請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17565完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張淑惠(SHU-HUI CHANG) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-You Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林昱佑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:21:39Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. The Medical Journal of Australia 1995;163:458-71. 2. Murphy M, McCloughen A, Curtis K. The impact of simulated multidisciplinary Trauma Team Training on team performance: A qualitative study. Australasian Emergency Care 2019;22:1-7. 3. Chapuis C, Chanoine S, Colombet L, et al. Interprofessional safety reporting and review of adverse events and medication errors in critical care. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2019;15:549-56. 4. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Quality Safety in Health Care 2008;17:216-23. 5. Cooper S, Cant R, Porter J, et al. Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation 2010;81:446-52. 6. Gordon M, Darbyshire D, Baker P. Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety: a systematic review. Medical Education 2012;46:1042-54. 7. Grand JA, Pearce M, Rench TA, Chao GT, Fernandez R, Kozlowski SW. Going DEEP: guidelines for building simulation-based team assessments. British Medical Journal Quality Safety 2013;22:436-48. 8. Hunziker S, Johansson AC, Tschan F, et al. Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011;57:2381-8. 9. Ford K, Menchine M, Burner E, et al. Leadership and Teamwork in Trauma and Resuscitation. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 2016;17:549-56. 10. Ornato JP, Peberdy MA, Reid RD, Feeser VR, Dhindsa HS. Impact of resuscitation system errors on survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2012;83:63-9. 11. Hunziker S, Tschan F, Semmer NK, Marsch S. Importance of leadership in cardiac arrest situations: from simulation to real life and back. Swiss Medical Weekly 2013;143:w13774. 12. 新北市政府研究發展考核委員會，新北市政府 施政成果網：Available at: https://wedid.ntpc.gov.tw/stable/detail/o0g4d63KZ5Db引用時間2020/07/01。 13. Fernandez Castelao E, Boos M, Ringer C, Eich C, Russo SG. Effect of CRM team leader training on team performance and leadership behavior in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. BMC Medical Education 2015;15:116. 14. Tschan F, Semmer NK, Gautschi D, Hunziker P, Spychiger M, Marsch SU. Leading to recovery: Group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups. Human Performance 2006;19: 277-304. 15. Hautz WE, Kämmer JE, Schauber SK, Spies CD, Gaissmaier W. Diagnostic performance by medical students working individually or in teams. The Journal of the American Medical Association 2015;313:303-4. 16. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA. The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1999;9:19-32. 17. Ford J, Henderson R, O'Hare D. The effects of Crew Resource Management (CRM) training on flight attendants' safety attitudes. Journal of Safety Research 2014;48:49-56. 18. Baker DP, Gustafson S, Beaubien JM, et al. Medical Team Training Programs in Health Care. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, et al., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20580/ 19. Cant RP, Porter JE, Cooper SJ, Roberts K, Wilson I, Gartside C. Improving the non-technical skills of hospital medical emergency teams: The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Emergency Medicine Australasia 2016;28:641-6. 20. Cooper S, Cant R, Connell C, et al. Measuring teamwork performance: Validity testing of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) with clinical resuscitation teams. Resuscitation 2016;101:97-101. 21. Frankel A, Gardner R, Maynard L, Kelly A. Using the Communication and Teamwork Skills (CATS) Assessment to measure health care team performance. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2007;33:549-58. 22. Freytag J, Stroben F, Hautz WE, Schauber SK, Kammer JE. Rating the quality of teamwork-a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma,Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2019;27:12. 23. Maignan M, Koch FX, Chaix J, et al. Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) for the assessment of non-technical skills during resuscitation: Validation of the French version. Resuscitation 2016;101:115-20. 24. Passauer-Baierl S, Chiapponi C, Bruns CJ, Weigl M. Teamwork in the operating theatre: the German Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS-D) and its first application in Germany. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie 2014;139:648-56. 25. Passauer-Baierl S, Hull L, Miskovic D, Russ S, Sevdalis N, Weigl M. Re-validating the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery tool (OTAS-D): cultural adaptation, refinement, and psychometric evaluation. World journal of surgery 2014;38:305-13. 26. Cooper S, Endacott R, Cant R. Measuring non-technical skills in medical emergency care: a review of assessment measures. Open access emergency medicine : Open Access Emergency Medicine 2010;2:7-16. 27. Cooper SJ, Cant RP. Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: an update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation 2014;85:31-3. 28. Myers JA, Powell DM, Psirides A, Hathaway K, Aldington S, Haney MF. Non-technical skills evaluation in the critical care air ambulance environment: introduction of an adapted rating instrument--an observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2016;24:24. 29. Porter JE, Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Rating teams' non-technical skills in the emergency department: A qualitative study of nurses' experience. International Emergency Nursing 2018;38:15-20. 30. Walker S, Brett S, McKay A, Lambden S, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Observational Skill-based Clinical Assessment tool for Resuscitation (OSCAR): development and validation. Resuscitation 2011;82:835-44. 31. Healey AN, Undre S, Vincent CA. Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams. Quality Safety in Health Care 2004;13 Suppl 1:i33-40. 32. Paisley AM, Baldwin P, Paterson-Brown S. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a new assessment form for use with basic surgical trainees. American Journal of Surgery 2001;182:24-9. 33. Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Quality Safety in Health Care 2009;18:104-8. 34. Undre S, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA. Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study. World journal of surgery 2006;30:1774-83. 35. McKay A, Walker ST, Brett SJ, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Team performance in resuscitation teams: comparison and critique of two recently developed scoring tools. Resuscitation 2012;83:1478-83. 36. Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, Glavin R, Maran N, Patey R. Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. British journal of anaesthesia 2003;90:580-8. 37. Mitchell L, Flin R, Yule S, Mitchell J, Coutts K, Youngson G. Evaluation of the Scrub Practitioners' List of Intraoperative Non-Technical Skills system. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2012;49:201-11. 38. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications: Sage publications(US); 2016. 39. Joseph L. Fleiss BL, Myunghee Cho Paik. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions: New York: Wiley; 2003. 40. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing health 2006;29:489-97. 41. Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2015;95:1-80. 42. 新北市政府消防局緊急傷病患救護作業程序，新北市政府消防局，2019年3月4日 第一版。 43. Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. British Medical Journal 1998;316:1154-7. 44. Calland JF, Guerlain S, Adams RB, Tribble CG, Foley E, Chekan EG. A systems approach to surgical safety. Surgical endoscopy 2002;16:1005-14; discussion 15. 45. Tanigawa K, Tanaka K. Emergency medical service systems in Japan: past, present, and future. Resuscitation 2006;69:365-70. 46. Kim JH, Ryoo HW, Kim JY, et al. Application of a Dual-Dispatch System for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: Will More Hands Save More Lives? Journal of Korean Medical Science 2019;34:e141. 47. Okubo M, Komukai S, Izawa J, et al. Prehospital advanced airway management for paediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide cohort study. Resuscitation 2019;145:175-84. 48. Kajino K, Kitamura T, Iwami T, et al. Impact of the number of on-scene emergency life-saving technicians and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Osaka City. Resuscitation 2014;85:59-64. 49. Tsai BM, Sun JT, Hsieh MJ, et al. Optimal paramedic numbers in resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled study in a simulation setting. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0235315. Published 2020 Jul 7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235315 50. Worster A, Haines T. Advanced statistics: understanding medical record review (MRR) studies. Academic Emergency Medicine 2004;11:187-92. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17565 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究目的:本研究探討高級救護技術員使用經過修正後之Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM)評估量表評估到院前救護技術員操作模擬急救之團隊合作之可行性。 研究背景:團隊合作與非技術性技能評估工具已被證實在許多醫療環境下能增進患者的安全及照護效率，但目前對於高級救護技術員在到院前仍缺乏合適的評估工具。 研究方法:本研究包含三個研究步驟。首先，依據系統性回顧後選擇適合緊急救護技術員到院前情境的評估工具。第二，進行專家效度分析以檢測修正後的團隊合作評估工具，簡稱Modified TEAM。最後，以集群隨機分派研究設計(Cluster randomization study design)收集資料，評估此團隊合作評估量表對於救護技術員模擬急救訓練紀錄影像之成效。 研究結果:在系統性回顧後，選擇TEAM為評估工具樣本。影像評估者使用完成專家效度分析後之Modified TEAM評估量表進行評分。共55位高級救護技術員(Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic, EMT-P)使用Modified TEAM評核2個模擬急救影像。研究發現，在12題題目與總分的評分表現中，EMT-P年資5年以下(含)與EMT-P年資超過5年的評分者在3人EMT模擬情境影像出現了5次的統計顯著差異。而在評估5人救護技術員模擬情境影像時，各項評分結果皆未達任何統計上顯著差異。 結論:在此前導研究中，結果顯示使用Modified TEAM評估量表可以有效評估救護技術員模擬急救訓練的團隊合作，特別是在5人EMT團隊情況。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Aim: To assess the feasibility of teamwork of emergency medical technician-Paramedic (EMT-P) using a modified TEAM tool in simulated prehospital resuscitation setting. Background: Teamwork and non-technical skill (NTS) assessment tools have been proved to increase the patient’s safety and care efficiency in many fields of medical environment, yet there is still lack of a proper tool to assess the prehospital setting for emergency medical technicians. Methods: This study comprised of three steps. First, we conducted a systematic review to opt for a tool that fits emergency medical technicians to be used in the prehospital setting. Secondly, we conducted an expert validity to verify the modified version of the teamwork assessment tool, called Modified TEAM. Finally, we conducted a cluster randomization study design to evaluate simulated resuscitation videos using the modified tool. Results: We chose the TEAM tool, after a systematic review, as the fundamental template to modified. The modified TEAM scoring tool was used by the video raters after the expert validation. Fifty-five emergency medical technicians used the Modified TEAM scoring tool to evaluate 2 of simulated resuscitation videos. We found 5 out of the 12 teamwork related items and the total score were significantly different between experienced EMT and novice EMT in the 3-EMT video, and none of them were significant difference between in the 5-EMT video between experienced EMT and novice EMT. Conclusion: In this pilot study, our result indicated that the Modified TEAM is a feasible tool to assess the teamwork among EMT’s simulated education training, especially for 5-EMT teams. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:21:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0408202022092600.pdf: 851268 bytes, checksum: fd10a0ad132f817929256907066c4766 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 導 論 8 第一節 實習單位簡介 8 第二節 研究背景與動機 9 第三節 研究架構 10 第四節 研究目的 11 第五節 文獻回顧 12 第六節 研究問題 16 第二章 方法 17 前言 17 第一節 研究工具 17 第二節 研究對象與實施方法 21 第三節 研究倫理考量 26 第三章 結果 27 第一節 EMT-P分布情況 27 第二節 EMT-P不同年資與評分的關係 28 第三節 模擬情境影像間的評分差異 35 第四章 討論與建議 40 第一節 實習目的 40 第二節 研究結果與討論 40 第三節 研究限制 46 第四節 未來教育訓練參考 46 第五節 結論 47 參考文獻 48 附錄 51 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 使用TEAM量表評估到院前救護技術員團隊合作表現-前導研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Evaluation of Prehospital Teamwork Performance For Emergency Medical Technician Education Training by Using TEAM SCORE – A Pilot Study. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor-orcid | 張淑惠(0000-0002-6164-0875) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳秀熙(HSIU-HSI CHEN),馬惠明(HUEI-MING MA),江文莒(WEN-CHU CHIANG) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee-orcid | 陳秀熙(0000-0002-5799-6705) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 評估工具,高級救護技術員,模擬急救訓練紀錄影像,TEAM,團隊合作, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Assessment tool,EMT-P,Simulated resuscitation videos,TEAM,Teamwork, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 51 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002419 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0408202022092600.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 831.32 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。