Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18417
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王銘宗
dc.contributor.authorWen-Hsiu Kuoen
dc.contributor.author郭玟秀zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T01:04:12Z-
dc.date.copyright2014-08-25
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-08-21
dc.identifier.citationAkarte, MM, Surendra, NV, Ravi, B, & Rangaraj, N. (2001). Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 511-522.
Al-Harbi, Kamal M. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International journal of project management, 19(1), 19-27. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
Albayrak, Esra, & Erensal, Yasemin Claire. (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: an application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15(4), 491-503. doi: 10.1023/B:JIMS.0000034112.00652.4c
Bhutta, Khurrum S., & Huq, Faizul. (2002). Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(3), 126-135. doi: 10.1108/13598540210436586
Chan, Felix T. S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Choy, K. L. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), 3825-3857. doi: 10.1080/00207540600787200
Chan, FT S. (2003). Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41(15), 3549-3579. doi: 10.1080/0020754031000138358
Chan, FTS, & Chan, HK. (2004). Development of the supplier selection model—a case study in the advanced technology industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 218(12), 1807-1824. doi: 10.1177/095440540421801213
Chan, FTS, Chan, HK, Ip, RWL, & Lau, HCW. (2007). A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 221(4), 741-758. doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM629
Chen, Chen-Tung, Lin, Ching-Torng, & Huang, Sue-Fn. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International journal of production economics, 102(2), 289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009
Chen, Yuh-Jen. (2011). Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Information Sciences, 181(9), 1651-1670. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.07.026
Choi, Thomas Y., & Hartley, Janet L. (1996). An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of operations management, 14(4), 333-343. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00091-5
Denzin, Norman K. (2001). Interpretive interactionism (Vol. 16): Sage Publications, Inc.
Forman, Ernest H, & Gass, Saul I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process-an exposition. Operations research, 49(4), 469-486. doi: 0030-364X/01/4904-0469
Gencer, Cevriye, & Gurpinar, Didem. (2007). Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31(11), 2475-2486. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.002
Ghodsypour, S.H., & O'Brien, C. (2001). The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. International Journal of Production Economics, 73(1), 15-27. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00093-7
Ghorbani, Mazaher, Arabzad, S. Mohammad, & Shahin, Arash. (2013). A novel approach for supplier selection based on the Kano model and fuzzy MCDM. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5469-5484. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.784403
Gubrium, Jaber F, & Holstein, James A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and method: Sage Publications, Inc.
Handfield, Robert, Walton, Steven V, Sroufe, Robert, & Melnyk, Steven A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70-87. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2
Ho, William, Xu, Xiaowei, & Dey, Prasanta K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
Hou, Jiachen, & Su, Daizhong. (2007). EJB-MVC oriented supplier selection system for mass customization. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(1), 54-71. doi: 10.1108/17410380710717643
Kahraman, Cengiz, Cebeci, Ufuk, & Ulukan, Ziya. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394. doi: 10.1108/09576050310503367
Khorramshahgol, Reza. (2012). An integrated strategic approach to supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(1), 55-76. doi: 10.1142/S0219622012500034
Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin, & Hai, Hui Lin. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), 308-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005
Liu, Jian, Ding, Fong-Yuen, & Lall, Vinod. (2000). Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(3), 143-150. doi: 10.1108/13598540010338893
Min, Hokey. (1994). International supplier selection:: A multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(5), 24-33. doi: 10.1108/09600039410064008
Muralidharan, C, Anantharaman, N, & Deshmukh, SG. (2002). A Multi‐Criteria Group Decisionmaking Model for Supplier Rating. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(3), 22-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00140.x
Putrus, Robert S. (1992). Outsourcing analysis and justification using AHP. Information Strategy, 9(1), 31-36.
Ritchie, Jane, Lewis, Jane, Nicholls, Carol McNaughton, & Ormston, Rachel. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (second ed.): Sage Publications Inc.
Rubin, Herbert J, & Rubin, Irene S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data: Sage Publications, Inc.
Saaty, Thomas L. (1980a). The analytic hierarchy process: McGraw-Hill New York.
Saaty, Thomas L. (1980b). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation: McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
Saaty, Thomas L. (1987). How to handle dependence with the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 369-376. doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90494-5
Saaty, Thomas L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Sarkis, Joseph, & Talluri, Srinivas. (2002). A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of supply chain management, 38(4), 18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00117.x
Seidman, Irving. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (fourth ed.): Teachers college press.
Sevkli, Mehmet, Koh, S. C. Lenny, Zaim, Selim, Demirbag, Mehmet, & Tatoglu, Ekrem. (2007). An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 45(9), 1973-2003. doi: 10.1080/00207540600957399
Vaidya, Omkarprasad S, & Kumar, Sushil. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Xia, Weijun, & Wu, Zhiming. (2007). Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega, 35(5), 494-504. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.09.002
Žavbi, Roman, & Duhovnik, Jože. (1996). The analytic hierarchy process and functional appropriateness of components of technical systems. Journal of Engeering Design, 7(3), 313-327. doi: 10.1080/09544829608907943
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18417-
dc.description.abstract供應商評選是採購部門最重要的任務之一,在現今競爭激烈的全球化經營環境中,如果一間企業欲致力於維持或提升其競爭優勢,其高階主管在決策採購決策時,必須考量到供應商的販售價格、產品品質、服務周全性等因素,在整體的供應商評選過程中,無非是為了達到降低採購風險和成本、為自身企業創造最大的價值等目地,並且建立雙方之間的密切關係和長期合作關係。
  在紡織產業中,在採購原料時必須考慮許多因素,根據與紡織產業先進的訪談內容得知原料成本佔總成本相當大的比例,因此今年採購原料的時機和價格都會深深地影響當年度的利潤和經營績效。然而,供應商評選是一個同時包含質化和量化因素的多準則議題,但在實務上,大多仰賴高階主管的直覺和經驗來擬定採購決策,並沒有一定的規則或制度可以依循。本研究的目的在於以多準則決策理論為基礎,建構一個適用於臺灣紡織產業的供應商評選模型,並且期望透過實證分析對實務應用及理論研究皆做出貢獻。
  本研究以多準則決策理論為基礎,嘗試建立一個三階段的供應商評選模型,利用文獻探討與專家深度訪談、模糊德菲法和層級分析法,層層篩選最適用於紡織產業的供應商評選因素,最後邀請13位紡織產業資深的高階經理為本研究提出之因素進行兩兩成對比較,藉由層級分析法的計算,結果顯示成本(0.3386)和品質(0.2013)是影響供應商評選最關鍵的構面,此外,在排名前十名的關鍵因素依序遞減為:購買價格(0.1603)、存貨成本(0.0860)、全球氣候變遷(0.0804)、商業信譽(0.0754)、品質一致性(0.0727)、準時交貨(0.0647)、不良率(0.0516)、財務穩定性(0.0484)、物流成本(0.0438)及關稅(0.0438),值得注意的是成本構面下的四個因素都在整體的前十名內,如同在專家深度訪談中得知成本是影響當年度獲利表現的關鍵因素。
  一般而言,紡織產業中的國際原料供應商評選議題包含了複雜因素和各式各樣的情境,高階主管必須具備敏銳的分析能力和豐富的經驗才能做出最有利的採購決策。雖然過去已有許多研究針對供應商評選的議題做深入探討,但本研究提出的模型與其他研究的不同之處在於增加了全球氣候變遷和政治穩定等外在環境因素,彌補了其他研究不適用於紡織產業的缺點,透過三階段的層層篩選,建立一個紡織產業原料供應商評選模型,簡化過去複雜的評選因素,並將其系統化,期能幫助高階主管更準確且迅速地做出正確的採購決策。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractSupplier selection is one of the most significant activities for purchasing departments. In today’s competitive global business environment, if a company makes great efforts to preserve its competitiveness, its decision makers need to consider the suppliers’ price, quality, service, etc. The entire purpose of supplier selection process is to decrease purchasing risk and cost, maximize value to the purchaser, and establish the intimacy and long-term relationship between buyers and suppliers.
In the textile industry, there are many factors must be considered when purchasing raw materials. Cost of raw materials accounts for a considerable proportion of total cost. Purchase may affects profit and operation performance this year. Supplier selection is a multiple criteria issue which contains both qualitative and quantitative factors. However, there is no rules to select raw material suppliers in practice. The purpose of this study is to describe an application of supplier selection model based on multiple criteria decision making techniques in Taiwanese textile industry. We hope that the case implementation results are of great interest both for practice application and theory research.
This study proposes a three-phase approach for supplier selection based on the multiple criteria decision making including in-depth experts interview, Fuzzy Delphi Method and analytic hierarchy process. After analyzing, the result shows that cost (0.3386) and quality (0.2013) are the critical dimensions by the preference of 13 selected senior managers in textile industry. Besides, the top 10 critical criteria among 20 criteria are shown as follows in sequence: purchase price (0.1603), inventory cost (0.0860), global climate change (0.0804), reputation (0.0754), quality consistency (0.0727), on-time delivery (0.0647), rejection rate (0.0516), financial stability (0.0484), logistics cost (0.0438), and tariffs and taxes (0.0438). It is worth noting that 4 criteria of cost dimension are all in top 10 critical criteria.
In general, international raw material supplier selection of textile industry issues consist of complex criteria and varied situation. The decision makers must have the penetrating abilities of analyzing and plentiful experience to make appropriate decisions. In this study, we developed a three-phases multiple criteria decision making technique, in-depth experts interview, Fuzzy Delphi Method and analytic hierarchy process, to obtained the criteria of supplier selection in textile industry. Our proposed model differs from previous studies, environmental problems including climate change and political stability are concerned.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:04:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-R01546014-1.pdf: 1819185 bytes, checksum: 0fef38cf85070dba1f0b5ed754e05f35 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 III
中文摘要 IV
Abstract VI
LIST OF FIGURES X
LIST OF TABLES XI
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 5
1.3 Research Procedure 6
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Supplier Selection Criteria 8
2.2 Literature Review of Supplier Selection 13
CHAPTER 3. Research Methodologies 16
3.1 Research Framework 16
3.2 In-depth Experts Interview 19
3.3 Fuzzy Delphi Method 24
3.4 Analytic Hierarchy Process 34
CHAPTER 4. CASE IMPLEMENTATION 42
4.1 Results of In-depth Experts Interview 42
4.2 Results of Fuzzy Delphi Method 45
4.3 Results of Analytic Hierarchy Process 49
CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS 53
5.1 Conclusions and Discussions 53
5.2 Contributions 55
5.3 Research Limitations 57
5.4 Suggestions for Future Research 58
LIST OF REFERENCES 59
APPENDIX A 63
APPENDIX B 69
dc.language.isoen
dc.title以多準則決策方法分析原物料供應商評選之關鍵準則-以臺灣A紡織公司為例zh_TW
dc.titleUsing Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach to construct Key Indicators of Raw Material Supplier Selection – Taking Taiwanese Textile Company A as an Exampleen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor蔡智勇
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee朱瓊華,林秀玲,黃舒伶,廖昭昌
dc.subject.keyword紡織產業,供應商評選,多準則決策,模糊德菲法,層級分析法,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTextile industry,Supplier selection,Multiple criteria decision making,Fuzzy Delphi Method,Analytic hierarchy process,en
dc.relation.page78
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2014-08-21
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工業工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.78 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved