請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18425完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳秀熙(Hsiu-Hsi Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jen-Hung Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張仁鴻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:04:35Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials definition and operational criteria. 1989;8:431-40.
2.Day NE, Duffy SW. Trial design based on surrogate end points--application to comparison of different breast screening frequencies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society). 1996;159(1):49-60. 3.Chiu SY, Malila N, Yen AM, Anttila A, Hakama M, Chen HH. Analytical decision model for sample size and effectiveness projections for use in planning a population-based randomized controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(1):123-9. 4.Chen HH, Prevost TC, Duffy SW. Evaluation of screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Trial design using markov chain models. BJC. 1999;79(11/12):1894-900. 5.Chen LS, Yen AMF, Chiu SY, Liao CS, Chen HH. Baseline faecal occult blood concentration as a predictor of incident colorectal neoplasia: Longitudinal follow-up of a taiwanese population-based colorectal cancer screening cohort. The Lancet Oncology. 2011;12(6):551-8. 6.Chen LS, Yen AMF, Fraser CG, Chiu SYH, Fann JCY, Wang PE, et al. Impact of faecal haemoglobin concentration on colorectal cancer mortality and all-cause death. BMJ Open. 2013;2013(3):e003740. 7.Freedman LS, Graubard B, Schatzkin A. Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Statistics In Medicine. 1992;11:167-78. 8.Fleming T. Evaluating therapeutic interventions: Some issues and experiences (with discussion). Statistical Science. 1992;7(428-56). 9.Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(7):605-13. 10.Ellenberg SS. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Getting closer to identifying markers for survival in aids. British Medical Journal. 1991;302(63-4). 11.Ellenberg S, Hamilton JM. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Cancer. Stat Med. 1989;8(4):405-13. 12.Wittes J, Lakatos E, Probstfield J. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Cardiovascular diseases. Stat Med. 1989;8(4):415-25. 13.Buyse M, Molenberghs G. Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments. Biometrics. 1998;54(3):1014-29. 14.Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley; 1990. 15.Schatzkin A, Freedman LS, Schiffman MH, Dawsey SM. Validation of intermediate end points in cancer research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82(22):1746-52. 16.Choi S, Lagakos SW, Schooley RT, Volberding PA. Cd4+ lymphocytes are an incomplete surrogate marker for clinical progression in persons with asymptomatic hiv infection taking zidovudine. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(9):674-80. 17.Benson VS, Patnick J, Davies AK, Nadel MR, Smith RA, Atkin WS. Colorectal cancer screening: A comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(6):1357-67. 18.The report of cancer registry on 2012. Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. 2014. http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Portal/File/PressFile/201404151012192334/2011%e7%99%8c%e7%99%bb%e8%a8%98%e8%80%85%e6%9c%83%e7%b0%a1%e5%a0%b1.pdf. 19.Seer cancer statistics review, 1975–2004. In: Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, editors. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2007. 20.Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, Tazi MA, Lamour J, Gerard D, et al. Reduction in colorectal cancer mortality by fecal occult blood screening in a french controlled study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(7):1674-80. 21.Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1472-7. 22.Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348(9040):1467-71. 23.Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(19):1365-71. 24.Levi Z, Rozen P, Hazazi R, Vilkin A, Waked A, Maoz E, et al. A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;146(4):244. 25.Lee KJ, Inoue M, Otani T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S, et al. Colorectal cancer screening using fecal occult blood test and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study in japan. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(1):3-11. 26.Denters MJ, Deutekom M, Fockens P, Bossuyt PM, Dekker E. Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the netherlands. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:28. 27.Nishida H, Urano S. Effectiveness of repeated screening using the fecal occult blood test and its impact on reducing false-negative cancer cases. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011;20(3):184-9. 28.Yang KC, Liao CS, Chiu YH, Yen AM, Chen TH. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood test within a multiple disease screening programme: An experience from keelung, taiwan. J Med Screen. 2006;13 Suppl 1:S8-13. 29.Chen LS, Liao CS, Chang SH, Lai HC, Chen TH. Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening (kcis 16). J Med Screen. 2007;14(4):191-9. 30.Robins J. The control of confounding by intermediate variables Stat Med. 1989;8(6):679-701. 31.MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Brown CH, Wang W, Hoffman JM. The intermediate endpoint effect in logistic and probit regression. Clin Trials. 2007;4(5):499-513. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18425 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究背景及目的
欲了解危險因子是否與感興趣的結果,例如疾病之死亡有相關,通常需要長時間的追蹤及觀察,而替代終點為驗證此因果關係之取代方法,但需經嚴謹的統計方法予以定義。本研究欲應用Prentice與Freedman所提出檢視替代終點之方法,利用社區為基礎之大腸直腸癌篩檢世代資料來評估對大腸直腸癌死亡風險具劑量效應之糞便血紅素濃度因子,是否可利用大腸直腸癌癌症病理分期及篩檢偵測模式作為大腸直腸癌死亡之替代終點進行檢視及驗證。 研究方法 本研究利用三個以社區為基礎之大腸直腸癌篩檢族群,研究樣本共204,052位參與糞便免疫法篩檢至少一次以上之40歲以上民眾,平均經4.14年追蹤時間之資料進行分析。基於Prentice’s替代終點檢視準則之於存活分析方法,以及Freedman’s替代終點準則之於廣義線性模式方法,進一步來驗證糞便血紅素濃度在大腸直腸癌死亡具劑量效應下,驗證癌症病理分期和篩檢偵測模式可否做為大腸直腸癌死亡之替代終點,利用增速事件時間分析模式和羅吉斯迴歸模式配合社區實證資料以檢定Prentice及Freedman所提出之替代終點驗證準則。 研究結果 首次糞便血紅素濃度測量值在篩檢偵測和臨床偵測癌症之表現不同,篩檢偵測癌症潛血值較低並有顯著差異(357.44±730.26與426.74±767.22, P<0.001)。在不同的腫瘤病理分期間,其首次糞便血紅素濃度亦有不同。這些發現皆符合Prentice’s替代終點驗證準則統計上若p則q,若非q則非p之定義。在調整年齡、性別和腫瘤病理分期後,就沒有逐漸增加的糞便血紅素濃度效果,迴歸係數則呈現反向的變化,而腫瘤病理分期在大腸直腸癌死亡風險表現上,迴歸係數仍維持相同方向性。這樣的結果說明了在腫瘤期別下,糞便血紅素濃度對大腸直腸癌死亡之條件獨立性,符合Prentice’s及Freedman’s替代終點驗證準則,這樣的結果在二元迴歸模式中也有相類似的發現。 由於調整和未調整替代終點後的迴歸係數間有相反的效果,Freedman's的解釋比例在所有的分析幾乎是100%,但僅調整腫瘤期別的二元迴歸模式下為96.8% (95%信賴區間為96.4%-97.2%)。藉由用首次糞便血紅素濃度分別對侵襲性大腸直腸癌及大腸直腸癌死亡做預測,對侵襲性大腸直腸癌的作業接受曲線下面積為74.6 %,十分很接近對大腸直腸癌死亡之72.2%。而利用糞便血紅素濃度對大腸直腸癌死亡做預測(72.2%)也與利用腫瘤期別之面積相當接近(73.8%)。 結論 本研究呈現如何應用替代終點的統計定義去評估某些歸因因子或危險因子對長期追蹤結果的效應,這樣的優點可免除長期追蹤的時間並同時獲得統計效益。本研究成功的應用Prentice’s及Freedman’s替代終點驗證統計準則並結合迴歸分析於探討糞便血紅素濃度與大腸直腸癌死亡之關係,驗證當長期追蹤結果為大腸直腸癌死亡時,腫瘤病理分期或篩檢偵測模式可做為大腸直腸癌死亡之替代終點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background
Surrogate endpoint under the context of strict statistical definition is a good idea for dispensing with long-term follow-up when the effect of certain risk factor on long-term sequence is required to be validated. The recent postulate on the effect of fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb) concentration on colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality is a good example. Aim We aimed to assess whether the effect of an incremental increase in f-Hb on the risk of death from CRC can be validated by using tumor stage and detection mode as surrogate endpoint under strict statistical definition of Prentice’s and Freedman’s criteria based on data on community-based CRC screening. Material and Methods A total of 205,042 participates with average of 4.14 years of follow-up, comprising three cohorts aged over 40 years who underwent CRC screening with fecal immunochemical test, were enrolled in our analysis. Prentice’s criteria under the context of survival domain and Freedman’s criteria under the context of generalized linear model were applied to validate the definition of the surrogate endpoint such as tumor stage and detection mode for the effect of f-Hb on CRC mortality. Accelerated failure time (AFT) model and the logistic regression model were operated to test these two conceptual criteria. Result The average baseline f-Hb concentration was different between screen-detected CRC and clinical-detected CRC. The difference of average baseline f-Hb across tumor stages was also noted. An incremental increase in both of baseline and updated f-Hb on the risk of advanced CRC cancer were found. These findings met statistical definition for surrogate endpoint using Prentice’s criteria with full equivalent logic argument (p⇔q). There was lacking of incremental effect of f-Hb on the risk for CRC death after adjustment for age, gender and tumor stages, showing there is a dramatic change of regression coefficients regarding the incremental effect of f-Hb. The effect of tumor stage on CRC death remained identical. These finding upheld Prentice’s and Freedman’s criteria on the auxillary argument about conditional independent effect of the f-Hb group on CRC death given tumor stage information has already known. Due to the opposite sign of regression coefficients between the unadjusted and adjusted for surrogate endpoints, Freedman's Proportion Explained (FPE) in all analysis were 100% but only 96.8% (95% CI: 96.4%-97.2%) of PE was found in binary model making allowance of tumor stage only. The 74.6 % of area under curve (AUC) for advanced CRC was close to that of 72.2% of AUC for CRC death by using baseline f-Hb as predictor. The predictive validity for f-Hb (72.2%) was also close to that for advanced CRC (73.8%). Conclusion We demonstrate how to apply statistical definition of surrogate endpoint to evaluate the effect of certain attribute or risk factor on long-term outcome in order to dispense with long-term follow-up and also to gain statistical efficiency. Prentice’s and Freedman’s criteria in combination with regression models were successfully applied to evaluating the effect of f-Hb on CRC mortality by using tumor stage and possibly detection mode as surrogate endpoint. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:04:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-P01849003-1.pdf: 1360960 bytes, checksum: 67384e761dce3903318af93420022320 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 1
摘要 2 Abstract 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 11 Chapter 2: Literature Review 14 2.1 Definition of Surrogate Endpoint 14 2.2 Prentice's Criteria for the Validation of Surrogate Endpoint 15 2.2.1 Prentice's Criteria 15 2.2.2 Freedman’s Criteria 17 2.2.3 Operational Definition with Regression Model 19 2.2.4 Freedman's Proportion Explained 21 2.3 Surrogate Endpoint for Effect of Fecal Hemoglobin Concentration on Screening Colorectal Cancer and Predicting its Mortality 22 Chapter 3: Data Source 26 3.1 Study Cohort 26 3.1.1 The Keelung Cohort 26 3.1.2 The Changhua Cohort 27 3.1.3 The Tainan Cohort 27 3.2 Laboratory Exam of Fecal Hemoglobulin Concentration 28 3.3 Data Collection 29 Chapter 4: Methodological Applications 31 4.1 Prentice’s Criteria of Surrogate Endpoints for the Effect of Fecal Hemoglobin on Colorectal Cancer Mortality 31 4.2 Freedman’s Criteria 33 4.3 Operational Definition of Surrogate Endpoint Using Regression Model 34 4.4 Freedman’s proportion explained 35 4.5 Freedman’s Criteria Tested by Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve 35 Chapter 5: Result 36 5.1 Demographics of Group of General Population and Colorectal Cancer Cases 36 5.2 Findings of CRC Cases 37 5.3 Statistical Testing for Prentice’s Criteria of (4-2) 38 5.4 Statistical Testing for Prentice’s Criteria of (4-3) 38 5.5 Interaction between Fecal Hemoglobin and Tumor Stage and Detection Mode 41 5.6 Statistical Testing for Prentice’s Criteria of (4-2) and (4-11) 42 5.7 Statistical Testing for Prentice’s Criteria of (3-6) and Freedman’s Criteria of (4-12) 43 5.8 Freedman's Proportion Explained by Using Tumor Stage as Surrogate Endpoint 44 5.9 Receiver Operating Characteristics Curves of Advanced CRC and CRC Death 45 Chapter 6: Discussion 46 6.1 Clinical Usefulness of Surrogate Endpoints in Longitudinal Follow-up 46 6.2 Applications to the Relationship between Fecal Hemoglobin and Colorectal Cancer Mortality 46 6.3 Statistical Benefit of Using Surrogate Endpoint 48 6.4 Intermediate Endpoint 49 6.5 Relationship of Interaction between Surrogate Endpoint and Fecal Hemoglobin 49 6.6 Using Tumor Stage as Surrogate Endpoint to Predict Colorectal Cancer Mortality by Freedman's Proportion Explained and Receiver Operating Characteristics curve 50 6.7 Strengths and Limitations 51 6.8 Conclusion 52 Reference 77 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 以糞便血色素濃度預測大腸直腸癌死亡之替代終點研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Surrogate Endpoint for Effect of Fecal Hemoglobin Concentration on Colorectal Cancer Mortality | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳立昇(Li-Sheng Chen),李宜家(Yi-Chia Lee),李永凌(Yung-Ling Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 糞便血色素濃度,替代終點,大腸直腸癌,腫瘤期別,篩檢偵測模式, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Fecal hemoglobin concentration,Surrogate endpoint,Colorectal cancer,Cancer stage,Detection mode, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
