Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 外國語文學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17708
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳雅鳳(Ya-feng Wu)
dc.contributor.authorHsing-yi Linen
dc.contributor.author林幸誼zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T00:32:21Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-07-08
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-06-28
dc.identifier.citationWorks Cited
Archer, John. “The Beginnings of Association in British Architectural Esthetics.” American Society of Eighteenth-Century Studies (1983): 241-64. JSTOR. Web. 7 Sep. 2012.
Aston, Margaret. “English Ruins and English History: The Dissolution and the Sense of the Past.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 36 (1973): 231-255. JSTOR. Web. 30 March. 2012.
Aubin, Robert Arnold. Topographical Poetry in 18th-century England. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 1936. Print.
Averill, James H. Wordsworth and the Poetry of Human Suffering. NY: Cornell University Press, 1980. Print.
Bermingham, Ann. Landscape and Ideology: The English Rustic Tradition, 1740-1860. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. Print.
Baridon, Michel. “The Gothic Revival and the Theory of Knowledge in the First Phase of the Enlightenment.” Exhibited by Candlelight. Sources and Developments in the Gothic Tradition. Ed. Valeria Tinkler-Villani, et al. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. 43-56. Print.
Bradley, Alexander. Ruskin and Italy. Michigan: UMI Research Press, 1987. Print.
Brooks, Michael W. John Ruskin and Victorian Architecture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987. Print.
Budge, Gavin, ed. Aesthetics and the Picturesque 1795-1840. Bristol: Thoemmes, 2001. Print.
Burnet, Thomas. The Sacred Theory of Earth. London, 1691. Google Book Search. Web. 4 Jan. 2013.
Carretta, Vincent. “Anne and Elizabeth: The Poet as Historian in Windsor Forest.” Studies in English Literature 1500-1900. 21.3 (1981): 425-37. JSTOR. Web. 10 May. 2013.
Casaliggi, Carmen and Paul March-Russel ed. Ruskin in Perspective: Contemporary Essays. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010. Print.
Charlesworth, Michael. “The ruined abbey: Picturesque and Gothic values.” Ed. Copley, Stephen and Peter Garside. The Politics of the Picturesque: Literature, Landscape and Aesthetics since 1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Print.
Clark, George. The Later Stuarts 1660-1714. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. Print.
Clifford, Derek. A History of Garden Design. Rev.ed. New York: Praeger, 1966. Print.
Cohen, Philip. “Narrative and Persuasion in ‘The Ruined Cottage.’” Journal of Narrative Technique 8.3 (1978): 185-99. JSTOR. Web. 26 Feb. 2013.
Cook E. T. and A. Wedderburn, ed. The Works of John Ruskin. 39 vols. London: George Allen, 1903-1912. Print.
Cronin, Richard, ed. 1798: The Year of the Lyrical Ballads. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998. Print.
Curtis, Jared, ed. The Poems of William Wordsworth: collected reading texts from the Cornell Wordsworth Series. Penrith: Humanities-Ebooks, 2009. Google Book Search. Web. 17 Oct. 2012.
Donovan, Andrea Elizabeth. William Morris and The Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. London: Routledge, 2008. Print.
Engell, James. The Creative Imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981. Print.
Fosso, Kurt. Buried communities: Wordsworth and the bonds of mourning. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004. Press.
Fritzsche, Peter. Stranded in the Present: Modern Time and the Melancholy of History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004. Print.
Fulford, Tim. Landscape, Liberty and Authority: Poetry, Criticism and Politics from Thomson to Wordsworth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Print.
Gill, Stephen. William Wordsworth. A Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. Print.
Gilpin, William. “Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty; On Picturesque Travel; and On Sketching Landscape.” Ed. Budge, Gavin. Aesthetics and the picturesque, 1795-1840. Bristol: Thoemmes, 2001. Print.
Glendinning, Miles. The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation: Antiquity to Modernity. London: Routledge, 2013. Google Book Search. Web. 17 Mar. 2013.
Glickman, Susan. The Picturesque and the Sublime: a Poetics of the Canadian Landscape. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998. Print.
Handa, Rumiko. “Ruins in Nineteenth-Century Romanticism: A Case of Hermeneutical Distanciation.” Copenhagen Working Papers on Design 1 (2010). Google Book Search. Web. 1 Jan. 2013.
Hebron, Stephen. The Romantics and the British Landscape. London: British Library, 2006. Print.
Heffernan, James A. W. The Re-creation of Landscape. A Study of Wordsworth, Coleridge, Constable and Turner. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1985. Print.
Helsinger, Elizabeth K. Rural Scenes and National Representation. Britain, 1815-1850. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. Print.
---. Ruskin and the Art of the Beholder. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982. Print.
Hetzler, Florence M. “The Aesthetics of Ruins: A New Category of Being.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 16. 2 (1982): 105-8. JSTOR. Web. 30 March. 2012.
Hewison, Robert. Ruskin on Venice: the Paradise of Cities. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print.
Hunt, John Dixon. “Ut pictura poesis, the picturesque, and John Ruskin.” MLN 93. 5 (1978): 794-818. JSTOR. Web. 2 May. 2012.
---, and Peter Willis, ed. The Genius of the Place. The English Landscape Garden 1620-1820. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000. Print.
Janowitz, Anne F. England’ s Ruins: poetic purpose and the national landscape. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990. Print.
Johnston, Kenneth R. “Wordsworth’s Revolutions, 1793-1798.” Revolution and English Romanticism. Ed. Keith Hanley and Raman Selden. Harvester Wheatsheaf: St .Martin’s Press, 1990. Print.
Kruft, Hanno-Walter. A history of architectural theory: from Vitruvius to the present. Trans. Ronald Taylor. London: Princeton Architectural Press, 1994. Print.
Landow, George P. The Aesthetics and Critical Theories of John Ruskin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. Print.
Levinson Marjorie. The Romantic Fragment Poem. A Critique of a Form. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986. Print.
---. Wordsworth’s Great Period Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Print.
Leslie, Michael. “History and Historiography in the English Landscape Garden.” Perspectives on Garden Histories. Ed. Michel Conan. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1999. Print.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Web. 1 Oct. 2012.
< http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/locke/locke1/Essay_contents.html>
Lockridge, Laurence S. The Ethics of Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Print.
Lovejoy, Arthur O. “The First Gothic Revival and the Return to Nature.” Modern Language Notes 47.7 (1932): 419-46. PDF.
Macarthur, John. “The Heartless of the Picturesque: Sympathy and Disgust in Ruskin’s Aesthetics.” Assemblage 32 (1997): 126-141. JSTOR. Web. 6 Oct. 2012.
Mallgrave, Harry Francis. Modern Architecture Theory A History—A Historical Survey, 1673-1968. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. PDF.
Makarius, Michel. Ruins. English Language ed. Paris: Editions Flammarion, 2004. Print.
McCarthy, Thomas J. Introduction. Relationships of Sympathy: The Writer and the Reader in British Romanticism. Aldershot, England: Scolar Press, 1997. Print.
McFarland, Thomas. Romanticism and the Forms of Ruins: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Modalities of Fragmentation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981. Print.
Morris, Kevin L. “John Ruskin and Medieval Art in the Nineteenth Century.” The Image of the Middle Ages in Romantic and Victorian Literature. London: Croom Helm, 1984. Print.
Mullett, Michael. Martin Luther. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.
Newman, Gerald. The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History 1740-1830. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997. Print.
Nicolson, Marjorie H. Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. New York: Norton, 1963. Print.
O’Gorman, Francis. “Ruskin’s Aesthetic of Failure in The Stones of Venice.” Review of English Studies: The Leading Journal of English Literature and the English Language 55.220 (2004): 374-91. PDF.
Piggott, Stuart. Ruins in a land scape: essays in antiquarianism: Essays in Antiquarianism. Edinburgh: University Press, 1976. Print.
Richey, William. “The Politicized Landscape of Tintern Abbey.” Studies in Philology 95.2 (1998): 197-219. JSTOR. Web. 6 Dec. 2012.
Roe, Nicholas. The politics of nature: William Wordsworth and some contemporaries. New York: Palgrave, 2002. Print.
Rogers, Elizabeth B., Elizabeth S. Eustis and John Bidewell. Romantic Gardens – Nature, Art, and Landscape Design. New York: Morgan Library & Museum, 2010. Print.
Rosen, Charles. The Romantic Generation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995. Print.
Rosenberg, John D. The Darkening Glass: A Portrait of Ruskin’s Genius. New York: Columbia University Press, 1962. Print.
Saito, Yuriko. “Why Restore Works of Art?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44.2 (1985): 141-151. JSTOR. Web. April. 2012.
Sch&ouml;nle, Andreas. “Ruins and History: Observation on Russian Approaches to Destruction and Decay.” Slavic Review 65.4 (2006): 649-669. JSTOR. Web. 30 April. 2012.
Selincourt, Ernest De ed. The Letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: The Early Years, 1787-1805. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. Print.
Semmel, Stuart. “Reading the Tangible Past: British Tourism, Collecting, and Memory after Waterloo.” Representations 69 (2000): 9-37. JSTOR. Web. Feb. 19, 2013.
Silver, Sean R. “Visiting Strawberry Hill: Horace Walpole’s Gothic Historiography.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 21.4 (2009): 534-64. Print.
Sweet, Rosemary. “Antiquaries and Antiquities in Eighteenth-Century England.” American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies. 34.2 (2001): 181-206. JSTOR. Web. Oct 2. 2012.
Thomas, Sophie. “Assembling History: Fragments and Ruins.” European Romantic Review 14. 2 (2003): 177-186. Web. 17 May. 2012.
---. Romanticism and Visuality. Fragments, History and Spectacle. New York: Routledge, 2008. Print.
Watt, Ian. “From the Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding.” Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach. Ed. McKeon, Michael. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2000. Print.
Wheeler, Michael. “Ruskin among the ruins: tradition and the temple.” The Lamp of Memory: Ruskin, Tradition and Architecture. Ed. Michael Wheeler and Nigel Whiteley. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992. Print.
Wolff, Kurt H. ed. Georg Simmel, 1858-1918. Ohio State University Press, 1959. Print.
Woodward, Christopher. In Ruins: a journey through history, art, and literature. New York: Vintage Books, 2003. Print.
Yu, K. W. “Wordsworth Studies and the Ethics of Criticism: The ‘Tintern Abbey’ Debate Revisited.” Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 30.2 (2004): 129-54. Web. 9 Mar. 2013.
Zucker, Paul. “Ruins. An Aesthetic Hybrid.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20. 2 (1961): 119-130. JSTOR. Web. 30 March. 2012.
---. Fascination of Decay. Ridgewood, NJ: The Gregg Press, 1968. Google Book Search. Web. 1 Jan. 2013.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17708-
dc.description.abstract本篇論文以廢墟作為建構論述的場域作為起始點,旨在探究廢墟在歷史、美學、文學與建築背景中的再現政治。廢墟常被和過去所發生的一切產生連結,被想像成是種可重複書寫的羊皮紙,承載並見證歷史的多重軌跡與演化。若此廢墟的本質是個尚未完成的形體,它具有的意義也是無窮盡的。此外,廢墟因其殘破不全的外在形體,激發我們的想像力去想像其無限解讀的可能性。
在文學的場域裡,本文特別著眼於威廉•華茲華斯三首詩歌中的廢墟再現─《沙利伯斯平原》(Salisbury Plain)、《塌毀的茅舍》(The Ruined Cottage) 和《丁騰寺》(Tintern Abbey)。在這三首詩中,華茲華斯利用廢墟作為提喻,來暗地批判他對英國社會因國內外政治政策的失敗所導致的社會不公。雖然華茲華斯從未把廢墟此概念作為詩歌中心,但廢墟代表的社會意義總是隱隱約約地出現在詩歌的時空背景裡。相較於華茲華斯的隱諱,約翰•拉斯金則在他的建築理論《建築的七盞明燈》(The Seven Lamps of Architecture) 及《威尼斯之石》(The Stones of Venice),清楚明確地用廢墟的形象來批判英國社會的沉淪與毀滅。由於拉斯金認為國家的建築反映了該國的道德情操,廢墟此概念也成為拉斯金社會批判的試驗石。
本文的討論範圍不只包含廢墟作為文學和美學欣賞的主題,同時也希望分析不同領域之間廢墟論述的複雜相互關係。本文將進一步探討廢墟再現作為一個論述的場域所引發的挑戰和曖昧不明的意義。透過分析廢墟的美學與政治意義,本篇論文希望可以充分闡明廢墟論述如何在不同的歷史文化背景下,被對立的群體以多元紛雜的方式建構協商。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractEngaging the theme of ruins as a discursive site, this thesis aims to formulate a viable politics of ruins representations among different fields of narratives. In retrospect, ruins, laid waste by the wreck of time, are constructed as palimpsests that bear testimony to historical traces and derivations. In prospect, ruins, as an unfinished form, suggest infinity and thus activate our mind to imagine any possibilities of its final shape.
Viewed as a text with historical inscription, ruins easily fall victim to textual manipulation in the service of various interested groups. This thesis focuses especially on William Wordsworth and John Ruskin. In “Salisbury Plain,” “Tintern Abbey” and “The Ruined Cottage,” Wordsworth as a poet adopts ruins as a synecdoche to illustrate social iniquity and evil caused by domestic and international polities in contemporary Britain. While ruins never occupy a central poetic attention, they loom large in the background and become a tool for Wordsworth’s poetic performance and to express his social concern. In contrast, Ruskin as a critic in The Seven Lamps of Architecture and The Stones of Venice adopts the theme of ruins to explicitly criticize the degeneration of British society. Since Ruskin has asserted that a nation’s architecture mirrors its moral life, ruins in his view become a touchstone for social criticism. Aside from the ruins representations in literature, the thesis also aims to elucidate the discursive framework with a view to addressing the complex relationships within the context of history, aesthetics and architecture.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:32:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R98122013-1.pdf: 690418 bytes, checksum: 83df3a721e0fb6e6de26059640a502ad (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents
Acknowledgements (English) i
Acknowledgements (Chinese) ii
Abstract (English) iii
Abstract (Chinese) iv

Introduction 1
Chapter One
The Surging Interest of Ruins in the Late Seventeenth Century 16
Chapter Two
Romantic Sentiments on Ruins 41
Chapter Three
John Ruskin and the Ruins Theory 68
Conclusion 95
Works Cited 99
dc.language.isoen
dc.title廢墟美學與政治:威廉•華茲華斯與約翰•拉斯金zh_TW
dc.titleThe Aesthetics and Politics of Ruins:
William Wordsworth and John Ruskin
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee高瑟濡(She-ru Kao),孫宓(Emily Sun)
dc.subject.keyword廢墟論述,威廉‧華茲華斯,約翰‧拉斯金,再現政治,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordruins,William Wordsworth,John Ruskin,politics of representation,en
dc.relation.page105
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2013-06-28
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept外國語文學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:外國語文學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
674.24 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved