請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16789完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃恆獎(Heng-Chiang Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chih Hung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪偉智 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T23:46:06Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-06-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 王熙哲、丁耀民（2006），「人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響」，資訊管理學報第十五卷第一期 2. 吳元蓉（2006），「大學生憂鬱、人際親密與自尊之相關研究」，國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文 3. 吳柄偉（2011），「老人人際親密、社會參與及心理健康狀況之相關研究」，國立台北教育大學教育學院心理與諮商學系 4. 李宜玲（2003），「人際關係的本質與溝通理論」，台北文化出版社 5. 李美枝（1985），「社會心理學」，大洋出版社 6. 林淑華（2002），「國小學童情緒管理與人際關係之研究」，國立屏東教育大學 7. 洪寧（2010），「Facebook上消費者類社會互動對品牌關係影響」，國立政治大學 8. 張文哲（2005），「教育心理學：理論與實務」，學富文化出版社 9. 張文賢、藍美英、黃玟儀（2012），「初探銷售人員接觸後之主觀感受-人際接觸日誌法之應用」，中州管理與人文科學叢刊第二卷第一期 10. 張宏文（1996），「實用人際關係學」，商鼎文化出版社 11. 張春興（1998），「現代心理學」，東華出版社 12. 張純富（2010），「社交網站人際關係維持之研究：以Facebook為例」，世新大學資訊傳播學系 13. 陳又華（2008），「高中生人際吸引力與學校生活適應之關係研究」，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所 14. 陳冠浤（2006），「知識工作者對偶同質性對人際脈絡績效影響之研究：關係品質的中介效果」，人力資源管理學報 15. 陳昭曄（1999），「人際吸引論談促進師生關係策略」，教育實習輔導。 16. 陳嬿竹（2002），「網路與真實人際關係、人格特質及幸福感之相關研究」，國立屏東師範學院心理與輔導學系 17. 傅仰止（2000），「個人網絡中他人聯繫強度的結構原理」，中央研究院社會學研究所 18. 游康婷（2002），「網路友誼的形成與維繫：電子佈告欄使用者交友行為之研究」 19. 黃厚銘（2000），「網路人際關係的親疏遠近」，國立台灣大學社會學研究所 20. 黃蘭鍈、陳憶菁（2012，6），「社交網絡服務網站的使用者動機與負面評論之研究－以Facebook為例」，2012第五屆科際整合研討會 21. 劉佳妍（2009），「社群網絡口碑傳播與使用者行為關聯之研究-以Facebook社群網路為例」，中國文化大學新聞研究所 22. 劉勇伸（2013，10），「人格特質、Facebook使用動機對人際關係衝擊研究-以台灣地區大學生為例」，國立雲林科技大學資訊管理學系研究所 23. 劉敏珍（2000），「老年人之人際親密、依附風格與幸福感之關係研究」，國立高雄師範大學 24. 賴美蒨（2009），「大學生背景變項、人際親密、社會支持與幸福感之差異研究」，台北市立教育大學心理與諮商學系研究所 25. 謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑（2006），「青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼動態」，台灣社會學第11期 26. 謝龍卿（2012），「青少年臉書成癮、人際關係與學業成就及其相關因素之研究」，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所 27. 簡士超（2010，1），「成年前期男性之寂寞因應行為研究－以Facebook 使用者為例」，世新大學公共關係暨廣告學系研究所 28. 簡佳盈（2011），「同儕對高中生利社會行為之影響：以同理心、友誼特性與同儕相似性為調節角色」，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系 29. 顏美如（2003），「影響大學生網路人際吸引因素之研究」，國立成功大學教育研究所 30. 蘇芬媛（1997），「虛擬社區的形成MUD之初探性研究」，國立交通大學傳播研所 英文部分 1. Ahuvia, A. c. (2005). 'Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers' Identity Narratives'. Journal Of Consumer Research, 32, 171-184. 2. Albert, N. (2010). 'Measuring love feeling for a brand using interpersonal love items'. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5. 3. Alexander Chernev, Ryan Hamilton, & Gal, D. (2011). 'Competing for Consumer Identity: Limits to Self-Expression and the Perils of Lifestyle Branding'. Journal of Marketing, 75, 66-82. 4. Anheier, H., & Kendall, J. (2002). 'Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: examining three approaches'. Britsh J Social, 53(3), 343-362. 5. Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). 'The Rules of Friendship'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1(2), 211-237. 6. Aron, Jodie L. Steele, Todd B. Kashdan, & Perez, M. (2006). 'When similarity do not attract: test of prediction from the self- expansion model'. Personal Relationships, 13, 387–396. 7. Belk, R. W. (1988). 'Possessions and the Extended Self'. Journal Of Consumer Research, 15, 139-116. 8. Bhuiyan, T. (2010). 'A Survey on the Relationship between Trust and Interest Similarity in Online Social Networks'. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(4). 9. Bimal Viswanath, Alan Mislove, Meeyoung Cha, & Gummadi, K. P. (2008). 'On the Evolution of User Interaction in Facebook'. 10. Boyd, Danah M. Ellison, & Nicole B.. (2007). 'Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship'. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. 11. Boyd, D. (2007). 'Why youth (heart) social network sites The role of networked'. Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. 12. Carlos Flavian, & Guinaliu, M. (2007). 'Development and validation of familiarity, reputation and loyalty scales for internet relationships'. esic market. 13. Chan, Darius K. S. Cheng, & L., G. H. (2004). 'A Comparison of Offline and Online Friendship Qualities at Different Stages of Relationship Development'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 305-320. 14. Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison, & Steinfield, C. (2006a). 'A Face(book) in the crowd Social searching vs. social browsing'. Michigan State University. 15. Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison, & Steinfield, C. (2006b). 'Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital the role of facebook'. ICA. 16. Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison, & Steinfield, C. (2007a). 'The Benefits of Facebook Friends: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites'. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. 17. Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison, & Steinfield, C. (2007b). 'A Familiar Face(book) Profile Elements as Signals in an Online Social Network'. Michigan State University. 18. Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison, & Steinfield, C. (2011). 'Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices'. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873-892. 19. Clouston, Verdery, Amin, & Gauthier. (2011). 'The Structure of Undergraduate Association Networks: A Quantitative Ethnography'. Department of Sociology, McGill University. 20. G. Craig., Steven. W. Duck. (1978). 'Personality similarity and the development of friendship'. Br. J. SOC. din. Psychol, 17, 237-242. 21. D. Norton, M. I. Frost, & J. H. Ariely. (2007). 'Less is more: the lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt'. J Pers Soc Psychol, 92(1), 97-105. 22. D. Norton, M. I. Frost, & J. H. Ariely. (2011). 'Does familiarity breed contempt or liking? Comment on Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, and Finkel (2011)'. J Pers Soc Psychol, 101(3), 571-574. 23. Daniele Quercia, Mansoureh Bodaghi, & Crowcroft, J. (2012). 'Loosing “Friends” on Facebook'. ACM. 24. Dansie, L. (2012). 'Long-distance dating relationships among college students: The benefits and drawbacks of using technology'. University of Missouri. 25. Davis, K. E., & Latty-Mann, H. (1987). 'Love Styles and Relationship Quality: A Contribution to Validation'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 409-428. 26. Dean Cocking, & Kennett, J. (1998). 'Friendship and the self'. Ethtics, 108(3), 502-527. 27. Denrell, J. (2005). 'Why most people disapprove of me: experience sampling in impression formation'. Psychol Rev, 112(4), 951-978. 28. Dittmar, H. (1992). 'To have is to be'. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 453-454. 29. Dittmar, H. (2004). 'Are you what you have'. The Psychologist, 17. 30. E. J. Reis, H. T. Maniaci, M. R. Caprariello, P. A. Eastwick, & P. W. Finkel. (2011a). 'Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction'. J Pers Soc Psychol, 101(3), 557-570. 31. E. J. Reis, H. T. Maniaci, M. R. Caprariello, P. A. Eastwick, & P. W. Finkel. (2011b). 'In live interaction, does familiarity promote attraction or contempt? Reply to Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2011)'. J Pers Soc Psychol, 101(3), 575-578. 32. Elaine Hatfield, & Sprecher, S. (1986). 'Measuring passionate love in intimate relationship'. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383-410. 33. Elizabeth J. Aries, & Johnson, F. L. (1983). 'Close Friendship in Adulthood: Conversational Content Between Same-Sex Friends'. Sex Roles, 9. 34. Floyd, K. (1995). 'Gender and closeness among friends and siblings'. J Psychol, 129(2), 193-202. 35. Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). 'Spatial distance and mental construal of social events'. Psychol Sci, 17(4), 278-282. 36. Gagne & Lydon, J. E. (2004). 'Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review'. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 322-338. 37. Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009). 'Predicting Tie Strength With Social Media'. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 38. Glaeser, E. l., Laibson, D. i., Scheinkman, J. a., & Soutter, C. l. (2000). 'Measuring trust'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 39. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). 'The strength of weak ties'. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. 40. Grote, N. K., & Frieze, I. H. (1994). 'The measurement of Friendship-based Love in intimate relationships'. Personal Relationships, 1, 275-300. 41. Gustavo S. Mesch , & Talmud, I. (2006). 'Online Friendship Formation, Communication Channels, and Social Closeness'. International Journal of Internet Science, 29-44. 42. Hargittai, & Eszter. (2007). 'Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites'. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276-297. 43. Hays, R. B. (1984). 'The Development and Maintenance of Friendship'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 44. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). 'Social networks and Internet connectivity effects'. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125-147. 45. Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). 'The Relationship Assessment Scale'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137-142. 46. Hogan, B. (2007). 'Analysing social network via internet'. 47. Huang, Y., Shen, C., & Contractor, N. S. (2013). 'Distance matters: Exploring proximity and homophily in virtual world networks'. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 969-977. 48. Huston, T. L. (1978). 'Interpersonal Attraction And Relationship'. Ann. Rev. Psychol, 29, 115-156. 49. James C. Mccroskey, Virginia P. Richmond, & Daly, J. A. (2006). 'The Development Of A Measure Of Perceived Homophily In Interpersonal Communication'. 50. Janis Wolak, Rimbaerly J. Mitchell, & FinkeIhor, D. (2002). 'Close online relationships in a national sample of adolescents'. Adolescehce, 37(147). 51. Jason Wiese, Patrick Gage Kelley, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Laura Dabbish, Jason I. Hong, & Zimmerman, J. (2011). 'Are You Close with Me? Are You Nearby? Investigating Social Groups, Closeness, and Willingness to Share'. Carnegie Mellon University. 52. Jennifer Ziegler, & Golbeck, C.-N. (2007). 'Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity'. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 460-475. 53. Jochen Peter, Patti M. Valkenburg, & Schouten, A. P. (2005). 'Developing a Model of Adolescent Friendship Formation on the Internet'. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 8(5). 54. Judy P. Strauss, Murray R. Barrick, & Connerley, M. L. (2001). 'An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking'. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 637-657. 55. K. Roger Van Horn, Angela Arnone, Kelly Nesbi'i't, Laura Desllets, Tanya Sears, Mlchelle Giffin, & Brijd, R. (1997). 'Physical distance and interpersonal characteristics in college students' romantic relationships'. Personal Relationships, 4, 25-34. 56. Kandel, D. B. (1978). 'Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships'. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436. 57. Karpman, S. B. (2010). 'Intimacy Analysis Today: The Intimacy Scale and the Personality Pinwheel'. Transactional Analysis Journal, 40(3-4). 58. Katelyn Y. A. McKenna, Amie S. Green, & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). 'Relationship Formation on the Internet: What' s the Big Attraction?'. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31. 59. Keefe, K. Berndt, & J., T. (1996). 'Relations of Friendship Quality to Self-Esteem in Early Adolescence'. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(1), 110-129. 60. Lan Nguyen Chaplin, & John, D. R. (2005). 'The Development of Self-Brand Connections in Children and Adolescents'. Journal Of Consumer Research, 32. 61. Larzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). 'The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships'. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42(3), 595-604. 62. Laurie L. Couch, & Jones, W. H. (1997). 'Measuring levels of trust'. Journal of research in personality, 31, 319-336. 63. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). 'Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com'. Social Networks, 30(4), 330-342. 64. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2014). 'Traversing psychological distance'. Trends Cogn Sci. 65. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). 'Construal Level Theory and Consumer Behavior'. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117. 66. Lisa Collins Tidwell, & Walther, J. B. (2002). 'Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations'. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317-348. 67. Liu, & Hugo. (2007). 'Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances'. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252-275. 68. Markey, P. M. Funder, D. C. Ozer, & J., D. (2003). 'Complementarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions'. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 29(9), 1082-1090. 69. Mccroskey, J. C., & Mccai, T. A. (1972). 'The Measurement of interpersonal attraction'. 70. Melissa Peskin, & Newell, F. N. (2004). 'Familiarity breeds attraction effect of exposure on attractiveness'. Perception, 33, 147-157. 71. Michael I. Norton, Joseph A. Vandello, & Darley, J. M. (2004). 'Casuistry and social bias'. J Pers Soc Psychol, 87(6), 817-831. 72. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, & Cook, J. M. (2001). 'Birds of a feather homophily in social network'. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 27, 415-444. 73. Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). 'Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889-922. 74. Nieson, R. E. (1989). 'The Strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations'. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 377-401. 75. Nira Liberman, Michael D. Sagristano, & Tropeb, Y. (2001). 'The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal'. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-534. 76. Noel, Hans Nyhan, & Brendan. (2011). 'The “unfriending” problem: The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence'. Social Networks, 33(3), 211-218. 77. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). 'Meanings for Closeness and Intimacy in Friendship'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(1), 85-107. 78. Pike, A., & Atzaba-Poria, N. (2003). 'Do sibling and friend relationships share the same temperamental origins? Atwin study'. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 598-611. 79. Pri Pradhan Shah, & Jehn, K. A. (1993). 'Do Friends Perform Better Than Acquaintances? The Interaction of Friendship, Conflict, and Task'. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 149-165. 80. Richard L. Moreland, R. B. Z. (1982). 'Exposure Effects in Person Perception: Familiarity, Similarity and Attraction'. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395-415. 81. Roberts-Griffin, C. P. (2011). 'What Is a Good Friend A Qualitative Analysis of friendship'. Penn McNair Research Journal, 3(1). 82. Rogers, E. M., & Bhowmik, D. K. (1971). 'Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research'. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(4), 523-538. 83. Sharabany, R. (1994). 'Intimate Friendship Scale: Conceptual Underpinnings, Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 449-469. 84. Swap, W. C. (1977). 'Interpersonal Attraction and Repeated Exposure to Rewarders and Punishers'. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 248-251. 85. Thelwall, M. (2009). Homophily in MySpace. 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology', 60(2), 219-231. 86. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). 'Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook'. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549. 87. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). 'Construal-level theory of psychological distance'. Psychol Rev, 117(2), 440-463. 88. Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Tolson, J. M. (1998). 'Adolescent Friendship Selection and Termination: The Role of Similarity'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 703-710. 89. Vagias, W. M. (2006). 'Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors'. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. 90. Verbrugge, L. m. (1983). 'A Research Note on Adult Friendship Contact: A Dyadic Perspective'. The University of North Carolina Press. 91. W. Sluckin, D. J. Hargreaves, & Colman, A. M. (1982). 'Some experimental studies of familiarity and liking'. Bulletin of The British Psychological Society, 35, 189-194. 92. Wakimoto, R. (2011). 'Reconstruction of the subjective temporal distance of past interpersonal experiences after mortality salience'. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 37(5). 93. Weigert, J. D. (1985). 'Trust as a social reality'. Social Forces, 63, 967-985. 94. Werner, C., & Parmelee, P. (1979). 'Similiarity of activity among friendship'. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 42, 62-66. 95. Wohl, M. J., & McGrath, A. L. (2007). 'The perception of time heals all wounds: temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression'. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 33(7), 1023-1035. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16789 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人際關係發展，指互動的個體間如何透過交流與發展，形成相互依存及相互聯絡之關係，長久以來為學者研究重點。發展過程中，影響互動雙方之熟悉度、人際吸引、親密度及信任度之要素，包含互動頻率高低、認識時間長短、互動內容多寡、背景相似性高低與興趣相似性高低。上述各要素多扮演重要角色，影響互動雙方之熟悉度等情感指標高低。過去學者之理論與實證多數證實，現實生活中，隨互動頻率、認識時間、互動內容與相似度上升，人際關係中之衡量要素會正向上升。換言之，五項要素與人際關係發展指標呈現正相關。本研究欲結合過去個別要素研究，形成結構模型方式，探究以社群網路工具Facebook提供之功能，驗證人際關係發展之要素與衡量指標間之正向關係。故本研究以五項前因變數：互動頻率、認識時間、互動內容、背景相似度及興趣相似度作為前因變數，衡量其水準高低變化，對於人際關係發展四項指標：熟悉度、人際吸引、親密度及信任度之影響。透過社群網路Facebook作為工具，利用「關於」、「動態消息」、「即時通訊」、「友誼紀錄」等功能，確認並訂出前因變數之高、中、低水準。了解Facebook用戶透過這些功能如何定義並發展人際關係。設計兩個實驗，實驗一透過單因子多變量變異數分析（One-way MANOVA）獨立衡量交流頻率、認識時間與互動內容指標;實驗二則利用多因子多變量變異數分析（Multi-way MANOVA）組內分析方式，衡量背景相似度與興趣相似度對衡量指標影響。研究結果可歸納下列結論：互動頻率、認識時間對熟悉度、人際吸引、親密度及信任度，具顯著正向影響。互動內容對四項指標影響效果不顯著。背景相似度對四項指標具顯著正向主效果影響、興趣相似度只對熟悉度指標顯著正向影響。而背景相似度與興趣相似度兩者之交互作用效果對熟悉度、親密度及信任度具顯著正向效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Development of Interpersonal Relationship means two or more people construct interdependent relations or connections between each other. During the developing process, Frequency of interaction, Temporal distances of acquaintance, Content of interaction, Homophily and Shared interests play the role as independent factors to affect Familiarity, Liking, Intimacy and Trust. From the Literature review, most studies prove the positive correlation between frequency, temporal distance, content, similarity and interpersonal relationship in real time face to face interaction. Our study intends to construct a model, confirming the relations between independent variables： frequency, temporal distance, content and similarity, and dependent variables： Familiarity, Liking, Intimacy and Trust.
With the help of social network sites, Facebook, we tried to prove the development of interpersonal relationship theories are also work out on internet. By using the function, “Profile,” “Status,” “Like,” “Inbox,” and “Friendship,” planning out high, medium and low levels for different attributes, to analyze the effect on familiarity, liking, intimacy and trust. Our study separate into two experiments. In Experiment 1, using One-way Multivariate analysis of variance to analyze the relations between frequency, temporal distance, content and interpersonal relationship factors. On the other hand, in Experiment 2, using Multi-way Multivariate analysis of variance and With-in subjects design to check the relation between similarity and interpersonal relationship. With the analysis, our study generalized following conclusions： First, on social network sites Facebook, Frequency of interaction and Temporal distance of acquaintance have significant effect on interpersonal relationship development, positively enhance familiarity, liking, intimacy and trust. On the other hand, Sharing content of interaction shows no significant on this four factors. Also, the similarity about background, Homophily, has positively main effect on interpersonal relationship formation, but Shared interest shows no significant effect. After all, the interaction effect of both has significant effect on familiarity, intimacy and trust. In conclusion, our study proposed a structured model for analyzing interpersonal relationship developing factors, with the help of Facebook, and confirmed with the positive relationships between important factors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:46:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01724082-1.pdf: 1738224 bytes, checksum: 101b091d2bb1f2dd0066cb510e1689c7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
致謝……………………………………………………………………………………..I 摘要…………………………………………………………………………………….II 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………III 目錄………………………………………………………………………………….....V 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………..VII 表目錄……………………………………………………………………………….VIII 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究背景…………………………………………………………….......1 第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………………...2 第三節 研究流程………………………………………………………………...3 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………..4 第一節 人際關係………………………………………………………………...4 第二節 網路人際關係…………………………………………………………...9 2.2.1 網際網路與人際關係…………………………………………………9 2.2.2 電腦中介傳播………………………………………………………..10 第三節 虛擬社群……………………………………………………………….15 第四節 社交網站……………………………………………………………….16 第五節 相似性、熟悉度與人際關係發展……………………………………...19 2.5.1 互動頻率與人際關係形成…………………………………………..19 2.5.2 認識時間與人際關係形成…………………………………………..20 2.5.3 交流內容與人際關係形成…………………………………………..21 2.5.4 背景相似度/同質性與人際關係形成………………………………22 2.5.5 興趣相似度與人際關係形成………………………………………..24 2.5.6 背景相似度、興趣相似度與人際關係形成………………………..25 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………26 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………………..26 第二節 變數定義………………………………………………………………..27 第三節 實驗與問卷研究設計…………………………………………………..28 3.3.1 前測問卷……………………………………………………………..28 3.3.2 實驗一………………………………………………………………..29 3.3.3 實驗二………………………………………………………………..34 第四節 抽樣方法………………………………………………………………..39 第五節 統計分析方法…………………………………………………………..40第四章 資料分析與研究結果………………………………………………………42 第一節 基本資料分析…………………………………………………………..42 4.1.1 實驗一………………………………………………………………..42 4.1.2 實驗二………………………………………………………………..46 第二節 信度分析………………………………………………………………..48 第三節 多變量變異數分析……………………………………………………..49 4.3.1 實驗一………………………………………………………………..49 4.3.2 實驗二………………………………………………………………..54 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………………59 第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………………..59 第二節 管理意涵………………………………………………………………..61 第三節 研究限制與未來建議…………………………………………………..62 5.3.1 研究限制……………………………………………………………..62 5.3.2 未來研究建議………………………………………………………..63 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….………66 附錄………………………………………………………………………………..…..77 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 互動頻率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人際關係發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | zh_TW | |
| dc.subject | 認識時間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 互動內容 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 相似度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Shared Content | en |
| dc.subject | Similarity | en |
| dc.subject | Interpersonal relationship | en |
| dc.subject | en | |
| dc.subject | Frequency | en |
| dc.subject | Temporal Distance | en |
| dc.title | 人際關係愈熱絡愈好嗎? Facebook之實證分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Does Familiarity Breed Attraction? An Empirical Study of Facebook | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葛致慧(Chih-Huei Ko),張嘉雯(Chia-Wen Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 人際關係發展,Facebook,互動頻率,認識時間,互動內容,相似度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Interpersonal relationship,Facebook,Frequency,Temporal Distance,Shared Content,Similarity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-06-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。