請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18951
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 徐善慧 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Min Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪宇旻 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:40:35Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-09-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Docheva D, Muller SA, Majewski M, Evans CH. Biologics for tendon repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015;84:222-39.
[2] Wang JHC. Mechanobiology of tendon. J Biomech 2006;39:1563-1582. [3] Kannus P. Structure of the tendon connective tissue. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000;10:312-320. [4] Thompson MS. Tendon mechanobiology: experimental models require mathematical underpinning. Bull Math Biol 2013;75:1238-1254. [5] Sharma P, Maffulli N. Biology of tendon injury: healing, modeling and remodeling. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006;6:181-190. [6] Killian ML, Cavinatto L, Galatz LM, Thomopoulos S. The role of mechanobiology in tendon healing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:228-237. [7] Trippel SB, Wroblewski J, Makower AM, Whelan MC, Schoenfeld D, Doctrow SR. Regulation of growth-plate chondrocytes by insulin-like growth-factor I and basic fibroblast growth factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:177-189. [8] Fenwick SA, Hazleman BL, Riley GP. The vasculature and its role in the damaged and healing tendon. Arthritis Res 2002;4:252-260. [9] Petersen W, Unterhauser F, Pufe T, Zantop T, Sudkamp NP, Weiler A. The angiogenic peptide vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is expressed during the remodeling of free tendon grafts in sheep. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:168-174. [10] Zhang F, Liu H, Stile F, Lei MP, Pang Y, Oswald TM, Beck J, Dorsett-Martin W, Lineaweaver WC. Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on rat Achilles tendon healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1613-1619. [11] Bidder M, Towler DA, Gelberman RH, Boyer MI. Expression of mRNA for vascular endothelial growth factor at the repair site of healing canine flexor tendon. J Orthop Res 2000;18:247-252. [12] Boyer MI, Watson JT, Lou J, Manske PR, Gelberman RH, Cai SR. Quantitative variation in vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA expression during early flexor tendon healing: an investigation in a canine model. J Orthop Res 2001;19:869-872. [13] Chang J, Most D, Stelnicki E, Siebert JW, Longaker MT, Hui K, Lineaweaver WC. Gene expression of transforming growth factor beta-1 in rabbit zone II flexor tendon wound healing: evidence for dual mechanisms of repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:937-944. [14] Klein MB, Yalamanchi N, Pham H, Longaker MT, Chang J. Flexor tendon healing in vitro: effects of TGF-beta on tendon cell collagen production. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27:615-620. [15] Chan BP, Chan KM, Maffulli N, Webb S, Lee KK. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor. An in vitro study of tendon healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;(342):239-247. [16] Chan BP, Fu S, Qin L, Lee K, Rolf CG, Chan K. Effects of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on early stages of tendon healing: a rat patellar tendon model. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:513-518. [17] Woo SLY, Debski RE, Zeminski J, Abramowitch SD, Saw SSC, Fenwick JA. Injury and repair of ligaments and tendons. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000;2:83-118. [18] Montgomery RD. Healing of muscle, ligaments, and tendons. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1989;4:304-311. [19] Grinnell F. Fibronectin and wound healing. J cell biochem 1984;26:107-116. [20] Lin TW, Cardenas L, Soslowsky LJ. Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair. J Biomech 2004;37:865-877. [21] Woo SL, Buckwalter JA. AAOS/NIH/ORS workshop. Injury and repair of the musculoskeletal soft tissues. Savannah, Georgia, June 18-20, 1987. J Orthop Res 1988;6:907-931. [22] Liu S, Hu C, Li F, Li XJ, Cui W, Fan C. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions with electrospun ibuprofen-loaded poly(L-lactic acid)-polyethylene glycol fibrous membranes. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19:529-537. [23] Potenza AD. Tendon healing within the flexor digital sheath in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44-A:49-64. [24] Nyska M, Porat S, Nyska A, Rousso M, Shoshan S. Decreased adhesion formation in flexor tendons by topical application of enriched collagen solution--a histological study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987;106:192-194. [25] Liu Y, Skardal A, Shu XZ, Prestwich GD. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions using a hyaluronan-derived hydrogel film following partial-thickness flexor tendon injury. J Orthop Res 2008;26:562-569. [26] Caulfield RH, Maleki-Tabrizi A, Patel H, Coldham F, Mee S, Nanchahal J. Comparison of zones 1 to 4 flexor tendon repairs using absorbable and unabsorbable four-strand core sutures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008;33:412-417. [27] Wong JK, Lui YH, Kapacee Z, Kadler KE, Ferguson MW, McGrouther DA. The cellular biology of flexor tendon adhesion formation: an old problem in a new paradigm. Am J Pathol 2009;175:1938-1951. [28] Khanna A, Friel M, Gougoulias N, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Prevention of adhesions in surgery of the flexor tendons of the hand: what is the evidence? Br Med Bull 2009;90:85-109. [29] Wang ED. Tendon repair. J Hand Ther 1998;11:105-110. [30] Gelberman RH, Manske PR, Akeson WH, Woo SLY, Lundborg G, Amiel D. Kappa-delta award paper - flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res 1986;4:119-128. [31] Ni T, Senthil-Kumar P, Dubbin K, Aznar-Cervantes SD, Datta N, Randolph MA, Cenis JL, Rutledge GC, Kochevar IE, Redmond RW. A photoactivated nanofiber graft material for augmented Achilles tendon repair. Lasers Surg Med 2012;44:645-652. [32] Lilly SI, Messer TM. Complications after treatment of flexor tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:387-396. [33] Ozgenel GY, Samli B, Ozcan M. Effects of human amniotic fluid on peritendinous adhesion formation and tendon healing after flexor tendon surgery in rabbits. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:332-339. [34] St Onge R, Weiss C, Denlinger JL, Balazs EA. A preliminary assessment of Na-hyaluronate injection into 'no man's land' for primary flexor tendon repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;(146):269-275. [35] Hagberg L. Exogenous hyaluronate as an adjunct in the prevention of adhesions after flexor tendon surgery: a controlled clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17:132-136. [36] Namba J, Shimada K, Saito M, Murase T, Yamada H, Yoshikawa H. Modulation of peritendinous adhesion formation by alginate solution in a rabbit flexor tendon model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;80:273-279. [37] Meier Burgisser G, Buschmann J. History and performance of implant materials applied as peritendinous antiadhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103:212-228. [38] Bhavsar D, Shettko D, Tenenhaus M. Encircling the tendon repair site with collagen-GAG reduces the formation of postoperative tendon adhesions in a chicken flexor tendon model. J Surg Res 2010;159:765-771. [39] Liu S, Zhao J, Ruan H, Tang T, Liu G, Yu D, Cui W, Fan C. Biomimetic sheath membrane via electrospinning for antiadhesion of repaired tendon. Biomacromolecules 2012;13:3611-2619. [40] Chen SH, Chen CH, Shalumon KT, Chen JP. Preparation and characterization of antiadhesion barrier film from hyaluronic acid-grafted electrospun poly(caprolactone) nanofibrous membranes for prevention of flexor tendon postoperative peritendinous adhesion. Int J Nanomedicine 2014;9:4079-4092. [41] Chen CH, Chen SH, Shalumon KT, Chen JP. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions with electrospun polyethylene glycol/polycaprolactone nanofibrous membranes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2015;133:221-230. [42] Yuan BM, He CL, Dong XM, Wang JC, Gao ZL, Wang Q, Tian HY, Chen XS. 5-Fluorouracil loaded thermosensitive PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels for the prevention of postoperative tendon adhesion. RSC Adv 2015;5:25295-25303. [43] Liu S, Hu CM, Li FF, Li XJ, Cui WG, Fan CY. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions with electrospun ibuprofen-loaded poly(L-lactic acid)-polyethylene glycol fibrous membranes. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19:529-537. [44] Kulick MI, Brazlow R, Smith S, Hentz VR. Injectable ibuprofen: preliminary evaluation of its ability to decrease peritendinous adhesions. Ann Plast Surg 1984;13:459-467. [45] Hu C, Liu S, Zhang Y, Li B, Yang H, Fan C, Cui W. Long-term drug release from electrospun fibers for in vivo inflammation prevention in the prevention of peritendinous adhesions. Acta Biomater 2013;9:7381-7388. [46] Chen SH, Chen CH2, Fong YT1, Chen JP. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions with electrospun chitosan-grafted polycaprolactone nanofibrous membranes. Acta Biomater 2014;10:4971-82. [47] Chen CH, Chen SH, Shalumon KT, Chen JP. Dual functional core-sheath electrospun hyaluronic acid/polycaprolactone nanofibrous membranes embedded with silver nanoparticles for prevention of peritendinous adhesion. Acta Biomater 2015;26:225-35. [48] Sartori S, Chiono V, Tonda-Turo C, Mattu C, Gianluca C. Biomimetic polyurethanes in nano and regenerative medicine. J Mater Chem B 2014;2:5128-5144. [49] Stokes K, McVenes R, Anderson JM. Polyurethane elastomer biostability. J Biomater Appl 1995;9:321-354. [50] Gunatillake PA, Meijs GF. Polyurethanes in biomedical engineering. Encyclopedia Mater Sci Tech 2001:7746-7752. [51] Zhou X, Li Y, Fang CQ, Li SJ, Cheng YL, Lei WQ, Meng XJ. Recent advances in synthesis of waterborne polyurethane and their application in water-based ink: a review. J Mater Sci Tech 2015;31:708-722. [52] Cakic SM, SpirkovavM, Ristic IS, B-Simendic JK, M-Cincovic M, Poreba R. The waterborne polyurethane dispersions based on polycarbonate diol: effect of ionic content. Mater Chem Phys 2013;138:277-285. [53] Hung KC, Hsu SH. Polymer surface interacts with calcium in aqueous media to induce stem cell assembly. Adv Healthc Mater 201528;4:2186-2194. [54] Huang YJ, Hung KC, Hsieh FY, Hsu SH. Carboxyl-functionalized polyurethane nanoparticles with immunosuppressive properties as a new type of anti-inflammatory platform. Nanoscale 2015;7:20352-20364. [55] Juarez-Moreno JA, Avila-Ortega A, Oliva AI, Aviles F, Cauich-Rodriguez JV. Effect of wettability and surface roughness on the adhesion properties of collagen on PDMS films treated by capacitively coupled oxygen plasma. Appl Surf Sci 2015;349:763-773. [56] Andrews EH, Kamyab I. Adhesion of surgical dressings to wounds. A new in vitro model. Clin Mater 1986;1:9-21. [57] Ning CX, Logsetty S, Ghughare S, Liu S. Effect of hydrogel grafting, water and surfactant wetting on the adherence of PET wound dressings. Burns 2014;40:1164-1171. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18951 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 肌腱沾黏目前仍是一個嚴重的問題,主要是因為它會影響肌腱的滑翔與關節 活動,雖然現在有許多研究著重於抗沾黏材料,但仍有許多問題,尤其是臨床化 的使用。聚胺酯是一個具有好機械強度與生物相容性之材料,有在抗沾黏使用上 的潛力,在本次研究中,一系列不同離子強度的聚胺酯被合成,之後進行物理化 學性質與生物相容性之分析,之後會選擇最適當的聚胺酯進行兔動物肌腱損傷模 型。
合成的一系列聚胺酯皆無生物毒性且不影響細胞型態,並且有適當的機械性 質與親疏水性,在膠體附著測試上聚胺酯比聚己內酯更不容易附著,這指出胞外 基質不容易沉積在聚胺酯上,動物肌腱損傷模型顯現聚胺酯有良好的抗沾黏效果, 明顯優於聚己內酯與不使用抗沾黏膜,並略優於商業抗沾黏膜,並且不會影響肌腱回復。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Tendon adhesion has been a serious problem and it affects the tendon gliding and joint motion. Although recent studies have yielded promising results in developing anti-adhesion materials, there are still many problems, especially in clinical applications. Polycaprolactone (PCL)-based Polyurethane (PU) has good mechanical properties and biocompatibility, and it has a potential in anti-adhesion applications. In this study, a series of PUs with different ratios of ionic groups were synthesized. The PU films were cast and characterized for physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. The most appropriate one was selected for animal studies and implanted to the tendons of the rabbits. All PU films were non-cytotoxic to cells and had mechanical properties suitable for anti-adhesion applications of the tendon surgery. Meanwhile, PU films demonstrated a lower peeling energy than the PCL film by the gelatin test, indicating that gelatin or extracellular matrix may not be easily deposited on the PUs. The rabbit implantation showed that PU had better anti-adhesion effect than PCL films and the untreated control, and demonstrated no significant difference in the anti-adhesion performance from the commercial product Seprafilm. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:40:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02549035-1.pdf: 5766184 bytes, checksum: 410d1ed8a1078d7db4317c6e59e6ed87 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第一章 文獻回顧 1 1.1肌腱的結構 1 1.2肌腱的修復 2 1.3 肌腱沾黏(adhesion)的影響與產生 3 1.4 沾黏的預防 4 1.5 聚胺酯(Polyurethane) 8 1.6 研究動機 9 第二章 研究方法 11 2.1 研究目標 11 2.2 水性生物可降解聚胺酯合成 (Waterborne biodegradable polyurethane, WBPU) 13 2.3 接觸角分析 15 2.4機械性質測試 15 2.5 明膠測試 15 2.6 吸水性與厚度變化測試 16 2.7 細胞毒性測試 17 2.8 螢光染色 18 2.9 動物實驗 19 2.10 組織切片 20 2.11 生物機械分析 21 2.12 體內降解 21 2.13 統計分析 (Statistical analysis) 21 第三章 實驗結果 22 3.1接觸角 22 3.2 材料的膨潤率與厚度變化 22 3.3 機械強度 22 3.4 材料與明膠貼附效果 23 3.5 細胞活性 23 3.6 動物肌腱沾黏 23 3.7 組織切片 24 3.8 生物機械性質 24 3.9 生物降解 25 第四章 討論 26 4.1 材料接觸角 26 4.2 機械性質 26 4.3 材料的穩定性 26 4.4 組織與材料的貼附性 27 4.5 細胞活性與型態 28 4.6 聚胺酯應用於肌腱抗沾黏 28 第五章 結論與未來展望 31 參考文獻 43 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 水性可降解聚胺酯用於預防肌腱術後沾黏之評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation and characterization of the waterborne biodegradable polyurethane films for prevention of the tendon postoperative adhesion | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 戴念國,張振榮,謝馥羽 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 術後,肌腱,沾黏,聚胺酯,抗沾黏,術後沾黏, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | adhesion,tendon,polyurethane,postoperative adhesion,anti-adhesion, | en |
dc.relation.page | 52 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603436 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 高分子科學與工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 高分子科學與工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.63 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。