Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 國家發展研究所
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15953
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor周桂田
dc.contributor.authorPo-Chuan Yangen
dc.contributor.author楊博全zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T17:56:16Z-
dc.date.copyright2012-08-22
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-08-14
dc.identifier.citation一、中文部分
杜文苓 (2009). '高科技污染的風險論辯-環境倡議的挑戰.' 臺灣民主季刊 6(4): 101-139.
杜文苓 (2010). '環評決策中公民參與的省思: 以中科三期開發爭議為例.' 公共行政學報 35: 29-60.
杜文苓、李翰林 (2011). '環境資訊公開的民主實踐課題-以霄裡溪光電廢水汙染爭議爲例.' 臺灣民主季刊 8(2): 59-98.
周桂田 (1998). '現代性與風險社會.' 臺灣社會學刊(21): 89-129.
周桂田 (2002). '在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口-遲滯型高科技風險社會.' 臺灣社會研究(45): 69-122.
周桂田 (2003). '從 [全球化風險] 到 [全球在地化風險] 之研究進路: 對貝克理論的批判思考.' 台灣社會學刊, 三十一期: 153-188.
林子倫 (2008). '台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析.' 公共行政學報(28): 153-175.

二、外文部分
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). 'Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly.' Critical Sociology 34(1): 51-79.

Barker, A. and B. G. Peters (1993). Politics of expert advice: creating, using and manipulating scientific knowledge for public policy, Edinburgh University Press.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity, Sage Publications Ltd.

Beck, U. (1995). Ecological politics in an age of risk, Polity.

Beck, U. (2000). 'Risk society revisited: theory, politics and research programmes.' The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory: 211-229.

Buchholz, R. A., A. A. Marcus, et al. (1992). Managing environmental issues: A casebook, Prentice Hall.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). 'A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance.' Academy of management review: 497-505.

Christoff, P. (1996). 'Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities.' Environmental politics 5(3): 476-500.

Clark, W. C. and N. M. Dickson (2003). 'Sustainability science: the emerging research program.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14): 8059.

Commission, E. (2006). 'Renewed EU sustainable development strategy.' Brussels, European Commission 29.

Croci, E. (2005). The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements: Design, implementation and evaluation issues, Kluwer Academic Pub.

de Groene, A. and M. Hermans (1998). 'Economic and other implications of integrated chain management: a case study.' Journal of Cleaner Production 6(3-4): 199-211.

Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concept of pollution and taboo, Psychology Press.

Dyllick, T. and K. Hockerts (2002). 'Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability.' Business strategy and the environment 11(2): 130-141.

Foucault, M. and C. Gordon (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, Vintage.

Funtowicz, S., J. Ravetz, et al. (1998). 'Challenges in the use of science for sustainable development.' International Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1): 99-107.

Gerbens-Leenes, P., H. Moll, et al. (2003). 'Design and development of a measuring method for environmental sustainability in food production systems.' Ecological Economics 46(2): 231-248.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis, Univ of California Pr.

Glasbergen, P. (1996). 'Learning to manage the environment.' Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects: 175-193.

Golob, U. and J. L. Bartlett (2007). 'Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia.' Public Relations Review 33(1): 1-9.

Grove-White, R., P. Macnaghten, et al. (2000). 'Wising up.' The public and new technologies.

Hajer, M. (1993). 'Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain.' The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning: 43-76.

Hajer, M. A. (1997). 'The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process.'

Hajer, M. A. (2005). 'Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: from Acid Rain to BSE.' Discourse theory in European politics: 297-315.

Hajer, M. A. and O. U. Press (1997). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process, Oxford University Press Oxford.

Hajer, M. A. and H. Wagenaar (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society, Cambridge Univ Pr.

Handfield, R., S. V. Walton, et al. (2002). 'Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process.' European Journal of Operational Research 141(1): 70-87.

Hanssen, O. (1999). 'Sustainable product systems--experiences based on case projects in sustainable product development.' Journal of Cleaner Production 7(1): 27-41.

Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector: industry self-regulation in a global economy, Carnegie Endowment.

Hays, S. P. (1999). Conservation and the gospel of efficiency: The progressive conservation movement, 1890-1920, Univ of Pittsburgh Pr.

Henderson, D. (2001). 'The case against'corporate social responsibility'.' POLICY-ST LEONARDS- 17(2): 28-32.

Huang, C. (2009). 'The Study on the Disputes of Developing Central Taiwan Science Park at Howli: from the Policy Network Perspective.'

Jasanoff, S. (1990). 'American exceptionalism and the political acknowledgment of risk.' Daedalus 119(4): 61-81.

Jasanoff, S. (1994). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers, Harvard Univ Pr.

Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict, Cambridge Univ Pr.

Lélé, S. and R. B. Norgaard (1996). 'Sustainability and the scientist’s burden.' Conservation Biology 10(2): 354-365.

Lash, S., B. Szerszynski, et al. (1996). Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology, Sage Publications Ltd.

Lerbinger, O. (1997). The crisis manager: Facing risk and responsibility, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Luke, T. W. (1997). Ecocritique: Contesting the politics of nature, economy, and culture, Univ Of Minnesota Press.

Mitroff, I. I. and T. C. Pauchant (1990). We're so big and powerful nothing bad can happen to us: An investigation of America's crisis prone corporations, Carol Pub. Group.

Mol, A. P. J., V. Lauber, et al. (2000). The voluntary approach to environmental policy: Joint environmental policy-making in Europe, Oxford University Press, USA.

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies, Princeton Univ Pr.

Schmandt, J. (1984). 'Regulation and science.' Science, Technology, & Human Values 9(1): 23-38.

Thomas, K. (1991). Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England 1500-1800, ePenguin.

Torgerson, D. (1999). The promise of green politics: Environmentalism and the public sphere, Duke University Press Books.

Wondolleck, J. M. (1988). Public lands conflict and resolution: Managing national forest disputes, Plenum Press.

Wood, D. J. (1991). 'Corporate social performance revisited.' Academy of management review: 691-718.

Zaccaï, E. (2008). 'Assessing the role of consumers in sustainable product policies.' Environment, Development and Sustainability 10(1): 51-67
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15953-
dc.description.abstract本文釐清,環境政治中,「論述聯盟」作為一種新的途徑,其政治的重要性已逐漸顯現與增加。依據這個概念,環境管理結合社會理論與細部的現實經驗分析,並且透過新竹工業廢水爭議的研究,說明了生態現代化的社會與政治動態。反思未來環境政治的制度性挑戰作為本文結論。本文不但是環境政治的反思,也著重在政策過程研究中,論述分析的應用。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe thesis identifies the emergence and increasing political importance of ‘Discourse‐Coalitions’ as a new way in environmental politics. In this concept, environmental management combined social theory with detailed empirical analysis, illustrating the social and political dynamics of ecological modernization through a study of the industrial waste water controversies in Hsin Chu. The thesis concludes with a reflection on the institutional challenge of environmental politics in the years to come. The thesis is not only seen as a reflection on environmental politics, but is also focused for its application of discourse analysis to the study of the policy process.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:56:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R96341050-1.pdf: 1441993 bytes, checksum: 39de70a37707aa4e0fb1e183c9ca5eac (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 10
第一節 問題陳述 11
第二節 研究目的 15
第三節 研究架構與方法 16
第二章 文獻分析 20
第一節 新環境衝突與規範 20
一、自然在環境論述的現狀 21
二、規範環境衝突 24
三、論述聯盟對政策的研究 27
第二節 生態現代化 29
一、生態現代化的思想 29
二、風險社會與企業社會責任(CSR) 34
第三節、制度起源與制度演化:過去研究的啟示 39
第三章 論述分析 - 55 -
第一節 政策論述 - 55 -
一、永續發展與政策手段(policy instrument) - 55 -
二、論述聯盟與故事情境 - 59 -
第二節 現實情形的演變 - 61 -
一、科技進步主義的迷思 - 61 -
二、企業永續的困境 - 61 -
第四章 研究分析─政府與企業的論述聯盟 - 64 -
第一節 科學主義與環境指標的問題 - 65 -
一、永續會主導下的環境指標意義 - 70 -
二、永續性指標:選擇與使用的爭議 - 72 -
三、在指標選擇與使用時,科學與政策的角色是甚麼? - 73 -
四、永續性指標的發展-科學亦或是政治的協商 - 78 -
五、科技主義對環境政策的影響 - 84 -
第二節、主導環境政策聯盟之間的關聯性 - 88 -
一、科學主義在政府技術官僚下的發展 - 88 -
二、科技官僚在環境概念上的規訓力量 - 89 -
三、政府責成企業社會責任建立經濟競爭力與地方認同 - 90
四、CSR務實與工具性的觀點 - 93 -
五、台灣企業社會責任協會建立影響力 - 95 -
六、資訊社會的科技官僚意識形態 - 100 -
七、標竿企業建構的現實世界 - 102 -
第五章 反對政府與企業的環境論述聯盟 - 108 -
第一節 傳統實證主義的故事情節 - 110 -
一、環境問題的爭議性 - 110 -
二、環境管制的不足與危機 - 114 -
第二節 生態現代化故事情節 - 117 -
一、水質調查的潛政治性 - 121 -
二、環評審議會的影響 - 126 -
三、反對勢力的抗爭與質疑 - 135 -
第六章 研究發現與結論 - 145 -
第一節 研究發現 - 145 -
一、論述聯盟與故事情節分析的解釋: - 145 -
二、社會結構性的忽視 (Ignorance) - 147 -
第二節 研究結論 - 148 -
一、環境結構的科技官僚風險 - 149 -
二、論述聯盟的影響與環境民主危機 - 151 -
三、我國環境論述的缺失 - 153 -
(一)、反身性生態現代化的不足與缺失 - 154 -
(二)、企業遵循的CSR - 155 -
(三)、環境決策的風險社會 - 156 -
參考文獻 - 158 -
一、中文部分 - 158 -
二、外文部分 - 158 -
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject工業廢水。zh_TW
dc.subject論述分析zh_TW
dc.subject論述聯盟zh_TW
dc.subject環境政治zh_TW
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen
dc.subjectindustrial waste water.en
dc.subjectenvironmental politicsen
dc.subjectCoalitionsen
dc.subjectDiscourse&#8208en
dc.title企業社會責任與生態現代化:論述聯盟觀點zh_TW
dc.titleCorporate Social Responsibility & ecological modernization:discourse coalitionsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee杜文苓,許甘霖
dc.subject.keyword論述分析,論述聯盟,環境政治,工業廢水。,zh_TW
dc.subject.keyworddiscourse analysis,Discourse&#8208,Coalitions,environmental politics,industrial waste water.,en
dc.relation.page165
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2012-08-15
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國家發展研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:國家發展研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.41 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved