請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18400
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇彩足 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Kang Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉仲康 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T01:03:20Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-09-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-09-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
丘昌泰,2008,《公共政策‧基礎篇》,台北:巨流出版。 中華民國統計資訊網,2014,〈聯合國HDI之改版與GII之創編〉,http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/32211511471.pdf,2014/3/6。 李元裕、尤善嘉,2012,〈下一站‧幸福:探討追求發展之另類指標〉,「第四屆發展研究年會學術研討會」論文 (10月20-21日),台北:國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所。 李健強、張存炳,2007,〈社會福利支出、人力資本與經濟成長─台灣的實證研究〉,《經濟與管理論叢》,3(2):225-247。 朱文儀,1991,《高科技產業從事共同研究發展之實證探討─以資訊電子業為例》,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 杜震華,2010,《世界經濟導論─全球化的生產與貿易》,台北:普林斯頓國際。 吳聰敏,2014,《經濟學原理》,http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntut019/ecomicro/ecomicro.html,2014/8/15。 郭昱瑩,2008,〈公共財政與公共選擇的對話〉,《公共行政學報》,26:159-169。 徐仁輝,2001,〈公共支出決策模式之剖析〉,中華決策科學學會年會發表論文。 徐仁輝,2005,《公共財務管理:公共預算與財務行政》,台北:智勝文化。 徐燕秀,2011,〈人力資本及人力資源發展策略的探討〉,http://www2.evta.gov.tw/safe/docs/safe95/userplane/half_year_display.asp?menu_id=3&submenu_id=518&ap_id=1392,2014/6/2。 張舒婷,2009,《OECD 國家公共年金之研究─單一制與分立制之比較》,國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 張潤書,2004,《行政學》,台北:三民。 蔡吉源,1997,《社會福利支出對臺灣總體經濟的影響》,台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。 蘇彩足,1998,〈聚合或分歧?-- OECD各國政府資源配置之演變趨勢〉,行政院國家科學委員會專題計畫成果報告。 西文部分 Akcay, Selcuk. 2006. “Corruption and Human Development.” Cato Journal 26(1): 29-48. Anand, Sudhir & Martin Ravallion. 1993. “Human Development in Poor Countries: On the Role of Private Incomes and Public Services.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(1): 133-150. Barro, Robert J. 1990. “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 103-125. Bassanini, Andrea & Stefano Scarpetta. 2001. “The Driving Forces of Economic Growth: Panel Data Evidence for the OECD Countries.” OECD Economic Studies 33: 9-56. Belletini, Giorgio & Carlotta Bertu Ceroni. 2000. “Social Security Expenditure and Economic Growth: An Empirical Assessment.” Research in Economics 54(3): 249-275. Bjornskov, Christian, Alex Dreher & Justina A. Fischer. 2007. “The Bigger the Better? Evidence of the Effect of Government Size on Life Satisfaction around the World.” Public Choice 130(3): 267–292. Bjornskov, Christian, Alex Dreher & Justina A. Fischer. 2008. “Cross-country Determinants of Life Satisfaction: Exploring Determinants across Groups in Society.” Social Choice and Welfare 30(1): 119-173. Blankenau, William F. & Nicole B. Simpson. 2004. “Public Education Expenditures and Growth.” Journal of Development Economics 73(2): 583-605. Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, J-W Lee. 1998. “How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?” Journal of International Economics 45: 115-135. Brennan, G & J. M. Buchanan. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundation of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Buchanan, James M. & Richard A. Musgrave. 1999. Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Buiter, Willem H. & Kenneth M. Kletzer. 1993. “Permanent International Productivity Growth Differentials in an Integrated Global Economy.” Scand. J. of Economics 95(4): 467-493. Cai, Yong. 2009. “Regional Inequality in China: Mortality and Health.” in Creating Wealth and Poverty in Postsocialist China. Deborah S. Davis & Wang Feng. California: Stanford University Press. Caldwell, John C. 1986. “Routes to Low Mortality in Poor Countries.” Population and Development Review 12(2): 171-220. Caldwell, John C. 1990. “Cultural and Social Factors Influencing Mortality Levels in Developing Countries.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 510(1): 44-59. Cleland, John G. & Jerome K. Van Ginneken. 1988. “Material Education and Child Survival in Developing Countries: The Search for Pathways of Influence.” Social Science Medicine 27(12): 1357-1368. Cullis, John & Philip Jones. 2009. Public Finance & Public Choice: Analytical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. Davies, Antony. 2009. “Human Development and the Optimal Size of Government.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 38: 326-330. Davies, Antony & Gary Quinlivan. 2006. “A Panel Data Analysis of the Impact of Trade on Human Development.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 35: 868 -876. Dewan, Sabina & Michael Ettlinger. 2009. “Comparing Public Spending and Priorities across OECD Countries.” in http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2009/10/pdf/oecd_spending.pdf. Latest update 25 October 2013. Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence” in Nations and Households in Economic Growth. P. David and M. Redar. New York: Academic Press. Gertner, Jon. 2010. “The Rise and Fall of the G.D.P.” in The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/magazine/16GDP-t.html?pagewanted=all&r=0. Latest update 25 October 2013. Gilpin, Robert & Jean M. Gilpin. 2001. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Goldstein, Joshua S. & Jon C. Pevehouse. 2007. International Relations. Boston: Pearson Longman. Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometrics. Boston : McGraw Hill. Hannum, Emily & Jennifer Adams. 2009. “Beyond Cost: Rural Perspectives on Barriers to Education” in Creating Wealth and Poverty in Postsocialist China. Deborah S. Davis & Wang Feng. California: Stanford University Press. Harris, Sandra M. 1998. “Factors Influencing Pursuit of Higher Education: Validating a Questionnaire.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Higgins, Andrew. 2013. “Vote for Merkel Seen as Victory for Austerity.” in The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/world/europe/vote-for-merkel-seen-as-victory-for-austerity.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&. Latest update 23 September 2013. IMF. 2014. “World Economic Outlook.” in http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=k3s92bru78li6_&hl=en&dl=en#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=ggx_ngdp&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=world&idim=world:Earth&idim=country:CL&ifdim=world&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false. Latest update 18 February 2014. Keeley, Brian. 2007. Human Capital: How What You Know Shapes Your Life. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Kelly, Allen C. 1991. “The Human Development Index: “Handle with Care.”” Population and Development Review 17(2): 315-324. Krugman, Paul. 2012. “Death of a Fairy Tale.” in The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/27/opinion/krugman-death-of-a-fairy-tale.html. Latest update 23 September 2013. Lai, Dejian. 2000. “Temporal Analysis of Human Development Indicators: Principal Component Approach.” Social Indicators Research 51(3): 331-366. Landau, Daniel. 1983. “Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study.” Southern Economic Journal 49(3): 783-792. Layard, Richard. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin Books. Lind, Niels C. 1992. “Some Thoughts on the Human Development Index.” Social Indicators Research 27: 89-101. Lind, Neils. 2004. “Values Reflected in the Human Development Index.” Social Indicators Research 66(3): 283-293. Lucas, Robert E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-42. McGillivray, Mark. 1991. “The Human Development Index: Yet Another Redundant Composite Development Indicator?” World Development 19(10): 1461-1468. Morse, Stephen. 2003. “For Better or For Worse, till the Human Development Index Do Us Apart?” Ecological Economics 45: 281-296. Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill. Neumayer, Eric. 2001. “The Human Development Index and Sustainability – A Constructive Proposal.” Ecological Economics 39: 101-114. Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton. Noorbakhsh, Farhad. 1998. “A Modified Human Development Index.” World Development 26(3): 517-528. OECD. 2013a. “Government Debt: General Government Gross Financial Liabilities as A Percentage of GDP.” in http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/government-debt_gov-debt-table-en. Latest update 26 November 2013. OECD. 2013b. “Government Deficit/Surplus as a Percentage of GDP: General Government Financial Balance, Surplus (+), Deficit (-).” in http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/government-deficit_gov-dfct-table-en. Latest update 26 November 2013. OECD. 2013c. “List of OECD Member Countries – Ratification of the Convention on the OECD.” in http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/list-oecd-member-countries.htm. Latest update 26 November 2013. OECD. 2013d. “Table A1.4a – Trends in Educational Attainment, by Age Group, and Average Annual Growth Rate (2000-2011)” in Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2013/trends-in-educational-attainment-by-age-group-and-average-annual-growth-rate-2000-11_eag-2013-table9-en. Latest update 16 August 2014. OECD. 2014a. “Gross Domestic Product (GDP): GDP per Head, US$, Constant Prices, Constant PPPs, Reference Year 2005.” in http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=559. Latest update 2 July 2014. OECD. 2014b. “LFS (Labor Force Statistics) by Sex and Age – Indicators” in https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=LFS_SEXAGE_I_R. Latest update 28 June 2014. OECD. 2014c. “Main Science and Technology Indicators - Industry Financed GERD as a Percentage of GDP.” in http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GERD_COST. Latest update 28 June 2014. OECD. 2014d. “National Account at a Glance: General Government.” in http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SNA_TABLE11. Latest update 18 February 2014. Pietro, G. Di. 2003. “Equality of Opportunity in Italian University Education: Is there any Role for Social Welfare Spending?” International Journal of Education Development 23: 5-15. Ranis, Gustav & Frances Stewart. 2000. “Strategies for Success in Human Development.” Journal of Human Development 1(1): 49-70. Ranis, Gustav & Frances Stewart. 2005. “The Priority of Human Development.” The Development Imperative: Toward a People-Centered Approach. pp.37-51. Ranis, Gustav, Frances Stewart & Alejandro Ramirez. 2000. “Economic Development and Human Development.” World Development 28(2): 197-219 Ranis, Gustav, Frances Stewart & Emma Samman. 2006. “Human Development: Beyond the Human Development Index.” Journal of Human Development 7(3): 323-358. Ravillion, Martin. 1997. “Good and Bad Growth: The Human Development Reports.” World Development 25(5): 631-638. Richards, Donald G. 2000. “An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Human Development and Quasi-Public Goods.” Review of Radical Political Economics 32(3): 417-427. Roubini, Nouriel, Jeffery Sachs, Seppo Honkapohja & Daniel Cohen. 1989. “Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Countries.” Economic Policy 4(8): 100-132. Sagar, Ambuj D. & Adil Najam. 1998. “The Human Development Index: A Critical Review.” Ecological Economics 25: 249-264. Sagar, Ambuj D. & Adil Najam. 1999. “Shaping Human Development: Which Way Next?” Third World Quarterly 20(4): 743-751. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. 1997. “Transfers, Social Safety Nets, and Economic Growth” IMF Staff Papers 44(1): 81-102. Saulnier, Raymond J. 1963. “Factors of Economic Growth.” in http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/17029/1/ar630005.pdf. Latest update 18 June 2014. Scully, Gerald W. 2001. “Government Expenditure and Quality of Life.” Public Choice 108(1/2): 123-145. Sen, Amartya. 2012. “The Crisis of European Democracy.” in The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/opinion/the-crisis-of-european-democracy.html?_r=0. Latest update 23 September 2013. Stapleton, Lee M. & Guy D. Garrod. 2007. “Keeping Things Simple: Why the Human Development Index Should Not Diverge from Its Equal Weights Assumption.” Social Indicators Research 84(2): 179-188. Tanzi, Vito. 2008. “The Role of the State and Public Finance in the Next Generation.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 8(2). Tanzi, Vito. 2011. Government versus Markets: The Changing Economic Role of the State. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tanzi, Vito & Ludger Schuknecht. 2000. Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. The Heritage Foundation. 2014a. “2014 Index of Economic Freedom Index: About the Index.” in http://www.heritage.org/index/about. Latest update 12 August 2014. The Heritage Foundation. 2014b. “2014 Index of Economic Freedom Index: Explore the Data – All Index Data.” in http://www.heritage.org/index/explore?view=by-region-country-year. Latest update 12 August 2014. The Heritage Foundation. 2014c. “2014 Index of Economic Freedom Index: Open Markets – Financial Freedom.” in http://www.heritage.org/index/financial-freedom. Latest update 12 August 2014. The Heritage Foundation. 2014d. “2014 Index of Economic Freedom Index: Open Markets – Investment Freedom.” in http://www.heritage.org/index/investment-freedom. Latest update 12 August 2014. The Heritage Foundation. 2014e. “2014 Index of Economic Freedom Index: Open Markets – Trade Freedom.” in http://www.heritage.org/index/trade-freedom. Latest update 12 August 2014. UN. 2014. World Economic Situation and Prospects 2014. New York: The United Nations. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wesp2014_en.pdf. Latest update 26 August 2014. UNDP. 2013a. Human Development Report 2013. New York: The United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/2013-report. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNDP. 2013b. Human Development Report 2013 Technical Notes. New York: The United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2013_EN_TechNotes.pdf. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNDP. 2014a. “Expected Years of Schooling (of Children) (years).” in http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/expected-years-schooling-children-years. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNDP. 2014b. “GNI per Capita in PPP terms (constant 2005 international $).” in http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gni-capita-ppp-terms-constant-2011-ppp. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNDP. 2014c. “Human Development Index (HDI).” in https://data.undp.org/dataset/Human-Development-Index-HDI-value/8ruz-shxu. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNDP. 2014d. “Human Development Reports Library: Global Reports.” in http://hdr.undp.org/en/global-reports. Latest update 30 July 2014. UNDP. 2014e. “Life expectancy at Birth (years).” in http://hdr.undp.org/en/69206. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNDP. 2014f. “Mean Years of Schooling (of Adults) (years).” in http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/mean-years-schooling-females-aged-25-years-and-above-years. Latest update 18 February 2014. UNSD. 2014. “United Nations Statistics Division - Detailed Structure and Explanatory Notes (Classification of the Functions of Government, COFOG).” in http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=4. Latest update 16 August 2014. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1964. The Politics of Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown and Co. Williamson, Oliver Eaton. 1964. The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. World Bank. 1997. The World Bank Annual Report: Major World Bank Program – Human Development. Washington: World Bank. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18400 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 全球金融危機與歐洲債務危機造成全球政治經濟環境極大的衝擊。面對經濟危機衝擊的影響,許多已開發國家選擇以擴大公共支出因應。然而,公共支出的擴張卻造成政府財政赤字以及公共債務的增加,導致國家財政問題的浮現。
為了解決財政問題,許多西方國家選擇以撙節措施因應,透過刪減公共支出來減輕財政負擔。然而,刪減公共支出對於國民生活福祉所造成的影響卻出現正反不同的看法。因此,本研究欲進一步探討公共支出對於已開發國家之國民生活福祉的影響。 本研究之研究對象為經濟合作暨發展組織(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD)國家共34國。本研究選擇聯合國開發計畫署(United Nations Development Programme, UNDP)所編纂的人類發展指數(Human Development Index, HDI)作為依變項,用以衡量國民之生活福祉。人類發展指數為一個單一綜合性指數,衡量一國在健康、教育、以及經濟層面的表現。本研究分析的時間範圍為2005年至2012年。本研究之自變項為OECD國家之公共支出。為反映公共支出的遞延影響效果,本研究以前一期的概念,選擇2004年至2011年作為分析的時間範圍。 透過迴歸模型之分析,本研究得到以下之結果。首先,政府的醫療支出與社會安全支出對於國民的「平均零歲餘命」具有顯著正向的影響。再者,政府的教育支出、社會安全支出、以及醫療支出皆對於一國之「預期受教育年數」具有顯著正向的影響。然而,即便政府的社會安全支出與醫療支出對於一國之「平均受教育年數」具有顯著正向的影響,政府教育支出的影響則為不顯著。另外,就公共支出對於「購買力平價計算之實質人均GNI」的影響而言,本研究得到的結果與凱因斯理論之論述相符:在經濟景氣良好的時候,公共支出具有排擠效果,對於整體經濟的表現具有負向的影響;然而,當經濟景氣出現衰退時,公共支出具有正向的刺激效果。最後,就公共支出對於人類發展指數的影響而言,本研究之迴歸模型結果顯示公共支出具有顯著正向的影響。 本研究認為,以上之結果能夠說明公共支出扮演著提升OECD國家國民生活福祉的角色。採取撙節措施雖然有助於減緩當前政府的財政問題,但是對於國民生活福祉的長遠影響是不可忽略的面向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The impact of the global financial crisis and the European debt crisis was huge and worldwide. For many developed countries, increasing public spending to boost the economy was their approach to deal with the economic crises. However, the move soon led to a bigger issue as fiscal deficit and national debt surged.
To address the problem, austerity measures and government spending cuts were carried out. However, the impact of government spending cuts on people’s well-being is a divided debate. Therefore, in this study, we shall look into the impact of public spending in the developed countries and see how it affects people’s lives. In our study, we shall examine the impact of public spending on human development in all 34 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. The analysis of this study covers an eight-year period, from 2005 to 2012, with the Human Development Index (HDI) and all four of its indicators being the dependent variables, and public spending in the OECD countries the independent variables. The HDI is a composite index developed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to evaluate the well-being of citizens in each United Nations (UN) country by health, education, and the standard of living. Our findings are as follows. First, our results show that health and social security spending both contribute to the increase in “life expectancy at birth”. Second, we found that the impact of education, social security, and health spending on “expected years of schooling” is significant and positive. While the impact of health and social security spending on “mean years of schooling” is significant and positive, we found the impact of public spending on education to be statistically insignificant. In addition, according to our results, despite that public spending can cause a crowding-out effect when the economy is booming, it plays a stimulus role during economic downturns. Finally, we found the impact of public spending on the HDI to be significant and positive, indicating that public spending is crucial for sustaining human development in the OECD countries. Although austerity measures may seem to be a solution to alleviate the nations’ financial problems, its impact on people’s lives in the long run cannot be overlooked. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T01:03:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00322023-1.pdf: 3609362 bytes, checksum: 193953a73b26a70aeaebbb2de944be47 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論......1
第一節 研究動機與研究問題......1 第二節 研究範圍......5 第三節 研究架構......7 第四節 研究目的......8 第二章 文獻回顧......11 第一節 公共支出的影響效果......11 第二節 公共支出對國民生活福祉的影響......15 第三節 公共支出與人類發展指數之相關文獻......19 第三章 人類發展指數之緣起與內涵......21 第一節 人類發展指數之緣起......21 第二節 人類發展指數之內涵......24 第三節 人類發展指數之觀察分析......30 第四章 OECD國家之公共支出......39 第一節 OECD國家之公共支出規模......39 第二節 OECD國家之公共支出結構......47 第五章 迴歸分析......53 第一節 統計模型之選擇......53 第二節 迴歸模型之依變項.......54 第三節 迴歸模型之解釋變項......54 第四節 迴歸模型之建構......68 第五節 數據資料之來源與說明......72 第六節 迴歸模型結果之呈現......75 第七節 迴歸模型結果之探討......93 第六章 結論與未來研究建議......97 第一節 研究結果......97 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議......100 參考文獻......101 壹、 中文部分......101 貳、 西文部分......102 附錄一 OECD會員國中英文對照表......113 附錄二 OECD國家之平均零歲餘命......114 附錄三 OECD國家之預期受教育年數......115 附錄四 OECD國家之平均受教育年數......116 附錄五 OECD國家之人均GNI......117 附錄六 OECD國家之人類發展指數......118 附錄七 OECD國家公共支出項目分類......119 附錄八 經濟自由度指數之衡量項目......122 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | OECD國家公共支出對人類發展指數之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Public Spending on the Human Development Index in the OECD Countries | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王宏文,方凱弘 | |
dc.subject.keyword | OECD國家,公共支出,健康,教育,經濟,人類發展指數,長期追蹤型資料統計迴歸模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | OECD countries,public spending,health,education,standard of living,Human Development Index,panel data model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-09-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.52 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。