Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17717
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳琮璠
dc.contributor.authorRen-Hao Ouen
dc.contributor.author歐人豪zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T00:32:56Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-07-18
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-06-27
dc.identifier.citationAllen, E., C. Larson, and R. Sloan. 2009. Accrual reversals, earnings and stock returns. Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis.
Barton, J., & Simko, P. J. 2002. The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. The Accounting Review, 77 (s-1): 1-27.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 443-465.
Beneish, M. D. 1997. Detecting GAAP violation: Implications for assessing earnings management among firms with extreme financial performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16 (3): 271-309.
. 1999. Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. The Accounting Review, 74 (4): 425-457.
Brazel, J. F., Jones, K. L., & Zimbelman, M. F. 2009. Using nonfinancial measures to assess fraud risk. Journal of Accounting Research, 47 (5): 1135-1166.
Cram, D. P., Karan, V., & Stuart, I. 2009. Three Threats to Validity of Choice‐based and Matched‐Sample Studies in Accounting Research*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26 (2): 477-516.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. 2011. Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28 (1): 17-82.
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. 2010. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2): 344-401.
Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14 (2): 235-250.
Ettredge, M., Sun, L., Lee, P., & Anandarajan, A. 2006. Do deferred tax data signal earnings fraud. Working paper, University of Kansas School of Business.
Farber, D. B. 2005. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter?. The Accounting Review, 80 (2): 539-561.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. 2002. The relation between auditors' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77 (s-1): 71-105.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40 (1): 3-73.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1): 85-107.
Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility?. The Accounting Review, 87 (3): 761-796.
KLD Research and Analytics, Inc. (KLD). 2006. Getting started with KLD stats and KLD’s ratings definitions. Boston, MA: KLD Research & Analytics, Inc.
Phillips, J., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. O. 2003. Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review, 78 (2): 491-521.
Rajgopal, S., Shevlin, T., & Venkatachalam, M. 2003. Does the stock market fully appreciate the implications of leading indicators for future earnings? Evidence from order backlog. Review of Accounting Studies, 8 (4): 461-492.
Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. T., & Tuna, I. (2005). Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (3): 437-485.
Skousen, C., & Wright, C. 2006. Contemporaneous risk factors and the prediction of financial statement fraud. SSRN Working Paper
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17717-
dc.description.abstract本研究的目的是希望藉由不同層面的偵測指標來分析財報不當認列之特性,以期建立出偵測財報不當認列之模型。為了觀察財報不當認列公司之特性,本研究是以美國證券交易委員會在2007年至2013年3月所發布的會計及審計處分函作為主要研究資料。在整理及分析美國證券交易委員會之處分函後,發現常見的不當認列項目包含:收入及應收帳款的不當認列及費用的不當認列。本研究並進一步選擇應計項目、財務績效、非財務性指標、資產負債表外指標以及與市場相關之誘因來測試財報不當認列公司與無財報不當認列公司兩者間之差異。最後再利用不同層面偵測指標與條件式邏輯迴歸來建立偵測不當認列之模型,以期提升偵測財報不當認列公司之準確度及改善統計上之錯誤。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to analyze the significant difference between misstating firms and no misstating firms and develop models to detect misstatements. The sample of misstating firms which this paper chooses was subject to the SEC’s AAERs between 2007 and 2013. After analyzing the features of misstating firms, this paper finds that revenue misstatements and expense misstatements are common misstatements. Moreover, this study concentrates on various aspects, such as accruals quality related variables, performance variables, nonfinancial variables, off-balance-sheet variables, and market-related incentives, to analyze the significant difference between misstating firms and no misstating firms. Finally, this paper uses conditional logistic regression to develop detective models, in order to improve the capability of detecting misstatements.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:32:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R00722046-1.pdf: 1124004 bytes, checksum: b9b91b827504f4ce0ee12162f9303500 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 I
中文摘要 II
Abstract III
Table of Contents IV
Lists of Tables V
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis 5
2.1 Literature Review 5
2.2 Hypothesis 10
3. Data and Sample Formation 12
3.1 Sample 12
3.2 Data Collection 13
3.3 Characteristics of Misstating Firms 16
3.4 Matched Sample 23
4. Analysis of Potential Incentive for Detecting Misstatements 26
4.1 Accrual Quality Variables 27
4.2 Financial Performance 29
4.3 Nonfinancial Measures 30
4.4 Off-Balance-Sheet Variables 32
4.5 Market-Related Incentives 33
5. Results 38
5.1 Descriptive Statistics 38
5.2 Correlation Coefficient 41
5.3 Detective Analysis 42
5.4 Modulation of Detective Analysis 44
5.5 Sensitivity Analysis 45
5.6 Additional Test 47
6. Conclusion 66
7. Reference 70
dc.language.isoen
dc.title偵測財務報表不當認列─以條件式邏輯迴歸來評估zh_TW
dc.titleDetecting Financial Statement Misstatements─Estimated by Conditional Logistic Regressionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee許文馨,張裕任
dc.subject.keyword財報不當認列,配對樣本,美國證期會發佈之會計審計處分函,條件式邏輯迴歸,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordfinancial statement misstatements,matched sample,AAERs,conditional logistic regression,en
dc.relation.page72
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2013-06-27
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.1 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved