Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15189
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor曾智揚
dc.contributor.authorPei-Ju Hsiehen
dc.contributor.author謝佩儒zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T17:28:24Z-
dc.date.copyright2020-07-22
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2020-06-03
dc.identifier.citation[1] 吳孟玲、張書陶與李泊諺,2015,國際化、多角化、下方風險與企業社會責任之關係探討 ,會計與財金研究,第八卷第一期:95-112。
[2] 林旻毅,2004,銷管費用僵固性之額外證據,私立輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。
[3] 林有志、傅鍾仁與陳筱萍,2011,成本僵固性之實證研究,當代會計,第十二卷第二期:191-220。
[4] 施宛宜、胡均立,2004,國際化程度與台灣製造業廠商之財務績效,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
[5] 高世隆,2010,成本僵固性之堆疊與品牌效用關聯性之研究-以筆記型電腦相關產業為例,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
[6] 梁明義、王文音,2002,台灣半世紀以來快速經濟發展的回顧與省思,金融投資與經濟發展:紀念梁國樹教授第六屆學術研討會發表之論文,台北。
[7] 陳建中,2016,銷管費用僵固性、帝國建立動機與公司治理個別機制之成效, 當代會計,第十七卷第二期:131-171。
[8] 曾聯洲,2003,銷管費用僵固性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
[9] 黃政仁、闕伶倫,2014,企業創新能力與國際化程度對創新績效及企業績效之影響:以臺灣電子資訊業為例,會計評論,第五十九期:107-147。
[10] 嚴友廷,2010,銷管費用僵固性與股價波動關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
[11] Anderson, M., R. D. Banker, and S. Janakiraman, 2003, Are selling, general, and administrative costs sticky Journal of Accounting Research 41: 47-63.
[12] Annavarjula, M., and S. Beldona, 2000, Multinationality-performance relationship: A review and reconceptualization. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 8(1): 48-67.
[13] Balakrishnan, R., K. Sivaramakrishnan, and G.Sprinkle, 2008, Managerial Accounting. Hoboken, New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[14] Banker, R. D., M. Ciftci, and R. Mashruwala, 2008, Managerial Optimism, Prior-Period Sales Changes, and Sticky Cost Behavior.Working Paper, Temple University.
[15] Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and J. M. Plehn-Dujowich, 2011, Sticky Cost Behavior: Theory and Evidence. Working Paper, AAA Annual Meeting, August 6-10, Denver, Colorado..
[16] Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci, and R. Mashruwala, 2014 a, The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26(2): 221-242.
[17] Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and J. M. Plehn-Dujowich, 2014 b, Demand Uncertainty and Cost Behavior. The Accounting Review 89(3): 839-865.
[18] Banker, R. D., and D. Byzalov, 2014 c, Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26(2): 43–79.
[19] Bobillo, A. M., F. Lopez-Iturriaga, and F. Tejerina-Gaite, 2010, Firm performance and international diversification: The internal and external competitive
advantages. International Business Review 19(6): 607-618.
[20] Buckley, P. J., and M. Casson, 1976, The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.
[21] Buhner, R, 1987, Assessing international diversification of West German corporations. Strategic Management Journal 8: 25–37.
[22] Caves, R. E, 1971, International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica 38(149): 1-27.
[23] Chen, X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis, 2012, The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research 29(1): 252–282.
[24] Contractor, F. J., S. K. Kundu, and C. C. Hsu, 2003, A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies 34(1): 5-18.
[25] Cooper, R. W., and R. Kaplan, 1998, The Design of Cost Management System: Text, Cases, and Readings. (2nd Edition), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[26] Cooper, R. W., and J. Haltiwanger, 2006, On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs. The Review of Economic Studies 73(3): 611-633.
[27] Denis, D. J., D. Denis, and K.Yost, 2002, Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance 57(5): 1951-1980.
[28] Deresky, H., 1994, International management:Managing across borders and cultures. New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publisher.
[29] Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders, 2012, Do managerial incentives drive behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in Belgian private firms. The Accounting Review 87(4):1219-1246.
[30] Dunning, J. H., 1980, Trade, location of economic activity and the multi-national enterprise: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies 11(1): 9-31.
[31] Geringer, J. M., P. W. Beamish, and R. C. Dacosta, 1989, Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal 10(2): 109-119.
[32] Gomes, L., and K. Ramaswamy, 1999, An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies 30(1): 173-187.
[33] Grant, R. M., 1987, Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies 18(3): 79-89.
[34] Graves, C., and J. Thomas, 2006, Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective. Family Business Review 19(3): 207-224.
[35] Hall, C. M., 2016, Does Ownership Structure Affect Labor Decisions? The Accounting Review 91(6): 1671-1696.
[36] Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and H. Kim, 1997, International diversification: Effection innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy
of Management Journal 40(4): 767-798.
[37] Hitt, M. A., R.D. Ireland, and R.E. Hoskisson, 2005, Strategic Management. Competitiveness and Globalization. Mason, Ohio: South Western, Thomson.
[38] Holzhacker, M., R. Krishnan, and M. D. Mahlendorf, 2015, Unraveling the black box of cost behavior: An empirical investigation of risk drivers, managerial
resource procurement, and cost elasticity. The Accounting Review 90(6): 2305–2335.
[39] Hope, O. K., and W. B. Thomas, 2008, Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 46(3): 591-626.
[40] Hymer, S. H., 1976, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[41] Jaramillo, F., F. Schiantarelli, and A. Sembenelli, 1993, Are Adjustment Costs for Labor Asymmetric? An Econometric Test on Panel Data for Italy. Review of
Economics and Statistics 75(4): 640-648.
[42] Jensen, M. C., 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76: 323-329.
[43] Johanson, J., and J. E.Vahlne, 1977, The internationalization process of the firm model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments.
Journal of International Business Studies 8(1): 23-32.
[44] Jones, G. R.,and C. W. L. Hill, 1988, Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal 9(1): 159-172.
[45] Kallapur, S., and L. Eldenburg, 2005, Uncertainty, Real Options, and Cost Behavior: Evidence from Washington State Hospitals. Journal of Accounting Research 43(5): 735–752.
[46] Kama, I., and D. Weiss, 2013, Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research 51(1): 201–224.
[47] Kitching, K., R. Mashruwala, and M. Pevzner, 2016, Culture and Cost Stickiness: A Cross-country Study. The International Journal of Accounting 51: 402-417.
[48] Lu, J. W., and P. W. Beamish, 2001, The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal 22(6/7): 565-586.
[49] Lu, J. W., and P. W. Beamish, 2004, International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 598-609.
[50] Masulis, R. W., C. Wang, and F. Xie, 2007, Corporate governance and acquirer returns Journal of Finance 62: 1851–1889.
[51] Noreen, E., 1991, Conditions under which activity-based costs provide relevant costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research 3: 159-168.
[52] Noreen, E., and N. Soderstrom, 1997, The accuracy of proportional cost models: Evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies 2(1): 89–114.
[53] Ramaswamy, K., K. G. Kroeck, and W. Renforth, 1996, Measuring the degree of internationslization of a firm: A comment. Journal of International Business Studies 27(1): 167-177.
[54] Rose, N., and A. Shepard, 1997, Firm diversification and CEO compensation: managerial ability or executive entrenchment? The Rand Journal of Economics 28(3): 489-514.
[55] Rugman, A. M., 1981, Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
[56] Ruigrok, W., and H. Wagner, 2003, Internationalization and performance: An organizational learning perspective. Management International Review 43(1): 63-83.
[57] Sambharya, R. B., 1995, The combined effect of international and product diversification strategies on the performance of US based multinational corporations. Management International Review 35(3): 197–218.
[58] Siddharthan, N. S., and S. Lall, 1982, Recent growth of the largest U.S. multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 44(1): 1-13.
[59] Stulz, R., 1990, Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics 26: 3-27.
[60] Sullivan, D., 1994, Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business studies 2: 325–342.
[61] Tallman, S., and J. Li, 1996, Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firm. Academy of Management Journal 39(1): 179-196.
[62] Tihanyi, L., A. E. Ellstrand, C. M. Daily, and D. R. Dalton, 2000, Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management 26(6): 1157-1177.
[63] Thomas, D. E., and L. Eden, 2004, What is the shape of multinationality performance relationship. The Multinational Business Review 12(1): 89–110.
[64] Vemon, R., 1966, Intemational investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190-207.
[65] Welch, L. S., and R. K. Luostarinen, 1988, Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept. Journal of General Management 14(2): 36-64.
[66] Zaheer, S., 1995, Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38(2): 341-363.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/15189-
dc.description.abstract隨著國際化之浪潮席捲全球,台灣企業欲躋身於高績效跨國企業之行列,再加上本國資源缺乏、市場狹小等因素,國際化策略為其必經之路。在追求利益最大化之時,為了編製預算、控制成本及適當評估績效,瞭解成本習性,進而獲得精確的成本資訊實為不可或缺之圭臬。近年來,成本結構之彈性與否成為新的研究方向,當企業使用較多變動成本,較少固定成本時,可稱此成本結構較為彈性;
本研究認為,當企業採行越高程度之國際化策略時,由於面對更多元且不熟悉之市場,其下方風險亦越高,較多的變動成本可協助企業快速調整成本以因應之,故較高程度之國際化公司應偏好較彈性之成本結構。另外,根據國內外研究之發現,成本動因與成本並非成等比例變動,由於資源調整成本、經理人樂觀程度與代理問題等原因,當銷貨收入上升時,費用所增加之幅度通常會大於收入下降時費用所減少之比例,此現象即為成本僵固性;本研究推論,對於企業來說,其採行愈高程度之國際化策略,代表管理階層對此策略之前景愈是樂觀,再加上越高程度的國際化投資,其資源調整成本也越高,若銷貨收入有下降之情況,由於上述原因,管理者也不會輕易裁撤資源,造成成本僵固性之情形。本研究以 1992 年至 2015 年國內上市上櫃公司為研究對象,探討企業國際化程度與成本習性之關聯,亦考量其他因素對成本習性之影響。根據實證結果發現,
銷管費用、管理費用、研發費用與營業成本皆有成本彈性之現象,且國際化程度與其有正向關係;另一方面,僅有銷管費用、研發費用與管理費用有成本僵固性之現象,且國際化策略並無對研發費用產生增額僵固性效果。本研究使用國外銷售額佔總銷售額比例與外幣換算調整數兩種國際化程度之指標,皆可支持以上結果。另外,為瞭解管理階層之代理問題對研究問題之影響,亦以獨立董事之有無做為基準來區分樣本,經研究結果顯示,不論公司是否有獨立董事,國際化程度均與成本僵固性呈顯著正向關係,顯示經理人之代理問題並不會影響經理人進行國際化程度之行為。最後,本研究區分近十年與過去之樣本,以深入探討研究問題。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the internationalization theme sweeping across the globe, the internationalization strategy becomes an indispensable method for Taiwanese companies. By implementing this strategy, companies not only expect themselves being multinational enterprises with high quality but also can solve some problems like narrow market for so on. However, companies adopting the internationalization strategy may face some struggles such as increasing downside risk, the costs of adjustment and reacquiring resources and the attitude of managers. According to the prior research of cost behavior, these struggles can be the factors that affect the cost decision made by the management. Therefore, this study is aimed at examining the relevance between the degree of internationalization and cost behavior including cost elasticity and cost stickiness. Using a sample of listed companies of Taiwan from 1992 to 2015, I find that the degree of internationalization causes the cost more elastic and stickier. In this study, two ways of measuring the degree of internationalization are used ,and the effect of agency problem is also taken into account. My findings support the proposition that the degree of internationalization indeed affects resource management decisions made by managers. The last, in order to investigate the difference between the recent 10 years and the past, internationalization factors were grouped by years. The empirical results provide the strong evidence that the cost structure of the recent 10 years is stickier and more elastic than the past is when the both all taking the degree of internationalization into consideration. My study makes a significant contribution in understanding the relevance between the degree of internationalization and the cost behavior.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T17:28:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05722023-1.pdf: 1018985 bytes, checksum: 59232100b2936972c5f54c1bf61f4033 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 ............................................................................................................................i
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... ii
目次 ................................................................................................................................. iii
表目錄 ............................................................................................................................... v
第一章 緒論............................................................................................................ 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 .......................................................................................... 1
第二節 預期貢獻 ...................................................................................................... 4
第三節 研究動機與目的 .......................................................................................... 5
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說推論 ....................................................................... 6
第一節 國際化 .......................................................................................................... 6
第二節 成本習性 .................................................................................................... 10
第三節 國際化與成本習性之關聯 ........................................................................ 14
第三章 研究方法.................................................................................................. 16
第一節 樣本選擇與資料來源 ................................................................................ 16
第二節 國際化程度衡量 ........................................................................................ 17
第三節 研究模型 .................................................................................................... 19
第四章 實證結果與分析 ..................................................................................... 24
第一節 敘述性統計 ................................................................................................ 24
第二節 國際化程度與成本彈性之關聯性分析 .................................................... 26
第三節 國際化程度與成本僵固性之關聯性分析 ................................................ 28
第五章 敏感性測試 ............................................................................................. 31
第一節 國際化程度與其他成本項目之成本習性之關聯 .................................... 31
第二節 以代理問題與否區分樣本 ........................................................................ 35
第三節 以外幣換算調整數做為衡量國際化程度之代理變數 ............................ 38
第四節 比較近十年與過去之樣本 ........................................................................ 40
第六節 結論與研究限制 ....................................................................................... 43
第一節 研究結論 .................................................................................................... 43
第二節 研究限制 .................................................................................................... 45
第三節 研究建議 .................................................................................................... 46
參考文獻 ......................................................................................................................... 47
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject成本僵固性zh_TW
dc.subject成本習性zh_TW
dc.subject國際化程度zh_TW
dc.subject成本彈性zh_TW
dc.subjectcost elasticityen
dc.subjectcost behavioren
dc.subjectcost stickinessen
dc.subjectthe internationalizationen
dc.title國際化程度與成本習性之關聯性分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe Internationalization and Cost Behavioren
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳耀宗,葛俊佑
dc.subject.keyword國際化程度,成本彈性,成本僵固性,成本習性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordthe internationalization,cost elasticity,cost stickiness,cost behavior,en
dc.relation.page53
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201800855
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2020-06-04
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
995.1 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved