請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/1272
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 莊世同 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Chia Chiu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 邱怡嘉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T09:35:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-02 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T09:35:18Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-03-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-02-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 石元康(2000),《當代西方自由主義理論》,上海:上海三聯書局。
許國賢(2004),〈德性、干預與個人自由〉,《政治科學論叢》,第二十期,民國93年6月,頁1-28。 徐振雄(2004),〈菲尼斯對於「同性婚姻」之道德論辯及其權利語言之探討〉,《政大法學評論》,77期,頁1-54。 徐振雄(2002),〈德沃金論「道德侵犯非罪化」與「自由主義的政治社群」一個古老的命題:社會可透過刑罰執行道德嗎?〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,91期,頁107-121。 徐振雄,〈「傾斜的」平行詮釋?德沃金的墮胎法理學〉,《止善》,第十六期,頁103-130。 顏厥安(2004),《鼠肝與蟲臂的管制-法理學與生命倫理論文集》,台北:元照。 顏厥安(1998),《法與實踐理性》,台北:允晨。 Berlin, Isaiah ,陳曉琳譯(1986),自由四論,台北:聯經。 Dworkin, Ronald,孫健智譯(2013),認真看待權利,台北:五南。 Dworkin, Ronald,司馬學文譯(2007),人權與民主生活,台北:韋伯文化。 Mill, John Stuart,孟凡禮譯(2013),論自由,台北:五南。 Stephen, James Fitzjames,Stuart D. Warner編,馮克利、楊曰鵬譯(2007)自由、平等、博愛,桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。 Arneson, Richard J.(2013)The Enforcement of Morals Revisited. in Criminal Law and Philosophy pp.435-454. Bix, Brian(2004) Jurisprudence: Theory and Context. 3rd Ed. North Carolina:Carolina Academic Press. Cane, Peter(2006) Taking Law Seriously:Starting points of the Hart/Devlin Debate. in The Journal of Ethics 10, pp.21-51. Cranor, Carl F.(1979)Legal Moralism Reconsidered. in Ethics. vol.89 No.2 pp.147-164. Devlin, Patrick (1965a) The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Devlin, Patrick(1965b)Law and Morality. in Manitoba Law School Journal. vol.1 no.3 pp.243-254. Dworkin, Gerald(1999)Devlin Was Right: Law and the Enforcement of Morality. in William & Mary Law Review, vol.40 issue 3. pp.927-946. Dworkin, Ronald(2011)Justice for Hedgehogs, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. Dworkin, Ronald(2006)Justice in Robes, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. Dworkin, Ronald. (1978)Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. Feinberg, Joel(1986)Harm to Others. Oxford:Oxford University Press. George, Robert P.(1993)Making Men Moral. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Gray, John.(1996)Mill on Liberty:A Defence. 2nd Ed. London:Routledge. Gray, John and Smith, G.W.(1991)Introduction. in John Gray and G.W. Smith Eds. J.S. Mill On Liberty in Focus, pp.1-20. Harcourt, Bernard E.(1999)The Collapse of the Harm Principle. in The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. vol.90. No.1 pp.109-194. Hart, H.L.A.(2013)The Concept of Law. 3rd Ed. Oxford:Clarendon Press. Hart, H.L.A.(1983)Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Hart, H.L.A.(1971)Immorality and Treason. reprint in Morality and the Law, Richard A. Wasserstrom ed. California:Wadsworth Pub. Co Hart, H.L.A. (1963)Law, Liberty and Morality. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Kekes, John(2000)The Enforcement of Morality. in American Philosophical Quarterly. vol.37. no.1 pp.23-35. Nagel, Ernest(1975)The Enforcement of Morals, in Ethics and Public Policy. pp.265-271. MacCormick, Neil(2008)H.L.A. Hart, 2nd Ed. California:Stanford University Press. McElrea, F. W. M. (1967)The Legal Enforcement of Non-Utilitarian Morality, in Otago Law Review, 4 ,pp.198-214. Mill, John Stuart. John M. Robson and Jack Stillinger Eds.(1981)Autobiography and Literary Essays. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol.I. Toronto:Toronto University Press. Mill, John Stuart. John M. Robson Eds.(1977)Essays on Politics and Society. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol.XVIII. Toronto:Toronto University Press. Moffat, Robert C.L.(2005)”Not The Law’s Business” The Politics of Tolerance and The Enforcement of Morality, in Florida Law Review, vol.57. pp.1097-1133. Petersen, Thomas Søbirk(2010)New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges. in Criminal Law and Philosophy pp.215-232. Stephen, James Fitzjames Richard Posner Ed.(1991) Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and Three Brief Essays. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. Stephen, Leslie (1895) The Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen. New York:G.P. Putnam’s Sons. Rees, John(1991), A Re-thinking of Mil on Liberty, in John Gray and G.W. Smith Eds. J.S. Mill On Liberty in Focus, pp.169-189. Riley, Johnathan.(1998)Mill on Liberty (Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks). London:Routledge. Ross, Jacob J.(1968) Morality and the Law, in TRADITION: A Journal of Orthodox Thought. Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 5-16. Rostow, Eugene V.(1960)The Enforcement of Morals. in The Cambridge Law Journal. vol.18 no.2 pp.174-198. The Committee on Homosexual Offenses and Prostitution(1963), The Wolfenden Report, New York:Stein and Day Publishers. Wollheim, Richard(1959)Crime, Sin and Mr. Justice Devlin, in Encounter. Nov. pp.34-40. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/1272 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文藉由重新檢視法律道德主義與自由主義的論辯,重省以法律貫徹道德的問題。本文首先反省Stephen-Devlin的法律道德主義,與Mill-Hart所支持的以傷害原則為核心的自由主義之間的傳統辯論,從中看到雙方所各自存在的侷限與難題。接著以此為線索,探索法律道德主義陣營為何難以維持其主張,並認為自由主義陣營以Ronald Dworkin理論一貫且深入的自由主義論點,對以法律貫徹道德的問題給予了較令人滿意的回答。
本文第二章首先將針對James Fitzjames Stephen與Lord Patrick Devlin的法律道德主義理論進行分析與批評,並從中整理出法律道德主義共同面對的難題;第三章則轉而梳理John Stuart Mill與H.L.A. Hart以傷害原則為核心的自由主義,以及傷害原則所面對的批評;第四章則試圖反省前兩章所整理出對雙方陣營的批評,並藉由當代論者對雙方陣營的回應來再次反省雙方的問題,最後總結出為何法律道德主義難以維持其論點,而自由主義則由Ronald Dworkin的論點對於以法律貫徹道德的問題給出了較令人滿意的回答。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis intends to re-evaluate the issue of the legal enforcement of morality in the light of the debates between legal moralism and liberalism. The initial objective of this thesis is to examine the classic debates between the Stephen-Devlin legal moralism and the Mill-Hart liberalism which is centred on the harm principle, and render the limits and difficulties of both positions. Taking these limits and difficulties as the clue, this thesis explores the reason why legal moralists can hardly maintain their position, and argues that Ronald Dworkin's liberalism theory provides better solution to the question of the legal enforcement of morality with coherent and profound arguments.
Chapter two focuses on the analysis and criticisms of the legal moralism theory held by James Fitzjames Stephen and Lord Patrick Devlin, and points out the difficulties confronted by the legal moralism in general. Chapter three turns to review the liberalism centred on the harm principle which is supported by John Stuart Mill and H.L.A. Hart, and the criticisms of the harm principle. Chapter four intends to reconsider the criticisms of both legal moralism and liberalism in previous chapters , and re-evaluate both positions with the reply from contemporary theorists. In conclusion, this thesis points out the reason why legal moralists can hardly maintain their position, and argues that Ronald Dworkin's liberalism theory which provides better solution to the question of the legal enforcement of morality. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-12T09:35:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R02a21007-1.pdf: 1196634 bytes, checksum: 11fe5e13790f9f16183b04814058f02e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝詞 i
摘要 iv Abstract v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題意識 1 一、兩個問題 1 二、兩種理論 3 三、本文的結構與論證 4 第二節 國內文獻回顧 5 第三節 與社群主義的關聯 8 第二章 Stephen與Devlin的法律道德主義 10 第一節 Stephen的極端論法律道德主義 12 一、道德對美好人生的必要性 12 二、運用法律強制力的證成 15 三、對Stephen極端論的批評 19 四、結語 25 第二節 Devlin的溫和論法律道德主義 26 一、Devlin的法律道德主義理論 27 二、與Stephen極端論法律道德主義的比較 32 三、對Devlin溫和論的批評 35 四、Rostow為Devlin的辯護 42 五、結語 46 小結-法律道德主義的基本命題與疑難 46 第三章 Mill與Hart的自由主義 49 第一節 Mill以傷害原則為核心的自由主義 49 一、人格多元的重要性 49 二、傷害原則 51 三、對Mill傷害原則的批評 53 四、結語 60 第二節 Hart為Mill的辯護 61 一、Hart對Mill的修改 61 二、最低限度自然法-一個例外? 63 三、對Hart修正理論的批評 65 四、結語 68 小結 69 第四章 重省法律道德主義與自由主義的爭論 70 第一節 法律道德主義的復興 70 一、John Kekes的新法律道德主義 71 二、「最佳」的法律道德主義 76 三、結語 83 第二節 Ronald Dworkin的平等自由主義 83 一、人性尊嚴、自重與本真 85 二、倫理獨立性與傷害的概念 86 三、政府行為的合法性 88 四、結語 89 小結-重省「以法律貫徹道德」的爭論 90 第五章 結論 92 參考文獻 97 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 論以法律貫徹道德-重省法律道德主義與自由主義的論辯 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Legal Enforcement of Morality:A Reflection on the Debates between Legal Moralism and Liberalism | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 顏厥安,張嘉尹 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 法律與道德,以法律貫徹道德,法律道德主義,自由主義,傷害原則, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | law and morality,legal enforcement of morality,legal moralism,liberalism,the harm principle, | en |
dc.relation.page | 101 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800581 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-02-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。