Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15630
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蕭崑杉
dc.contributor.authorZhe-Qiang Liaoen
dc.contributor.author廖哲強zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T17:49:05Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-02-16
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-02-05
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
【外文文獻】
Agnew, J. 1987 Place and Politics. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
Bessiere, J. 1998 “Local development and heritage:
traditional food and cuisine as tourist attraction in
rural areas.” Sociologia Ruralis 38(1):21-34.
Burch, M. and Gomez, R. 2002 “The English regions and the
European Union.” Regional Studies 36: 767-778.
Bowler, I. R. 1992 The geography of agriculture in
developed market economies, London: Longman.
Brain, C. and Deaton, B. and Busch, L. 2005 “Reshaping the
agro-food system: the role of standards, standard-
makers and third-party certifiers.” In: Higgins, V.
and Lawrence, G. Agriculture Goveranc: Globalization
and the new politics of Regulation 71-81. Routledge:
Abingdon.
Blaikie, P. M. 1985 The political economy of soil erosion
in Development Countries. London: Longman.
Baker, O. E. 1926 “Agricultural regions of North
America.” Economic Geography 2:459-494.
Cloke, P. and Little, J. 1997 Contested Countryside
Culture: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality.
London: Routledge.
Cloke, P. J. and Le Heron, R. B. and Roche, M. M. 1990
“Towards a geography of political economy perspective
on rural change.” Geografiska Annaler 72(B):13-27.
Cox, K. R. 1998 “Spaces of dependence, spaces of
engagement and the politics of scale, or : Looking
for local politics.” Political Geography 17(1): 1-23.
Coppock, J. T. 1964 “Post-war studies in the geography of
British agriculture.” Geographyical Review 54:409-
426.
Chiotti, Q. P. and Johnston, T. and Smit, B. and Ebel, B.
1997 “Agricultural response to climate change: a
preliminary investigation of farm-level adaptation in
southern Alberta.” In: Ilbery, B. W. and Chiotti, Q.
and Rickard, T. Agricultural restructuring and
sustainability: a geographical perspective 201-218.
Wallingford: CAB International.
Dupuis E. M. and Gillon, S. 2009 “Alternative modes of
governance:organic as civic Engagement.” Agric Hum
Values 26:43-56.
DuPuis, M. and Goodman, D. 2005 “Should we go home to eat?
Toward a reflective
politics of localism.” Journal of Rural Studies 21: 359-371.
Dupuis E. M. and Gillon, S. 2009 “Alternative modes of governance:organic as civic
Engagement.” Agric Hum Values 26:43-56.
Henshall, J. D. 1967 “Models of agricultural activity.” In: Chorley R. J. and Haggett,
P. Models in geography 425-458. London: Metheun.
Errington, A. 1985 “Sampling frames for farm surveys in the United Kingdom: some
alternatives.” Journal of Agriculture Economics 36:251-258。
Feagan R. 2007 “The place of food: mapping out the local in local system.” Progress
in Human Geography 31(1): 23-42.
Friedmann, H. 1993. “The political economy of food: A global crisis.” New Left
Review 197:29-57。
Fonte, M. 2008 “Knowledge, Food and Place.A way of Producing, a Way of
Knowing.” Sociologia Ruralis 48: 200-222.
Friedmann, H. and McMichael, P. 1989 “Agriculture and state system: the rise and
fall of national agricultures, 1870 to the present.” Sociologia Ruralis 29: 93-117.
Goodman, D. 2004 “Rural Europe redux? Reflections on alternative agro-food
networks and paradigm change.” Sociologia Ruralis 44:3-16.
Goodman, D. and Sorj, B. and Wilkinson, J. 1987. From farming to biotechnology: A
theory of agro-industry development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Goodman , D. 2003 “The quality turn and alternative food practices: reflections and
agenda.” Journal of Rural Studies 19(1):1–7.
Giovannucci, D. and Ponte, S. 2005 “Standards as a new form of social contract?
Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry.” Food Policy 30:284-301.
Granovetter, M. 1985 “Economic action and social structure: the problem of
embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481-510.
Hart, J. F. 1978 “Cropland concentrations in the South.” Annals of the Association of
American Geographers 68:505-517.
Holloway, L. and Kneafsey, M. 2004. Geographies of rural cultures and societies.
London: Ashgate.
Higgins, V. and Dibden, J. and Cocklin, C. 2008 “Building alternative agri-food
networks: Certification, embeddedness and agri-environmental governance.”
Journal of Rural Studies 24:15-27.
Humphrey, J. and Schmitz, H. 2000 Governance in global value chains. Bridhton:
Sussex University.
Herod, A. 2003 “Scale:The local and the global.” In: Holloway, S. L. and Rice, S. P.
and Valentine, G. Key concepts in geography 229-247. London: Sage.
Hart, J. F. 1982 “The highest form of geographer’s art.” Annals of the Association of
American Geographers 72: 1-29.
Hinrichs, C. 2003 “The practice and politics of food system localization.” Journal of
Rural Studies 19:33-45.
Hagerstrand, T. 1967 Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Ilbery, B. and Morris, C. and Buller, H. and Maye, D. and Kneafsey, M. 2005
“ Product, process and place: an examination of marketing and labeling schemes
in Europe and North America.” European Urban and Region Studies
12(2):116-132.
Jackson, P. and Ward, N. and Russell, P. 2006 “Mobilising the commodity chain
concept in the politics of food and farming.” Journal of Rural Studies 22:
129-141.
Jarosz, L. 2008 “The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in
Metropolitan areas.” Journal of Rural Studies 24:231-244.
Johnston, R. J. 1997 Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography
since 1945. London: Edward Arnold.
Knox, P. and Steven, P. 2000 Urban social geography. London: Person Educaction.
Kulke, E. 2008 “Agrarian Clusters and Chains in Rural Areas of Germany and
Poland.” In: Stringer, C. and Le Heron, R. Agri-Food commodity chains and
globalizing networks 137-146. London: Ashgate.
Kitchin, R. and Tate, N. J. 2000 Conducting research into human geography. London:
Person Educaction.
Latour, B. 1996 “On actor-network theory: a few clarifications.” Soziale Welt 47:
369-381.
Lissa Goldstein, S. F. 2011 “Alternative food in the global south: Reflections on a
direct marketing Initiative in Kenya.” Journal of Rural Studies 27: 24-34.
Le Heron, R. B. and Roche, M. M. 1995 “A fresh place in food’s space.” Area
27:23-33.
Lewis, N. 2008 “Constructing Economic Objects of Governance: The New Zealand
Wine Industry.” in C. Stringer and R. L. Heron, Agri-Food Commodity Chains
and Globalising Networks 103-120. Cornwall: Ashgate.
Lazzarini, S. G. and Chaddad, F. R. and Cook, M. L. 2001 “Integrating supply chain
and network analyses: the study of netchains.” Journal on Chain and Network
Science 1(1): 7-22.
Morris, C. 2004 “Lost words, Lost Worlds? Cultural geographies of agriculture.” In:
Holloway, L. and Kneafsey, M. Geographies of rural cultures and societies.
London: Ashgate.
Maye, D. and Holloway, L. and Kneafsey, M. 2007 Alternative Food Geographies.
London: Elsevier.
Milestad, R. and Bartel-Kratochvil, R. and Leitner, H. and Axmann, R. 2010 “Being
close: The quality of social relationships in a local organic cereal and bread network in Lower Austria.” Journal of Rural studies 26:228-240.
McCarthy, J. 2006 “Rural geography: Alternative rural economics—the search for
alterity in forests, fishers , food, and fair trade.” Progress in Human Geography 30(6):803-811.
Morgan, K.. and Morley, A. 2002 Relocalising The Food Chain: The Role of
Creative Pubic Procurement. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
Maye, D. and Ilbery, B. 2007 “Regionalisation, local food and supply chain
governance: A case study from Northumberland, England.” in D. Maye et al.(ed.), Alternative food geographies 149-168. Oxford:Elsevier.
Masden, T. and Banks, J. and Bristow, G. 2000 “Food supply chain approaches: explor
their role in rural development.” Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 427-438.
Masden, T. 1998 “New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural space.”
Journal of Rural Studies 14:107-117.
Mansvelt, J. 2005 Geographies of Consumption. London: Sage.
Murdoch, J. 2000 “Networks – a new paradigm of rural development?” Journal of
Rural Studies 16:407-419.
Morgan, K. and Marsden, T. and Murdoch, J. 2006 Worlds of food place, power and
provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mutersbaugh, T. and Klooster, D. and Renard, M. and Taylor, P. 2005
“Editorial—certifying rural spaces: quality-certified products and rural
governance.” Journal of Rural Studies, 21:381-388.
Martin, G. J. 2005 All possible worlds: A history of Geographical Ideals. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Mannion, A. M. and Bowlby, S. 1992 Environmental issues in the 1990s. Chichester:
John Wiley and Sons.
Nicholls, A. and Charlotte, O. 2005. Fair Trade: Market-Drive Ethical Consumption.
London: SAGE.
Peet, R. J. and Lyons, J. V. 1981 “Marxism: Dialectical materialism, social formations
and geographic relations.” In: Harvey, M. E. and Holly, B. P. Themes in
Geographic Thought 187-206. London: Croom Helm.
Pollan, M. 2006 The Omnivore’s Dilemma. New York: Penguin Press.
Peck, J. 2004 “Geography and public policy: constructions of Human Geography.”
Progress in Humam Geography 28: 392-405.
Page, B. 2003 “Agriculture.: In: Sheppard, E. and Barnes,T. J. A companion to
economic Geography 242-256. Oxford: Blackwell.
Parrott, N. and Wilson, N. and Murdoch, J. 2002 “Spatialising Quality: Regional
Proction and the Alternative Geography of Food.” European Journal of Urban
and Regional Studies 9: 241-261.
Qazi, J. A. and Selfa, T. L. 2005 “The politics of budling alternative agro-food
networks in the belly of agro-industry.” Food, Culture and Society: An
international Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 8(1): 45-72.
Robinson, G. M. 2004 Geographies of Agriculture: Globalisation, restructuring and
sustainability. London: Pearson Education.
Renting, H. and Marsden, T. K. and Banks, J. 2003 “Understanding alternative food
networks:exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development.”
Environment and Planning A 35:393-411.
Robinson, G. M. 2004 Geographies of Agriculture: Globalisation, restructuring and
sustainability. London:Pearson Education.
Stassart, P. and Whatmore, S. 2003 “Metabolising Risk: Food scares and the
un/re-making of Belgian Beef.” Environment and Planning A 35: 449-461.
Sage, C. 2003 “Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative good food
networks in southwest Ireland.” Journal of Rural Studies 19:47-60.
Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R. 2004 Scale and Geographic Inquire: Nature, Society
and Method. Oxford:Blackwell.
Stringer, C. and Le Herod, R. 2008 Agri-Food commodity chains and Globalising
Networks. Cornwall:Ashgate.
Sonnino, R. 2007 “Embeddedness in action : Safforn and the making of the local in
southern Tuscany” Agriculture and Human Values 24:61-74.
Sim, R. 2010 “Putting place on the menu: The negotiation of locality in UK food
tourism, from production to consumption.” Journal of Rural Studies 26:105-115.
Thomas, S. J. and Huggett, R. J. 1980 Modelling in geography: a mathematical
approach. London: Harper & Row.
Watts, M. and Goodman, D. 2005 “Making reconnections in Agro-food Geography:
Alternative System of Provision.” Progress in Human Geography 29(1):22-40.
Walkley, C. 2007 “Governing the speciality food sector: Integrating supply chains,
sectors and scales in West Wales.” in D. Maye et al.(ed.) Alternative food geographies 169-184. Oxford:Elsevier.
Watts, M. 1999 “Commodities.” In: Cloke, P. and Crang, P. and Goodwin, M.
Introducing Human Geographies 205-315. London: Arnold.
Wallerstein, I. 2000 The Essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press.
Wolpert, J. 1964 “The decision process in the spatial context.” Annals of the
Association of American Geographers 54:537-558.
Woods, M. 2005 Rural Geography. London: Sage.
Watanabe S. J. 2009 “The Taiwanese Community Building as Compared with the
Japanese: Professionalism vs. Amateurism.” 2010臺大彭立沛老師社區營造課
堂講義。
Whatmore, S. 2002 Hybrid Geographies. Natures Cultures Spaces. London: Sage.
Yeung, H. 2005 “Rethinking relation economy geography.” Transaction of the
Institute of British Geographers 30:37-51.
【中文文獻】
仇德哉,1979,《雲林縣誌》。雲林:雲林縣文獻委員會。
白美女,2006,《古坑咖啡傳奇—地方品牌化之分析》。國立臺灣師範大學地理研
究所碩士論文。
王秋原、趙建雄、何致中,1997,〈區域地理研究的探討〉。《地理學報》 23:83-102。
王興中、劉永剛,2007,〈人文地理學研究方法論的進展與文化轉向以來的流派〉。
《人文地理》 22(3):1-11。
李宛凌,2008,《臺灣咖啡產業的歷史考察》。國立臺北教育大學社會科教育研究
所碩士論文。
沈孟穎,2005,《咖啡時代 : 台灣咖啡館百年風騷》。台北:遠足文化。
李澤治,1994,《吃在臺灣》。台北:聯經。
李小建、苗長虹,2004,〈西方經濟地理學新進展及其啟示〉。《地理學報》59:
153-161。
李松源,2008,《台灣咖啡種植》。屏東:李松源。
范婷,2000,〈從波麗路到星巴克--臺灣咖啡文化的歷史分析〉。《傳播文化》 8:
41-77。
林瑩、毛永年,2002,《愛上咖啡》。台北:商智文化。
林楷雄,2007,《我國推動咖啡產銷履歷之策略探討》。東海大學食品科學所碩士
論文。
林威逸,2005,《雲林縣古坑鄉觀光產業發展與空間生產》。世新大學觀光學系碩
士論文。
周麗蘭,2003,《古坑—偶然相遇》。雲林:雲林縣政府。
金相郁,2004,〈二十世紀區位理論的五個發展階段及其評論〉。《經濟地理》
24(3):94-98。
林文賜、羅健霖、廖紹安,2008,〈土石災害集水區之環境敏感區位分析—以雲
林古坑華山地區為例〉。《水保技術》 3(2):95-104。
邵佩君,2003,〈台灣集集震災後社區營造式重建機制之探討—以軍功里和劉家
伙房之重建為例〉。《都市與計劃》 371-389。
林彥辰,2004,《雲林縣古坑華山社區發展與地方感之研究》。彰化師範大學地理
研究所碩士論文。
胡清霖,2007,《咖啡種植成本系統架構分析與設計》。國立屏東科技大學工業管
理所碩士論文。
胡文青,2005,《台灣的咖啡》。台北:遠足。
姚家恩、梁炳琨,2010,〈在地食物的鑲嵌—以與大有機農夫市集為例〉。《中國
地理學年會論文集》 台北:台灣師範大學。
洪迺鈞,2005,《咖啡樹變搖錢樹─以古坑咖啡產業觀光化形成為例》。南華大學
環境藝術研究所碩士論文。
施添福,1979,〈論當代地理學主流的形成及其方法論和本質觀〉。《思與言》
18(6):569-586。
洪富峰,2009,〈台灣咖啡產業的脫鏈現象〉。《第一屆發展研究年會論文集》台
北:政治大學。
柯依伶,2008,《咖啡.華山.夢:想像堆疊的生活風格》。雲林科技大學文化資
產維護研究所碩士論文。
高崇倫,2008,〈雲林縣古坑鄉咖啡節慶活動對地方觀光產業影響之研究〉。《華
崗地理學報》 22:44-64。
黃紫翎,2010,〈全球化下在地食物網絡的連結歷程〉。《中國地理學年會論論文
集》,台北:台灣師範大學。
柴彥威、顏亞寧、岡本耕平,2008,〈西方行為地理學的研究歷程及其最新進展〉。
《人文地理》6:1-6。
黃躍雯,2008,〈雲林古坑華山地區以咖啡帶動地方觀光發展的轉型經驗〉。《生
物與休閒事業研究》 6 (1):41-62。
黃光國,2001,《社會科學的理路》。台北:心理。
黃麗玲,1994,《新國家建構過程中社區角色的轉變:「生命共同體」之論述分析》。
國立臺灣大學城鄉與建築研究所碩士論文。
黃昭謹、林鍚銓,2011,〈農會農特產品展售中心之創新調適〉。《農業推廣文彙》
56:152-163。
梁炳琨,2008,〈農業食物在地化—台東縣池上鄉米食產業的探討〉。《地理學報》
53: 85-117。
梁炳琨,2010,〈從文化經濟取向探討嘉義縣逹邦社區的旅遊發展〉。《中國地理
學會會刊》 45:19-40。
梁炳琨,2007,〈鄉村地理學:後生產主義轉型、在地農業食物與自然—社會關
係觀點的探討〉。《中國地理學會會刊》 39:1-20。
陳柔縉,2005,《台灣西方文明初體驗》。台北:麥田。
陳惠貞、林柏霖,2009,〈農民市場之探討〉。《農業推廣文彙》54:275-288。
許銘文,2009,《全球化下地方文化產業營造之研究-古坑咖啡產業個案分析》。
國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
雲林縣政府,2007,《2007年台灣咖啡節成果結案冊》。雲林:雲林縣政府。
楊文仁,2010,〈台灣農夫市集的建立、運作與社會鑲嵌:與大有機農夫市集的
個案研究〉。《生物產業學術研討會論文集》 嘉義:嘉義大學。
溫佳芸,2010,〈台灣公平貿易咖啡發展與網絡〉。《中國地理學年會論文集》,台
北:台灣師範大學。
廖哲強、蕭崑杉,2010,〈西方另類食物網絡文獻回顧及其地方意涵〉。《臺灣鄉
村研究》 10:127-150。
廖淑玲,2011,《地方節慶、產業特色、行銷模式對經營績效影響之研究 ─以雲
林縣古坑鄉咖啡業者為例》。國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。
廖宏彬,2002,《起飛的鳳凰—古坑鄉》。雲林:雲林縣政府。
蔡宜恬,2008,《古坑咖啡文化創意產業之魅力因子》。雲林科技大學工業設計所
碩士論文。
蕭開清,2007,〈漫談臺灣咖啡產銷〉。《農業世界》 286:66-70。
賴守誠,2011,〈農村特色食品之形成與發展:以深坑綠竹筍為例〉。《農業推廣
文彙》 55:85-96。
賴守誠,2010,〈地方食品特產與鄉村發展:以美濃粄條與新埔柿餅興起的個案
為例〉。《臺灣鄉村研究》 10:87-125。
戴振豐,2003,〈文化生產與文化消費--日治時期臺灣的咖啡〉。《臺灣歷史學會
會訊》 17:23-43。
魏源金、莊萬進,2007,〈古坑台灣咖啡節節慶滿意度之研究〉。《第四屆地方鄉
鎮觀光產業發展與前瞻學術研討會論文集》178-179。
顏建賢,2001,〈臺灣農會組織研究與發展願景〉。《農民組織學刊》3:117-134。
羅建怡,2006,《古坑華山地方產業轉型觀光發展的問題與策略》。世新大學觀光
學系碩士論文。
Harvey D. 1990 The condition of postmodernity,周寬、許鈞編,2004,《後現代的
狀況》。北京:商務印書館。
Patel R. 2007 Stuffed and Straved,葉家興、謝伯讓、高蕙含、謝佩妏譯,2009,《糧
食戰爭》。台北:高寶。
Peet, R. 2003 Modern geographical thought,王志弘、張華蓀、宋郁玲、陳毅峰譯,
《現代地理思想》台北:群學。
Sindey, W. M. 2006,〈食物、歷史與全球化〉。《中國飲食文化》 2(1):23-38。
Cresswell, T. 2004 Place. 徐苔玲、王志弘譯,《地方》。台北:群學。
【網路資料】
古坑鄉戶政事務所,2013,http://gukeng.household.yunlin.gov.tw/index.asp,查詢
日期2013年1月18日。
古坑鄉公所,2013,http://www.gukeng.gov.tw/index2.asp,查詢日期2013年1月
18日。
雲林縣政府,2011,http://www.yunlin.gov.tw/newskm/index,查詢日期2011年11
月25日。
聯合新聞資料庫,2012,http://udndata.com/,查詢日期2012年10月12日。
農糧署農情報告資源網,2011,http://agr.afa.gov.tw/afa/afa_frame.jsp。查詢日期
2011年4月25日。
雀巢集團,2011,http://www.nestle.com.tw/,查詢日期2011年4月25日。
丹堤咖啡,2011,http://www.dante.com.tw/,查詢日期2011年4月25日。
雲林縣政府農業處,2012,http://www4.yunlin.gov.tw/agriculture/,查詢日期2012
年11月3日。
統一星巴克,2011,http://www.starbucks.com.tw/home/index.jspx,查詢日期2011
4月25日。
古坑鄉農會,2012,http://www.gkcafe.org.tw/,查詢日期2012年7月20日。
雲林縣果菜生產合作社,2012,http://www.kuper.com.tw/product.php,查詢日期
2012年7月20日。
華山社區發展協會理事長吳登立先生網誌,2009,http://huashan-wu.blogspot.tw/,
查詢日期2009年11月5日。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15630-
dc.description.abstract另類農食近年浮現於西方消費社會與學界的討論範疇中,本研究以此為題探究古坑咖啡的形塑歷程。研究目的為:(一)以古坑咖啡的發展脈絡檢視臺灣另類農食的形塑歷程,由於此概念是根著於西方社會所洐生的經驗現象,並不能完全套用解釋於臺灣個案中,因此,本研究透過歷史的視野,清楚分析咖啡在主流與另類間的變動性與辦證性。(二)勾勒古坑咖啡運作的網絡關係以及「品質」、「地方」的概念,最後則建構另類農食整合要素關係。
透過檢視農業地理研究進展,本研究方法論採政治經濟學與文化轉向面向,以前者言,由歷史脈絡重新檢視各階段國家政策對古坑咖啡產業影響(日治、光復、921震後);以後者言,落實到在地網絡關係能量如何注入產業運作中,如此,兼具鉅觀與微觀的視野。因此,本研究資料收集方法初期採文獻收集,勾勒對研究場域的初步輪廓後,透過訪談法和觀察法作為主要資料收集方式,選取相關行動者作為訪談/觀察對象並逐步聚焦問題核心。此外,在資料收集與論文書寫的過程中,應避免激化不同群體的對立,以及因過度披露真相造成地方利益的損害。
本研究發現為:(一)臺灣另類農食形塑有別於歐美社會出自於環境倫理、社會正義及鄉村經濟再發展的背景,以古坑咖啡個案為例,它是一種以地方為基礎的小資本主義,且是在政治、文化、經濟發展標的下的產物。(二)本研究將古坑咖啡生產分為栽種、烘焙收購、販賣三部分,每階段都有相應的網絡關係。咖啡栽種主要行動者為農民,其生產知識網絡體系來自環境演育、歷史背景與各行動者的互動中形成;烘焙收購主要行動者為咖啡廳、農會與合作社等中小型資本者,咖啡廳收購網絡型態異於農會與合作社,計有至咖啡生豆評鑑會場選購、代客烘焙期間購買、與農民對分、農民推銷四種,古坑憑藉地理聲望成為臺灣本土咖啡的集散地,使得咖啡廳業者不一定收購古坑自產咖啡豆,原料收購區擴及鄰近鄉鎮。基於品質穩定,傾向與特定農民建立長期非契約式的合作關係,並由此交流所屬領域知識。農會與合作社則是另種類型,其商品主力為即溶系列咖啡,原料來源以進口咖啡粉為主、收購古坑在地咖啡豆為輔,不似咖啡廳業者以品質穩定為優先考量,收購本土咖啡豆目的在於取得販賣古坑咖啡的正當性;販賣方面,農會與合作社藉由通路行銷至外地,透過商品包裝論述、地方品牌經營代表性、農產認證標章等方式取得消費者信賴。咖啡廳則透過咖啡園實景、闡釋臺灣咖啡風味特性、沖泡技術展演等方式向遊客推銷。個體農民則偏向論述咖啡「在地」好滋味吸引遊客購買。此外,本研究也檢視古坑咖啡的空間關係網絡運作,它是各種層級空間力量交互作用所建構,包含全國廣告意象形塑、地方行動者力量、縣政府透過節慶辦理得以連結在地與外界。(三)地方長期以來是人文地理所關注的焦點,不同的典範傳統對地方亦有不同的解釋與觀點,研究發現古坑咖啡的地方性是由各地交互作用下所共構而出,強調是連結性與變動性。更進一步,另類農食涉及一系列的壟斷地租的空間戰爭,雲林縣政府透過臺灣咖啡節舉辦自此壟斷臺灣咖啡的代表權,使得古坑咖啡等同於臺灣咖啡,至於古坑境內各地亦透過不同方式爭取代表權。此外,若將地方視為工具,則對每類行動者產生不同的意義,地方政府將古坑視為是臺灣咖啡的原鄉、咖啡廳業者則強調為本土咖啡的集散地且具有高度的專業知識、咖啡小農則論述為道地的滋味、農會則表示為咖啡的加工地,調配出適合國人口感的臺灣咖啡。(四)在另類農食中,品質是社會文化所建構的產品,而非科學專家知識衍化的指標,經由媒體報章的內容分析,宣揚古坑咖啡品質可分為四個向度:歷史文化、技術、品種、風土條件,我們也藉此發現媒體作為品質文化建構中介者的重要角色。若更細緻分析,不同行動者有其相應的品質建構策略,咖啡廳業者透過高價位訂定、與特定農民長期合作、烹煮技術展演等方式。農會與合作社則仰賴地方品牌代表性、農產認證、商品包裝意象取得信賴,建立與消費者間連結。最後,研究發現每年咖啡評鑑則成為專家知識與地方知識競逐品質論述主導的話語權。(五)本研究建構另類農食運作模式,須從地方、網絡、品質三方面進行。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAs alternative food becomes a subject of discussion in both consumerist societies and academic communities in the west, this study also delves into how Cukeng coffee is turned into a kind of alternative food in Taiwan. Goals of this research are as follows: (1) Examine the formation of alternative food in Taiwan through Cukeng coffee. Because the term 'alternative food' derives from the west and
therefore cannot be fully applied to the society of Taiwan, a historical perspective is taken to discuss the characteristics of related field experiences here. (2) Identify the workings of the coffee networks in Cukeng and the concepts of 'quality' and 'place,' and map out an alternative food supply system in the end.
Having looked into the course of development of agricultural geography, it was decided that political economy and cultural turn would be the main focuses of this research. First, in a historical context, the influence of national policies in various stages on Cukeng's coffee sector was re-examined. As for cultural turn, the exertion of local networks on local industries was reviewed. In this way, both macroscopic and microscopic observations were made. Literature was collected in the beginning for a preliminary picture of the researched field. Information was gathered mainly through interviews and observations, and related actors were chosen as interviewees / the observed subjects. Gradually the core of this research came into being. In the course of information-collecting and paper-writing, confrontations among different groups were avoided; so was excessive exposure of what’s inside the industry, which may result in conflicts of interest.
Research results show that (1) As opposed to alternative food in European and North American societies that comes from environmental ethics, social justice and the re-development of rural economy, the alternative food in Taiwan is about local-based mini-capitalism and a product of political, cultural and economic development. (2) In this study, coffee production in Cukeng comes in three stages: planting coffee trees, baking and buying coffee beans, and finally selling coffee. For each production stage, there is a network supporting it. The main actors in the first stage are farmers, whose knowledge is based on environmental evolutions and historical backgrounds at play. The main actors who bake and buy coffee beans are owners of small and medium-sized businesses or groups, such as coffee shops, agricultural associations and co-operatives. Coffee shop owners have very different ways of purchasing coffee beans than their agricultural association and co-operative counterparts. The purchases may be made at green coffee bean review events, when they bake beans for their clients, from farmers who work with them (the harvests may be equally shared by both sides), or when farmers recommend beans to them. In addition, because Cukeng now serves as a main coffee hub in Taiwan for its geographical reputation, coffee shop owners are also willing to purchase green coffee beans from nearby townships. They are inclined to establish long-term collaboration ties with chosen farmers without contracts and exchange industry knowledge during the course. Agricultural associations and co-operatives are a different story. Instant coffee is their much highlighted product, which is mostly based on imported coffee powder than local coffee beans. Unlike coffee shop owners who take quality as priority, agricultural associations and co-operatives only purchase local beans to justify the products as coffee from Cukeng. As for sale, agricultural associations and co-operatives sell their coffee to other parts of the country with help from distributors. Through packaging, branding and acquiring qualifications, they are able to win trust from customers. Coffee shop owners promote their products by allowing access to their coffee farms, explaining why Taiwanese coffee is special and what their qualities are, or displaying their coffee-making skills. Individual farmers emphasize the good “local” taste of their coffee beans to attract interested visitors/clients. This study also delves into the dynamic workings of space in Cukeng’s coffee sector, which has to do with the branding and imaging of Cukeng coffee around the country, local actors exerting their own power and the county government that connects Cukeng and the outside world through coffee festivals. (3) “Place” has always been a much discussed subject in humanistic geography. Not only that different explanations and perspectives are given by different schools, the results of this study also show that the placeness of Cukeng coffee has been jointly constructed by various places and is therefore much about connection and change. Alternative food is also related to a series of battles on monopoly rent. Since it organized the Taiwan International Coffee Festival years ago, the Yunlin County Government has professed Cukeng as the coffee of Taiwan. Coffee businesses within Cukeng have also competed against one another to be the most authentic one since then. When place is taken as a means to establish oneself, it means differently to different types of actors. For the local government, Cukeng is the production origin of Taiwanese coffee. Coffee shop owners see it as a local coffee hub where highly professional knowledge can be exchanged. Small coffee growers see Cukeng as guarantee of authentic flavor. Agricultural associations see it as a manufacturing town where hybrid coffee catering to Taiwanese people’s taste may be made. (4) When it comes to alternative food, “quality” is perceived socially and culturally, rather than scientifically. According to media coverage, the quality of Cukeng coffee is decided by its background history and culture, the technology used to produce it, its variety, and the terroir of its production origin. This also shows that media plays a critical mediatory role in constructing the culture of quality. On a closer look, all of the actors have their own ways to emphasize quality. Coffee shop owners sell coffee at a high price, work with selected farms and hold activities to show off their coffee-making skills. Agricultural associations and co-operatives establish their own brands, qualifications and product design to win trust, favor and bonding from customers. It has also been found that coffee bean review events are where experts and local business owners contend for the right to decide what counts as quality. (5) Finally, to set up an alternative food supply system, place, network and quality must be taken into account.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:49:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-D97630003-1.pdf: 2703550 bytes, checksum: 5f3ee956996e207fd6122d346da1c64f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontents論文口試委員審定書 ii
謝誌 iii
中文摘要 v
英文摘要 viii
目錄 xii
圖目錄 xiv
表目錄 xvi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究對象/區域選定 8
第三節 研究範圍 10
第四節 研究流程 12
第二章 另類農食形塑的相關概念與經驗研究 13
第一節 另類農食網絡形塑背景脈絡 13
第二節 國內另類農食與古坑咖啡相關研究 37
第三章 方法論 40
第一節 農業地理研究典範轉移 40
第二節 研究方法 45
第四章 臺灣咖啡產業再現 56
第一節 臺灣咖啡生產栽培史 56
第二節 臺灣咖啡消費文化演進 63
第三節 古坑咖啡產業的原鄉再現 67
第五章 古坑咖啡的另類農食建構 77
第一節 古坑咖啡產業相關行動者特性分析 77
第二節 古坑咖啡農食網絡分析 96
第三節 古坑咖啡的品質建構 116
第四節 古坑咖啡原鄉的地方建構 127
第六章 討論 131
第一節 臺灣另類農食建構的發展與機會 131
第二節 古坑咖啡的運作--網絡的觀點議題 134
第三節 古坑咖啡的品質建構轉向議題 138
第四節 古坑咖啡的地方建構議題 140
第五節 另類農食要素整合關係之討論 144
第七章 結論 146
參考文獻 152
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject古坑咖啡zh_TW
dc.subject另類農食zh_TW
dc.subject網絡zh_TW
dc.subject地方zh_TW
dc.subject品質zh_TW
dc.title另類農食形塑歷程—古坑咖啡之個案zh_TW
dc.titleThe Construction of Alternative Food--A Case Study of Cukeng Coffeeen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張長義,郭大玄,蔡建福,蔡必焜
dc.subject.keyword另類農食,網絡,地方,品質,古坑咖啡,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordalternative food,network,place,quality,Cukeng coffee,en
dc.relation.page164
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2013-02-05
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.64 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved