請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/1243完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃心怡(Hsini, Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ta-Chun Su | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇大鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T09:34:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-05-31 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T09:34:46Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-05-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-05-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
壹、中文部分 一、期刊、論文及專書 丁幸姬，2006，〈行政院開發基金之研究－代理人理論之觀點〉，台北：台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 于宗先、王金利，2003，《一隻看得見的手－政府在經濟發展過程中的角色》。台北：聯經出版社。 王振寰，2010，《追趕的極限》。台北：巨流圖書公司。 王健全、麥朝成，1999，〈產業結構變遷與產業發展策略〉，施建生(編)，《一九八0年代以來台灣經濟發展經驗》。台北：中華經濟研究院，頁267-307。 李志華，2002，《微笑禿鷹－創投與創業真實內幕》。台北：商智文化。 杜英儀，1999，〈如何加強行政院開發基金投資運作〉。《經濟前瞻》，(63): 76-79。 徐進鈺，1997，〈台灣積體電路工業發展歷程之研究－高科技、政府干預與人才回流〉。《國立台灣大學地理學系地理學報》，(23): 33-48。 陳東升，2008，《積體網路－臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北：群學出版社。 曾怡禛，2005，〈開發基金計劃性變革之探討〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》，28(7): 77-85。 鄭力軒、王御風，2011，〈重探發展型國家的國家與市場〉。《台灣社會學刊》，47: 1-43。 鄭陸霖，2006，〈幻象之後：台灣汽車產業發展經驗與「跨界產業場域」理論〉。《台灣社會學》，11: 111-174。 蔡蕙如，2006，〈董事會組成及投資期間對獲利能力之影響－以我國開發基金之投資事業為例〉，台北：淡江大學會計學系在職專班碩士論文。 瞿宛文，1997，〈產業政策的示範效果－台灣石化業的產生〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》，(27): 97-132。 瞿宛文，2001，〈台灣產業政策成效之初步評估〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》，(42): 67-117。 瞿宛文、安士敦，2003，《超越後進發展－台灣的產業升級策略》。朱道凱譯，台北：聯經出版社。 二、官方出版品、創投年鑑及報章新聞 今周刊，2001，〈行政院開發基金看大不看小〉，242：88。 今周刊，2004，〈台灣神隆再也不「神」了〉，392：84。 中時電子報，2011，〈苦撐十年獲利 台灣神隆生技股大黑馬〉，10/14，網址：http://magazine.chinatimes.com/ctweekly/20111014004130-300106。檢閱日期：12/23/2017。 中華民國創業投資商業同業公會，歷年，《台灣創業投資年鑑》。台北：中華民國創業投資商業同業公會。 生技中心，歷年，《生物技術產業年鑑》。台北：生物技術開發中心。 台灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心能源資訊組，2017，〈Open Energy 台灣十大溫室氣體排放源變化趨勢分析〉。官網：http://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-TW/m01-3/climate-change/704-10606-20_greenhouse-gas-source。檢閱日期：9/14/2017。 自由時報電子報，2016，〈國發會三駕馬車振投資〉，5/26，網址：http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/paper/993604。 自由時報電子報，2017，〈國發基金踩雷 生技是重災區〉，3/14，網址：http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/paper/1085583。檢閱日期：11/15/2017。 科技報橘，2015，〈有財團背景的Gogoro，憑什麼能讓國發基金投資三千萬？〉，11/27，網址：https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2015/11/27/gogoro-development-overseas-marketing/。檢閱日期：11/19/2017。 信傳媒，2017，〈國發基金去救快破產的陽明海運 說好的投資新創產業呢？〉，2/23，網址：https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/2863。檢閱日期：11/20/2017。 國科會，歷年，《中華民國科學技術年鑑》。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。 商業周刊，2012，〈三次危機 把國光生技逼近國際賽〉，1269：72-74。 經濟日報，2008，〈史威靈投資失敗的檢討〉，3/7，A4版。 經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組，2008，《生技產業白皮書》。台北：經濟部工業局。 經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組，2017a，《生技產業白皮書》。台北：經濟部工業局。 經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組，2017b，《2018生物技術產業簡介》。台北：經濟部工業局。 監察院電子信，2011，〈一筆投資，7個月賠掉5000萬! 國發基金審查制度 設計有漏洞〉，網址：http://www.cy.gov.tw/ap_home/upload/files/epaper/201104/html/201104.htm。檢閱日期：11/15/2017。 監察院098財正0027號糾正文 (98/07/09)。 監察院101財正0008號糾正文 (101/04/17)。 監察院102財正0055號糾正文 (102/10/02)。 監察院103教正0009號糾正文 (103/06/12)。 監察院105財正0008號糾正文 (105/02/03)。 聯合晚報，2009，〈立委封殺國發基金投資 TIMC死局〉，11/26，A3版。 聯合晚報，2016，〈確保經營權 陳添枝：國發基金不再賣台積電〉，10/31，B6版。 聯合報，2011，〈極機密 國發基金 投資宇昌 六天准〉，12/9，A1版。 聯合報，2015，〈宇昌案後 報政院核准投資案更制度化〉，10/27，A2版。 貳、英文部分 Arrow, Kenneth, 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activities, eds. Richard Nelson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 609-625. Amsden, Alice. 1985. “Taiwan's State and Economic Development.” In Bringing the State back in, eds. Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. NY: Cambridge University Press, 78-106. Auerswald, P. and L. M. Branscomb. 2003. “Valley of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States.” Journal of Technology Transfer 28(3-4): 227-239. Avnimelech, Gil and Morris Teubal. 2006. “Creating Venture Capital Industries that Co-evolve with High Tech: Insights from an Extended Industry Life Cycle Perspective of the Israeli Experience.” Research Policy 35(10): 1477-1498. Block, Fred. 2008. “Swimming against the Current: The Rise of a Hidden Developmental State in the United States.” Politics and Society 36(2): 169-206. Block Fred and Matthew R. Keller. 2011. “Where do Innovations Come From? Transformations in the U.S. Economy, 1970-2006.” In State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development, eds. Fred Block and Matthew R. Keller. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publisher, 154-172. Brander, James A., Edward Egan, and Thomas Hellmann F. 2008. “Government Sponsored versus Private Venture Capital: Canadian Evidence.” In International Differences in Entrepreneurship, eds. Josh Lerner and Antoinette Schoar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 275-320. Breznitz, Dan. 2007. Innovation and the State：Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan and Ireland. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Breznitz, Dan and Darius Ornston. 2013. “The Revolutionary Power of Peripheral Agencies: Explaining Radical Policy Innovation in Finland and Israel.” Comparative Political Studies 46(10): 1219-1245. Chang, Ha-Joon. 1999. “The Economic Theory of the Developmental State.” In The Developmental State, ed. Meredith Woo-Cumings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 182-199. Chu, Yin-Wah. 2009. “Eclipse or Reconfigured? South Korea’s Developmental State and Challenges of the Global Knowledge Economy.” Economy and Society 38(2): 278-303. Colombo, Massimo G., Douglas Cumming J., and Silvio Vismara. 2014. “Governmental Venture Capital for Innovative Young Firms.” Journal of Technology Transfer. Available Online at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2471469. Cumming, Douglas J. and Jeffrey MacIntosh G. 2006. “Crowding out Private Equity: Canadian Evidence.” Journal of Business Venturing 21: 569-609. Cumming, Douglas J. and Jeffrey MacIntosh. 2007. “Mutual Funds that Invest in Private Equity? An Analysis of Labour Sponsored Investment Funds.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31(3): 445-487. Cumming, Douglas J., Luca Grilli, and Samuele Murtinu. 2017. “Governmental and Independent Venture Capital Investments in Europe: A Firm-level Performance Analysis.” Journal of Corporate Finance 42: 439-459. Devenow, Andrea and Ivo Welch. 1996. “Rational Herding in Financial Economics.” European Economic Review 40(3-5): 603-15. Edquist, Charles. 2005. “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds. Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181-208. Etzkowitz, Henry. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relation.” Social Science Information 43(4): 293-337. Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Freeman, Chris. 1995. “The “National System of Innovation” in Historical Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1): 5-24. Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Gomper, Paul and Josh Lerner. 2003. “Short-Term America Revisited? Boom and Bust in the Venture Capital Industry and the Impact on Innovation.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 3: 1-27. Gorman, Michael and William Sahlman A. 1989. “What do Venture Capitalists do?”Journal of Business Venturing (4): 231-248. Gulinello, Christopher. 2005. “Engineering A Venture Capital Market and the Effects of Government Control on Private Ordering: Lessons from the Taiwan Experience.” George Washington International Law Review 37(4): 845-883. Hirschman, Albert O. 1981. Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Keller, Matthew. 2011. “The CIA’s Role in Public Venture Capital Initiatives.” In State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development, eds. Fred Block and Matthew R. Keller. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publisher, 109-132. Keller, Matthew and Fred Block, 2012. “Explaining the Transformation in the US Innovation System: The Impact of a Small Government Program.” Socio-Economic Review 11: 629-656. Kline, Stephan and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. “An Overview of Innovation.” In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, eds. Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 275-304. Knight, Frank H. 1971 [1921]. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Lazonick, William and Öner Tulum. 2011. “US Biopharmaceutical Finance and the Sustainability of the Biotech Business Model.” Research Policy 40 (9): 1170-1187. Lerner, Josh. 2002. “When Bureaucrats Meet Entrepreneurs: The Design of Effective ‘Public Venture Capital’ Programs.” The Economic Journal 112: F73-F84. Lerner, Josh. 2009. Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed－And What to Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Leyden, Dennis P. and Albert Link N. 2015. Public Sector Entrepreneurship: US Technology and Innovation Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke and Susan Borrás. 2005. “Science, Technology and Innovation Policy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, eds. Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 599-631. Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press. Motoyama, Yasuyuki, Richard Appelbaum, and Rachel Parker. 2011. “The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?” Technology in Society 33 (1-2): 109-118. Nelson, Richard, ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Nightingale, Paul and Alex Coad. 2014. “Muppets and Gazelles: Political and Methodological Biases in Entrepreneurship Research.” Industrial and Corporate Change 23(1): 113-143. Ó Riain, Seán. 2004. The Politics of High-Tech Growth: Development Network States in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Powell, Walter W., Kenneth Koput W., and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996.“Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116-145. Rodrik, Dani. 2014. “From Welfare State to Innovation State.” Project Syndicate. Available Online at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/labor- saving-technology-by-dani-rodrik-2015-01. (accessed 2/11/2017) Schumpeter Joseph A. 1949. “Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History.” In Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles and the Evolution of Capitalism, ed. Richard V. Clemence. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 253-271. Tyebjee, Tyzoon T. and Albert Bruno V. 1984. “A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activities.” Management Science 30(9): 1051-1066. Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Wang, Jenn-Hwan. 2016. “Toward a Platform Builder: The State’s Role in Taiwan’s Biopharmaceutical Industry.” In The Asian Developmental State, ed. Yin-Wah, Chu. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 97-115. Wong, Joseph. 2004. “From Learning to Creating: Biotechnology and the Postindustrial Developmental State in Korea.” Journal of East Asian Studies 4(3): 491-517. Wong, Joseph. 2005. “Re-making the Developmental State in Taiwan: The Challenges of Biotechnology.” International Political Science Review 26(2): 169-191. Wu, Yongping. 2004. “Rethinking the Taiwanese Developmental State.” The China Quarterly 177: 91-114. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/1243 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 當前全球許多國家與區域正熱衷追求創新成長，並致力推動新創與創投事業的發展。因此，國家在創新、創業及經濟成長中之角色便成為值得探究的議題。相較於既有文獻傾向視國家為輔助者，本研究則藉由記錄與分析國發基金在產業創新中的角色，以此說明政府扮演創投冒險投資高風險新興產業的面向。
本研究嘗試運用次級資料與訪談內容回答以下問題：(一) 國發基金在產業創新中的不同角色；(二) 政府與民間資本在台灣生技產業發展過程中的分工與互動關係；(三) 國發基金的投資策略，以及國發基金與民間創投在投資邏輯方面的差異；(四) 外界對國發基金投資運作的常見批評。 核心發現指出國發基金扮演種子基金帶頭投資角色，催化民間對生技產業的投資。本研究主張這是因為國發基金一般來說較民間資本更有意願與能力承擔高風險與長回收期。除此之外，國發基金與其他政府機構及民間專業社群合作亦強化了對創業市場的治理能力。然而，本文亦指出公私部門之間的投資合作儘管能夠創造綜效，但仍須面對潛在的代理問題。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Many countries and regions are currently pursuing innovation-led growth, with the aim of promoting the development of startups and venture capital. Thus, the role of the state in innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth becomes an important issue to be explored. In contrast to extant literature emphasizing the supporting functions of the state, this research demonstrates that the state can also act as venture capital (VC), investing in high-risk emerging industries by documenting and analyzing the roles of National Development Fund (NDF) in industrial innovation.
Drawing on both secondary data and in-depth interviews, this research seeks to answer the following questions: (i) the different roles of NDF in industrial innovation; (ii) the division of labor and the relationship between public and private capital in the development process of Taiwan’s biotechnology industry; (iii) the investment strategies of NDF and the different investment logics between NDF and private VC; (iv) the common criticisms against the NDF. The core findings show that NDF played a lead investor role in catalyzing the private investment in biotechnology industry. This research argues that this is because in general NDF is more willing and capable to take higher risks and tolerate long lead time of innovation. Moreover, cooperating with other government agencies and professional communities enables NDF to strengthen its governance of early-stage capital market. However, the agency problem remains to be solved for generating better synergies between public and private investment. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-12T09:34:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R04322017-1.pdf: 2204134 bytes, checksum: 6e5d96da9e5e16b9e93a2500f25aa72b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究動機 1 第二節、文獻回顧 3 壹、飛躍式追趕：發展型國家論 3 貳、邁向創新國家：創新系統與發展網絡國家論 6 參、企業型國家：政府作為創業投資 10 肆、台灣的產業升級之路：政府的帶領作用 16 伍、目前對開發基金的研究：制度與財務面 19 第三節、研究問題 21 壹、國發基金在生技產業中的角色為何？ 21 貳、國發基金的投資邏輯為何？ 23 第四節、國發基金簡介 28 第五節、研究方法 33 第六節、章節地圖 34 第二章 國發基金如何帶動產業創新？ 35 第一節、國發基金業務內容 35 壹、直接投資 35 貳、創業投資 40 參、專案投資 45 肆、融資 46 伍、其他業務 47 第二節、國發基金在產業創新中的角色 50 壹、刺激景氣與提振經濟 50 貳、推動經濟發展 51 參、扶持新創企業成長 52 肆、因應當今經濟與社會挑戰 53 第三節、國發基金與生技投資的關係 55 壹、台灣創業投資概況 55 貳、生技投資：國發基金與民間創投 58 參、生技公司個案研究 62 第三章 國發基金如何進行投資運作？ 68 第一節、國發基金投資策略 68 壹、直接投資策略：為產業投資添加柴火 69 貳、創業投資策略：構築公私合作網絡 80 參、專案投資策略：借重政府部門產業專業 83 肆、投資特色：國發基金與民間創投 84 第二節、對國發基金投資運作的批評 87 壹、投資績效 87 貳、投資審核與監督 89 參、投資公平性 90 肆、投資正當性 91 第四章、結論 94 第一節、企業型國家：理論與政策意涵 95 第二節、研究限制 99 第三節、未來研究建議 100 參考文獻 102 附錄一 訪談大綱 111 附錄二、國發基金投資組合 112 附錄三、國發基金大事紀 119 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 投資策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國發基金 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 產業創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創業投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生技產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | venture capital | en |
| dc.subject | National Development Fund | en |
| dc.subject | investment strategies | en |
| dc.subject | biotechnology industry | en |
| dc.subject | industrial innovation | en |
| dc.title | 企業型國家:行政院國家發展基金在產業創新中的角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Government as Entrepreneur: A Case Study on the Role of National Development Fund in Industrial Innovation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張國暉(Kuo-Hui Chang),陶儀芬(Yi-Feng Tao),吳親恩(Chin-En Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國發基金,產業創新,創業投資,生技產業,投資策略, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | National Development Fund,industrial innovation,venture capital,biotechnology industry,investment strategies, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 122 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800767 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-05-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf | 2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。