請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17030
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李顯峰(Hsien-Feng Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Wan Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林靜婉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T23:53:52Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-10-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-10-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 方崇懿(2010),「公務人員退休撫卹基金委託經營規模與績效關聯性之探討」,國防大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
中國時報,http://www.chinatimes.com 今週刊,http://www.businesstoday.com.tw 內政部統計處,http://www.moi.gov.tw 自由時報,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw 行政院勞工委員會,http://www.cla.gov.tw 何宗武(2011),「 Eviews高手—財經計量應用手冊」,鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。 投信投顧公會,http://www.sitca.org.tw 沈孟賢(2005),「退撫基金遴選委託經營機構之考量因素研究」,國防管理學院國防財務資源研究所碩士論文。 沈威利(2006),「共同基金績效探討-經理人任期與年資之影響」,義守大學財務金融系碩士論文。 李純瑩(2004),「國內股票型基金績效之影響因素研究」,世新大學經濟學系碩士論文。 吳旭裕(2007),「高年資高績效嗎?基金經理人年資與基金績效之再探討」,義守大學財務金融系碩士論文。 吳慧君(2002),「系統風險及公司特徵因子對台灣共同基金績效之實證研究」,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。 洪嘉苓(1999),「共同基金經營團隊與基金績效關係之研究」,中山大學企管系碩士論文。 徐子啠(1999),「共同基金代理問題之研究」,中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 財團法人國家政策基金會,http://www.npf.org.tw 陳旭昇(2009),「時間序列分析—總體經濟與財務金融之應用」,東華出版社。 陳佩君 (2004),「基金績效與基金規模關聯性之探討」,臺灣大學會計學碩士論文。 陳素真(2002),「我國退休基金委外經營風險之研究」,銘傳大學金融所碩士論文。 陳素真、李進生、陳登源(2003),「我國退休基金委外經營風險之探討」,臺灣金融財務季刊,第 4卷第1期,97-124頁。 張銘煌(1998),「基金經理人更換、董事會組成與績效之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。 勞工退休基金監理會,http://www.lpsc.gov.tw 許麗君(2007),「退撫基金委託經營與委外存續因素之探討」,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。 黃永杰(2003),「基金經理人升遷與過度自信之理論與實際」,雲林科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。 黃彥彰(2001),「共同基金代理問題之探討」,銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。 游佳紅(1996),「基金經理人異動對其績效影響之實證研究」,中興大學企業管理系碩士論文。 維基百科,http://www.wikipedia.org 廖振威 (2006),「公務人員所得替代率之探討」,政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。 蔡其昌(2009),「退休基金監理與誘因設計—以勞退基金為例」,中興大學高階經理人班碩士論文。 劉倩伶(2004),投信績效對基金績效之影響,國立中正大學財務金融研究所論文。 鍾惠民、周賓凰、孫而音(2013),「財務計量—Eviews的運用」,新陸書局股份有限公司。 蘋果日報,http://www.appledaily.com.tw Brown, K., W. Harlow, and L. Starks (1996), “Of Tournaments and Temptations: An- Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 51, 85‐110. Carl, Ackermann, Richard, McEnally and David Ravenscraft (1999), “The Performance of Hedge Fund: Risk, Return and Incentives.” The Journal of Finance, 54, 833-874. Cohen, S., and L. Starks (1988), “Estimation Risk and Incntive Contracts for Portfolio Managers.” Management Science, 34, 1067-1080. Golec, J. H. (1996), “The Effects of Mutual Fund Managers’ Characteristics on Their Portfolio Performance, Risk and Fees,” Financial Services Review, 5, 133-148. Grinblatt, M., and S. Titman (1989), “Adverse Risk Incentives and the Design of Performance Based Contracts.” Management Science, 35, 807-822. Guesneric, R., P. Piard, and P. Rey (1988), “Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard with Risk Neutral Agents.” European Economic Review, 33, 807-823. Hung-Gay Fung, Xiaoqing Eleanor Xu, and Jot Yau (2002), “Global Hedge Fund: Risk, Return and Market Timing.” Financial Analysis Journal, 58, 19-29. Ippolito, R. A. (1989), “Efficiency with Costly Information A Study of Mutual Fund Performance Quarterly.” Journal of Economics, 104, 1-23. Jan, Y. C. and M. W. Hung (2003), “Mutual Fund Attributes and Performance.” Financial Services Review, 12, 165-178. Jensen, M. C. (1968), “The Performance of Mutual Funds in The Period 1945-1964.” Journal of Finance, 23, 389-416. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Kritzman, M. (1987), “Incentive Fees: Some Problems and Some Solutions.” Financial Analysts Journal, 43, 21-26. Prather, L., W. J. Bertin, and T. Henker (2004), “Mutual Fund and Characteristics, managerial attributes, and fund performance.” Review of Financial Economics, 13, 305-326. Ramasamy, B. and M. C. H. Yeung. (2003), “Evaluating Mutual Funds in an Emerging Market Factors that Matter to Financial Advisors.” International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21, 122-136. Ross, S. A. (1976), “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic Theory, 13, 341-360. Sharpe, W. F. (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Business, 39, 119-138. Treynor, J. L. (1965), “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds.” Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 63-75. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17030 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 新制勞退基金自2005年1月1日開辦以來,隨著規模迅速累積,為達專業管理、分散基金風險、提昇效率及增加收益等多重目標,於2007年8月21日辦理第一批次國內委託經營業務,現階段委託經營佔資產配置比例乃逐年提高。
本研究運用新制勞退基金2007年10月至2013年6月國內委託經營計5年9個月月資料為個案研究,以橫斷面時間序列分析法模型(Panel Data Model),分別由投信面向、經理人面向及策略面向等三類,探討影響勞退基金委託經營績效之因素。實證結果如下: 1. 投信面向:投信規模愈大,可產生規模經濟之效益,有助提昇績效,惟投信規模愈大,愈容易產生行政作業疏失,所以投信遭懲處次數與Jensen指標、Sharp指標及與大盤差距等三項績效指標均呈正相關。 2. 經理人面向:經理人年資及異動次數均與與Jensen指標呈負向關係,建議勞退可於投資契約納入規範經理人之操作期間限制及更換次數。 3. 策略面向:β係數與投資組合報酬率、Jensen指標及Sharp指標均為負相關,建議勞退及基金經理人退休基金之投資運用,應著重安全穩健;而買進週轉率與投資組合報酬率、Jensen指標與Sharp指標呈正相關;賣出週轉率於投資組合報酬率則呈負相關,與大盤之差距呈正相關。實證結果顯示,週轉率愈高,雖可改善投資績效,惟亦提高交易成本。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Labor Pension Fund (LPF) has been set up on January 1, 2005. For the multi-purposes of professional management, diversifying investment risk, implementing asset allocation, and increasing investment profit, Labor Pension Fund undertook domestic discretionary operation on Aug. 21, 2007 at first time. As the size of Labor Pension Fund increases rapidly, the mandated percentage of the assets allocation of Labor Pension Fund gets higher year by year.
In this study, we investigate the factors that may influence the effectiveness of the discretionary investment of Labor Pension Fund. Our sample data is monthly, dated from Oct. 2007 to Jun. 2013. We estimate with Panel Data Model, investment trust enterprises, fund managers and investment strategy aspects to measure the discretionary investment of LPF. Our major empirical findings are as follows: 1. Investment trust enterprises:Inventors trust larger size, can gain economies of scale efficiency, enhance performance. However the larger the scale of investment trust is, the more easier to bring administrative jobs negligence. The punished number of investment trust enterprises is positively correlated with Jensen ratio, Sharp ratio and portfolio returns and returns TAIEX gap, i.e. three performance indicators, respectively. 2. Fund Managers:The fund managers’ seniority and turnover are negatively correlated with Jnsen ratio. It suggests that LPF investment contract may include specification of the manager during operation of the restrictions and replacements. 3. Investment Strategy:β coefficient is negatively correlated with the returns of investment portfolio, Jensen ratio and Sharp ratio, respectively. It suggests that LPF and fund manager should comply with the principles of security and steadiness. Buying turnover rate is positively correlated with the returns of investment portfolio, jensen ratio and sharp ratio, respectively. Selling turnover rate is negatively correlated with the returns of investment portfolio, and is positively correlated with portfolio returns and returns TAIEX gap. Our empirical findings show that the turnover rate can improve the investment performance, while it also increases the transaction cost. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:53:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P00323008-1.pdf: 591612 bytes, checksum: 5acce5fc9d0bdba80f0a1cad95abecf7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CONTENTS
摘要 i ABSTRACT ii CONTENTS iv 表目錄 vi 圖目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究方法與限制 6 1.3.1 研究方法 6 1.3.2 研究限制 6 1.4 研究架構 7 1.5 研究流程 8 第二章 勞工退休基金與委託經營 9 2.1 勞工退休基金監理會 9 2.2 勞工退休基金介紹及業務 11 2.2.1 新舊制基金制度說明 11 2.2.2 新舊制基金投資運用範圍 14 2.3 新制勞工退休基金業務概況 17 2.4 新制勞工退休基金國內委託經營現況 19 2.4.1 委託經營概述 19 2.4.2 勞退基金全權委託投資作業流程 20 2.5 新制勞退國內委託經營現況 22 2.6 勞工退休基金委託經營制度的問題 25 第三章 文獻探討 27 3.1 委託經營所產生代理問題之相關文獻 27 3.2 基金績效衡量指標 31 3.3 影響基金績效因素相關文獻 34 3.3.1 國內文獻 34 3.3.2 國外文獻 36 第四章 實證模型設定與樣本資料 40 4.1 資料來源與樣本定義 40 4.2 樣本資料處理 44 4.3 計量方法與步驟 46 4.3.1 混合迴歸模型(Pooled Regression Model) 46 4.3.2 固定效果模型(Fixed Effect Model) 47 4.3.3 隨機效果模型(Random Effect Model) 48 第五章 實證結果與分析 50 5.1 敘述統計量 50 5.2 迴歸模型檢定 52 第六章 結論與建議 58 6.1 結論 58 6.2 建議 59 參考文獻 61 附錄 65 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 勞退基金委外績效影響因素之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Determinants of the Outsourcing Performance of Labor Pension Fund | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝德宗(Te-Tsung Hsieh),黃淑惠(Shu-Sui Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 勞退基金,委託經營,績效,橫斷面時間序列分析法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Labor Pension Fund,Outsoucing Investment,Performance,Panel Data Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-10-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 577.75 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。