請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18509完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃榮南(Rong-Nan Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ning Kung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 孔寧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:08:58Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王一雄。2007。紅火蟻防治用藥高劑量使用對土壤生態環境之衝擊。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期中進度報告。 石正人。2008。入侵紅火蟻教育研究網及土棲生物相調查。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。台灣大學機構典藏。 李昆龍、顏辰鳳、鄒慧娟、郭克忠。2008。我國防治入侵紅火蟻之措施與成效。農政與農情 191:54-48。 林沛晨、楊懿如、林德恩。2017。以社會資本探討路殺社的經營。第27屆中華民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會。 林宗岐。2004。入侵紅火蟻之緊急防治措施。興大農業 51:1-8。 林德恩。2018。系統化路死動物大調查。自然保育季刊 101:76-77。 邱皓政。2010。量化硏究與統計分析: SPSS (PASW) 資料分析範例。五南圖書出版股份有限公司, 台北。 特有生物研究保育中心。2018a。台灣動物路死觀察網(https://roadkill.tw/) 特有生物研究保育中心。2018b。臺灣飛蛾資訊分享站(http://twmoth.tesri.gov.tw/) 國家發展委員會。2019。108年持有手機民眾數位機會調查報告。行政院國家發展委員會 張峯誠。2006。紅火蟻入侵防治政策對桃園縣家計與農業部門之效益分析。中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文:1-79。 許嘉軒。2020。在參與公民科學中學習:探討臺灣動物路死觀察網參與者之參與動機、學習歷程與學習產出。國立臺灣大學森林所學位論文1-148。 黃志堅。2017。公民科學家計畫的過去與未來。臺灣林業雙月刊 43:51-60。 黃基森。2005。入侵紅火蟻防治政策在環境保護上之意義研究。環境教育學刊 4:79-107。 楊懿如、龔文斌。2009。運用調查志工進行臺灣蛙類生物多樣性熱點監測研究。自然資源保育暨應用學術研討會論文集:30-41。 楊懿如、龔文斌。2014。臺灣地區斑腿樹蛙族群分布探討。台灣生物多樣性研究 16:21-32。 楊懿如。2016。共護台灣蛙蛙世界。科學發展月刊 522:12-18。 桃園市政府農業局。2017。紅火蟻防治成果專案報告。桃園市政府議案 編號20。 趙泓棋。2007。學童生活經驗對入侵紅火蟻議題教學之影響研究。臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所學位論文:1-128。 蔡奇立、謝伯娟。2016。蝸牛、臉書與公民科學。科學發展月刊 522:34-39。 Allen IE, Seaman CA. 2007. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress 40:64-65. Bao SZ, Kafle L, Shih CJ. 2011. A new baited trap for monitoring Solenopsis invicta (Formicidae: Hymenoptera) in Taiwan. Applied Entomology Zoology 46:165-169. Bertelsmeier C, Ollier S, Liebhold A, Keller L. 2017. Recent human history governs global ant invasion dynamics. Nature Ecology Evolution 1:1-8. Bissmire S. 2006. Red imported fire ants found at Whirinaki. Biosecurity 69:6. Buren WF. 1972. Revisionary studies on the taxonomy of the imported fire ants. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 7:26. Chao RF. 2017. Using Transformative Learning Theory to Explore the Mechanisms of Citizen Participation for Environmental Education on the Removal of Invasive Species: The Case of Green Island, Taiwan. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 13:2665-2682. Christian S. 2009. Red imported fire ants eradicated from Napier. Biosecurity 92:28-29. Chuang TR, Lin TE, Chang YH, Chen CY, Chen YK, Hsieh PK, Mai GS. 2016. Communal Data Workflow in TaiRON (Taiwan Roadkill Observation Network). SciDataCon, Denver, CO. Clary EG, Snyder M. 1999. The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8:156-159. Crall AW, Jordan R, Holfelder K, Newman GJ, Graham J, Waller DM. 2013. The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science 22:745-764. Curtis V. 2015. Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: A study of Foldit. Science Communication 37:723-746. Davis FD. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13:319-340. Dolan RW, Harris KA, Adler M. 2015. Community involvement to address a long-standing invasive species problem: Aspects of civic ecology in practice. Ecological Restoration 33:316-325. Domroese MC, Johnson EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation 208:40-47. Elbroch M, Mwampamba TH, Santos MJ, Zylberberg M, Liebenberg L, Minye J, Mosser C, Reddy E. 2011. The value, limitations, and challenges of employing local experts in conservation research. Conservation Biology 25:1195-1202. Falk JH. 2001. Free-Choice Science Education: How We Learn Science outside of School. Ways of Knowing in Science and Mathematics Series. Teachers College Press. Falk JH, Dierking LD. 2002. Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Rowman Altamira. Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Ballard HL, Sturtevant VE. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: a study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology Society 13:4. Gallo T, Waitt D. 2011. Creating a successful citizen science model to detect and report invasive species. BioScience 61:459-465. Gruenewald DA. 2003. The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher 32:3-12. Hanemann WM. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:19-43. Herodotou C, Aristeidou M, Miller G, Ballard H, Robinson L. 2020. What do we know about young volunteers? An exploratory study of participation in Zooniverse. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5:1-14. Hiller SE, Kitsantas A. 2014. The effect of a horseshoe crab citizen science program on middle school student science performance and STEM career motivation. School Science and Mathematics 114:302-311. Johnson CJ, Gillingham MP. 2008. Sensitivity of species-distribution models to error, bias, and model design: an application to resource selection functions for woodland caribou. Ecological Modelling 213:143-155. Kafle L, Wu WJ, Kao SS, Shih CJ. 2011. Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana against the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Taiwan. Pest Management Science 67:1434-1438. Kafle L, Wu WJ, Shih CJ. 2010. A new fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) bait base carrier for moist conditions. Pest Management Science 66:1082-1088. Kim S, Mankoff J, Paulos E. 2013. Sensr: evaluating a flexible framework for authoring mobile data-collection tools for citizen science. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. pp 1453-1462. Lam S-P, Cheng S-I. 2002. Cross-informant agreement in reports of environmental behavior and the effect of cross-questioning on report accuracy. Environment and Behavior 34:508-520. Lemke L, Kissam J. 1989. Public attitudes on red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) infestations in homes and recreational areas. Journal of Entomological Science 24:446-453. Lepczyk CA. 2005. Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:672-677. Lükő I, Kollarics T. 2013. The Significance of Environmental Sustainability in Adult Environmental Education. International Journal of Environmental Protection 3:1-9. MacKay WP, Majdi S, Irving J, Vinson SB, Messer C. 1992. Attraction of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to electric fields. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 65:39-43. McNaught MK, Wylie R, Bell R. 2019. Join the ant hunt: how accurately can the public recognise red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Australia? Austral Entomology 58:745-752. Miller SE, Henry MS, Vander Mey BJ, Horton PM. 2000. Averting-cost measures of the benefits to South Carolina households of red imported fire ant control. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 17:113-123. Newman G, Crall A, Laituri M, Graham J, Stohlgren T, Moore JC, Kodrich K, Holfelder KA. 2010. Teaching citizen science skills online: Implications for invasive species training programs. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 9:276-286. Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K. 2012. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology the Environment 10:298-304. Oscarson DB, Calhoun AJ. 2007. Developing vernal pool conservation plans at the local level using citizen-scientists. Wetlands 27:80-95. Pattengill-Semmens CV, Semmens BX. 2003. Conservation and management applications of the reef volunteer fish monitoring program. Coastal Monitoring through Partnerships. Springer. pp 43-50. Phillips TB, Ballard HL, Lewenstein BV, Bonney R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education 103:665-690. Pimm SL, Alibhai S, Bergl R, Dehgan A, Giri C, Jewell Z, Joppa L, Kays R, Loarie S. 2015. Emerging technologies to conserve biodiversity. Trends in Ecology Evolution 30:685-696. Rhoades RB, Stafford CT, James Jr FK. 1989. Survey of fatal anaphylactic reactions to imported fire ant stings. Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology 84:159-162. Rotman D, Preece J, Hammock J, Procita K, Hansen D, Parr C, Lewis D, Jacobs D. 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. pp 217-226. Sargeant J, Curran V, Jarvis‐Selinger S, Ferrier S, Allen M, Kirby F, Ho K. 2004. Interactive on‐line continuing medical education: Physicians' perceptions and experiences. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 24:227-236. Shaw E, Surry D, Green A. 2015. The use of social media and citizen science to identify, track, and report birds. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 167:103-108. Silvertown J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology Evolution 24:467-471. Tschinkel W. 1998. The reproductive biology of fire ant societies. Bioscience 48:593-605. Ujiyama S, Tsuji K. 2018. Controlling invasive ant species: a Theoretical strategy for efficient monitoring in the early stage of invasion. Scientific Reports 8:1-9. Uyanık G. 2016. Effect of environmental education based on transformational learning theory on perceptions towards environmental problems and permanency of learning. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education 6:126-140. Wiggins JS. 1973. Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Krieger Publishing Company. Yiming L, Zhengjun W, Duncan RP. 2006. Why islands are easier to invade: human influences on bullfrog invasion in the Zhoushan archipelago and neighboring mainland China. Oecologia 148:129-136. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18509 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 世界百大入侵害蟲之一的入侵紅火蟻(Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta) 於臺灣被發現已近15年,因為相關經費逐年縮減以及防治人力不足等原因,至今仍無法將其根除。據此背景,本研究提出以公民科學的方式,透過普及的行動科技技術和網路社群,建立利用手持裝置就能輕易使用的數位學習與通報平台,提供防治資訊並鼓勵民眾參與,運用公眾力量紓緩相關經費與人力短缺的困境。
雖然臺灣的火蟻防治計畫已施行多年,有許多過去相關研究與資源的優勢,但對於推行全民防治時欲招募的公民科學家目標族群,卻沒有太多了解。本研究透過問卷,針對紅火蟻入侵最嚴重的桃園周邊地區,調查參與相關教育宣導工作坊的民眾以及蟲害防治人員。針對兩族群在科技使用習慣、參與動機,以及火蟻防治知識的資訊,分析以行動科技與公民科學家作為臺灣紅火蟻防治解決方案的可行性與入侵紅火蟻即時偵測通報系統(RIFA App)之平台設計相關指標。 研究結果顯示:在科技使用調查項目,近九成受測者具有可以使用RIFA App的硬體設備,且對於該科技平台具有高接受度;參與動機調查結果顯示,無論民眾或防治人員的主要參與動機均屬於內在動機,其中又以解決問題與自我實踐為最主要的動機。本研究也發現,工作坊會增加受測者參與火蟻防治的意願,工作坊後各面向參與動機指數均有提升。知識評量結果則顯示,受測者對火蟻以及蟻巢外觀辨識的相關知識較薄弱,但多半都了解火蟻防治方法以及螫傷處理的手段。此外,兩族群工作坊的學習成效沒有顯著差異,在工作坊後相關知識均顯著提升。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Red Imported Fire Ant (RIFA, Solenopsis invicta), one of the 100 world’s worst invasive alien species, was first reported in Taiwan in late 2003. Limited budget and insufficient pest control operator involved in RIFA control are the major constraints of RIFA eradication program in Taiwan. Therefore, this research proposes that citizen science could assist RIFA control in Taiwan by providing an efficient data source, a low-cost way to strengthen the control system, and a new approach to enhance public engagements.
Although Taiwan’s RIFA control program has been implemented for many years, there is not much knowledge about the citizen scientists expected to be recruited when promoting public self-control of RIFA. In this study, a questionnaire survey was constructed for pest control operators (PCO) and citizens living around the core infested area in Taiwan. To examine the potential of mobile-based citizen science project in terms of controlling RIFA, the structure of the questionnaire was based on three pillars: 1. digital literacy, which requires the participant’s ability to find, evaluate and create information through mobile platform. 2. motivation, which involves attracting and retaining participants who could contribute their time and effort to the project. Finally, 3. science literacy related to the public’s knowledge of and attitude to RIFA. The result shows that, for the digital literacy pillar, the hardware, technology, and related skills of the RIFA App were well embraced by the participants. For the motivation pillar, the main motivations for both PCO and citizen participants were internal motivations, such as problem-solving, learning, and self-achievement. For the knowledge pillar, although the participants were familiar with RIFA’s control method and first-aid treatments of RIFA sting, the identification of RIFA and its colony were considered difficult for them. These results are expected to provide the bottom-up information to optimize RIFA control and related projects in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:08:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0502202115212600.pdf: 3281644 bytes, checksum: e2e06d98c90090c206e79356151b0581 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 一、 前言-1 二、 文獻探討-3 (一) 入侵紅火蟻的生態特性與擴散-3 1. 生態特性-3 2. 入侵歷史與擴散範圍-3 (二) 臺灣入侵紅火蟻防治現況-4 (三) 運用科技作為公民參與生態保育的解決方法-5 1. 公民科學的觀念-5 2. 公民科學家計畫之成效評估-7 3. 臺灣的公民科學計劃回顧-9 三、 研究目的、動機與研究問題-11 四、 研究方法:問卷調查法-14 (一) 研究對象-16 1. 蟲害防治人員-16 2. 入侵區域周邊的民眾-16 (二) 問卷工具-17 (三) 問卷內容-18 1. 數位素養與科技使用習慣-19 2. 參與動機-20 3. 知識需求與火蟻相關經驗-20 (四) 問卷信效度檢驗-21 (五) 資料搜集與分析-22 五、 結果-25 (一) 人口組成分析-25 1. 性別-25 2. 年齡-25 3. 教育程度-25 4. 叮咬經驗-26 5. 防治經驗-26 6. 火蟻防治權責歸屬-26 (二) 科技素養-28 1. 硬體設備覆蓋率-28 2. 通報相關技能-29 3. 使用手機功能習慣-29 4. 常用軟體-29 5. 對智慧型手機的態度-30 6. 對RIFA App的態度與期待-32 (三) 動機-35 1. 民眾之初始參與動機-36 2. 民眾之初始動機因素探索-37 3. 民眾之持續參與動機-39 4. 民眾之持續參與動機因素探索-40 5. 防治人員之初始參與動機-44 6. 防治人員之初始動機因素探索-45 7. 防治人員之持續參與動機-48 8. 防治人員之持續參與動機因素探索-50 9. 兩群組比較-51 (四) 知識-51 1. 整體參與者前後測比較-51 2. 兩群組前後測分數比較-52 3. 影響後測分數的變數探索-53 4. 兩群組學習成效的差距-54 5. 知識構面比較與易錯題目分析-55 (五) 願付價格-56 1. 組間差異:工作坊前測驗-56 2. 組間差異:工作坊後測驗-58 3. 個人前後測變化-60 4. 拒絕支付與拒絕透露支付意願者-62 六、 討論-63 (一) 參與者人口資料討論-63 (二) 從參與者科技素養討論推行RIFA App的可行性-64 (三) 參與者的動機與變化-65 (四) 參與者的知識斷層與工作坊學習效果-67 (五) 參與者的願付價格-69 (六) 公民參與者在未來的可能角色-72 七、 研究限制與未來研究-76 (一) 研究限制-76 (二) 未來研究-76 參考文獻-78 附錄一、本研究使用問卷-82 附錄二、問卷設計三概念下各構面題項與信度-92 (一) 數位素養-92 (二) 動機-93 (三) 知識-95 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 行動科技與公民科學方案提升臺灣入侵紅火蟻防治效果之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Application of mobile software and citizen science on the management of red imported fire ants: A research in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉湘瑤(Shiang-Yao Liu),劉康慧(Helen K. Liu),林宗岐(Chung-Chi Lin),曾惠芸(Hui-Yun Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 入侵紅火蟻,公民科學,參與動機,數位媒體素養, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | red imported fire ant,citizen science,motivation,digital literacy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 95 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100592 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0502202115212600.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
