Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 食品安全與健康研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17332
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor姜至剛(Chih-Kang Chiang)
dc.contributor.authorPin-Chun Kuoen
dc.contributor.author郭品君zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T00:07:15Z-
dc.date.copyright2020-08-26
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-08-14
dc.identifier.citationAkahane, K., Yonai, S., Fukuda, S., Miyahara, N., Yasuda, H., Iwaoka, K., . . . Akashi, M. (2012). The Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident and exposures in the environment. The Environmentalist, 32(2), 136-143.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Chicago, IL, 384-398.
BBC. (2013). Q A: Horsemeat scanda. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-21335872
Beck, U., Lash, S., Wynne, B. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17): sage.
Botterill, L., Mazur, N. (2004). Risk and risk perception: A literature review. Kingstrom, ACT: Australian Government Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
Braun, B., Aßheuer, T. (2011). Floods in megacity environments: vulnerability and coping strategies of slum dwellers in Dhaka/Bangladesh. Natural hazards, 58(2), 771-787.
Cardello, A. V., Schutz, H. G., Lesher, L. L. (2007). Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: A conjoint analytic study. Innovative Food Science Emerging Technologies, 8(1), 73-83.
CDC. (2018). Potassium Iodide (KI). Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/ki.htm
Chauvin, B. (2018). Individual differences in the judgment of risks: Sociodemographic characteristics, cultural orientation, and level of expertise Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis (pp. 37-61): Springer.
FAO/WHO. (2006). Food safety risk analysis: A guide for national food safety authorities: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Health Organization.
FAO/WHO. (2018). Risk communication applied to food safety: handbook: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Health Organization.
Fink, A. (2015). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide: Sage Publications.
Frewer, L., de Jonge, J., van Kleef, E. (2009). Consumer perceptions of food safety. Medical Sciences-Volume II, 243.
Frewer, L. J., Fischer, A., Brennan, M., Bánáti, D., Lion, R., Meertens, R. M., . . . Vereijken, C. M. (2016). Risk/benefit communication about food—a systematic review of the literature. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 56(10), 1728-1745.
Ha, T. M., Shakur, S., Do, K. H. P. (2019). Consumer concern about food safety in Hanoi, Vietnam. Food Control, 98, 238-244.
Ha, T. M., Shakur, S., Do, K. H. P. (2020). Linkages among food safety risk perception, trust and information: Evidence from Hanoi consumers. Food Control, 110, 106965.
Hansson, S. O. (2002). Uncertainties in the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal, 54(1), 39-+.
Hartmann, C., Hübner, P., Siegrist, M. (2018). A risk perception gap? Comparing expert, producer and consumer prioritization of food hazard controls. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 116, 100-107.
IAEA. (2015). The Fukushima Daiichi Accident: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Johnson, B. B., Covello, V. T. (1987). Agenda-Setting, group conflict, and the social construction of risk. The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.
Jouve, J.-L., Stringer, M., Baird-Parker, A. (1998). Food safety management tools [Press release]
Kang, H.-J., Kim, S., Lee, G., Lim, H. S., Yun, S. S., Kim, J.-W. (2017). Perception gaps on food additives among various groups in Korea: Food experts, teachers, nutrition teachers, nongovernmental organization members, and general consumers. Journal of food protection, 80(6), 1015-1021.
Kim, N. H., Cho, T. J., Kim, Y. B., Park, B. I., Kim, H. S., Rhee, M. S. (2015). Implications for effective food risk communication following the Fukushima nuclear accident based on a consumer survey. Food Control, 50, 304-312.
Koo, Y.-H., Yang, Y.-S., Song, K.-W. (2014). Radioactivity release from the Fukushima accident and its consequences: A review. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 74, 61-70.
Krewski, D., Turner, M. C., Lemyre, L., Lee, J. E. (2012). Expert vs. public perception of population health risks in Canada. Journal of risk research, 15(6), 601-625.
Kron, W. (2002). Keynote lecture: Flood risk= hazard× exposure× vulnerability. Flood defence, 82-97.
Lee, D., Seo, S., Song, M. K., Lee, H. K., Park, S., Jin, Y. W. (2017). Factors associated with the risk perception and purchase decisions of Fukushima-related food in South Korea. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187655.
MAFF. (2020a). Lifting of the Import Restrictions on Japanese Foods Following the Accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (54 Countries and Regions). Retrieved from https://www.maff.go.jp/j/export/e_info/pdf/thrm_en.pdf
MAFF. (2020b). List of countries and regions that have lifted import measures on Japanese food imposed after the TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Retrieved from https://www.maff.go.jp/j/export/e_info/pdf/kisei_keii_en.pdf
MAFF. (2020c). Status of countries and regions introduced import measures on Japanese foods after the TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Retrieved from https://www.maff.go.jp/j/export/e_info/pdf/kisei_gaiyo_en.pdf
Merz, S., Shozugawa, K., Steinhauser, G. (2015). Analysis of Japanese radionuclide monitoring data of food before and after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Environmental science technology, 49(5), 2875-2885.
Miao, P., Chen, S., Li, J., Xie, X. (2020). Decreasing consumers’ risk perception of food additives by knowledge enhancement in China. Food Quality and Preference, 79, 103781.
Moen, R., Norman, C. (2006). Evolution of the PDCA cycle: Citeseer.
Nemoto, T., Beglar, D. (2014). Likert-scale questionnaires. Paper presented at the JALT 2013 Conference Proceedings.
NRC. (2011). Report of Japanese government to the IAEA ministerial conference on nuclear safety - The accident at TEPCO's Fukushima nuclear power stations: Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters of Government of Japan.
Perko, T. (2011). Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accident. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 7(3), 388-392.
Perko, T., Adam, B., Stassen, K. (2015). The differences in perception of radiological risks: lay people versus new and experienced employees in the nuclear sector. Journal of risk research, 18(1), 40-54.
Purvis‐Roberts, K. L., Werner, C. A., Frank, I. (2007). Perceived risks from radiation and nuclear testing near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: A comparison between physicians, scientists, and the public. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 27(2), 291-302.
Rossi, M. d. S. C., Stedefeldt, E., da Cunha, D. T., de Rosso, V. V. (2017). Food safety knowledge, optimistic bias and risk perception among food handlers in institutional food services. Food Control, 73, 681-688.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 393-404.
Siegrist, M. (2019). Trust and risk perception: a critical review of the literature. Risk analysis.
Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., Earle, T. C. (2005). Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of risk research, 8(2), 145-156.
Siegrist, M., Keller, C., Kastenholz, H., Frey, S., Wiek, A. (2007). Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 27(1), 59-69.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
Slovic, P. (2012). The perception gap: Radiation and risk. Bulletin of the atomic scientists, 68(3), 67-75.
Slovic, P., Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current directions in psychological science, 15(6), 322-325.
Soumerai, S. B., Ross-Degnan, D., Kahn, J. S. (1992). Effects of professional and media warnings about the association between aspirin use in children and Reye's syndrome. The Milbank Quarterly, 155-182.
Steinhauser, G., Brandl, A., Johnson, T. E. (2014). Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: a review of the environmental impacts. Science of the total environment, 470, 800-817.
Taylor, A. W., Coveney, J., Ward, P. R., Dal Grande, E., Mamerow, L., Henderson, J., Meyer, S. B. (2012). The Australian Food and Trust Survey: Demographic indicators associated with food safety and quality concerns. Food Control, 25(2), 476-483.
USEPA. (2011a). Radiation Sources and Doses - Background Radiation. Retrieved from United States Environmental Protection Agency: https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-sources-and-doses#backgroundradiation
USEPA. (2011b). Radiation Terms and Units. Retrieved from United States Environmental Protection Agency: https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-terms-and-units
USEPA. (2011c). Radioactive Decay. Retrieved from United States Environmental Protection Agency: https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radioactive-decay
Wahlberg, A. A., Sjoberg, L. (2000). Risk perception and the media. Journal of risk research, 3(1), 31-50.
WHO. (2011a). Can radioactive contamination be removed from water? Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hac/crises/jpn/faqs/en/index8.html
WHO. (2011b). Ionizing radiation - Use of potassium iodide for thyroid protection during nuclear or radiological emergencies. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/tech_briefings/potassium_iodide/en/
WHO. (2015). WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015 (9241565160).
WHO. (2016). Ionizing radiation, health effects and protective measures. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ionizing-radiation-health-effects-and-protective-measures
Yeung, R. M., Morris, J. (2001). Food safety risk: Consumer perception and purchase behaviour. British food journal.Zhu, W., Yao, N. C., Ma, B., Wang, F. (2018). Consumers’ risk perception, information seeking, and intention to purchase genetically modified food. British food journal.
Zhu, W., Yao, N. C., Ma, B., Wang, F. (2018). Consumers’ risk perception, information seeking, and intention to purchase genetically modified food. British food journal.
丁逸年(2016)。聳動媒體與風險知覺:探討餿水油事件之相關報導。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,臺北,臺灣。
中國核能行業協會(2020)。2019年1-12月全國核電運行情況。檢自http://www.china-nea.cn/site/content/36862.html,檢索日期於2020年7月6日。
方偉達(2018)。人文社科研究方法。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
日本厚生勞動省(2019)。食品中的放射性物質檢測結果。檢自 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/kinkyu/0000045250.html,檢索日期於2020年3月17日。
台灣環境資訊協會(2014)。回顧2011食安風暴 認識生活中的塑化劑。檢自https://e-https://e- info.org.tw/node/102919,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
台灣環境資訊協會(2019)。農試所研究:土質、作物、農法三管齊下 可防作物鎘濃度超標。檢自https://e-info.org.tw/node/218263,檢索日期於2020年3月5日。
甘志展、李明璁(2008)。消費者對食品安全議題之風險認知與其消息來源可靠度之研究。食品市場資訊,97(4),頁1-10。
自由時報(2013)。使用人工香精 胖達人認了 願退費。檢自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/707682,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
自由時報(2018a)。全球僅台灣、中國全面禁止// 中國開始解禁日核食。檢自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1250677,檢索日期於2019年9月16日。
自由時報(2018b)。禁日核食進口公投過關 日本代表「深感遺憾」。檢自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2623888,檢索日期於2019年9月16日。
行政院(2016)。日本輸台證明。檢自 https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/32832bac-22f2-45fa-8ec2-59db11fc03fa,檢索日期於2019年9月6日。
行政院原子能委員會(2019)。什麼是輻射。檢自https://www.aec.gov.tw,檢索日期於2020年6月8日。
行政院環境保護署毒物及化學物質局全球資訊網(2017a)。不該在牛奶裡的「三聚氰胺」,是能吃的東西嗎?檢自https://www.tcsb.gov.tw/fp-263-2707-b306d-1.html,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
行政院環境保護署毒物及化學物質局全球資訊網(2017b)。那些QQ的食物和不該出現的添加物「順丁烯二酸酐這就是所謂Q彈的代價?(下)。檢自 https://www.tcsb.gov.tw/fp-263-2712-23491-1.html,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
吳明隆(2008)。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳明隆(2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計(第三版)。新北市:易習圖書。
宋明哲(2018)。風險心理學:人本風險管理。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
李仲彬(2011)。[信任] 在電子治理中所扮演的角色:以文獻檢閱爲基礎的初探性分析。公共行政學報,39,頁105-147。
李宜映、黃偉庭(2018)。國內大專院校對於基改作物風險感知與溝通管道之問卷調查研究。農業世界,414,頁84-87。
周桂田(1998)。現代性與風險社會。臺灣社會學刊,21,頁89-129。
周桂田(2007)。公眾信任與風險感知:以2003/2004年基因改造產品為案例分析。科技醫療與社會,4,頁150 -178。
林宗弘、蕭新煌、許耿銘(2018)。邁向世界風險社會?台灣民眾的社會資本、風險感知與風險因應行為。調查研究-方法與應用,40,頁127-166。
食力(2017a)。歐洲毒雞蛋是人為事件 兇手可能是飼料廠清潔劑。檢自 https://www.foodnext.net/issue/paper/4975384030,檢索日期於2020年3月5日。
食力(2017b)。戴奧辛接著芬普尼!為什麼2017年的毒雞蛋特別多?檢自 https://www.foodnext.net/issue/paper/4975399637,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
食力(2019)。你真的了解「核食」議題嗎?維持8年的臨時性政策將因公投過關再凍兩年。檢自 https://www.foodnext.net/news/newstrack/paper/5111272316,檢索日期於2019年9月16日。
凌明沛(2017)。建立食安信心的重要關鍵─強化風險溝通!ILSI Taiwan專欄。檢自http://www.ilsitaiwan.org/Page/ArticleContent.aspx?ArticleID= tDUUk pdu8Bs%3d ArticleTypeID=T11P2UT2Yxc%3d,檢索日期於2019年10月21日。
康健雜誌(2011)。防輻射 先吃碘片預防?小心副作用。檢自https://www.commonhealth.com.tw/article/article.action?nid=61712,檢索日期於2020年7月29日。
陳彥陵(2019)。中國境內非洲豬瘟疫情威脅台灣民眾的媒體使用、政治信任與風險感知之探討。「中華傳播學會」發表之論文。
陳柚伶(2017)。政府風險溝通之研究-以日本福島核災事故後調整特定地區食品輸台管制措施為例。國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文,臺北,臺灣。
陳憶寧 (2011)。美國牛肉進口台灣危機中的媒介使用、政治信任與風險感知的關係。傳播與社會學刊,17,頁31-60。
焦點事件(2018)。福島核災食品 台灣禁了什麼?。檢自http://www.eventsinfocus.org/issues/1218,檢索日期於2019年9月16日。
鈕文英(2015)。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。
溫世頌(2006)。心理學。臺北市:三民書局股份有限公司。
經貿透視雙周刊(2020)。有關菲律賓解除對日本產農.水產品的進口禁令之報導。檢自https://www.trademag.org.tw/page/newsid1/?id=758984 iz=6,檢索日期於2020年6月2日。
經濟部能源局(2020)。能源統計月報。檢自 https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/web_book/WebReports.aspx?book=M_CH menu_id=142,檢索日期於2020年6月28日。
葉乃嘉(2013)。研究方法的第一本書。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
鄒宗珮、慕蓉蓉、黃志傑、陳沛蓉、黃婉婷、吳和生(2011)。腸道出血性大腸桿菌之回顧與因應。疫情報導,27(12),頁147-152。
臺灣電力公司(2019)。核能營運現況與績效。檢自 https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=203,檢索日期於2020年6月28日。
劉航宇(2014)。大眾對基因改造食品之知覺風險研究。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,新北,臺灣。
蔡明峯(2016)。台灣民眾對食品安全衛生之風險感知,社會信任與個人避險行為之關係。佛光大學社會學系碩士論文,宜蘭,臺灣。
衛生福利部(2015)。油症條例修正草案立院三讀通過,患者健康照護保障升級!檢自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2633-9728-1.html,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2011)。日本食品管理工作專區。檢自 https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteList.aspx?sid=2356 pn=161,檢索日期於2020年3月5日。
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2014)。黑心油品事件專區。檢自 https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteList.aspx?sid=4106 pn=1,檢索日期於2020年3月2日。
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2019a)。107年度「日本食品取樣檢驗與調查研究」。檢自https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteList.aspx?sid=9808,檢索日期於2019年9月6日。
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2019b)。107年度食品輸入管理暨輸入查驗統計年報。檢自https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/publicationsContent.aspx?id=129,檢索日期於2020年6月28日。
鄭麗玉、陳秀容、危芷芬、留佳莉(2006)。心理學。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
韓柏檉 (1989)。冰山一角-綠牡蠣事件。科學月刊,237(7)。
藍婕予(2019)。綜合活動學習領域教師對食品安全之認知、風險感知與行為的研究----以臺南市國中為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,臺北,臺灣。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17332-
dc.description.abstract2011年3月11日,日本東北外海發生規模9.0地震,引起的海嘯造成福島第一核電廠毀損,釋出放射性物質汙染土壤、水源及食品。各國政府為維護民眾健康及安全,紛紛提出因應措施。臺灣亦自2011年3月25日起,全面禁止日本5縣(福島、茨城、栃木、群馬及千葉)食品進口。然事件發生迄今已超過9年,從公民投票結果初步瞭解ㄧ般民眾對於議題看法,卻無從得知專業人士之風險感知。為瞭解專業人士對食品安全議題的觀點,本研究透過問卷,瞭解國內食品安全相關研究所師生之風險感知,希望透過專業角度來看待日本福島核災事件,作為後續風險溝通之參考。
本研究採用網路問卷詢問研究對象,問卷內容包含「對福島核災事件後日本食品的風險感知」、「對周邊國家潛在核災事故的風險感知」、「關於放射性、環境中的輻射對健康影響的看法」、「對目前食品安全風險溝通的信心程度」、「食品安全資訊取得、搜尋習慣及教育方式」以及「填答者基本資料」等6個部分,總共30題。
結果共蒐集到70位樣本,大於70%填答者在福島核災事件發生後未曾經拒絕購買日本食品。31.4%填答者認為日本食品會受到放射性物質影響11-50年。如果核災事故再次上演,45.7%填答者認為我國會影響食品安全最大,54.3%填答者認為主要原因為距離近。填答者認為影響我們健康的主要原因是暴露到空氣、雨水、海水和食入受到放射性物質汙染的食物及水,兩者各佔50.0%。整體來說填答者關於放射性、環境中輻射對健康影響的認知程度高,惟「吃高碘食物可以預防輻射產生的疾病。」答對率僅32.9%。
大部分填答者信任政府。40.0%填答者認為政府機構是最信任的資訊來源,其次是食品安全專家。84.3%填答者對日本福島核災事件的資訊感興趣,且80.0%知道衛生福利部食品藥物管理署網站上刊載關於放射性物質汙染食品的資訊。65.7%填答者願意參與政府提供關於放射性物質汙染食品安全教育課程,希望透過教育方式如線上教育。
即使福島核災事件發生迄今已超過9年,對食品安全專業人士而言依然是高關注公共議題,大部分食品安全相關研究所師生對政府抱持信任態度且最信任由政府提供的資訊。本研究瞭解他們的風險感知後,可能影響未來政策及作為後續風險溝通參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractOn March 11, 2011, an earthquake with magnitude 9.0 occurred in the outer sea of Northeastern Japan and the tsunami destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Lots of radioactive materials were released, and soil, water, and food were contaminated. Several countries around the world, including Taiwan, took some activities to protect people’s health. On March 25, our government banned all Japanese food imports from Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, and Chiba. More than nine years passed, we preliminary understand the public’s views on this issue through the result of the referendum. In order to understand the point of view of the experts focusing on the food safety issue, we try to organize the questionnaire to explore the risk perception of experts from the six graduate institutes of food safety in Taiwan. From a professional perspective, their perception will be as a basis for subsequent risk communication.
Our study design is applying survey respondents by using an Internet questionnaire. There are six parts, including risk perception of Japanese foods and potential nuclear accidents in surrounding countries, knowledge questions, confidence in our government, food safety information requirements and search behavior and sociodemographic characteristics, total 30 questions.
A total of 70 respondents have been investigated. Over 70% people did not avoid purchasing Japanese foods. 31.4% of people thought that Japanese foods will be affected for 11-50 years in the future. If nuclear accidents occur again in Taiwan, 45.7% of the people thought that Taiwan would have the greatest effect on food safety, and over half of the people (54.3%) answered close distance was the reason. Half of the respondents considered the main reason that affects our health was exposing to air, rain or seawater, the other half of the respondents thought ingesting food or water contaminated with radionuclides. The knowledge of radioactivity, environmental radiation, and health effects was high, except for eating foods with high iodine content for prevention (correct rate = 32.9%).
Most of people were confident in our government. Among the information sources, 40.0% of people considered that governmental institutions were the most credible, following by food safety experts. Most of the respondents (84.3%) were interested in different types of food safety information related to the Fukushima accident and 80.0% people knew Taiwan Food and Drug Administration provided large amounts of information related to radioactive contamination of food via various online channels. 65.7% of the people responded they would like to participate in food safety education related to radioactive contamination by the government and the modes of education contain on-line education.
Even nine years after the Fukushima accident, it is still a highly concerned public issue among the food safety-related experts. Most of them were confident in our government and believed the information from the government. After knowing their risk perception, it probably will affect banned policies and be as a basis for subsequent risk communication.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:07:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0608202011105100.pdf: 2473896 bytes, checksum: afa1b64ce4842c0bcb08dc4838730eac (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 v
目錄 viii
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景、動機與目的 1
第二節 研究流程與架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 風險相關名詞涵義 7
第二節 風險感知 16
第三節 相關研究回顧 23
第四節 日本福島核災事件 26
第三章 研究方法與設計 35
第一節 研究方法與對象 35
第二節 研究作業 40
第三節 前測問卷施測結果與建議 51
第四章 結果與討論 57
第一節 食安所師生分布概況 57
第二節 風險感知與認知程度 60
第三節 風險溝通與資訊來源 66
第四節 研究討論 71
第五章 結論與建議 77
第一節 研究發現 77
第二節 研究限制 80
第三節 研究建議 82
參考文獻 85
附錄一、日本福島核災事件文獻探討 95
附錄二、研究倫理審查資料 111
附錄三、前測問卷 113
附錄四、正式問卷 117
附錄五、前測問卷施測結果 123
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title福島核災事故發生9年後的食品風險感知:以臺灣食品安全相關研究所為例
zh_TW
dc.titleFood Risk Perception 9-year after Fukushima Nuclear Accident: Take Graduate Institute of Food Safety in Taiwan as an Exampleen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee許輔(Fuu Sheu),王宏文(Hong-Wung Wang)
dc.subject.keyword風險感知,風險溝通,食品風險,食品安全,福島核災,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordRisk perception,Risk communication,Food risk,Food safety,Fukushima nuclear accident,en
dc.relation.page128
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202002516
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2020-08-15
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept食品安全與健康研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:食品安全與健康研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0608202011105100.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.42 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved