請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18029
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳郁蕙 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tien-Tzu Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王恬滋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:48:58Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 行政院主計總處,1993。『統計地區標準分類』。台北:行政院主計總處。(http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct_view.asp?xItem=27078&ctNode=1313)
(2015/01/25)。 行政院主計總處,2004。『農林漁牧業普查簡介』。台北:行政院主計總處。(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=565&ctNode=3277&mp=1) (2015/01/24)。 行政院主計總處,2006。『94年農牧戶普查表』。台北:行政院主計總處。(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct_view.asp?xItem=16803&ctNode=3277) (2015/01/25)。 行政院主計總處,2013。『99年農牧戶普查表』。台北:行政院主計總處。(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=34529&ctNode=3277&mp=1) (2015/01/30)。 行政院主計總處,2014。『產業關聯表』。台北:行政院主計總處。(http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/51692441A8RC8SAF.pdf)(2015/01/30)。 行政院農業委員會,1991。「農業天然災害救助辦法」。 行政院農業委員會,1994-2014。『農業統計年報』。台北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,1997-2014。『農業統計年報』。台北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2001-2014。『農業統計年報』。台北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2004-2014。『農業統計年報』。台北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2012。「政府已實施多項農業補助將採取更積極作法因應國際環境變化」。(http://www.coa.gov.tw/show_news.php?cat=show_news&serial=coa_diamond_20120517181723&print=1)(2015/04/13)。 行政院農業委員會,2013。「政府持續補貼化學肥料,減輕農民負擔」。(http://www.ey.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D7350F42DBAB35D7&sms=D50166BA3B48B之D2A&s=D4A8E35F59430C26)(2015/03/12)。 行政院農業委員會,2015。「補貼肥料價差」(http://www.tdais.gov.tw/view.php?catid=23395)(2015/01/29)。 尚瑞國、郭迺鋒,2003。「財政短絀、肥料換穀制度與臺灣戰後初期之經濟發展-1954年12部門個體結構型CGE模型分析」,『農業經濟半年刊』。74期,23-61。 李武忠、陳郁蕙,2008。「農家所得破百萬不是夢!」,『中國時報』。(http://geo-economic.blogspot.tw/2008/06/blog-post_11.html)(2015/06/10)。 林昀靜、盧孟明,2010,「近五十年極端降雨之分析」,『臺北災害管理研討會論文集』。3-4。(http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/climate/climate_info/statistics/pdf/extreme_prec.pdf)(2015/06/10)。 林國慶、許聖章、施瑩艷,2008。「臺灣歷年農民所得變動與政策意涵之研究」。(http://bioagri.agec.ntu.edu.tw/ecmeeting/03/F3-141.pdf)(2015/06/10)。 洪宏毅,2015。「化學肥料補貼邁入資訊化促進施政資訊整合」,『農政與農情』。273期。(http://www.coa.gov.tw/coa_official/bulletin/view.php?catid=2502701&print=1)(2015/04/13)。 孫岩章、李英周、魏恆巍,2009。『無毒農業疾病防治手冊』。花蓮:花蓮縣政府農業處。 (http://lam.hl.gov.tw/hadd/index.aspx?unit=publish&p=15)(2015/02/01)。 翁震炘,2008。「肥料價格調整及穩定供需因應方案」,『農政與農情』。192期,16-18。(http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=17666)(2015/03/11)。 國家發展委員會,2014。「推動民營化成果」。 (http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0015352#.VQFdbvmUcp8) (2015/03/12)。 張金城,2005。「臺灣化學肥料穩定供需措施」,『農政與農情』。154期,61-65。(http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=8426)(2015/03/11)。 張致盛,2012。「氣候變遷對臺灣果樹生產影響與因應對策」,『臺中區農業改良場特刊』。111期,233-236。 陳兆勇,2012。「肥料換穀與租佃制度:統治技藝和農民理性」。(http://conference.nccu.edu.tw/actnews/news.php?Sn=67&NSn=296) (2015/03/12)。 陳守泓、李炳和、姚銘輝、申雍,2006。「臺灣地區年際異常氣象狀況對農業生產之影響」,『作物、環境與生物資訊』。3卷,4期,307-316。 華松年,1984。『臺灣糧政史』。台北:臺灣商務。 黃伯恩,1999。「肥料政策調整計畫八十七年度執行成果及檢討」,『農政與農情』。87期,29-33。(http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=2196)(2015/03/11)。 蘇宗振,2009「氣候變遷下台灣糧食生產因應對策」,『農政與農情』。200期,37-40。(http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=18969)(2015/06/10)。 Angrist, J. D., and J. S. Pischke, 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joshua_Angrist/publication/51992844_Mostly_harmless_econometrics_an_empiricist's_companion/links/00b4953344a9a0cb13000000.pdf)(2015/06/10). Athey, S., and G. W. Imbens, 2006. “Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference‐in‐Differences Models,” Econometrica. 74(2):431-497. Beaman, L., D. Karlan, B. Thuysbaert, and C. Udry, 2013. “Profitability of Fertilizer: Experimental Evidence from Female Rice Farmers in Mali,” American Economic Review. 103(3):381-386. Blundell, R., C. Meghir, M. Costa Dias, and J. van Reenen, 2004. “Evaluating the Employment Impact of a Mandatory Job Search Program,” Journal of the European Economic Association. 2:569-606. Braun, R., H. Eidenmüller, A. Engert, and L. Hornuf, 2013. “Does Charter Competition Foster Entrepreneurship? A Difference‐in‐Difference Approach to European Company Law Reforms,” Journal of Common Market Studies. 51(3):399-415. Card, D., and A. Krueger, 1994. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” American Economic Review. 84:772-793. Chang, H. H., 2013. “Old Farmer Pension Program and Farm Succession: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey of Farm Households in Taiwan,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 95(4):976-991. Deng, X., Y. Luo, S. Dong, and X. Yang, 2005. “Impact of Resources and Technology on Farm Production in Northwestern China,” Agricultural Systems. 84(2):155-169. Duflo, E., M. Kremer, and J. Robinson, 2008. “How High Are Rates of Return to Fertilizer? Evidence from Field Experiments in Kenya,” American Economic Review. 98(2):482-488. Duflo, E., M. Kremer, and J. Robinson, 2011. “Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya,” American Economic Review. 101(6):2350-2390. Epstein, L. H., N. Jankowiak, H. Lin, R. Paluch, M. N. Koffarnus, and W. K. Bickel, 2014. “No Food For Thought: Moderating Effects of Delay Discounting and Future Time Perspective on the Relation between Income and Food Insecurity,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 100(3):884-890. FAO, 1999. “What is Organic Agriculture?” (http://www.fao.org/organicag/oa-faq/oa-faq1/en/)(2015/1/31). Farrelly, Matthew C., James M. Nonnemaker, and Kimberly A. Watson, 2012 “The Consequences of High Cigarette Excise Taxes for Low-Income Smokers,” PLoS One. 7(9): e43838. Fisher, A. C., W. Hanemann, M. J. Roberts, and W. Schlenker. 2012. “The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Output and Random Fluctuations in Weather: Comment,” American Economic Review. 102(7):3749-60. Heckman, J. J., R. LaLonde, and J. Smith, 1999. “The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs,” Handbook of Labor Economics. 3:1865-2097. Larsen, A. F., and H. B. Lille?r, 2014. “Beyond the Field: The Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Food Security and Poverty Alleviation,” World Development. 64:843-859. Lechner, M., 2010. “The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods,” Foundations and Trends in Econometrics. 4(3):165-224. Meyer, B. D., 1995. “Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 13(2):151-61. Mohammadi, A., S. Rafiee, S. S. Mohtasebi, and H. Rafiee, 2010. “Energy Inputs–Yield Relationship and Cost Analysis of Kiwifruit Production in Iran,” Renewable Energy. 35(5):1071-1075. Mottaleb, K. A., S. Mohanty, and A. K. Mishra, 2015. “Intra-Household Resource Allocation under Negative Income Shock: A Natural Experiment,” World Development. 66:557-571. Mottaleb, K. A., S. Mohanty, H. T. K. Hoang, and R. M. Rejesus, 2013. “The Effects of Natural Disasters on Farm Household Income and Expenditures: A Study on Rice Farmers in Bangladesh,” Agricultural Systems. 121:43-52. Porto, A. J. M., and R. Nogueira, 2012. “Whose Beef are our Workers Subsidizing?,” Economic Analysis of Law Review. 3(2):323-337. Puhani, P. A., 2012. “The Treatment Effect, the Cross Difference, and the Interaction Term in Nonlinear “Difference-in-Differences” Models,” Economics Letters. 115(1):85-87. Ricker-Gilbert, J., 2014. “Wage and Employment Effects of Malawi's Fertilizer Subsidy Program,” Agricultural Economics. 45:337-353. Rose, D., K. O'Malley, L. F. Dunaway, and J. N. Bodor, 2014. “The Influence of the WIC Food Package Changes on the Retail Food Environment in New Orleans,” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 46(3):S38-S44. Rougoor, C. W., H. Van Zeijts, M. F. Hofreither, and S. Bäckman, 2001. “Experiences with Fertilizer Taxes in Europe,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 44(6):877-887. Streletskaya, N. A., P. Rusmevichientong, W. Amatyakul, and H. M. Kaiser, 2014. “Taxes, Subsidies, and advertising Efficacy in Changing Eating Behavior: An Experimental Study,” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 36(1):146-174. Towe, C., and C.I.Tra, 2012. “Vegetable Spirits and Energy Policy,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 95(1):1-16. Wairegi, L. W. I., and P. J. A. Van Asten, 2010. “The Agronomic and Economic Benefits of Fertilizer and Mulch Use in Highland Banana Systems in Uganda,” Agricultural Systems. 103(8):543-550. Warr, P., and A. A. Yusuf, 2014. “Fertilizer Subsidies and Food Self‐Sufficiency in Indonesia,” Agricultural Economics. 45(5):571-588. Zhang, F., C. L. Huang, B. H. Lin, and J. E. Epperson, 2008. “Modeling Fresh Organic Produce Consumption with Scanner Data: A Generalized Double Hurdle Model Approach,” Agribusiness. 24(4):510-522. Zhu, Z. L., and D. L. Chen, 2002. “Nitrogen Fertilizer Use in China–Contributions to Food Production, Impacts on the Environment and Best Management Strategies,” Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 63(2-3):117-127. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18029 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2007-2008年間發生金融海嘯,國際油價物價的飆漲,使得國內肥料價格波動劇烈,在農民不堪負荷的反彈聲浪下,政府於2008年5月底實施肥料價差補貼措施,價差補貼國內17種化學肥料的價格,以確保農民福祉與穩定農業生產。本研究利用行政院主計處調查之2005與2010的農牧戶普查的資料,將資料進行整理後採取差異中之差異法(Difference-in-Difference)做實證分析,依據資料特性進行分組,選取慣行農戶為實驗組,不使用化學肥料與農藥的農戶為控制組,並且利用2005年與2010年做為政策實施前與政策實施後之資料,估計肥料價差補貼後對於臺灣農家農業收入之影響。首先,將所有農戶進行實證分析,研究肥料價差補貼對於所有農戶的影響。其次,擷取稻米農戶、雜糧農戶、蔬菜農戶、果樹農戶、花卉農戶以及特用作物農戶,分開探討各種類農戶在肥料價差補貼實施後,農家的農業收入之情形。
實證結果顯示對於所有作物的農戶而言,肥料價差補貼之政策效果十分顯著,但是分開探討各別作物農戶後,卻發現政策效果不明顯,甚至在果樹農戶中出現負向的影響。另一方面,估計結果顯示指揮者性別為男性對於農業收入的影響較大;隨年齡的增長會對農業收入有負向的影響;指揮者工作日數與農業收入正相關係;指揮者的教育程度越高,對於農業收入的影響幅度越大;農戶人口數越多則對於農業收入有較顯著之影響,且滿15歲以上的人口對於農業收入較有影響力;農戶為專業或兼業也顯著影響農業收入;地區變數顯示不同地區對於農業收入有顯著的影響;天氣變數的估計結果在每個作物農戶中有所差異,但皆顯著影響農業收入;最後,作物面積則與農業收入有顯著正相關。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Due to the financial crisis of 2007-08, raw materials price increased worldwide, and caused the fluctuation in fertilizer price in Taiwan. In order to assure the welfare of farmers, and stabilize the farm production, Taiwan’s government implemented Farm Deficiency Payment in May, 2008. Data use in this study was sourced from 2005 and 2010 Taiwan’s Agricultural Census. Difference-in-Difference approach was adopted in this paper to estimate the impact of Fertilizer Deficiency Payment on farm household revenue in Taiwan. We assigned the conventional farming households the treatment group, and both fertilizer-free and pesticide-free households as the control group. By measuring the difference between the treatment and control group overtime, we can carry out the policy effect. In this paper, we will analysis not only the policy effect for all farm households but also the policy effect in various types of the farm households such as rice, grain, vegetable, fruit, flower, and special crop farm households.
The empirical results showed significant policy effect for all farm households. However, the policy effects for specific types of the farm households are not significant, and even found a negative policy effect for fruit farm households. On the other hand, the results suggested male farm operator has a higher impact on farm revenue; higher operator age has a negative impact on farm household revenue; working days have a positive relation with farm household revenue; higher education has a greater influence on farm household revenue; larger farm household population has more significant impact on farm revenue, full-time or part-time farm households significantly impact farm revenue; regions have various significant impact on farm household revenue; and finally, the cultivate area and weather have significant influence on farm household revenue. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:48:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02627017-1.pdf: 2411805 bytes, checksum: d8119aa27ad0929dd060134fc7c9b9d1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法與步驟 3 第三節 論文架構 4 第二章 研究背景 5 第一節 臺灣肥料政策發展 5 第二節 臺灣肥料施用情形 7 第三節 臺灣肥料價格與肥料進口量 11 第三章 文獻回顧 17 第一節 使用肥料對農家經濟影響文獻 17 第二節 肥料政策相關文獻 19 第三節 差異中之差異法相關之文獻 21 第四節 小結 27 第四章 模型設定與資料處理過程 29 第一節 理論模型 29 第二節 資料概述與處理過程 31 第三節 實證模型設定 32 第四節 變數選取與處理過程 36 第五章 農業普查資料敘述統計 45 第一節 農業收入敘述統計 45 第二節 農戶基本資料敘述統計 54 第六章 實證分析 77 第一節 未控制解釋變數Difference-in-Difference估計結果 77 第二節 控制解釋變數之Difference-in-Difference估計結果 84 第三節 小結 99 第七章 結論 101 第一節 結論 101 第二節 建議 104 參考文獻 107 附錄 113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 肥料價差補貼措施對臺灣農家的農業收入之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Impact of Fertilizer Deficiency Payment on Farm Household Revenue in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 孫立群 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹滿色,陳雅惠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 肥料價差補貼措施,差異中之差異法,農家農業收入, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Fertilizer Deficiency Payment,Difference-in-Difference,Farm Household Revenue, | en |
dc.relation.page | 118 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。