請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16148
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳羿貞(Yi-Jane Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Shiou Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳怡秀 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T18:02:52Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-09-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Singh GD. Morphologic determinants in the etiology of class III malocclusions: a review. Clin Anat. 1999;12(5):382-405.
2. Soh J, Sandham A, Chan YH. Occlusal status in Asian male adults: prevalence and ethnic variation. Angle Orthod. Sep 2005;75(5):814-820. 3. Salonen L, Mohlin B, Gotzlinger B, Hellden L. Need and demand for orthodontic treatment in an adult Swedish population. European journal of orthodontics. Oct 1992;14(5):359-368. 4. Chew MT. Spectrum and management of dentofacial deformities in a multiethnic Asian population. The Angle orthodontist. Sep 2006;76(5):806-809. 5. McDonnell JP, McNeill RW, West RA. Advancement genioplasty: a retrospective cephalometric analysis of osseous and soft tissue changes. J Oral Surg. Aug 1977;35(8):640-647. 6. Hohl TH, Epker BN. Macrogenia: a study of treatment results, with surgical recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. May 1976;41(5):545-567. 7. Schendel SA, Eisenfeld JH, Bell WH, Epker BN. Superior repositioning of the maxilla: stability and soft tissue osseous relations. Am J Orthod. Dec 1976;70(6):663-674. 8. Freihofer HP, Jr. The lip profile after correction of retromaxillism in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg. May 1 1976;4(3):136-141. 9. Freihofer HP, Jr. Changes in nasal profile after maxillary advancement in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg. Feb 1977;5(1):20-27. 10. Pospisil OA. Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. Apr 1987;15(2):79-83. 11. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Max Surg. Jun 2009;38(6):609-625. 12. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dento maxillo facial radiology. Jul 1999;28(4):245-248. 13. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-1564. 14. Bamgbose BO, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Ogunlewe MO. Conebeam computed tomography (CBCT): the new vista in oral and maxillofacial imaging. Nig Q J Hosp Med. Jan-Mar 2008;18(1):32-35. 15. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol. Jan 2009;82(973):35-40. 16. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Jul 2006;35(4):219-226. 17. Howerton WB, Jr., Mora MA. Advancements in digital imaging: what is new and on the horizon? Journal of the American Dental Association. Jun 2008;139 Suppl:20S-24S. 18. Baumrind S, Miller D, Molthen R. The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. Am J Orthod. Dec 1976;70(6):617-644. 19. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod. Nov 1971;60(5):505-517. 20. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. Aug 1971;60(2):111-127. 21. Carlsson GE. Error in x-ray cephalometry. A method study and a longitudinal investigation of the facial skeleton on series with and without natural teeth over a 5-year period. Odontol Tidskr. Apr 20 1967;75(2):99-129. 22. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Sep 2004;33(5):291-294. 23. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Dec 2005;128(6):803-811. 24. Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Will LA. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Aug 2009;136(2):156 e151-156; discussion 156-157. 25. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE, Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Jan;40(1):24-34. 26. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. Journal of orthodontics. Dec 2005;32(4):282-293. 27. Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker SF, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Jan 2007;131(1):44-50. 28. Terajima M, Yanagita N, Ozeki K, et al. Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Jul 2008;134(1):100-111. 29. Plooij JM, Naphausen MT, Maal TJ, et al. 3D evaluation of the lingual fracture line after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Int J Oral Max Surg. Dec 2009;38(12):1244-1249. 30. Ryckman MS, Harrison S, Oliver D, et al. Soft-tissue changes after maxillomandibular advancement surgery assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Apr 2010;137(4 Suppl):S86-93. 31. Draenert FG, Erbe C, Zenglein V, Kammerer PW, Wriedt S, Al Nawas B. 3D analysis of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible in mono- and bimaxillary orthognathic surgery - a methodology study in 18 patients. Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie. Nov 2010;71(6):421-429. 32. Kim YI, Kim JR, Park SB. Three-dimensional analysis of midfacial soft tissue changes according to maxillary superior movement after horizontal osteotomy of the maxilla. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. Sep 2010;21(5):1587-1590. 33. Carvalho Fde A, Cevidanes LH, da Motta AT, Almeida MA, Phillips C. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular advancement 1 year after surgery. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Apr 2010;137(4 Suppl):S53 e51-12; discussion S53-55. 34. Kim YI, Cho BH, Jung YH, Son WS, Park SB. Cone-beam computerized tomography evaluation of condylar changes and stability following two-jaw surgery: Le Fort I osteotomy and mandibular setback surgery with rigid fixation. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. Jun 2011;111(6):681-687. 35. Kim YI, Park SB, Son WS, Hwang DS. Midfacial soft-tissue changes after advancement of maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy and mandibular setback surgery: comparison of conventional and high Le Fort I osteotomies by superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography volumes. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Jun 2011;69(6):e225-233. 36. Almeida RC, Cevidanes LH, Carvalho FA, et al. Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement using 3D CBCT scanning. Int J Oral Max Surg. Apr 2011;40(4):353-359. 37. Hwang DS, Kim YI, Park SB, Lee JY. Midfacial soft tissue changes after leveling Le Fort I osteotomy with differential reduction. The Angle orthodontist. May 2012;82(3):424-431. 38. Park SB, Yoon JK, Kim YI, Hwang DS, Cho BH, Son WS. The evaluation of the nasal morphologic changes after bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III maloccusion by using the superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Jun 2012;40(4):e87-92. 39. Cevidanes LH, Motta A, Proffit WR, Ackerman JL, Styner M. Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Apr 2010;137(4 Suppl):S120-129. 40. Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR, Jr., et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dento maxillo facial radiology. Nov 2005;34(6):369-375. 41. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American journal of orthodontics. May 1983;83(5):382-390. 42. Hwang DS, Kim YI, Park SB, Lee JY. Midfacial soft tissue changes after leveling Le Fort I osteotomy with differential reduction. The Angle orthodontist. Sep 2 2011. 43. Pirttiniemi PM. Associations of Mandibular and Facial Asymmetries - a Review. Am J Orthod Dentofac. Aug 1994;106(2):191-200. 44. Mulick JF. An Investigation of Craniofacial Asymmetry Using the Serial Twin-Study Method. American journal of orthodontics. Feb 1965;51:112-129. 45. Melnik AK. A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Apr 1992;101(4):355-366. 46. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. The Angle orthodontist. Aug 2003;73(4):381-385. 47. Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Lee SH. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Int J Oral Max Surg. Jan 2006;35(1):43-48. 48. Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji Y, et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. Sep 2006;102(3):382-390. 49. Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. The Angle orthodontist. Feb 2002;72(1):28-35. 50. Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1997;12(3):171-176. 51. Hwang HS, Youn IS, Lee KH, Lim HJ. Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Sep 2007;132(3):279 e271-276. 52. Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia--hemimandibular elongation. Journal of maxillofacial surgery. Aug 1986;14(4):183-208. 53. Rosen HM. Lip-nasal aesthetics following Le Fort I osteotomy. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Feb 1988;81(2):171-182. 54. Betts NJ, Vig KW, Vig P, Spalding P, Fonseca RJ. Changes in the nasal and labial soft tissues after surgical repositioning of the maxilla. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1993;8(1):7-23. 55. Chung C, Lee Y, Park KH, Park SH, Park YC, Kim KH. Nasal changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in Koreans. The Angle orthodontist. May 2008;78(3):427-432. 56. Day CJ, Robert T. Three-dimensional assessment of the facial soft tissue changes that occur postoperatively in orthognathic patients. World journal of orthodontics. Spring 2006;7(1):15-26. 57. Moss JP, McCance AM, Fright WR, Linney AD, James DR. A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of fifteen patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions after bimaxillary surgery. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. May 1994;105(5):430-437. 58. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, Tsay TP, Hohlt WF. The use of temporary anchorage devices for molar intrusion. Journal of the American Dental Association. Jan 2007;138(1):56-64. 59. Jensen AC, Sinclair PM, Wolford LM. Soft tissue changes associated with double jaw surgery. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Mar 1992;101(3):266-275. 60. Enacar A, Taner T, Toroglu S. Analysis of soft tissue profile changes associated with mandibular setback and double-jaw surgeries. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1999;14(1):27-35. 61. Hershey HG, Smith LH. Soft-tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. American journal of orthodontics. May 1974;65(5):483-502. 62. Lin SS, Kerr WJ. Soft and hard tissue changes in Class III patients treated by bimaxillary surgery. European journal of orthodontics. Feb 1998;20(1):25-33. 63. Robinson SW, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. The Angle orthodontist. Jul 1972;42(3):227-235. 64. Chew MT. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients. The Angle orthodontist. Nov 2005;75(6):959-963. 65. Kim M, Lee DY, Lim YK, Baek SH. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery in class III malocclusion patients according to extent of mandibular setback, vertical skeletal pattern, and genioplasty. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. May 2010;109(5):e20-32. 66. Burstone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Seminars in orthodontics. Sep 1998;4(3):153-164. 67. de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. Feb 2009;107(2):256-265. 68. Jung YJ, Kim MJ, Baek SH. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. Jun 2009;107(6):763-771 e768. 69. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman MB, Kean MR. Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Mar 2007;131(3):305-310. 70. Ingervall B, Thuer U, Vuillemin T. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular setback with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1995;10(1):15-25. 71. Suckiel JM, Kohn MW. Soft-tissue changes related to the surgical management of mandibular prognathism. American journal of orthodontics. Jun 1978;73(6):676-680. 72. Fanibunda KB. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. Aug 1989;27(4):277-286. 73. Gjorup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. Oct 1991;100(4):312-323. 74. Lew KK, Loh FC, Yeo JF, Loh HS. Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1990;5(3):189-197. 75. Hu J, Wang D, Luo S, Chen Y. Differences in soft tissue profile changes following mandibular setback in Chinese men and women. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Oct 1999;57(10):1182-1186. 76. Fukushima K, Yasui K, Oatuka Y, Matsui S, Hirase N, Takay- anagi J, et al. Morphological characteristics of patients with jaw deformity -Frontal cepharometric evaluation of facial symmetry. Meikai Univ Dent J. 2003; 32:118-23. 77. Tani M, Iketani M, Watanabe M, Suda S, Fujimura N, Miyazawa M, et al. Posterior-anterior cephalometric analysis in patients with dentofacial deformities. J Jpn Stomatol Soc. 1989; 35:1749- 59. 78. 黃耀德、陳木熊,淺談輻射常識與牙科微劑量診斷,北縣牙醫 No.196 p. 27~32 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16148 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的: 對於嚴重的骨性第三級異常咬合患者,治療方式常需要合併矯正治療與正顎手術才能同時改善咬合功能及顏面外觀,過去對於治療效果的評估常使用二維影 像放射線測顱分析。由於近年來錐狀射束斷層掃描的發展,使我們便於取得三維 立體影像資訊。在本研究中,我們透過收集顏面不對稱之第三級異常咬合患者在 接受正顎手術及矯正治療前後的錐狀射束斷層掃描資訊,分析治療前後三維影像 的變化,以供日後診斷、擬定治療計畫、及改良相關術式之參考。
實驗材料與方法: 本研究收集在台大醫院齒顎矯正科接受矯正合併正顎手術治療,於矯正治療前(T1)與所有治療結束並拆除矯正器後一個月內(T2)拍攝錐狀射束斷層掃描 的第三級咬合異常患者共 15 位,使用 Dolphin imaging system 將治療前後之 CBCT 三維影像疊合在顱底後進行分析,包括前後、左右、垂直三個向度的測量。我們 將三維形態解構至二維平面上,以評估左右向對稱性及前後向凹凸情形,二維平 面包括四個水平面(平行法蘭克福平面,通過 T1 時的前鼻棘點(ANS,X1)、下顎 正中門齒牙骨質牙釉質交界(L1 CEJ,X2)、右側頦孔(mental foramen,X3)、T2 時 的骨性頦點(bony Pog,X4)之水平面)、九個矢狀面(正中矢狀面(Y0)往左右每距 離一公分為下一個矢狀面,由右至左簡稱 YR4、YR3、YR2、YR1、Y0、YL1、 YL2、YL3、YL4)與五個冠狀面(通過 T2 bony Pog 的冠狀面(Z0)往後每距離一 公分為下一個冠狀面,由前至後簡稱為 Z1、Z2、Z3、Z4、Z5),所有軟硬組織測 量值都是在上述平面的交點來做記錄。 (一) 垂直方向 (1) 咬合平面:測量上顎左右第一大臼齒近心頰側咬尖最凸點至法蘭克福平面的 垂直距離。 (2) 下顎垂直變化:在 Z3 以及 Z4 平面上,量測左右兩側下顎枝下緣最低點至法 蘭克福平面的垂直距離,以評估左右差異程度在治療後是否有所改變。 (二) 前後方向 在治療前與治療後軟硬組織三維形態表面,選取相對於四個水平面與九個矢狀面交點的結構點(需同時可以測量到軟硬組織,故共計 28 個),分別量測軟硬 組織至冠狀參考平面(通過兩側 Porion 中點)的前後距離,以評估前後向之凹凸 度變化。 (三) 左右方向 在治療前與治療後軟硬組織三維形態表面,選取相對於三個水平面(X2、X3、 X4)與五個冠狀面交點的結構點,分別測量左右兩側對應點至正中矢狀面的垂直 距離,以評估下顎之左右對稱性。 結果: 十五位患者的在治療前上顎咬合平面傾斜程度平均為 1.73 mm,治療後則減 少為 1.04 mm,其中接受雙顎手術(五位)與術前矯正時期有合併使用迷你植體(三 位)的患者,左右側第一大臼齒有不同程度的 intrusion,其餘七位病患則多是 extrusion。治療前後大多數患者的左右下顎枝下緣高低傾斜方向與咬合平面傾斜方 向一致,患者接受下顎 BSSO setback 手術之後下顎下緣大多有往下的移動,治療 前左右高低落差平均為 1.87 mm,治療後增加為 2.08 mm。 治療前所有患者前後方向上的左右臉凹凸度差異都是下顎大於上顎,於治療後下臉部皆變得較為對稱。五位接受雙顎手術患者的上顎軟組織相對於硬組織之移動比值由正中矢狀面往兩側,此比率有逐漸增加的趨勢(0.295、0.745、1.19); 至於下顎變化,十五位患者在下顎之軟硬組織移動比率於不同高度略有不同(X2、 X3、X4 level,分別為:0.96、1.07、1.13),但都非常接近 1。 十五位患者中下顎較寬側與下巴偏移方向相同的 10 位病患,治療前下顎的左 右寬度差異越往 Pog 處越明顯,治療後左右臉寬度差異變小,但仍未達到完全對 稱。下顎軟組織相對硬組織的水平移動比值差異極大,並無一致性的結果。 結論: 使用疊合之錐狀射束斷層掃描三維影像可以有效地分析下顎前突症患者之正顎手術矯正治療前後的軟硬組織變化。 垂直方向上治療前後大多數患者的左右下顎枝下緣高低傾斜方向與咬合平面傾斜方向一致,治療後咬合平面傾斜程度較為輕微,但下顎枝下緣左右高低落差 稍微增加。 下顎前突症患者其下顎在前後方向上的左右不對稱情形較上顎明顯,接受雙 顎手術之患者上顎軟組織相對硬組織之前後移動比值由正中矢狀平面往兩側逐漸 增加,將單顎與雙顎手術一起評估則發現下顎於不同高度(L1 CEJ、mental foramen、Pog)的變化皆趨近於 1。 顱顏面不對稱之下顎前突症患者下顎偏往左側的比例比右側高,下顎較寬側 與下巴偏移方向相同之患者其左右寬度差異在 Pog 處最大,而下顎軟組織相對硬 組織之水平移動比值個別差異很大,軟組織在水平方向的移動變化似乎是較難預測的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The prevalence of Class III malocclusion is higher in Asians than in Caucasians. To improve the occlusal function and facial esthetics, orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery is often indicated in Class III malocclusion with severe skeletal discrepancy. The objectives of this research were to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) morphological changes of the soft and hard tissues in Class III facial asymmetry patients who were corrected with surgical orthodontic treatment.
Method: The subjects included 15 adult skeletal Class III patients who had 3D cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) taken before full mouth orthodontic treatment (T1) and within one month after debanding and debonding (T2). They were treated with orthodontic treatment combined with one-jaw surgery to setback mandible (bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, BSSO) or two-jaw surgery (Le Fort I maxillary advancement and BSSO mandibular setback). The 3D CBCT images were superimposed on the cranial base in Dolphin imaging system (best fit of cranial base). After superimposition, 3D changes of the soft and hard tissues were measured from the vertical, anteroposterior, and transverse directions, respectively. In addition, the soft to hard tissue movement ratios were calculated. Result: Asymmetry was more evident in the lower face in comparison with the middle face. Chin deviation was found in 13 of 15 subjects and 5 of them were deviated to the right side. Moreover, the mean deviation of bony pogonion at T1 was 4.32 mm. The mandibular prognathism were successfully corrected and facial asymmetry improved, but not fully corrected. In the vertical evaluation, the average occlusal plane canting changed from 1.73 mm to 1.04 mm. The vertical discrepancy of bilateral mandibular inferior border changed from 1.87 mm (T1) to 2.08 mm (T2). In the evaluations either before or after treatment, the vertical asymmetry of bilateral mandibular inferior borders was coincident with the direction of occlusal plane canting. In the anteroposterior (AP) evaluation of two-jaw surgery patients, the soft-to-hard tissue movement ratios (S/H ratios) of the maxilla gradually increased from midsagittal to paranasal area (0.295, 0.745, 1.19). The S/H ratios of the mandible were gradually increased from L1 CEJ to pogonion. Furthermore, marked individual variation of S/H ratios in transverse direction is noted. Conclusion: The CBCT 3D image is useful to evaluate the treatment effects of surgical orthodontic treatment in patients with mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry. The S/H ratios of maxilla in AP direction gradually increased from midsagittal to paranasal area. The S/H ratios in mandible were close to one. The transverse movement of the soft tissue seemed difficult to predict from hard tissue because of marked individual variation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T18:02:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R98422026-1.pdf: 3274865 bytes, checksum: aecbeb8b4b1422e5b253eee1255950ef (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要...............................................................................i
英文摘要..............................................................................iv 第一章 緒論..........................................................................1 1.1 研究背景........................................................................1 1.2 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描儀..................................................4 1.2.1 現今市面上可見之錐狀射束斷層掃描儀............................5 1.2.2 錐狀射束斷層掃描輻射劑量之考量..................................6 1.2.3 錐狀射束斷層掃描於正顎手術評估之近期研究.............................................7 1.3 研究目的......................................................................10 第二章 研究材料與方法........................................................11 2.1 利用三維影像疊合分析下顎前突症之正顎手術矯正治療效果............................11 2.1.1 研究對象...................................................................11 2.1.2 研究材料製備.............................................................11 2.1.2.1 三維影像資料之取得................................................11 2.1.2.2 三維影像之定位......................................................12 2.1.2.3 三維影像之疊合......................................................12 2.1.2.4 三維影像之測量......................................................12 2.1.2.5 觀察者誤差............................................................14 第三章 結果.......................................................................15 3.1 觀察者組內誤差............................................................15 3.2 垂直方向.....................................................................15 3.2.1 咬合平面傾斜程度......................................................15 3.2.2 下顎下緣垂直方向之變化............................................15 3.3 前後方向.....................................................................15 3.4 下顎左右對稱性............................................................18 第四章 討論.......................................................................21 4.1 三維影像之疊合............................................................21 4.2 三維影像之界標判定......................................................22 4.3 顱顏發育之不對稱.........................................................23 4.3.1 顱顏發育不對稱之綜論................................................23 4.3.2 顱顏面不對稱情形之分類.............................................24 4.4 利用三維影像疊合分析下顎前突症之正顎手術矯正治療效果...........................25 4.4.1 咬合平面傾斜............................................................26 4.4.2 前後方向..................................................................27 4.4.3 左右對稱性...............................................................28 4.4.4 個案討論..................................................................30 第五章 結論.......................................................................33 第六章 未來展望.................................................................34 參考文獻...........................................................................68 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 顏面不對稱第三級異常咬合患者之正顎手術矯正治療效果評估-錐狀射束斷層掃描分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation of Surgical Orthodontic Correction in Class III Patients with Facial Asymmetry- Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉佳觀,姚宗珍(Chung-Chen Yao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 錐狀射束斷層掃描,顏面不對稱第三級異常咬合,正顎手術,軟硬組織變化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cone beam computed tomography,Class III malocclusion,facial asymmetry,orthognathic surgery,soft and hard tissue changes, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 牙醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。