請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17622
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林嬋娟 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jenn-Yeong Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王振勇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:25:57Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.王宗斌(2011)“獨立董監、家族治理對公司績效有影響嗎?--台灣上市電子公司之實證研究”,國立東華大學經濟學系未發表碩士論文。
2.沈中華(2012) “台大EMBA 公司治理與企業發展導論講義”。 3.何麗梅(2003)“推行公司治理創造價值--臺灣積體電路製造股份有限公司實例探討”,台灣大學財務金融研究所EMBA未發表碩士論文。 4.沈宜鈴(2002)“我國與德國勞工董事制度之比較研究,我國與德國勞工董事制度之比較研究”,國立中正大學勞工研究所未發表碩士論文。 5.祁遠芳(2011)“股權結構對公司財務績效影響之研究--個案與上市公司實證之比較”,國立東華大學國際企業學系未發表碩士論文。 6.吳姿燕(2011)“公司治理與資訊揭露對企業經營績效之關聯性研究-以臺灣上巿櫃半導體產業為例”,國立中正大學�會計與資訊科技研究所未發表碩士論文。 7.吳家淩(2009)“公司治理與勞工參與--日本勞資協議制度之考察”,逢甲大學財經法律研究所未發表碩士論文。 8.林明謙(2001)“股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究”,輔仁大學金融研究所未發表碩士論文。 9.林忠熙(2009)“公司治理面向下獨立董事、勞工董事之定位--兼論信賴義務內涵與責任配套機制”,國立東華大學財經法律研究所未發表碩士論文。 10.林建甫(2011)“國營事業落實公司治理個案分析--以桃園國際機場股份有限公司及港務股份有限公司為例”行政院研究發展考核委員會委託中華經濟與金融協會研究報告. 11.柯承恩 (2012)“台大EMBA 公司治理與企業發展導論講義”。 12.翁淑育(2000)“台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究”,輔仁大學金融研究所未發表碩士論文。 13.張毓強(2003)“公司治理機制與經營績效關聯性研究--以中國大陸上市企業為例”, 雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士班未發表碩士論文。 14.張緒中(2010)“政府持股事業之公司治理與績效關聯性研究”,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所未發表博士論文。 15.陳暐智(2011)“獨立董事與審計委員會對公司績效的影響”,國立成功大學財務金融研究所未發表碩士論文。 16.陳美如(2006)“從公司治理論勞工董事之角色與功能”,中國文化大學勞動學研究所未發表碩士論文。 17.黃彥儒(2003)“上市公司監理機制與財務預測可靠性之研究”,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所未發表碩士論文。 18.黃世鑫(2004)“勞工董事制度之理論與實務”,行政勞工委員會委託台灣勞動與社會政策研究協會研究報告。 19.葉銀華(2012)“台大EMBA 公司治理與企業發展導論講義”。 20.葉銀華、李存修(2012)“中華公司治理協會,公司治理與評等系統第五章”,台大EMBA 公司治理與企業發展導論講義。 21.葉銀華(1998)“家族控股、董事會組成與經營績效--台灣家族企業管治機制之研究”,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。 22.經建會(2005)“政府持股事業之公司治理與績效關聯性研究”,委託研究報告。 23.經建會(2005)“勞工董事對勞資關係與董事會決策型態之影響”, 委託研究報告. 24.楊明峰(2003)“國營事業實施勞工董事制度對勞資關係氣氛之影響--以台電公司產業工會幹部為例”,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未發表碩士論文。 25.廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華(2006)“董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究--兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響”,東吳經濟商學學報第五十四期,pp.117-160。 26.劉義夫(2005)“公司治理機制與企業經營績效之關聯性研究--以中國大陸上市資訊電子產業為例”,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士班未發表碩士論文。 27.劉雲嬌(2011)“國營事業公司治理之研究--以台灣菸酒公司為例”,國立東華大學�公共行政研究所未發表碩士論文。 28.戴貴美(2011)“公司治理與資訊透明度對經營績效之影響--以台灣金融保險業為例”,南華大學財務金融學系財務管理碩士班未發表碩士論文。 29.籃啟祜(2011)“公司治理對經營績效的影響--台灣上市櫃鋼鐵公司之實證研究”,國立中正大學�高階主管管理碩士在職專班未發表碩士論文。 30.Alchian, A.A. and H. Demsetz, (1972) “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization, American Economic Organization.” American Economic Review, 62(5), pp. 777-795. 31.Adams, R. J. and Rummel, C. H. (1977) “Workers’ Participation in Management in West Germany: Impact on the Workers, the Enterprise and the Trade Union.” Industrial Relations Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4-22. 32.Appelbaum, E. and Hunter, L. W. (2003) “Union Participation in Strategic Decisions of Corporations.”NBER working paper #9590. 33.Benelli, G.; Loderer, C. and Lys, T. (1987) “Labor Participation in Corporate Policy-making Decisions: West Germany’s Experience with Codetermination.” Journal of Business, vol.60, no.4, pp.553-575. 34.Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932) “ The modern corporation and private property.” New York, MacMillan. 35.Chang, Ha-Joon and Singh, Ajit (1997)“Can Large Firms Be Run Efficiently Without Being Bureaucratic?”Journal of International Development, 9(6), pp. 214-237. 36.Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, Lixin Colin Xu,(2000) “Corporate performance in the East Asian financial crisis”, The World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), pp.23-47. 37.Denis, Diane k. (2001) “Twenty-five years of corporate governance research and counting”, Review of Financial Economics, 2001, 10(3), pp.191-212. 38.Fama, Eugene F, Jensen, Michael C, (1983) “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), pp.301-326. 39.Furubotn, E. G., and Wiggins, S. N. (1984) Plant Closings, Worker Reallocation Costs and Efficiency Gains to Labor Representation on Boards of Directors, Mimeographed. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington. 40.Grossman, Sanford J., Hart, Oliver D., (1980) “Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation”, Rand Journal of Economics, 11(1), pp.42. 41.Hansen, Gary and Hill, Charles W.L. (1991) “Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time Series Study of Four Technology-Driven Industries Introduction”, Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998), 12(1), pp.1-17. 42.Haynes, Michelle and Steve Thompson, Mike Wright. (2003) “The determinants of corporate divestment: Evidence from a panel of UK firms”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(1), pp.147. 43.Hermalin, B. E., M. Weisbach, (2001), “Board Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature,” NBER Working Paper No.8161. 44.Hill, Charles WL, Snell, Scott A. (1988) “External Control, Corporate Strategy, And Firm Performance in Researchintensive Industries”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), pp.577-591. 45.Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, W. (1976) “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp.305-360. 46.Jensen, Michael C. and Ruback, Richard S. (1983) “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4); pp.5-51. 47.Kesner, Idalene F. (1987) “Directors' Stock Ownership and Organizational Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies”, Journal of Management, 13(3) pp.499-509. 48.Kornai, J. (1980) “’Hard’ and‘ Soft’ budget Constrain”, Acta Oeconomica, 25(3-4), pp. 231-245. 49.La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny, (1999) ,“Corporate Ownership Around the World”, Journal of Finance, 54(2), pp.471-517. 50.Mikkelson, Wayne H., Ruback, Richard S., (1991) “Targeted Repurchases and Common Stock Returns”, Rand Journal of Economics, 22(4), pp.544-562. 51.Mikkelson, Wayne H., Partch, M. Megan, (1989) “Managers' Voting Rights and Corporate Control”, Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), pp.263-291. 52.Mitchell, Mark L., Lehn, Kenneth, (1990) “Do Bad Bidders Become Good Targets?” Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), pp.372-399. 53.Morck, R., Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny (1988) “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2), pp. 293-316. 54.Potthoff, E.; Blume, O. and Duvernell, H. (1962) Zwischenbilanz der Mitbestimmung, Tubingen: J.C. B. Mohr. 55.Prowse, S. (1998), Corporate Governance: Emerging Issues and Lessons from East Asia.” The World Bank Working Pager, Washington, D.C. 56.Raghuram G. Rajan Lurgi Zingales(1998) “Which Capitalism? Lessons from The East Asian Crisis” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Volume 11, Issue 3 pp.40-48. 57.Ross L. Watts and Jerold L. Zimmerman(1978) “ Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards”, THE Accounting Review Vol. LII, NO.1,pp.112–134. 58.Shivdasani, Anil (1993) “Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, pp.167-198. 59.Shleifer, A. Vishny, R. (1986) “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.”Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), pp.461-487. 60.Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.(1997) “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, The Journal of Finance VOL. LII, NO.2,pp.737–783. 61.Stern, R. N. (1988) ”Participation by Representation: Workers on Boards of Directors in the U.S. and Abroad.” Work and Occupations, vol.15, no.4, pp.396-422. 62.Streeck, W. (1984) “Co-Determination: The Fourth Decade.” In Bernard Wilpert and Arndt Sorge, eds. International Yearbook of Organizational Democracy, vol. 2. London: Wiley. 63.Vernon-Wortzel, Heidi and Wortzel, Lawrence (1989) “Privatization: Not the only Answer.” World Development, 17(5), pp.73. 64.Wilpert, B. (1975) “Research on Industrial Democracy: The German Case.” Industrial Relations Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53-64. 65.Yin-Hua Yeh,Tsun-Siou Lee and Tracie Woidtke(2001)“Family Control and Corporate Governance:Evidence From Taiwan”,International Reivew of Finance,pp.21–48. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17622 | - |
dc.description.abstract | With the expansion of enterprise organization and management specialization, shareholders no longer have the ability to run their companies on their own, so there is the emergence of professional managers. Owner and manager in the company objectives are inconsistent, asymmetric information causes, 'Principal-agent problem'. To address the separation of ownership and management of agency problems, the need for strengthening the monitoring of operators, a mechanism for maintaining shareholders ' equity, corporate governance systems have begun to emerge.
Most prior studies on corporate governance have focused on listed companiesonly few research investigates state-owned enterprises. Since state-owned enterprises are an important part of the national economic construction, it's important to study the association between corporate governance and performance of these firms. In this research, four state-owned enterprises are the main object of study. Case study method is adopted to explore the association between state-owned enterprises corporate governance evaluation results and operating performance. This paper also examinesy the role of the independent directors and the labor representives on the board, and the impact of their involovment on the board on the enterprises’ decisions. The results from this study may help regulator to promote and improve the corporate governance of the state-owned enterprises. The findings suggest that the establishment and implementation of the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises may enhancce non-financial performance. To promote the effectiveness of the evaluation of corporate governance system, this study recommends that the results of the assessment can be further applied to government-owned undertakings, direct investment undertakings and businesses owned by the investment undertakings.. This study further finds that the frequency of speaking in the board meeting by independent directors is positively associated with the effectiveness of the corporate governance and operating performance of state-owned enterprises. Such finding may be attributable to the variety of issues concerned by the independent directors. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:25:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P00744003-1.pdf: 3842838 bytes, checksum: 31b629e717b0ee3c86ec73638ad05aca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 iii
誌謝 iv 中文摘要 v 英文摘要 vi 目 錄 viii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xiii 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究動機與目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節、公司治理制度發展歷程與基本架構 3 第二節、國營企業公司治理制度與特色 11 第三節、公司治理制度之評鑑 13 第四節、過去重要研究 16 第三章 研究架構與方法 30 第一節、研究架構 30 第二節、研究議題 31 第三節、研究方法 31 第四章 個案分析 33 第一節、資料來源 33 第二節、資料分析 34 第三節、研究分析結果 84 第四節、研究分析建議 87 第五章 結論與建議 88 第一節、研究結論 88 第二節、建議事項 89 第三節、研究限制 91 第四節、後續研究建議 92 參考文獻 93 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公司治理制度與經營績效關聯之研究--以國營企業為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Association between Corporate Governance and Performance -- Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳勝源,蘇裕惠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 代理問題,公司治理,經營績效,國營企業,勞工董事,獨立董事, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Agency problem,Corporate Governance,Operating Performance,State-Owned Enterprise,the Labor Representive on the Board,Independent director., | en |
dc.relation.page | 97 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計與管理決策組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計與管理決策組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.75 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。