semi-quantitative RT-PCR Analysis, RT-PCR) 43
2.6 即時定量反轉錄聚合酶鍊式反應(Quantitive real-time polymerase chain reaction, qPCR) 44
2.7 免疫螢光染色(Immunofluorescence assay, IFA) 45
2.8 西方墨點法與Coomassie Blue染色 45
2.8.1 TCA蛋白質沉澱 45
2.8.2 西方墨點法(Western Blot Analysis) 46
2.8.3 Coomassie Blue染色 46
2.9 免疫沉澱法(Immunoprecipitation, IP) 46
2.10 染色質免疫沉澱(Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, ChIP) 47
2.11 重組蛋白質gTOPBP1及突變gTOPBP1表現載體建構 48
2.11.1 重組gTOPBP1蛋白質的表現載體建構 48
2.11.2 重組gTOPBP1m1蛋白質的表現載體建構 49
2.11.3 重組蛋白質純化 49
2.12 囊體計數(Cyst count) 49
2.13 電泳位移實驗 (Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, EMSA) 50
第三章 實驗結果(Results) 51
3.1 分析梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1胺基酸序列 51
3.2 gTOPBP1在梨形鞭毛蟲不同時期的表現量 51
3.3 gTOPBP1在囊體化時期主要分布於細胞核 51
3.4 gTOPBP1和gTOPBPm1大量表現對梨形鞭毛蟲基因的表現量影響 52
3.5 gTOPBP1大量表現誘導囊體壁蛋白質表現量及囊體數量改變 53
3.6 gTOPBP1蛋白質可誘導轉錄因子Myb2及轉錄因子WRKY蛋白質表現量增加 53
3.7 gTOPBP1蛋白質會減緩MMS所造成的DNA損傷 54
3.8 gTOPBP1蛋白質會與轉錄因子Myb2產生交互作用 54
3.9 gTOPBP1蛋白質能夠與囊體壁蛋白質基因與轉錄因子基因的啟動子結合 54
3.10 gTOPBP1蛋白質具有結合DNA的能力 55
第四章 討論(Discussion) 56
4.1 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1之蛋白質序列分析 56
4.2 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1大量表現對囊體形成的影響 56
4.3 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1蛋白質能與囊體壁蛋白質基因和轉錄因子基因啟動子結合 57
4.4 梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1蛋白質參與DNA修復路徑 57
4.5 分析gTOPBP1及gTOPBP1m1蛋白對DNA結合能力 57
附圖 59
圖一、梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1蛋白質序列分析 63
圖二、梨形鞭毛蟲內生性gTOPBP1基因表現量分析 65
圖三、梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1及gTOPBP1m1在細胞內的分布情形 67
圖四、梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1在囊體化時期對基因表現的影響 69
圖五、gTOPBP1和gTOPBP1m1大量表現後對於囊體化cwp1蛋白質表現量及囊體形成的影響 70
圖六、gTOPBP1和gTOPBP1m1對MMS造成損傷的修復狀況 72
圖七、gTOPBP1在囊體化時期與轉錄因子Myb2產生交互作用 73
圖八、gTOPBP1蛋白質能與囊體壁蛋白質基因啟動子及轉錄因子基因啟動子結合 74
圖九、梨形鞭毛蟲gTOPBP1蛋白質及突變蛋白質對DNA的結合能力 76
附表 77
表一. gTOPBP1蛋白質同源性分析 77
REFERENCE 78
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject拓樸異構?II結合蛋白1zh_TW
dc.subject梨形鞭毛蟲zh_TW
dc.subject拓樸異構?IIIαzh_TW
dc.subjectMMSzh_TW
dc.subjectDNA損傷修復zh_TW
dc.subjectGiardia lambliaen
dc.subjectDNA damage repairen
dc.subjectTopoisomerase II-binding protein1en
dc.subjectMMS treatmenten
dc.subjectTopoisomerase IIIαen
dc.title梨形鞭毛蟲拓樸異構酶IIIα以及拓樸異構酶II結合蛋白1之分析與功能鑑定zh_TW
dc.titleCharacterization of Functions of Giardia lamblia Topoisomerase IIIα and Topoisomerase II-binding Protein 1en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear104-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李財坤(Tsai-Kun Li),詹迺立(Nei-Li Chan)
dc.subject.keyword梨形鞭毛蟲,拓樸異構?IIIα,MMS,拓樸異構?II結合蛋白1,DNA損傷修復,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordGiardia lamblia,Topoisomerase IIIα,MMS treatment,Topoisomerase II-binding protein1,DNA damage repair,en
dc.relation.page82
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201600414
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2016-08-17
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept微生物學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:微生物學科所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
7.76 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved