請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16528
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chun Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林俞均 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T18:19:14Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | AdlerS.P., & KwonS.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospect for a new concept. Academy of Management Review.
Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Anderson, E. W., & W., S. M. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science . Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research . BakerE.Wayne. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology. Balasubramanian, S., & Mahajan, V. (2001). The Economic Leverage of the Virtual Community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce . Berlo, D. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. BourdieuPierre. (1986). The forms of capital. Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan., G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Bradac, J. J., Hopper, R., & Wiemann, J. M. (1989). Message Effects: Retrospect and Prospect. Brock, T. (1965). Communicator-Recipient Similarity and Decision Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior. Chicago journals . Busch, P., & Wilson, D. T. (1976). An Experimental Analysis of a Salesman's Expert and Referent Bases of Social Power in the Buyer-Seller Dyad. Journal of Marketing Research . Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems . Chiu, H. C., Hsieh, Y. C., Kao, Y. H., & Lee, M. (2007). The Determinants of E-Mail Receivers’ Disseminating Behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research, (pp. p.524-534). Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Dann, S. (2010, 11 24). Twitter content classification. First Monday [Online], Volume 15 Number 12 . Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research . Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research . Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology . Harrison-Walker, L. (1993). The measurement of word-of-mouth communicationa and an investigation of service quality and customer commiment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, Vol.22, No.3 , pp. 59-74. Hayduk, L. (1987). Structual equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Heath, C. (1996). Do People Prefer to Pass Along Good or Bad News? Valence and Relevance of News as Predictors of Transmission Propensity. Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1990). Source expertise, time of source identification, and involvement in persuasion: An elaborative processing perspective. . Journal of Advertising . Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1952). The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly . Hovland, Carl, I. J., & Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural equation modeling. Huang, C.-C., Lin, T.-C., & Lin, K.-J. (2009). Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): Integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications . HungH.Kineta, & LiYiyanStella. (2007). The Influence of eWOM on Virtual Consumer Communities: Social Capital, Consumer Learning, and Behavioral Outcomes. Journal of Advertising Research. Jamieson, G. (1985). Communication and persuasion. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009, 11). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , pp. p.2169-2188. Java, Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proc. of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis. ACM. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence: the Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Kellermann, K., & Lim, T.-S. (1989). Inference-generating knowledge structures in message processing. In Message effects in comminication science. Law, S. P.-M., & Chang, M. K. (2008). Fostering Knowledge Exchange in Online Communities: A Social Capital Building Approach. ICIS. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management . McDonald, R., & Ho, M. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structual equation analysis. Psychological Methods . McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. (1974). Persuasibility as a Function of Source Credibility and Locus of Control: Five Cross-Cultural Experiments. Journal of Personality . Mistzal, B. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C.-H. (2010). Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. ACM. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998, 4). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 2 , pp. 242-266. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2d ed. Nylen, D. W. (1986). Advertising: Planning, implementation & control. O'Keefe, D. (1990). Persuasion. Theory and Research. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Phelps, J., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research , pp. 333-348. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect . Ray, M. L. (1982). Advertising and communication management. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., & Matsuo, Y. (2010). Earthquake Shakes Twitter Users: Real-time Event Detection by Social Sensors. International World Wide Web Conference Committee. Sherry, J. F. (1990 ). A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern Flea Market. Journal of Consumer Research . Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response. The Journal of Consumer Research , pp. 252-260. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network. IEEE International Conference on Social Computing. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17 (Winter Special Issue) , pp. 27-43. Tam, J. L. (2004). Customer Satisfaction, Service Quality and Perceived Value: An Integrative Model. Journal of Marketing Management . Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005, 3). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MISQ , pp. 35-57. Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source Effects in Communication and Persuasion Research: A Meta-analysis of Effect Size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , pp. 101–112. Woolcock, M. (n.d.). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society . Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Who Says What to Whom on Twitter. International World Wide Web Conference Committee. Yuan, Y., Head, M., & Du, M. (2003). The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation . Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. The Journal of Marketing . Zhao, D., & Rosson, M. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro–blogging Plays in informal communication at work. International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 243-252). ACM. 王叢桂. (2005). 華人價值研究. 於 華人本土心理學. 徐淑如, 董和昇, & 柳雅婷. (2011). 網路論壇口碑強度、雙面訊息與口碑順序對說服效果之影響-產品涉入之干擾效應. Journal of E-business. 徐淑如 & 林家琪. (2010). 線上品牌社群知覺關鍵多數、知覺價值與忠誠度之研究. 資訊管理學報. 張重昭, 黃麗霞, & 周宇貞. (2006). 消費者個人因素與訊息特性對電子郵件反應行為之影響. 管理學報. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16528 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 微網誌為新興的網路應用服務,結合了部落格的個人發表功能以及社交網路的概念,提供使用者發表具有字數限制的簡短訊息,使用者通常使用微網誌來分享自己日常生活以及尋找、分享資訊。相較於過去的資訊傳播媒介,微網誌具有數項特點:(1)結合人際關係,且可單向追蹤其他使用者訊息,增加傳播的廣度(2)篇幅較短,在資訊爆炸的時代,提供精簡內容、篩選之功能(3)結合行動通訊裝置,對比以往的資訊傳播管道更為即時(4)匯聚已追蹤之其他使用者發表之訊息(5)訊息來自個人篩選之對象。上述特性讓微網誌同時存在社交互動以及資訊傳播功能,而藉由轉推之行為,更能增幅傳播的廣度,達到個人自我推銷或企業行銷之目的。
本研究目的為探討影響微網誌傳播行為發生的外部因素,進而提供個人或企業改善、加強傳播情形之方法。根據過去傳播與說服相關文獻歸納,以及考量微網誌實際使用情形,將重點放在資訊來源與資訊內容兩項外部因素的影響力,並考量微網誌資訊傳播步驟,探討這兩項外部因素是否分別影響傳播前的點閱意願及而後的傳播意願。研究中以社會資本來衡量資訊來源因素,以資訊價值來橫量資訊內容因素。 本研究採用問卷調查法,並採用結構方程模式(SEM)進行分析。研究結果顯示,在微網誌資訊傳播中,資訊來源者的「社會資本」,包括中央性、信任、共享語言等,將會影響資訊接收者「接收資訊、了解內容」的意願;而「資訊內容價值」則是讓資訊接收者「決定是否繼續傳播資訊」的關鍵。並據此結果,進一步向個人或企業提出加強微網誌傳播行為之關鍵要素。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Micro-blog is a new web application that combines the post function of blog and the concept of social network. Users could share their life and information on micro-blog with word-limited posts. Through social network, these posts would broadcast to people who follow the user. Compare to past media, micro-blog has following characteristics: (1) communicate through social network, and the social ties could be unidirectional or bidirectional, which increases range of communication, (2) word-limited post leads to specific and precise contents, (3) with mobile devices, the communication becomes more instant, (4) aggregate all the posts of following people, (5) posts comes from people who are chose by users. All these characteristics let micro-blog be in favor for information propagation, besides, the information could reach more people by retweet behavior, than people could promote themselves and companies could share marketing information.
This study is aimed to exploring the external factors of information propagation in micro-blog, and come to offer some suggestions of improving propagation situations on micro-blog. Based on past studies and micro-blog usage, this study would focus on two external factors: information source effects and message effects. Considering the steps of propagation, we infer that the critical steps of propagation were affected separately by these two factors. Source affects receiving intentions and message affects pass-along intentions. In the study, we use social capital to measure source effects and content value to measure message effects. This study use questionnaire survey, collect data from 243 Twitter users, and analysis data by structural equation modeling (SEM). The result reveals that social capital including centrality, shared language, and trust that all affect the receiving intentions; content value would affect the pass-along intentions. According the results, we propose some suggestions to enhance the effectiveness of information propagation on micro-blog. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:19:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R98725013-1.pdf: 1064476 bytes, checksum: e28e2dbefbd6320a4858613529c27204 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
謝辭 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一章、緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 第二章、文獻回顧 5 2.1 微網誌 5 2.1.1 Twitter簡介 5 2.1.2 Twitter中的資訊傳播 7 2.2傳播與說服 9 2.2.1 來源影響(Source effects) 9 2.2.2 訊息影響(Message effects) 10 2.2.3 電子化口碑傳播(E-WOM) 13 2.2.4 電子郵件傳播 15 2.3 知覺價值(Perceived value) 16 2.4 社會資本(Social capital) 17 2.4.1 社會資本定義 17 2.4.2 社會資本分類 20 2.4.3 社會資本與資訊分享 21 第三章、 研究方法 24 3.1 研究架構 24 3.2 研究假說 24 3.2.1 社會資本之結構資本(structure capital) 24 3.2.2 社會資本之關係資本(relational capital) 25 3.2.3 社會資本之認知資本(cognitive capital) 25 3.2.4 資訊內容價值 26 3.2.5 傳播與點閱意願 26 3.3 變數定義與衡量指標 28 3.3.1 社會資本之結構資本(structure capital) 28 3.3.2 社會資本之關係資本(relational capital) 29 3.3.3 社會資本之認知資本(cognitive capital) 30 3.3.4 訊息價值 30 3.3.5 傳播與點閱意願 31 3.4 研究方法與設計 31 3.4.1 問卷設計與資料蒐集 31 3.4.2 分析方法 32 第四章、 研究結果 34 4.1 敘述性統計分析 34 4.2 信度檢測 36 4.3 效度檢測 37 4.3.1 收斂效度分析 37 4.3.2 區辨效度分析 38 4.4假說檢定 39 4.4.1 整體模型配適度 39 4.4.2 假說檢定 41 第五章、 討論與結論 43 5.1 討論 43 5.1.1 社會資本對資訊傳播之影響 43 5.1.2 資訊內容價值對資訊傳播之影響 44 5.2 研究限制與後續研究建議 45 5.3 結論與實務建議 46 參考文獻 48 附錄:問卷 54 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 微網誌中資訊傳播行為之外部因素探討-以Twitter使用者為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring the External Factors of Information Propagation in Micro-blog- An Empirical Study of Twitter | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳玲玲,王貞雅 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 微網誌,社會資本理論,資訊傳播,推特,社交網絡, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Micro-blog,Social capital theory,information propagation,Twitter,social metwork, | en |
dc.relation.page | 60 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。