請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16737
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張惠娟(Hui-chuan Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ming-ming Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳旼旼 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T23:44:44Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abbot, Philip. “Should Utopians have Perfect Bodies?”
Futures 42 (2010): 874-881. Print. Adams, Carol J. “Ecofeminism and the Eating of Animals.” Hypatia 6.1 (1991): 125-145. ---. “The Feminist Traffic in Animals.” Gaard 195-218. ---. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company, 1990. Print. Archambault, Anne. “A Critique of Ecofeminism.” Canadian Woman Studies 13.3 (1993): 19-22. Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake: a Novel. London: Virago, 2004. Print. ---. The Year of the Flood: a Novel. New York: O.W. Toad, 2009. Print. Bordo, Susan. “The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity.” Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California P, 2003. 165-184. Print. Burgess, Olivia Anne. “Utopian Body: Alternative Experience of Embodiment in 20th Century Utopian Literature.” Diss. Texas A&M University, 2010. Collard, Andree, and Joyce Contrucci. Rape of the Wild: Man’s Violence against Animals and the Earth. Bloominton: Indiana UP, 1989. Print. Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-Hour: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Studies in Canadian Literature 31.2 (2006): 63-83. Print. Cudworth, Erika. “Embodiment, Materiality, and Symbolic Regimes.” Developing Ecofeminist Theory: The Complexity of Difference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 128- 155. Print. Davies, Madeleine. “Margaret Atwood’s Female Bodies.” Howells 58-71. Diamond, Irene. Fertile Ground: Women, Earth, and the Limits of Control. Boston: Beacon P, 1994. Print. Dunayer, Joan. “Sexist Words, Speciesist Roots.” Animal and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations. Eds. Carol J. Adams and Josephine Donovan. Durham: Duke UP, 1995. 11-31. Print. Eckersley, Robyn. “Ecofeminism.” Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992. 63-72. Print. Gaard, Greta. Ecocriticism: the New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge, 2004. Print. ---, ed. Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1993. ---. “Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Science 23.3 (2002): 117-146. Print. Galeano, Eduardo H. Walking Words. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Incorporated, 1997. Print. Gomel, Elana. “The Plague of Utopias: Pestilence and the Apocalyptic Body.” Twentieth Century Literature 46.4 (2000): 405-433. Griffin, Susan. Pornography and Silence: Culture’s Revenge against Nature. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1981. Print. Gruen, Lori. “Dismantling Oppression: An Analysis of the Connection between Women and Animals.” Gaard 60-90. Hengen, Shannon. “Margaret Atwood and Environmentalism.” Howells 58-71. Howells, Coral Ann. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print. Jaroff, Leon. “The Gene Hunt.” Time. Time Inc. 20 March 1989. Web. 19 Apr 2014. Kheel, Marti. “From Heroic to Holistic Ethics: the Ecofeminist Challenge.” Gaard 243-271. ---. Nature Ethics: An Ecofeminist Perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print. King, Ynestra. “Healing the Wounds: Feminism, Ecology, and the Nature/Culture Dualism.” Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. Ed. Irene Diamond and Gloria Feman Orenstein. San Francisco: Sierra Club, 1990. 106- 121. Print. ---. “The Ecology of Feminism and the Feminism of Ecology.” Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. Ed. Judith Plant. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1989. 18-39. Print. Ko, Dorothy. “Bodies in Utopia and Utopian Bodies in Imperial China.” Thinking Utopia: Steps into Other Worlds. Ed. Jorn Rusen, Michael Fehr and Thomas W. Rieger. New York: Berghahn Books, 2005. 89-103. Print. Lewes. Darby. “Introduction: Utopian Sexual Landscapes.” Nudes From Nowhere:Utopian Sexual Landscapes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. 1-14. Print. Loughney, Robert. “Margaret Atwood[‘s] The Year of the Flood: Why Painball is Awesome.” Suite. Suite, 15 Aug. 2010. Web. 28 May 2014. Mak Ngah Lam, Elaine. “Eugenics in Fictional Dystopia: Ecofeminist Praxis.” Postmodern Productions. U of Hong Kong., n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. <http://www.gradnet.de/ papers /pomo2.papers/mak00.htm> Messer, Melissa. “Writing the World: Ursula K. Le Guin and Margaret Atwood’s Literary Contributions to Ecofeminism.” Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects. Western Kentucky University, 2007. Print. Midgley, Mary. Animals and Why They Matter. Athens: University of Georgia P, 1983. Print. Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. Ecofeminism. Halifax: Fernwood Publications, 1993. Print. Parker, Emma. “You Are What You Eat: The Politics of Eating in the Novels of Margaret Atwood.” Twentieth Century Literature 41.3 (1995): 349-367. Parrinder, Patrick. “Eugenics and Utopia: Sexual Selection from Galton to Morris.” Utopian Studies 8.2 (1997): 1 – 12. Print. Soper, Kate. “Naturalized Woman and Feminized Nature.” The Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism. Ed. Laurence Coupe. London: Routledge, 2000. 139-143. Print. Spretnak, Charlene. “Earthbody and the Personal Body as Sacred.” Ecofeminism and the Sacred. Ed. Carol J. Adams. New York: Continuum, 1993. 261-280. Print. Stanford, Craig B. “Meat’s Patriarchy.” The Hunting Apes: Meat Eating and the Origins of Human Behavior. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1999. 199-218. Print. Twine, Richard T. “Ma (r) king Essence—Ecofeminism and Embodiment.” Ethics & the Environment 6.2 (Autumn 2001): 31-58. Print. Vale, Valhalla, and Andrea Juno. Modern Primitives: An Investigation of Contemporary Adornment and Ritual. San Francisco: RE/Search P, 1989. Print. Warkentin, Traci. “Dis/intergrating Animals: Ethical Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for Human Consumption.” AI & Soc 20 (2006): 82-102. Print. Warren, Karen J. Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What it is and Why it Matters. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield P, 2000. Print. Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used against Women. New York: Doubleday, 1992. Print. Yilmaz, Saadet. “Eugenics with Regard to Biotechnology and Women: An Ecofeminist Perspective.” Turkish Journal of Politics 1.1 (2010): 27-35. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16737 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 有關身體的論述,一直是人類生存史上最富爭議性的話題之一。文學作品中對於身體的描寫,尤其是在烏托邦的場域裡,往往打破了生理的枷鎖,超越了理性的束縛,並且被賦予多方想像與幻想的色彩。本文以生態女性主義的角度來檢視瑪格麗特•愛特伍的兩部反烏托邦作品—《末世男女》與《洪荒年代》,並依序由生育,情色,與食素三大主軸切入來討論身體在其文本中的再現。生態女性主義集結了生態主義與女性主義的學說,不僅對於自然以及女性在父權體制下所遭受的宰制有新穎的解讀,也提供了本文批判現代理性與科學主流的環境下,將身體視為可重複被拆解、被重組、被消費、被客製化等等,以期全然符合人類需求特性的立論依據。瑪格麗特•愛特伍的兩本反烏托邦作品中對於基因改造、情色文化、素食主義等的著墨演示了一種人類投射於肉體上的弔詭:一方面它體現了通往解放和烏托邦境界的潛能,另一方面它又受制裁與壓迫背後的極權主義和反烏托邦陰影的籠罩。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The body has been one of the most contested sites in the history of human existence. Literary portrayals of the body, especially in utopian settings, often break the yoke of biological constraints, transcend the confinement of rationality, and manifest all guises of imaginations and fantasies. This thesis approaches Margaret Atwood’s two dystopias—Oryx and Crake, and The Year of the Flood from an ecofeminist perspective, and examines the representation of the body as it pertains to the issue of reproduction, pornography, and vegetarianism. Drawing from ecologism and feminism in their discussion of the dual subordination of nature and women in the patriarchal structure of domination, ecofeminist discourse on the body makes room for the discussion of the precarious state of the body as physically collectable, controllable, consumable, and customizable. As embodiment becomes endlessly alterable for human ends, this thesis demonstrates how the representation of the bodies in Margaret Atwood’s two dystopias exemplify both the liberating and utopian potential, and the totalitarian dystopian mechanisms that lurk behind the system that sanctions oppression. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:44:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R99122005-1.pdf: 1163815 bytes, checksum: bdb59c80b2b417829fee1c887848c5b2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
Major Argument 8 Literature Review 9 Original Contribution 12 Methods and Procedures 13 Structure and Organization 16 Chapter One: the Reproductive Body 18 Genetic Engineering 23 Eugenics 30 Chapter Two: the Pornographic Body 40 Violence and Visual Spectacle 46 Pornography and Prostitution 51 Chapter Three: the Vegetarian Body 61 The Patriarchy of Meat 66 Vegetarianism 71 Conclusion 77 Works Cited 80 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 身體的論述: 從生態女性主義角度探討愛特伍的兩本反烏托邦小說 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Discourse on the Body: An Ecofeminist Reading of Margaret
Atwood’s two Dystopias | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李欣穎(Sherry Li),劉毓秀(Yu-hsiu Liu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 身體,生態女性主義,生育,情色,食素, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Body,Ecofeminism,Reproduction,Pornography,Vegetarianism, | en |
dc.relation.page | 83 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。