Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15269
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳政衛(Cheng-Wei Wu)
dc.contributor.authorLiang-An Maen
dc.contributor.author馬良安zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T17:29:09Z-
dc.date.copyright2020-02-18
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2020-02-12
dc.identifier.citation李俊興(2016)。公司治理對企業捐贈之實證研究。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,台南市。
翁瑞陽(2018)。企業捐贈與機構投資人持股相關性探討。國立臺北大學經濟學系碩士論文,新北市。
陳小林、魏學強(2013)。公司慈善捐贈、市場價值與業績增長。江漢學術,32(5),5-11。
葉念佳(2011)。代理問題對企業慈善捐款影響之研究。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,台南市。
Abzug, R., & Webb, N. J. (1996). Rational and extra-rational motivations for corporate giving: Complementing economic theory with organization science. NYL Sch. L. Rev., 41, 1035.
Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 641-654.
Aichian, A. A., & Kessel, R. A. (1962). Competition, monopoly, and the pursuit of pecuniary gain. In Aspects of labor economics (pp. 157-183). Princeton University Press.
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 82-100.
Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy: restraining Robin Hood?. Business & Society, 41(3), 319-344.
Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855-877.
Campbell, L., Gulas, C. S., & Gruca, T. S. (1999). Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(4), 375-383.
Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons., 34(4), 39–48.
Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 173-178.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Levy, F. K., & Shatto, G. M. (1978). The evaluation of corporate contributions. Public Choice, 33(1), 19-28.
Logsdon, J. M., Reiner, M., & Burke, L. (1990). Corporate philanthropy: Strategic responses to the firm's stakeholders. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(2), 93-109.
Manne, H. G. (1973). The limits and rationale of corporate altruism: An individualistic model. Va. L. Rev., 59, 708.
Marquis, C., & Lee, M. (2013). Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large US firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 483-497.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity?. Journal of Business, 61(1), 65.
Parket, I. R., & Eilbirt, H. (1975). The practice of business social responsibility: The underlying factors. Business Horizons, 18(4), 5-10.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–69.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595-612.
Sánchez, C. M. (2000). Motives for corporate philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and political legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 363-375.
Stroup, M. A., Neubert, R. L., & Anderson Jr, J. W. (1987). Doing good, doing better: Two views of social responsibility. Business Horizons, 30(2), 22-25.
Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 73-90.
Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (2000). Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 854-866.
Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557.
Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159-1181.
Williamson, O. E. (1963). Managerial discretion and business behavior. The American Economic Review, 53(5), 1032-1057.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15269-
dc.description.abstract近日,聯合國提出永續發展目標(SDGs),且臺灣金管會亦規定符合條件之企業應編撰企業社會責任報告書(簡稱CSR報告書),企業社會責任日益受到臺灣社會大眾關注與重視。本研究聚焦於企業捐贈的議題,欲了解影響臺灣企業進行捐贈的因素,將捐贈原由、推銷費用率和研究發展費用率以及產業是否受到政府規範編寫CSR報告書一併納入分析。
本研究以臺灣2013年至2018年之上市(櫃)公司為研究對象,利用最小平方法之廣義估計式進行實證研究。研究結果顯示捐贈原由—文化與捐贈金額呈現正相關,捐贈原由基於文化相關則捐贈金額較大;研究發展費用率與捐贈金額呈負相關,研究發展費用率愈高則捐贈金額較小。捐贈原由—藝術、推銷費用率以及規範編製CSR報告書之產業與捐贈金額之間為正相關,卻未達顯著水準。
本文之研究結論應有助於了解企業進行捐贈背後的動機,供企業領導者進行決策時作為參考。最後分別從政府以及企業面向提出建議,希望能夠促進企業捐贈乃至於永續發展。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been getting more attention from the Taiwanese publics in recent years as the United Nations proposed the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Financial Supervisory Commission R.O.C.(Taiwan) had also regulated that enterprises meeting certain conditions are required to publish corporate social responsibility reports (CSR reports). This study focuses on the issue of corporate donations, aiming to understand the factors affecting Taiwanese corporate philanthropy by analyzing the reasons for corporate donation, ratio of advertising to total sales, ratio of R&D to total sales and whether the industries are regulated by the government to publish CSR reports.
The data used in this empirical study is based on firm-level data from 2013 to 2018 in Taiwan, and the Generalized estimating equations is used to analyze the determinants. The results of this study indicated that among the donation reasons, cultural factors for the donation were positively correlated with the amount of donation, the closer the donation reason is related to cultural factor, the larger the amount of donation is. The ratio of R&D to total sales was negatively correlated with the donation amount, which means the higher the R&D to total sales is, the smaller the amount of donation would be. The art factor of the donation reason, ratio of advertising to total sales, and the industries required to publish CSR reports were all positively correlated with the amount of donations, but not at a significant level.
The conclusion of this study contributes to understanding the motivation behind corporate donations and provides business leaders reference while making decisions. Finally, this study makes suggestions regarding government and enterprises perspectives, hoping to promote corporate donations and even sustainable development.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:29:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-R06724038-1.pdf: 739855 bytes, checksum: 303698770b6819b7b05fcb2d9447f7ac (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 2
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 企業社會責任 4
第二節 企業捐贈 5
第三節 企業捐贈相關研究 7
第四節 研究假說 8
第三章 研究方法 9
第一節 樣本資料 9
第二節 研究變數 9
第三節 分析方法 15
第四章 結果與討論 16
第一節 研究結果 16
第二節 討論 26
第五章 結論與建議 30
第一節 結論 30
第二節 建議 30
第三節 研究限制 31
參考文獻 32
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject捐贈原由zh_TW
dc.subject推銷費用率zh_TW
dc.subject研究發展費用率zh_TW
dc.subject企業捐贈zh_TW
dc.subject規範編製企業社為責任報告書之產業zh_TW
dc.subject廣義估計式zh_TW
dc.subjectCorporate philanthropyen
dc.subjectGeneralized estimating equationsen
dc.subjectIndustries required to publish CSR reportsen
dc.subjectRatio of R&D to total salesen
dc.subjectRatio of advertising to total salesen
dc.subjectReasons for donationen
dc.title臺灣企業捐贈行為之實證研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn Empirical Study of Taiwanese Corporate Philanthropyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林舒柔,蘇威傑
dc.subject.keyword企業捐贈,捐贈原由,推銷費用率,研究發展費用率,規範編製企業社為責任報告書之產業,廣義估計式,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate philanthropy,Reasons for donation,Ratio of advertising to total sales,Ratio of R&D to total sales,Industries required to publish CSR reports,Generalized estimating equations,en
dc.relation.page34
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202000443
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2020-02-12
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
722.51 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved