Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18018
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔡彥卿
dc.contributor.authorJun-Jie Luen
dc.contributor.author陸俊杰zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T00:48:39Z-
dc.date.copyright2015-07-21
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-07-17
dc.identifier.citationAmram, M., & Kulatilaka, N. (1998). Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. OUP Catalogue.
Baygan, G. & Freudenberg M. (2000). The Internationalisation of Venture Capital Activity in OECD Countries: Implications for Measurement and Policy, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2000/07, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Berlin L. (2015). Why silicon valley will continue to Rule, retrieved at May 25th, <https://medium.com/backchannel/why-silicon-valley-will-continue-to-rule-c0cbb441e22f>
Benjamin, G. A., & Margulis, J. B. (2005). Angel capital: How to raise early-stage private equity financing (Vol. 287). John Wiley & Sons.
Beaton N. J., (2010). Valuing early stage and venture-backed companies. John Wiley & Sons.
Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research policy,34(6), 795-816.
Colombo, M. G., Delmastro, M., & Grilli, L. (2004). Entrepreneurs' human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8), 1183-1211.
Cochrane, J. H. (2009). Asset Pricing:(Revised Edition). Princeton university press.
Damodaran, A. (2009). The dark side of valuation: Valuing young, distressed, and complex businesses. Ft Press.
Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. John Wiley & Sons.

Dow Jones Venturesource (2015a). Dow Jones Quarterly Venture Capital Report China 4Q14, retrieved at May 24th, <http://images.dowjones.com/company/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2015/02/Dow-Jones-Quarterly-Venture-Capital-Report-China-4Q14-CN.pdf>
Dow Jones Venturesource (2015b). Dow Jones Quarterly Venture Capital Report US 4Q14, retrieved at May 24th,
<http://images.dowjones.com/company/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2015/01/Dow-Jones-Quarterly-Venture-Capital-Report-US-4Q14-.pdf>
Gage, D. (2012). The Venture Capital Secret: 3 Out of 4 Start-Ups Fail. retrieved at March 25th, <http://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390443720204578004980476429190>
Ge, D. (2003). Startup Valuation by Venture Capitalists: A Strategic Management Approach[D]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010). Additive manufacturing technologies. New York: Springer.
Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2004). The venture capital cycle. MIT press.
Google trend. (2015), retrieved at March 15th, <http://www.google.com.tw/trends/explore?q=High+tech#q=High%20tech%2C%20%2Fm%2F01m2bt&date=1%2F2012%2036m&cmpt=q&tz=>
Graham P. (2012). Black Swan Farming, retrieved at May 21st <http://www.paulgraham.com/swan.html>
Hart J. (2013), Additive Manufacturing , retrieved at April 21st,
<http://web.mit.edu/2.810/www/lecture/19-additive-mfg.pdf>
Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the High Technology Sector and Product Classification, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 1997/02, OECD Publishing.
Lev B. (2000). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings Institution Press.
Maginn J. L., Tuttle D. L., Pinto J. E., and McLeavey D. W.(2014), Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process, Third Edition.
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of financial economics, 5(2), 147-175.
O’Donohoe, N., Leijonhufvud, C., Saltuk, Y., Bugg-Levine, A., & Brandenburg, M. (2010). Impact investments: An emerging asset class. JP Morgan, 6.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Random House LLC.
Ross S., Cox D., (1995). Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,3(7):9-11.
Trigeorgis, L. (1993). The nature of option interactions and the valuation of investments with multiple real options. Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis, 28(01), 1-20.
Trigeorgis, L., & Schwartz, E. S. (2001). Real Options and Investments under Uncertainty. MIT press, London.
Ubelhart, M. C., Thomas, R., & Gup, B. E. (2009). An Economic View of the Impact of Human Capital on Firm Performance and Valuation. The Valuation Handbook, 508.
3Dsystems (2015). Charles W. Hull Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer retrieved at June 27th, <http://www.3dsystems.com/files/downloads/3D-Systems-Charles-W-Hull-Executive-Bio.pdf>
黃曉斐 (2008) 高科技風險企業的價值評估研究[D] 上海交通大學。
中共中央 (1985) 關於科學技術體制改革的決定[N] 中發(1985) 6號。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/18018-
dc.description.abstract本文著眼於風險投資下的科技企業估值的研究與探索,試圖通過傳統的估值方法與改良後實物期權估值模型並輔以個案來重新審視處於早期的科技企業的估值。
本文從介紹風險投資的起源、發展與現狀開始。通過對科技企業的特點與行業進行分析與討論,揭示兩者的緊密內在聯繫。然後,本文通過對傳統企業估值方法的簡述與分析,辨識出其應用於初創與成長期科技企業估值的局限性所在。因此,本文對傳統實物期權理論模型進行改良以更好地符合風險資本下科技企業估值特點。此外,本文從定量層面與定性層面構建風險投資估值模型來完善風險投資下科技企業估值研究,在模型中將風險投資機構與風險投資家的專精與專業判斷納入考量。最後,本文通過案例分析來具體將風險投資估值模型應用於企業價值評估中。
最後本文指出模型的限制及其與使用模型的“人”的界限和互補性,模型無法取代在風險投資過程中機構與風險投資家個人的能力與經驗。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis focuses on the research and exploration on valuation with regard to venture-backed technology firms and intends to apply traditional valuation methods and modified real option valuation model to re-examine valuation on technology firms with assistance of a case.
In the beginning, this thesis describes the origin, development and current status of venture capital. By the analysis on characteristics of the technology firms and industry, this thesis reveals the close interlinkages between technology firms and venture capital. Then, this thesis discusses the traditional valuation methods and identifies limitations when these methods are applied to the valuation of technology firms in startup or growth stage. Therefore, this thesis revises traditional real option valuation approach for the purpose of better meeting valuation characteristics of venture-backed technology firms. In addition, this thesis establishes a venture capital valuation model in terms of quantitative and qualitative aspects in order to further complete the research. The model takes the level of investment expertise and professional judgment into account. Thereafter, the thesis discusses a case to illustrate the valuation model into concrete venture capital circumstances.
Finally, the thesis points out limitations of model and complementarity effect of the model user-‘human’ boundaries and in the venture capital model cannot replace expertise of venture capital institutes and venture capitalists’ capacity and experience.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:48:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-R02722051-1.pdf: 1094658 bytes, checksum: 8ea51ce17578a1b243cb440f6cefa4ca (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………… i
謝辭……………………………………………………………………… ii
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………… iii
表目錄…………………………………………………………………… iv
中文摘要………………………………………………………………… v
英文摘要………………………………………………………………… vi
第1章 緒論……………………………………………………………… 1
1.1 研究背景…………………………………………………………… 1
1.2 研究問題提出與意義……………………………………………… 3
1.3 研究整體架構……………………………………………………… 4
第2章 風險投資、科技企業與估值意義概述………………………… 5
2.1 風險投資概念與特點……………………………………………… 5
2.2 科技企業的定義與產業特點……………………………………… 8
2.3 風險投資下科技企業估值的意義………………………………… 9
第3章 風險投資下企業估值方法……………………………………… 13
3.1 傳統估值方法與應用局限………………………………………… 13
3.1.1 成本法:歷史視角……………………………………………… 13
3.1.2 市場比較法:當前視角………………………………………… 13
3.1.3 收益法:未來視角……………………………………………… 14
3.1.4 傳統估值方法在新創科技企業的估值局限…………………… 15
3.2 實物期權估值理論方法…………………………………………… 16
3.2.1 實物期權模型…………………………………………………… 16
3.2.2 實物期權估值理論方法改良…………………………………… 17
3.3 科技企業的無形資產估值探索…………………………………… 21
3.3.1 人的估值………………………………………………………… 21
3.3.2 協同價值的估值………………………………………………… 23
3.4 風險投資估值模型建立…………………………………………… 24
第4章 風險資本下科技企業估值個案研究…………………………… 27
4.1 個案背景…………………………………………………………… 27
4.1.1 行業基本概念與背景…………………………………………… 27
4.1.2 企業與風險投資個案背景……………………………………… 28
4.2 3DMF企業估值……………………………………………………… 30
4.2.1 現有業務估值…………………………………………………… 30
4.2.2 增長機會的實物期權估值……………………………………… 31
4.2.3 無形資產的估值探索…………………………………………… 33
4.3 個案估值結果……………………………………………………… 35
第5章 結論與展望……………………………………………………… 36
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………… 37
附錄 ……………………………………………………………………… 40
附錄1:3DMF現有業務所構成公司的β計算…………………………… 40
附錄2:NASDAQ市場收益率……………………………………………… 40
附錄3:現有業務估值計算……………………………………………… 42
附錄4:V0 計算………………………………………………………… 42
附錄5:實物期權價值計算……………………………………………… 43
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title風險資本下科技企業估值之個案研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Case Study on Venture-backed Technology Firms Valuationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李淑華,楊孟萍
dc.subject.keyword風險投資,科技企業,估值,實物期權,無形資產,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordVenture Capital,Technology firm,Valuation,Real option,Intangible asset,en
dc.relation.page43
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2015-07-17
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.07 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved