智慧財產權民事訴訟中侵權證明與損害規範之研究－與日本法之比較

Abstract

證據之收集與舉證責任之分配恆為原告獲得損害賠償的關鍵。然於智慧財產侵權訴訟中，由於智慧財產權本身之無體性、於訴訟中之證據偏在性等特質，相較於一般訴訟，其常有難以證明侵害存在或估算額度之情形。 本論文以證據保全之條文構造及各法院之裁定內容為出發，先行探討智慧財產權民事訴訟中法院對證據保全裁定核准率過低之問題，並接續研究公證制度於智慧財產權民事訴訟中所發揮之功能，末再就現行法規中舉證責任之議題為論述。同時亦於各該議題中著重比較日本相關法制。

The collection of evidence and the burden of proof are always the hinge to the damage compensation of the plaintiff. However, in the intellectual property infringement suits, because of the intangibility and evidence-imbalance, it is not easy to prove the existence of the infringement nor to calculate the amount of the damage while comparing to the common ones. This thesis starts from the construction of the evidence-perpetuation and the content of the court rulings, discussing the low approval rate of abovementioned rulings in the intellectual property suits as the first issue, and then turn to the function of notary public in such suits to be the second issue, with the research of the burden of proof under the existing law being the final issue. All issues are emphasized to compare with the Japanese law.