請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18819完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 雷立芬 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jun-Hung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳均宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:28:30Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王貳瑞(2001),《流程管理》,臺北:華泰書局。
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2009),《政府採購制度問題探討與對策》,臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。 行政院公共工程委員會編印(2010),《政府採購法相關資料彙編》,臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。 李佳倫、蕭文琪、蔡雅齡、孫麗珍(2011),「降低某內科病房檢體退件率之專案」,《高雄護理雜誌》,28(1):23-34。 巫和懋,夏珍(2002),《賽局高手─全方位策略與應用》,台北:時報出版社。 吳道生(1994),《賽局理論在公共工程合約授與行為之應用》,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 吳道生(1996),《營建工程競標理論之研究》,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文。 邱鼎(1998),《工程契約資訊不對稱問題之研究-以監督機制為例》,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 林益年(2012),「政府採購制度變革-從新制度主義之觀點」,《全球商業經營管理學報》101(09):67-81。 林耕宇(1998),《公有建築工程同等品制度之研究》,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 財團法人臺灣營建研究所(2009),《公共工程常用植栽手冊》,臺北:財團法人臺灣營建研究所。 袁方(2002),《社會研究方法》,臺北:五南書局。 候威銘、張炳坤、陳女晏(2013),「地方政府採購組織位階之研究-以桃園縣政府為例」,《萬能商學學報》,18:79-85。 翁秉仁(2007),「賽局的破綻:骨董花瓶」,《科學人》,65:106-112。 陳永甡(2001),「採購品質之探討」,《品質月刊》,37(6):34-37。 陳啟光、廖世凱、蔡政和與謝安晋(2008),「流程管理對於推動ISO 9000品質系統成效影響之初探-以產品良率為驗證指標」,《品質學報》,15:85-100。 馮丁樹、方煒(1998),《林苗生產自動化之研究》,新竹:臺灣大學生農學院生物產業自動化教學及研究中心。 臺北市政府(2012),《臺北市政府採購標準作業程序》,臺北:臺北市政府。 謝秋菊(2010),「企業標準編制過程中的PDCA循環」,《標準化科學管理》,23:31-33。 簡志邦(1992),《公共工程資訊不對稱問題之研究-以底價及品質為例》,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Book Inc. Biazzo, S. and Bernardi, G.(2003). 'Process management practices and quality systems standards: Risks and opportunities of the new ISO 9001 certification.' Business Process Management Journal, 9 (2):149- 169. Bloomfield, P.(2006).”The challenging business of long-term public-private partnerships: Reflections on local experience.” Public Administration Review, 66(3):400-411. Cooter, R. and Ulen, T. (1997). Law and Economics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press. Dees, J.G ,(1998).”Enterprising nonprofits.” Harvard Business Review,76(1):12. Deming, W. E.(1950). Elementary Principles of the Statistical Control of Quality. Nippon Kagaku Gijutsu Remmei. Douglas, G. Baird, R., Gertner, H., and Picker, R. C. (1995), Game Theory and Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Drexler, J. A. and Larson, E. W.(2000). 'Partnering: Why Project Owner-contractor Relationships Change.' Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126 (4):293-397. Elzinga, D.J., Horak, T., Lee, C. Y. and Bruner, C.(1995). “Business process management: Survey and methodology” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, , 42(2):119-128. Feucht, J. R. and Butler, J. D. (1988). Landscape management: planting and maintenance of trees, shrubs and turfgrasses. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Goldberg,V. P. (1989). Reading in the economics of contract law. London: Cambridge University Press. Hammer, M.(1990). ”Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate.” Harvard Business Review, 68(4):104–112. Hodge, G. A. and Greve, C.(2009). “PPPs: The passage of time permits a sober reflection.” Economic Affairs, 29(1):33-39. Kartam, S. (1999). “Generic methodology for analyzing delay claims.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(6):409-419. Kaushik, B,(1994).”The traveler's dilemma: Paradoxes of rationality in game theory'. American Economic Review, 84(2):391–395.; Kirstin, Z.(2002),”Supply chain coordination with uncertain just-in-time delivery.” Int. J. Production Economics, 77:1-15 Lane, J. E. (2005). Public administration and public management: The principal-agent perspective. London: Routledge. Maxwell, J. A.(2012). Qualitative research design:An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Molenaar, K., Washington, S., and Diekmann, J. (2000). “Structural equation model of contraction contract dispute potential.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(4): 268-277. Nash, J.(1950),'The bargaining problem. ' Econometrica,18(2):155-162. Rubin, A. and Babbie, E. (2010). Research methods for social work, 7 edition. New York: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning. Shewhart, W.A.(1930).” Economic quality control of manufactured product.” Bell System Technical Journal, 9(2):364-389. Talwar, R.(1993),”Business re-engineering – A strategy driven approach.' Long Range Planning, 26(6):22-40. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.(1944), Theory of games and economic behavior 2nd Editions. New York: Princeton University Press. Walton, M. (1986), The Deming management method. New York: Berkley Publishing Group. Yang, H. D. and Vandenbosch, B.(1998).”Visibility as the basis of a framework for identifying strategic information systems.”. Journal of Information Technology Management, 9:31-42. Yang, H. D., Mason, R. M., and Chaudhury, A.(2001).”The internet, value chain visibility, and learning.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1):1-120. Yin, Z. P., Ding, H., and Xiong, Y. L. (2000). “Visibility theory and algorithms with applications to manufacturing process.” International Journal of Production Research, 38(13):2891-2909. 全國法規資料庫(2014),http://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx,2014.04.02。 行政院農委會(2013),102年第三季農業資訊科技應用發展電子報,No.27,http://www.coa.gov.tw/office_epaper/epaper/infoexplorer/online/27/002/Untitled-1.html,2014.06.13。 行政院農委會(2014),農業資料統計查詢,http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/ public/indicator/Indicator.aspx,2014.04.01。 行政院公共工程委員會(2013),http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/TMPLfronted/ChtIndex.do?site=002,2013.10.24。 臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處處(2013),《為民服務白皮書》,http://pkl.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=114514&CtNode=46915&mp=106011,2014.05.01。 臺北市政府公務人員訓練處(2014),http://www.dcsd.taipei.gov.tw/,2014.04.06。 彭工(2014),品管方法:PDCA法(过程决策程序图法),http://xuexihr.com/d/2994.html,2014.03.25。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18819 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去15年來,政府實行政府採購法之後,政府採購行為(包括綠化工程植栽),都以一般採價格最低標方式、異質性最低標、選擇性或限制性招標等方式,而在花木類別中,因被認為技術無差異性,且為最普通採購行為,僅依簡易的株寬、株高標準而訂定固定單價的方式。廠商最低價得標情形下,得標後往往都以成本為考量,提供符合規格的植栽、品質卻是良窳不齊的植栽,履履造成施工、驗苗及退貨困擾或糾紛。因為政府每年要編列大筆預算採購花木達到綠化目的,根據採購法,樹苗或種子是由承包商提供及種樹(或由公園處播種或植樹)。如果業者提供的產品品質不好,就會浪費公帑,所以應該找出一套讓承包商提供好品質的模式。
本研究是透過蒐集臺北市及其他相關單位綠化工程採購流程及標準;探討找出流程管理與花木品質的關係;透過PDCA迴圈品質管理提昇花木品質的方式;以賽局理論解釋政府採購法的實際內涵及由廠商間良性競爭提升花木品質;以深度訪談方式分析彙整需求端-政府綠化官員、承包商及供苗商三者對於政府綠化工程採購提升花木品質之方式;歸納提出提升政府綠化工程花木品質改良建議。讓花木生產者知道公部門的採購花木品質標準、以更實際的方式去種植培育優質苗木;承包商不再以成本考量採購花木、促進各綠化廠商良性競爭,政府部門可獲得品質提升的花木,使得民眾得以享有優質綠化的市容景觀之四贏的局面。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Government procurement are constrained by the law since the government put into the practice of Government Procurement Law over the past 15 years ago. Including the procurement of plant are based on the way of lowest standard, heterogeneity, selective or restricted bidding. For the category of flowers and wood, the fix price is based on the width and height of flowers and wood because it is the most common procurement without any technique. Normally, the lowest price from a vendor will win the procurement. However, the vendor only provide the regular plant with poor quality of planting. Therefore, it will cause a lot of argument and dispute between government and vendors. The government spend a large amount of budget for purchasing plant to green city annually. According to the law, the vendor need to both provide plant and do planting, so we need need to find the best solution to have better quality of plant and planting.
This research was collected from the process of procurement of department of greening projects in Taipei. We try to discuss the relationship between the quality of flower and wood and process management. We also explore how to improve the quality of flowers and wood through the PDCA management. In addition, analyzing the use case via game theory between the government and vendors. We have suggestions for how the government green cities via in-depth interviewing government official and vendors. Therefore, farmers will realize the process of procurement, vendors can pay attention to the quality, which will bring more positive competitive between vendors. Therefor, the government will have better quality of flowers and wood, and the public have more greening city. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:28:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-P01627012-1.pdf: 1609126 bytes, checksum: 3b69c791df17a32038aaef1ec807841c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第貳章 政府採購制度 9 第一節 採購法令概述 9 第二節 政府採購範圍及規定 15 第三節 國際間採購制度的比較 17 第四節 臺北市政府綠化工程採購流程 21 第參章 文獻回顧 25 第一節 流程管理與花木品質的關係 25 第二節 PDCA迴圈品質管理 30 第三節 政府採購的賽局理論 38 第肆章 研究假設與訪談大綱設計 43 第一節 研究假設與深度訪談法 43 第二節 訪談大綱與訪談對象 46 第伍章 訪談結果整理與討論 52 第一節 政府單位綠化工程對花木品質規定 52 第二節 花木培育技術創新與採購流程精進 56 第三節 PDCA品質管理的投入 58 第四節 採購法的賽局理論 60 第五節 其他對花木採購品質提升建議 63 第陸章 結論 66 參考文獻 70 附錄1 訪談大綱 74 附錄2 訪談摘要 75 附錄3 公園處綠化工程查核表單 86 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 提昇政府綠化工程採購花木品質措施之研究:以台北市公園處為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Improving the Performance Of Government’s Landscape Green Engineering Procurement: The Case of Taipei City Park Office | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 官俊榮,吳志文 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 政府採購,綠化工程,PDCA,賽局理論,深度訪談, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | government procurement,greening projects,PDCA,game theory,in-depth interviews, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 95 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
