Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16635
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳達仁
dc.contributor.authorIuan-Chang Chengen
dc.contributor.author鄭淵漳zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T23:42:33Z-
dc.date.copyright2014-08-01
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-07-24
dc.identifier.citationAaker, David A. (1984). Developing business strategies (Vol. 200): Wiley.
Altinay, Levent. (2006). Selecting partners in an international franchise organisation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(1), 108-128.
Buyukozkan, Gulcin, Feyzioğlu, Orhan, & Nebol, Erdal. (2008). Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 148-158.
Badaracco, Joseph. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances: Harvard Business Press.
Barney, JB. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading, Addison-Wesley.
Brouthers, Keith D, Brouthers, Lance Eliot, & Wilkinson, Timothy J. (1995). Strategic alliances: choose your partners. Long range planning, 28(3), 2-25.
Chan, Su Han, Kensinger, John W, Keown, Arthur J, & Martin, John D. (1997). Do strategic alliances create value? Journal of Financial Economics, 46(2), 199-221.
Chand, Mohinder, & Katou, Anastasia A. (2012). Strategic determinants for the selection of partner alliances in the Indian tour operator industry: A cross-national study. Journal of World Business, 47(2), 167-177.
Chang, P.T., Huang, L.C., & Lin, H.J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 511-520.
Chen, Sheu Hua, Wang, Pei Wen, Chen, Chien Min, & Lee, Hong Tau. (2010). An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(2), 278-287.
Contractor, Farok J, & Lorange, Peter. (1988). Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures. Cooperative strategies in international business, 3-30.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1951). The use of experts for the estimation of bombing requirements. A project Delphi experiment. The Rand Corporation.
Devlin, Godfrey, & Bleackley, Mark. (1988). Strategic alliances—guidelines for success. Long Range Planning, 21(5), 18-23.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M, & Schoonhoven, Claudia Bird. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. organization Science, 7(2), 136-150.
Glaister, Keith W, & Buckley, Peter J. (1996). Strategic Motives For International Alliance Formation*. Journal of Management studies, 33(3), 301-332.
Hamel, Gary, Doz, Y, & Prahalad, C. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors. Harvard business review, 67(1), 133-139.
Hart, Oliver, & Moore, John. (1990). Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm.
Hwang, C.L., & Lin, M.J. (1987). Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Jensen, Michael C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. the Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
Jensen, Michael C, & Meckling, William H. (1990). Specific and general knowledge, and organizational structure.
Jorde, Thomas M, & Teece, David J. (1989). Competition and Cooperation-Striking the Right Balance. California management review, 31(3), 25-37.
Kale, Prashant, Dyer, Jeffrey H, & Singh, Harbir. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747-767.
Kogut, Bruce. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic management journal, 9(4), 319-332.
Kuo, Y.F., & Chen, P.C. (2008). Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1930-1939.
Liou, James JH. (2012). Developing an integrated model for the selection of strategic alliance partners in the airline industry. Knowledge-Based Systems, 28, 59-67.
Lynch, Robert Porter. (1989). The practical guide to joint ventures and corporate alliances: Wiley New York.
Merchant, Hemant, & Schendel, Dan. (2000). How do international joint ventures create shareholder value? Strategic Management Journal, 21(7), 723-737.
Murray Jr, Edwin A, & Mahon, John F. (1993). Strategic alliances: Gateway to the new Europe? Long Range Planning, 26(4), 102-111.
Parkhe, Arvind. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of management journal, 36(4), 794-829.
Porter, Michael E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance: New York: The Free Press.
Porter, Michael E, & Fuller, Mark B. (1986). Coalitions and global strategy. Competition in global industries, 1(10), 315-343.
Robinson, William T. (1988). Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries. Journal Of Marketing Research (JMR), 25(1).
Tyler, Beverly B, & Steensma, H Kevin. (1998). The effects of executives' experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 939-965.
Varadarajan, P Rajan, & Cunningham, Margaret H. (1995). Strategic alliances: a synthesis of conceptual foundations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 282-296.
Walters, Bruce A, Peters, Steve, & Dess, Gregory G. (1994). Strategic alliances and joint ventures: making them work. Business Horizons, 37(4), 5-10.
Williamson Oliver, E, & Ouchi, William G. (1981). The markets and hierarchies and visible hand perspectives. Perspectives on organisation design and behavior, Chichester: Wiley, 347-370.
Yoshino, Michael Y, & Rangan, U Srinivasa. (1995). Strategic alliances: an entrepreneurial approach to globalization: Harvard Business Press.
方至民. (2000). 企業競爭優勢 (初版 ed.): 前程企業出版社.
吳青松. (1991). 本國產業策略聯盟結構與績效之評估. 產業科技研究發展管理研討會, 中國生產力中心.
曾怡慈. (2011). 策略聯盟夥伴選擇準則之研究-以我國銀行業為例. 交通大學科技管理研究所學位論文, 1-86.
曾韻慈. (2010). 航空客運業策略聯盟績效分析-以亞洲地區為例. 交通大學經營管理研究所學位論文(2010 年), 1-67.
黃啟昌. (2005). 新產品開發決策模式之研究-以南部某家傳統製造業為例. 成功大學工程管理碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-98.
黃啟瑞. (2004). 策略聯盟類型與廠商績效之研究—以我國生技公司為例. 臺灣大學國際企業學研究所學位論文, 1-128.
黃國平, 陳弘法, & 王明坤. (2012). 策略聯盟兩岸晶圓代工競爭優勢之關鍵因素. [Key Factors for Competitive Advantages of Cross-straitIC Foundry in Strategic Alliance]. 管理與系統, 19(1), 139-167.
黃意婷. (2006). 電信產業策略聯盟夥伴評選準則之研究--以民營化之中華電信為例. 成功大學電信管理研究所學位論文, 1-95.
黃耀輝. (2006). 市場導向, 組織創新氣候與新產品開發績效相關之研究; A Study of Relationships among Market Orientation, Organizational Innovative Climate and New Product performance.
趙郁文. (2000). 國際企業管理-系統化理論與分析 (初版 ed.). 台北: 華泰文化事業股份有限公司.
劉常勇. (1999). 新產品開發程序. 劉常勇管理學習知識庫, http://cm. nsysu. edu. tw/~ cyliu.
鄭峰斌. (2003). 台商進入大陸之策略模式, 夥伴選擇準則 及其經營績效相關性研究. 成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA) 學位論文, 1-93.
賴蓉禾. (2011). 公司治理, 夥伴選擇與策略聯盟績效-台灣與美國企業之比較. 組織與管理, 4(2), 1-38.
簡琬莉. (2011). 網路通訊產業在數位匯流下策略聯盟夥伴選擇之研究. 交通大學管理學院科技管理學程學位論文, 1-82.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16635-
dc.description.abstract台灣紡織業的競爭環境至今仍然無法與大陸及東南亞等其他國家比,舉凡人力成本、電費、政府市場貨幣政策的支持與關稅等等均劣勢於其他開發中或已開發的國家,故台灣整體紡織業在產業裡的競爭力無法超越其他國家,而台灣紡織業面對這樣的困境與壓力下選擇了將工廠外移到諸多成本更低的國家,而卻也面臨到了在當地無法與擁有地主優勢的紡織業者競爭的窘境。
  進不得退不得的境況下,紡織業將目光放在針織布料本身的設計開發與突破,試圖針對市場消費者的需求做各種的應對改變,而這樣的實行方法近來在特殊針織布領域裡的開發也到一個飽和階段,舉凡發熱衣、清涼衣等等已問世、亦已降低製造成本使其量產,竟已面臨到無新產品新概念的景況。而漸漸成熟與奈米化的生物科技使紡織業有了新的想法,創新出了「膠原蛋白紡織品」這樣的突破性產品,取得了專利,這樣的專利技術產品不容易被模仿與取代,才有競爭優勢。
  話雖如此,有了好的產品,卻不保證產品推出會得到巨大的利潤與使紡織業獲得成功的先例繼以將此成功範本承祀下去,本論文將討論策略夥伴之選擇,以許多文獻中找出四大構面,設計問卷進行研究,最後得到四大構面的權重順序,做一結論,在選取台灣國內知名紡織公司,台元紡織股份有限公司在新機能纖維紗線開發成功後如何去選擇供應鏈中管理合作之策略夥伴中之方法,讓上下游策略整合的方式將長尾效應減到最低、效益最大化的過程,並將大量客製化(Mass-Customization)應用到產品上的策略管理過程。
  本論文將深入訪談國內成長與成熟兼備的傳產紡織產業個案企業-台元紡織股份有限公司開發出膠原蛋白纖維紗線後進行策略夥伴選擇之過程,個案中,將以此選擇策略夥伴流程的過程及條件以MCDM來探討並設計出訪談問卷,進行專家訪談,讓個案完整的成功經驗過程能完整呈現。
  經過訪談研究與分析,分析台元紡織股份有限公司的夥伴策略競爭管理、企業宏觀環境與製程特性有必要的相互關係及影響,本研究的結論將增加紡織產品研發後夥伴選擇之策略管理的成功,期望能帶來新的屬於台灣的紡織業經濟奇蹟。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe environment of Taiwan textile industry remains less competitive in comparison with China or East South Asia countries, such as human resource, electricity fee, monetary policy and custom tax. Many Taiwan makers moved to other developing countries to lower cost, while still facing difficulties of could not stand the same level as local maker.
Due to difficult environment, Taiwan textile industry focuses on R&D of textile fabric to satisfy consumer’s demand and has become saturated, such as heat-generated fabric or cool fabric. Taiwanese textile companies also provide low cost and big scale manufacturing. The maturity of nano technology in biotech also provide opportunities for textile business, stimulated the revolution of “collagen inside textiles”, in which companies could get the patent to prevent the imitation.
This research is focused on the importance of strategic partners. According to the literature review, we used 4 criteria to design the questionnaires and to evaluate the weight sequence of each scope. In this case study, we aim to investigate TAI YUEN TEXTILE CO., LTD and its strategic partners management procedure of supply chain during new functional yarn development, by up-downstream strategy integration, narrow the long tail impact, maximum the profit and mass –customization.
In this case study, we employ MCDM criteria to investigate and design the questionnaire to study the strategic partners procedure via expert interview, to represent the entire success experience in the case study.
After the interview and research, we found out that the strategic partners competitive management, enterprise macro environment and manufacture features show a positive correlation. This research can help to better understand the success of R&D strategic partner’s management and hope to bring new ideas for Taiwan textile industry.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:42:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-P01546003-1.pdf: 2676149 bytes, checksum: a0b5c5f1c28b9f7caab81ec4b1321b89 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
誌謝 II
中文摘要 III
ABSTRACT IV
目錄 VI
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究方法 3
1.4 研究範圍、流程與架構 3
1.4.1 研究範圍 3
1.4.2 研究流程 4
1.4.3 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1 紡織業之文獻探討 6
2.1.1 紡織業的定義與分類 6
2.1.2 新產品開發定義與分類相關文獻 7
2.2 策略聯盟之文獻探討 7
2.2.1 策略聯盟之定義 7
2.2.2 策略聯盟形成之優缺點 9
2.2.3 策略聯盟的形成動機 11
2.2.4 策略聯盟的型態 13
2.2.5 策略聯盟夥伴選擇 15
2.2.6 策略聯盟夥伴選擇之相關研究 16
2.3 小結 19
第三章 研究方法 20
3.1 多準則決策之相關文獻 20
3.2 模糊德菲法 21
3.3 研究分析構面 26
3.4 構面與關鍵成功因素 27
3.5 訪談程序與問題設計 31
3.6 研究限制 33
第四章 產業分析 34
4.1 問卷 34
4.2 實際案例分析 41
4.3 結論與建議 43
4.4 未來的研究方向 45
參考文獻 46
附錄 51

圖目錄
圖 1 研究流程 4
圖 2 研究架構 5
圖 3 成功的策略聯盟要素 15
圖 4 保守值與樂觀值的下限、上限、平均值 22
圖 5 灰區顯示 23
圖 6 無重疊區域案例顯示圖 24
圖 7 重複區案例 25
圖 8 重複區案例 25
圖 9 探討紡織業新產品開發的策略夥伴「選擇」標準評估準則 27
圖 10 策略聯盟夥伴選擇構面 34
圖 11 夥伴關係構面 34
圖 12 生產與技術構面 34
圖 13 財務健康構面 34
圖 14 企業文化構面 34

表目錄
表 1 影響本研究策略聯盟夥伴選擇準則之相關研究 16
表 2 策略聯盟夥伴選擇之準則來源 30
表 3 訪談程序 31
表 4 問卷結果 34
表 5 實際案例分析 34
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject夥伴選擇zh_TW
dc.subject供應鏈垂直整合zh_TW
dc.subject策略聯盟zh_TW
dc.subject關鍵成功因素zh_TW
dc.subject策略管理zh_TW
dc.subjectstrategic management.en
dc.subjectSupply Chain integrationen
dc.subjectstrategic allianceen
dc.subjectpartner managementen
dc.subjectkey successful factoren
dc.title紡織業新產品開發的策略夥伴選擇標準之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Study of Choosing Strategic Partner of New Product Development in Textile Industryen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳春光,黃慕萱
dc.subject.keyword供應鏈垂直整合,策略聯盟,夥伴選擇,關鍵成功因素,策略管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSupply Chain integration,strategic alliance,partner management,key successful factor,strategic management.,en
dc.relation.page59
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2014-07-25
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工業工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.61 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved