請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17267完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 丁志音 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Chen Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊淑真 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T00:04:01Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-09-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
丁志音、涂醒哲(2003)。傳染病照護的選擇性歧視-醫師及牙醫師的愛滋病專業倫理與照護意願。臺灣衛誌,23(1),45-58。 行政院衛生署疾病管制局(2012):人類免疫缺乏病毒感染介紹。取自http://www.cdc.gov.tw/professional/knowdisease.aspx?treeid=beac9c103df952c4&nowtreeid=7B56E6F932B49B90&id=3013B7FC8F965336&did=651。 行政院衛生署疾病管制局(2008)。2008年愛滋病防疫政策民意調查調查報告。 行政院衛生署疾病管制局(2012):愛滋病統計資料。取自http://www.cdc.gov.tw/info.aspx?treeid=1f07e8862ba550cf&nowtreeid=6c5ea6d932836f74&tid=4D59359AFFA04851。 社團法人臺灣露得協會(2012)。臺灣愛滋感染者生活現況調查。取自http://www.lourdes.org.tw/list_1.asp?id=2216&menu1=7&menu2=138 林正鄆(2011)。男同性戀愛滋感染者就醫就業障礙與因應方式之初探(碩士論文)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。 邱美珠(2007)。毒癮愛滋感染者之生活世界(碩士論文)。嘉義縣:南華大學。 徐美苓(2001)。愛滋病與媒體-民眾對愛滋病患與感染者的權益與相關態度。臺北:巨流圖書公司。 徐美苓、黃淑貞(1997)。大臺北地區民眾愛滋病認知與相關態度之分析。民意研究季刊,202,10-50。 徐美苓、陳瑞芸、張皓傑、賴奕帆、林佳韻(2006)。愛滋新聞閱讀與對感染者與病患的態度:以針對年輕族群的訊息設計實驗為例。新聞學研究,87,1-49。 晏涵文、劉潔心、李思賢、廖梨伶、陳德馨、王曉薇(2001)。台灣地區愛滋病衛生教育之成效評價及教育需求評估(未出版)。行政院衛生署九十年度科技研究發展計畫(計畫編號:DOH90-DC-1017),臺北市。 陳志軒、徐畢卿、李靜姝、黃建豪(2011)。健康研究中的烙印議題。台灣醫學,16(1):84-92。 黃仲毅(1998)。居民對鄰避設施認知與態度之研究:以彰化溪洲垃圾資源回收焚化廠為例(碩士論文)。臺北市:中國文化大學。 陳宏梅、史曉寧(2010)。愛滋的汙名烙印。新台北護理期刊,12(2),51-57。 莊苹、劉仲冬 (1997)。愛滋風暴-愛滋之烙印對感染者及一般民眾之意義。護理研究5(1),52-63。 莊惠勤(2003)。醫院員工對醫療廢棄物風險知覺之關係研究-以嘉義地區區域醫院為例(碩士論文)。嘉義縣:南華大學。 黃葳威(1999)。文化傳播-歧視。臺北:正中書局。 謝菊英(1996)。愛滋感染者家屬適應探討之質性研究。臺灣社會工作學刊,5,45-74。 謝瀛春(1990)。科學傳播專輯:大眾傳播與科學傳播。科學月刊雜誌(248)。取自http://210.60.224.4/ct/content/1990/00080248/0006.htm Denis McQuai (2011)。McQuail’s大眾傳播理論:基礎、發展與未來。陳芸芸、劉慧雯(譯) 。臺北市:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。(原著出版年:2005) Nova Corcoran (2008)。健康傳播。郭慧琳(譯)。臺北:華杏出版股份有限公司。(原著出版年:2007) 英文文獻: Amuria M., Mitchellb S., Cockcroftc A. & Anderssond N. (2011). Socio-economic status and HIV/AIDS stigma in Tanzania. AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 23(3), 378-382. Bertrand J.T. & Anhang R. (2006). The effectiveness of mass media in changing HIV/AIDS-related behavior among young people in developing countries. Preventing HIV/AIDS in young people : a systematic review of the evidence from developing countries. WHO technical report series.938, 205-239. Hamra M, Ross MW, Orrs M, D’Agostino A (2006). Relationship between expressed HIV/AIDS-related stigma and HIV-beliefs/knowledge and behaviour in families of HIV infected children in Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 11:513–527. Herek GM., Capitanio JP., Widaman KF. (2002).HIV-Related Stigma and Knowledge in the United States: Prevalence and Trends, 1991-1999. American Journal of Public Health,92(3),371-377. Herek GM., Capitanio JP., Widaman KF. (2003). Stigma, Social Risk, and Health Policy: Public Attitudes Toward HIV Surveillance Policies and the Social Construction of Illness. Health Psychology ,22(5), 533-540. Hung C.C., Hsiao C.F., Chen M.Y., Hsieh S.M., Chang S.Y., Sheng W.H.…Chang S.C.( 2006). Improved survival of persons with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy in Taiwan. Japanese Journal Infectious Diseases,59(4), 222-8. Hutchinson P.L., Mahlalela X., Yukich Josh (2007)Mass Media, Stigma, and Disclosure of HIV Test Results: Multilevel Analysis in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. AIDS Education and Prevention,19(6),489-510. Lee, Martha B., Wu, Zunyou, Rotheram-Borus, Mary J., Detels, Roger, Guan, Jihui & Lee (2005). HIV-Related Stigma Among Market Workers in China. Health Psychology, 24(4), 435-438. Leiker J.J., Taub D.E., Gast J. (1995).The stigma of AIDS: Persons with AIDS and social distance. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal,16 (4), 333-351 Letamo G. (2003). Prevalence of, and Factors Associated with, HIV/AIDS-related Stigma and Discriminatory Attitudes in Botswana. Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 21(4), 347-357. Lew-Ting C-Y. & Hsu M-L. (2002).Pattern of responses to HIV transmission questions: HIV knowledge and its relevance to AIDS prejudice. AIDS CARE, 14(4), 549-557. Lifson AR., Demissie W., Tadesse A., Ketema K., May R., Yakob B.,…, Shenie T. (2012). HIV/AIDS stigma-associated attitudes in a rural Ethiopian community: characteristics, correlation with HIV knowledge and other factors, and implicatio.ns for community intervention. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 12:6. MacPherson P., Webb E.L., Choko A.T., Desmond N., Chavula K., Mavedzenge S. N…., Corbett E. L. ( 2011). Stigmatising Attitudes among People Offered Home-Based HIV Testing and Counselling in Blantyre, Malawi. Construction and Analysis of a Stigma Scale, Plos one. 6(10), 1-9. Marks G., Crepaz N., Senterfitt JW. & Janssen RS.(2005). Meta-Analysis of High-Risk Sexual Behavior in Persons Aware and Unaware They are Infected With HIV in the United States. J ournal ofacquired immune deficiency syndromes, 39(4), 446-53. Nur N. (2012). Turkish school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes toward HIV/AIDS. Croat Medical Journal,53(3) ,271-277. Prachakul W., Grant J.S., Keltner N.L. (2007). Relationships among functional social support, HIV-related stigma, social problem solving, and depressive symptoms in people living with HIV: a pilot study. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care.18(6), 67–76. Vissera M.J., Makinb J.D., Vandormaelc A., Sikkemad K.J. & Forsyth B.W.C. (2013). HIV/AIDS stigma in a South African community. AIDS Care. Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 21(2), 197-206. Sayles J.N., Ryan G.W., Silver J.S., Sarkisian C.A., Cunningham WE (2007). Experiences of social stigma and implications for healthcare among a diverse population of HIV positive adults. Journal of Urban Health,84(6), 814–28. Sengupta S., Banks B., Jonas D., Miles M.S., Smith G.C. (2011).HIV Interventions to Reduce HIV/AIDS Stigma: A Systematic Review. AIDS and Behavior, 15(6), 1075–1087. Sengupta S., Strauss R.P., Miles M.S., Roman-Isler M., Banks B., Corbie –Smith G.(2010). A conceptual model exploring the relationship between HIV stigma and implementing HIV clinical trials in rural communities of North Carolina. North Carolina Medical Journal, 71(2), 113–22. UNAIDS (2010). 26th Meeting of the UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board: Non-discrimination in HIV responses. 取自http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/priorities/20100526_non_discrimination_in_hiv_en.pdf UNAIDS (2011). Global HIV/AIDS Respones: Epidemic update and health sector progress towards Universal Access. 取自http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2011/20111130_ua_report_en.pdf UNAIDS (2012). Global Report: UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS epidemic. 取自http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiology/2012/gr2012/20121120_UNAIDS_Global_Report_2012_with_annexes_en.pdf Valdiserri R. O. (2002).HIV/AIDS Stigma: An Impediment to Public Health. American Journal Public Health, 92(3), 341–342. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17267 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 背景
民眾對愛滋的烙印不僅影響愛滋感染者或病患就學、就業、就醫居住安養等權益,也間接讓對感染有疑慮的民眾害怕就醫進行愛滋病毒檢驗,甚至尋求治療,以至於增加愛滋病持續傳播之風險,因此了解可能影響社會大眾對愛滋烙印之因素並朝去烙印、汙名化之目標邁進更是刻不容緩的。 目的 本研究主要探討近年台灣民眾對愛滋病的烙印變遷及影響台灣男性愛滋烙印之主要因素。 方法 本研究係透過疾病管制局2009-2012年愛滋病民調資料庫之次級資料進行分析,除了分析愛滋烙印態度量表外,主要驗證之變項尚包括:社會人口學特徵、愛滋風險知覺、暴露大眾媒體訊息以及民眾對政府愛滋防治政策信心度,分析方法包括:雙變項分析、複迴歸及趨勢分析。 結果 (1)年齡、職業、愛滋風險知覺、是否暴露大眾傳播訊息及民眾對政府推動愛滋防治信心度為預測愛滋烙印之顯著因素(2)由迴歸分析結果可看出,調查的年份在愛滋烙印亦是重要的決定因素,民眾對愛滋之烙印隨年份推移而逐年升高,至2012年方有趨緩現象(3)最年輕(15-19歲)、最年長(50-59歲)、低教育程度、藍領工作者、家管/無業者及居住於離島與東部地區民眾,對愛滋有較高之錯誤認知(風險偏誤)。 結論 近年來,臺灣男性民眾對愛滋的烙印是呈現持續攀升趨勢直到2012年方日漸趨緩,其中部分人士對於愛滋病患或感染者仍存有較高之烙印。因此,未來應針對這些族群,規劃適合之教育宣導計畫並利用合適之宣導管道進行宣導,降低民眾對愛滋的偏見,以創造對愛滋友善之支持性環境。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Public stigma of HIV/AIDS not only negatively affects patients’ schooling, employment, receiving medical care and residential security but also indirectly deters those who perceiving risk for HIV infection from HIV testing and seeking treatment, which in turn increases the risk of continuing spread of HIV/AIDS. Therefore, it is urgent to grasp factors contributing to public’s stigma towards HIV/AIDS and make efforts to de-stigmatize HIV infected persons.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to understand the recent shift in public stigma of AIDS in Taiwan and to examine factors contributing to AIDS stigma among males aged 15-59 years in Taiwan. Methods: This research used data derived from “AIDS public survey” databases collected yearly by Taiwan CDC from 2009-2012. In addition to HIV stigma attitude scale, variables examined by this study included socio-demographic characteristics, HIV risk perceptions, mass media message exposure, and confidence in government AIDS policy. Data were analyzed by means of bivariate methods, multiple regression and trend analysis. Results: The major findings are: (1) age, occupation, HIV risk perceptions, exposure to mass media messages and confidence in government AIDS prevention policy were significant predictors of AIDS stigma attitude, (2) while time (year) of survey was also a determinant in the regression analysis, it was found that AIDS stigma attitude increased steadily over the years up till 2012 when the increase began slowing down, (3) the youngest (15~19) and oldest (50~59), people with lower educational attainment, blue collar workers, housekeepers and the unemployed, and residents living in remote islands and the eastern parts of Taiwan were more likely to hold HIV/AIDS misconceptions and therefore biased risk perceptions. Conclusions: In the past few years, the HIV/AIDS stigma carried by adult males in Taiwan has kept increasing steadily until 2012. Some segments of this population were particularly apt to be stigma holders. Tailored educational and communication programs should be developed to reduce their prejudicial attitudes and as a result gradually shape an overall supportive environment. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:04:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R99847037-1.pdf: 3748175 bytes, checksum: 80382fd07edbe2b5c1b8db0082604910 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要………………………………………………………….. Ⅰ
英文摘要………………………………………………………….. Ⅱ 目錄………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ 表目錄……………………………………………………………… Ⅴ 圖目錄……………………………………………………………… Ⅵ 附錄………………………………………………………………… Ⅶ 第一章 導論……………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………… 1 第二節 文獻探討……………………………………………… 2 第三節 研究架構與假說……………………………………… 12 第四節 實習機關及單位簡介………………………………… 14 第二章 研究方法………………………………………………… 16 第一節 研究材料……………………………………………… 16 第二節 各變項定義與測量…………………………………… 18 第三節 資料分析……………………………………………… 24 第三章 研究結果………………………………………………… 26 第一節 樣本特性……………………………………………… 26 第二節 各變項與愛滋烙印之描述性統計及檢定…………… 33 第三節 影響愛滋烙印主要因素之迴歸分析………………… 39 第四節 歷年愛滋烙印之趨勢變化…………………………… 46 第四章 討論與建議……………………………………………… 51 第一節 討論…………………………………………………… 51 第二節 對於實務工作上之建議……………………………… 56 第三節 研究限制……………………………………………… 58 參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 59 中文文獻………………………………………………………. 59 英文文獻………………………………………………………. 61 表目錄 表1 愛滋烙印施測題項之信度分析…………………………… 22 表2 愛滋烙印施測題項之列聯相關係數摘要表……………… 23 表3 人口學變項分布情形表…………………………………… 27 表4 愛滋訊息、愛滋風險知覺及對政府信心度分布………… 29 表5 愛滋烙印衡量題項分布…………………………………… 32 表6 社會人口學變項之檢定表………………………………… 35 表7 大眾傳播訊息、風險知覺及對政府信心度之檢定表…… 38 表8 2009-2012年各變項與愛滋烙印之迴歸分析檢定表…….. 45 表9 歷年民眾對愛滋病患之烙印趨勢表……………………….. 49 表10 歷年愛滋病正負面新聞則數統計表…………………….. 55 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 台灣男性民眾愛滋烙印之變遷:2009-2012 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Change of HIV Stigma Attitude among Adult Males in Taiwan: 2009-2012 | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉士豪,徐美苓 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 愛滋烙印,歧視,社交距離,風險知覺,大眾傳播, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | AIDS stigma,prejudice,social distance,risk perceptions,mass media, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 65 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.66 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
