請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16492完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃囇莉(Li-Li Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guan-Yun Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王冠云 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T18:17:25Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abubshait, A., Wiese, E. (2017). You look human, but act like a machine: Agent appearance and behavior modulate different aspects of human–robot Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Retrieved from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01393/full Alves-Oliveira, P., Janarthanam, S., Candeias, A., Deshmukh, A., Ribeiro, T., Hastie, H., . . . Aylett, R. (2014, 25-29 Aug. 2014). Towards dialogue dimensions for a robotic tutor in collaborative learning scenarios. Paper presented at the The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Edinburgh, UK. Amaro, R. (2016). Teaching computational linguistics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of II World Congress on Computer Science, Engineering and Technology Education, Castelo Branco, Portugal. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21). Retrieved from: https://robotics.sciencemag.org/content/3/21/eaat5954 Breazeal, C. (2004). Social interactions in HRI: the robot view. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2), 181-186. Bruffee, K. A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(1), 12-18. doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.9937722 Callele, D., Neufeld, E., Schneider, K. (2010, 28-28 Sept. 2010). A proposal for cognitive gameplay requirements. Paper presented at the 2010 Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization. Sydney, NSW, Australia. Damiano, L., Dumouchel, P., Lehmann, H. (2015). Artificial empathy: An interdisciplinary investigation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1), 3-5. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0259-6 Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier. Dror, I. E. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics amp; Cognition, 16(2), 215-223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.2.02dro Hegel, F., Krach, S., Kircher, T., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G. (2008, 12-15 March 2008). Theory of Mind (ToM) on robots: A functional neuroimaging study. Paper presented at the 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Amsterdam, Netherlands. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1567-1579. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946 Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach (pp. 37-56). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Jimenez, F., Kanoh, M. (2013, 13-16 Oct. 2013). Robot that can promote learning by observing in collaborative learning. Paper presented at the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Manchester, UK. Jimenez, F., Kanoh, M., Yoshikawa, T., Furuhashi, T. (2014, 5-8 Oct. 2014). Effect of collaborative learning with robot that prompts constructive interaction. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). San Diego, CA, USA. Jimenez, F., Kanoh, M., Yoshikawa, T., Furuhashi, T., Nakamura, T. (2014). Effect of robot utterances using onomatopoeia on collaborative learning. 4(2), 125. doi: 10.1515/jaiscr-2015-0003 Johnson, D. G., Verdicchio, M. (2018). Why robots should not be treated like animals. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(4), 291-301. doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9481-5 Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010 Jones, A., Küster, D., Basedow, C. A., Alves-Oliveira, P., Serholt, S., Hastie, H., ... Castellano, G. (2015, October). Empathic robotic tutors for personalised learning: A multidisciplinary approach. In International conference on social robotics (pp. 285-295). Springer, Cham. Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Learning and Instruction, 10, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00021-9 Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Designing Sociable CSCL Environments. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 221-243). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Laal, M., Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091 Landsgesell, I. N. (2018). Empathy with robots. (Unpublished master’s thesis), University of Vienna, Austria. Lawrence, K. (2015). Today’s college students: Skimmers, scanners and efficiency-seekers. Information Services Use, 35, 89-93. doi:10.3233/ISU-150765 Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Paiva, A. (2013). The influence of empathy in human–robot relations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), 250-260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005 Li, H., Rau, P.-L. P., Salvendy, G., Chen, C., Huebner, D., Frey, D. (2014). Effects of communication styles on acceptance of recommendations in intercultural collaboration. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 8. Retrieved from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2783469 Littell, P., Levin, L., Eisner, J., Radev, D. (2013). Introducing computational concepts in a linguistics olympiad. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Teaching NLP and CL. Sofia, Bulgaria. Martini, M. C., Gonzalez, C. A., Wiese, E. (2016). Seeing minds in others – can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PloS one, 11(1), e0146310. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146310 Nishio, S., Ogawa, K., Kanakogi, Y., Itakura, S., Ishiguro, H. (2012, 9-13 Sept. 2012). Do robot appearance and speech affect people's attitude? Evaluation through the Ultimatum Game. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Paris, France. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Yamada, S. (2020). Do people with social anxiety feel anxious about interacting with a robot? AI SOCIETY, 35, 381-390. doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00889-9 Nourbakhsh, I. R., Bobenage, J., Grange, S., Lutz, R., Meyer, R., Soto, A. (1999). An affective mobile robot educator with a full-time job. Artificial Intelligence, 114(1-2), 95-124. Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001 Ohio State University, D. o. L. (2016). Language Files: materials for anintroduction to language and linguistics. Taipei, Taiwan: Bookman Books. Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84-95. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.528484 Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., Pianta, R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004 Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., Janse, M. D. (2010). Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753567 Schweighofer, P., Ebner, M. (2015). Aspects to be considered when implementing technology-enhanced learning approaches: A literature review. Future Internet, 7(1), 26-49. Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Küster, D., Jones, A., Alves-Oliveira, P., Paiva, A. (2016). Students' normative perspectives on classroom robots. In J. Seibt, M. Nørskov, S. S. Andersen (Eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do (pp. 240-251) Netherlands: IOS Press. Serholt, S., Barendregt, W., Leite, I., Hastie, H., Jones, A., Paiva, A., . . . Castellano, G. (2014, 25-29 Aug. 2014). Teachers' views on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom. Paper presented at the The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Edinburgh, UK. Sharkey, A. J. C. (2016). Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 283-297. doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9387-z Shimada, M., Kanda, T., Koizumi, S. (2012). How can a social robot facilitate children’s collaboration?. In Ge S.S., Khatib O., Cabibihan JJ., Simmons R., Williams MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 98-107). Germany: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Shin, D.-H., Choo, H. (2011). Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human–robot interaction. Interaction Studies, 12(3), 430-460. Tapus, A., Mataric, M. J. (2007). Emulating empathy in socially assistive robotics. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics, Palo Alto, California. Tapus, A., Mataric, M. J. (2008). Socially assistive robots: The link between personality, empathy, physiological signals, and task performance. Paper presented at the AAAI spring symposium: emotion, personality, and social behavior, Palo Alto, California. Wang, L., Rau, P. P., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., Hinds, P. (2010, 2-5 March 2010). When in Rome: The role of culture context in adherence to robot recommendations. Paper presented at the 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Osaka, Japan. Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006 Yueh, H.-P., Lin, W.-J. (2005, 28-29 Jan. 2005). Developing a Web-based environment in supporting students team-working and learning in a problem-based learning approach. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (C5'05), Kyoto, Japan. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16492 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究測試一個能模擬人類同理心的機器人，作為科技輔助教學的工具之一，機器人具備了「物理存在感」這項特點，再加上具備聲音與表情，使之可能得以模擬人類的同理心並且介入合作學習的任務之中。本研究之實驗情境為一個語言解題任務，實驗參與者共有45人，男生21人、女生24人，參與者皆為學生，且每三人為一組，隨機分派到三種實驗條件：高同理心組、低同理心組、控制組。本研究要了解學生如何被給予情感支持、如何感受到指導方的同理心，進而提升自己的學習，學習成效方面分為認知表現（解題時間、解題正確率）以及情感表現（機器人友情、心智知覺、基本同理心）。在本研究的研究結果中，發現了在控制組的實驗條件之下，實驗參與者的解題正確率最高，且對於機器人的心靈知覺亦較高。當機器人介入合作學習的小組討論時，確實可以讓學習者對於機器人投以更多的社交行為，並且促進討論。此外，本研究結果顯示了使用者對於科技仍然較期待一個「客觀而聰明」的機器作為輔助工具。在具有挑戰性的學習情境中，科技模擬而出的同理心，可能影響了學習。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study tests a robot which can emulate human’s empathy. As a technology-enhanced system in education, robot, which has “physical presence” with voice and facial expression, is more possible to emulate empathy than other information communication tools. This study used a linguistic puzzle task as our experimental scenario. Totally 45 participants including 21 males and 24 females joined the experiment, and 3 students a group would be randomly assigned to 3 conditions: high empathy group, low empathy group and control group. This study examined the learning performance of both cognitive (solving time, solving accuracy) and affective (friendship with robot, mind perception of robot, basic empathy). The results showed that in neutral group, the participants had higher accuracy and mind perception of robot. When robot intervened into collaborative learning group, the learners engaged more social interaction behavior and the robot facilitate their discussion. Besides, the users expected a “objective and clever” robot as a supportive tool. In this kind of challenging learning scenario, emulating empathy might reduce the performance of learning. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:17:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2807202017130700.pdf: 2321599 bytes, checksum: 68a6eff505f67f6ac046d3cbeeb389ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 情感支持與科技輔助教學 7 第二節 同理心與教學情境 9 第三節 合作學習 12 第四節 小結 16 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究對象與流程 20 第二節 實驗設計 22 第三節 實驗素材 24 第四節 語言解謎輔助之機器人系統 26 第五節 量表與評估工具 34 第四章 研究結果 41 第一節 描述性統計 41 第二節 各同理心實驗條件之差異 50 第三節 合作學習歷程與訪談結果 55 第五章 總結與討論 63 第一節 同理心於教育情境中之必要性 63 第二節 合作學習之教學方法 65 第三節 模擬同理心之可能性 66 第四節 未來應用與研究限制 68 參考文獻 72 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 情感支持 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 同理心 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技輔助教學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 合作學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人機互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | emotional support | en |
| dc.subject | human-robot-interaction (HRI) | en |
| dc.subject | technology-enhance learning | en |
| dc.subject | collaborative learning | en |
| dc.subject | empathy | en |
| dc.title | 同理心模擬之情感支持系統對合作學習之成效測試 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Emulating Empathy in Emotional Support System to Test Performance on Collaborative Learning | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.author-orcid | 0000-0003-2060-8470 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 岳修平(Hsiu-Ping Yueh) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林維真(Weijane Lin),傅立成(Li-Chen Fu),曹峰銘(Feng-Ming Tsao) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 同理心,人機互動,科技輔助教學,合作學習,情感支持, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | empathy,human-robot-interaction (HRI),technology-enhance learning,collaborative learning,emotional support, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 80 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001980 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2807202017130700.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。