請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/1182
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 謝清麟 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Hao Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林信豪 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T09:33:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-01 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T09:33:51Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王文中(1997)。測驗的建構:因素分析還是Rasch分析?調查研究,3,129-166。
李素、林昭宏、謝清麟(2006)。中風復健動作評估量表的心理計量特性分析。 高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所。 邱弘毅(2008)。腦中風之現況與流行病學特徵。腦中風會訊,15卷3期,p. 2-4。 林嘉皇(2013)。鏡像治療對慢性腦中風患者上肢動作功能之療效。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,9卷1期,28-40。 胡漢華(2008)。台灣腦中風防治指引2008第一版。台灣腦中風學會,2008, 75-94。 祝旭東、王淳厚、謝清麟、陳美香、陳瓊玲(1996)。布氏動作恢復量表之信度及同時效度研究。職能治療學會雜誌,14,1-12。 Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Higgins, J., Salbach, N. M., Finch, L., & Wood-Dauphinée, S. L. (2003). The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): A Comparison With Other Measures Used to Evaluate Effects of Stroke and Rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 83, 617-630. doi:10.1093/ptj/83.7.617 Alt Murphy, M., Resteghini, C., Feys, P., & Lamers, I. (2015). An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol, 15, 29. doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6 Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573. doi:10.1007/bf02293814 Biller J, L. B., Marsh E, et al. (1990). Spontaneous improvement after acute ischemic stroke. A pilot study. Stroke 1990;21:1008-12, 21, 1008-1012. Bond TG, F. C. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah. Erlbaum, Mahwah. Bonita R, B. R. (1988). Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke, 19, 1497-1500. Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Person Reliability, Item Reliability, and More Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (pp. 217-234). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Carr, J. H., Shepherd, R. B., Nordholm, L., & Lynne, D. (1985). Investigation of a New Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients. Physical Therapy, 65, 175-180. doi:10.1093/ptj/65.2.175 Chen, J., Liu, H. H., Li, Z., & Quiben, M. (2006). Multivariant Analysis of Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Pilot Study in a Chinese Population. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics, 24, 1-14. doi:10.1080/J148v24n04_01 Chen, J., Liu, H. H., Li, Z., & Quiben, M. (2009). Multivariant Analysis of Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Pilot Study in a Chinese Population. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics, 24, 1-14. doi:10.1080/J148v24n04_01 Daley K, M. N., Wood-Dauphinée S. (1999). Reliability of scores on the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure. Phys Ther. 1999 Jan, 79, 20-23. Duncan, P. W., Goldstein, L. B., Matchar, D., Divine, G. W., & Feussner, J. (1992). Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke, 23, 1084-1089. doi:10.1161/01.str.23.8.1084 Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., & Nelson, S. G. (1983). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery Following Cerebrovascular Accident. Physical Therapy, 63, 1606-1610. doi:10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606 Fugl-Meyer, A. R., & Jääskö, L. (1980). Post-stroke hemiplegia and ADL-performance. Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement, 7, 140-152. G. Broeks, J., Lankhorst, G. J., Rumping, K., & Prevo, A. J. H. (1999). The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 357-364. doi:10.1080/096382899297459 Goldstein, L. B., Bertels, C., & Davis, J. N. (1989). Interrater reliability of the nih stroke scale. Archives of Neurology, 46, 660-662. doi:10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026 Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenls. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139-164. doi:10.1177/014662168500900204 Hsueh, I.P., Hsieh, C.L. (2002). Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 617-624. doi:10.1191/0269215502cr530oa Hsueh, I.P., Wang, W., Wang, C.H., Sheu, C.F., Lo, S.K., Lin, J.H., Hsieh, C.L. (2006). A simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument. Phys Ther., 86, No. 7, 936-943. Huang, C.Y., Lin, G.H., Huang, Y.J., Song, C.Y., Lee, Y.C., How, M.J., . . . Hsieh, C.L. (2016). Improving the utility of the Brunnstrom recovery stages in patients with stroke: Validation and quantification. Medicine, 95, e4508. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004508 Huang, Y.J., C. K., Chou, Y.T., Hsueh, I.P., Hou, C.Y., Hsieh, C.L. (2015). Comparison of the Responsiveness of the Long-Form and Simplified Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Group- and Individual-Level Analysis. Phys Ther., 95, NO. 8, 1172-1183. Koh, C.L., Pan, S.L., Jeng, J.S., Chen, B.B., Wang, Y.H., Hsueh, I.P., & Hsieh, C.L. (2015). Predicting recovery of voluntary upper extremity movement in subacute stroke patients with severe upper extremity paresis. PLoS One, 10, e0126857. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126857 Kumar, K. V., Joshua, A. M., Kedambadi, R., & Mithra, P. P. (2017). Eclectic/mixed model method for upper extremity functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: A pilot study. Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine, 8, 75-81. doi:10.4103/0976-9668.198357 Kwok, T., Lo, R. S., Wong, E., Wai-Kwong, T., Mok, V., & Kai-Sing, W. (2006). Quality of Life of Stroke Survivors: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1177-1182. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.015 Lannin, N. A. (2004). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 109-116. doi:10.1080/0963828032000157970 Lin, G.H., Lu, Y., Wu, C.T., Chiu, E.C., Huang, S.L., Hsueh, I.P., & Hsieh, C.L. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Five-Digit Test in patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil, 38, 97-102. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1031288 Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. . Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Lyden, P. D., Lu, M., Levine, S. R., Brott, T. G., & Broderick, J. (2001). A Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for Use in Stroke Clinical Trials. Preliminary Reliability and Validity, 32, 1310-1317. doi:10.1161/01.str.32.6.1310 Malouin, F., Pichard, L., Bonneau, C., Durand, A., & Corriveau, D. (1994). Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: Comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 1206-1212. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90006-X Miller, K. J., Slade, A. L., Pallant, J. F., & Galea, M. P. (2010). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the upper limb subscales of the Motor Assessment Scale using a Rasch analysis model. J Rehabil Med, 42, 315-322. doi:10.2340/16501977-0519 Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., . . . de Vet, H. C. W. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 737-745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Danish National Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen. Santisteban, L., Térémetz, M., Bleton, J.-P., Baron, J.-C., Maier, M. A., & Lindberg, P. G. (2016). Upper Limb Outcome Measures Used in Stroke Rehabilitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS One, 11, e0154792. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154792 Twitchell, T. E. (1951). THE RESTORATION OF MOTOR FUNCTION FOLLOWING HEMIPLEGIA IN MAN. Brain, 74, 443-480. doi:10.1093/brain/74.4.443 Vongsirinavarat, M., & Hiengkaew, V. (2014). Factors determining functional ability of individuals with stroke in community (Vol. 97 Suppl 7). Wang, C.H., H. C., Dai, M.H., Chen, C.H., Lai, Y.F. (2002). Inter-rater reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (stream) instrument. J Rehabil Med., 2002 Jan, 20-24. Williams, B. K., Galea, M. P., & Winter, A. T. (2001). What is the functional outcome for the upper limb after stroke? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47, 19-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60295-6 WJ, F. (1992). Fisher WJ. Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6, 238. Wohlk Olsen, L. (2003). Essays on Georg Rasch and his contributions to statistics. Wright, B. D., & Mok, M. (2000). Rasch models overview. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 83-106. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/1182 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:中風復健動作評估量表 (Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement, STREAM) 目前已有許多古典測驗理論相關的心理計量特性研究。但仍有三個問題待解決:(1) STREAM上、下肢次量表題目是否符合單向度 (unidimensionality)? (2) 將順序量尺 (ordinal) 直接當作等距量尺 (interval) 加總計分,有數學運算不當的問題。(3) 題目難度之估計具有樣本依賴性。羅序分析 (Rasch analysis) 以數學模式為基礎,依據個案作答反應以等距量尺同時估計個案能力及題目難度,且當評量數據符合羅序模式 (Rasch model) 預期時,該題目符合單向度。然而至今僅有一研究使用羅序分析驗證STREAM,無法呈現充分且穩定的證據。
研究目的:本研究目的為交叉檢驗STREAM上、下肢動作次量表之心理計量特性,包含建構效度之單向度、羅序信度,以及題目難度排序相關性。並且另外檢驗,以本研究及昔日研究之題目難度參數估計個案分數的相關性。 研究方法:採用次級資料分析法。先自原始資料中篩選出符合收案標準的302位亞急性期中風患者,再以羅序分析之評等量尺模式 (rating scale model) 驗證:單向度以各題目之羅序模式適配度為指標,適配度良好表示該題目具有單向度;羅序信度則假設測量標準誤會隨著個案能力不同而有所差異。最後將分析結果與過去研究進行交叉檢驗,比較心理計量特性的一致性及相關性。 結果:(一)上肢次量表僅有6題目具單向度,包含:舉手碰頭頂、手向後摸對側屁股、手臂舉高過頭、前臂旋前/後、握拳、手打開。下肢次量表有8題目具單向度,包含:大腿抬高、膝關節伸直、膝關節彎曲、於坐姿下腳板翹高且腳跟著地、腳跟翹高且腳尖著地、膝關節伸直且腳趾翹起、髖關節伸直且膝關節彎曲、於站姿下腳板翹高且腳跟著地。(二)上、下肢次量表羅序信度分別為 0.92、0.93,均略高於Hsueh等研究的0.86、0.91。上、下肢次量表之個案信度皆為243人大於0.90、59人介於0.80 ~ 0.90之間。(三)二篇研究之上、下肢次量表題目難度排序分別為低度及中度相關 (Spearman's rho = -0.31、0.48)。(四)二篇研究之上、下肢次量表題目難度參數估計個案分數之相關性分別為高度及中度相關 (Pearson's r = 0.96、0.62)。 結論:交叉檢驗STREAM上、下肢動作次量表之心理計量特性,發現上肢次量表題目單向度結果不一致、其題目難度排序僅有低度相關,但其題目難度參數估計之個案分數具高度相關。下肢次量表單向度結果相對較一致、題目難度排序有中度相關,然而其難度參數估計之個案分數卻僅有中度相關。分析結果與預期之間的落差也許跟樣本特性有關,但僅憑二篇研究之比較,較難推論二數據之優劣。未來宜再驗證並釐清之。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: There have been many studies based on classical test theory (CTT) which validated the psychometric properties of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM). But there were at least 3 psychometric issues that needed to be investigated, including (1) the unidimensionality of upper extremity (UE) / lower extremity (LE) movements subscales of the STREAM; (2) the direct transformation of ordinal raw STREAM total scores into interval scores, which was not mathematically valid; and (3) the estimation of the item difficulty parameters was sample dependent. The Rasch analysis enables examining unidimensionality and Rasch reliability. Moreover, Rasch analysis could transform the STREAM from an ordinal-level measure into an interval-level measure, and estimate both person’s ability and item difficulty. However, so far there was only one study using the Rasch analysis to validate the STREAM, which couldn’t provide sufficient and solid evidence.
Purpose: To cross-validate the psychometric properties of UE / LE movements subscales of the STREAM with the Rasch Analysis, including (1) the unidimensionality of construct validity; (2) the Rasch reliability; and (3) the correlation of the order of item difficulty parameters between previous study and this study. Besides, researchers validated the correlation of latent trait scores based on previous parameters and this study’s. Methods: Researchers employed secondary data analysis. First, 302 stroke patients during subacute period were derived by screening secondary data source. Then all items were examined with rating-scale model of Rasch analysis. For example, the unidimensionality was examined by each item’s goodness-of-fit index; and the Rasch reliability was estimated by standard error of measurement, which was assumed that it varied with different latent trait level. Last but not least, we cross-validated the outcomes between previous study and this study, and compared the consistency and the correlation of the psychometric properties. Results: (1) Only 6 items from UE subscale possessed the unidimensionality, including “Raises hand to touch top of the head”, “Places hand on sacrum”, “Raises arm overhead to fullest elevation”, “Supinates and pronates forearm”, “Closes hand from fully opened position”, and “Opens hand from fully closed position.” While 8 items from LE subscale possessed the unidimensionality, including “Flexes hip in sitting”, “Extends knee in sitting”, “Flexes knee in sitting”, “Dorsiflexes ankle in sitting”, “Plantar flexes ankle in sitting”, “Extends knee and dorsiflexes ankle in sitting”, “Flexes affected knee with hip extended”, and “Dorsiflexes affected ankle with knee extended.” (2) The Rasch reliabilities of UE / LE subscale of this study were 0.92 and 0.93 respectively, which were both slightly higher than Hsueh’s study (0.86 and 0.91 respectively). Besides, 243 patients’ person reliabilities of UE / LE subscale of this study were higher than 0.90, and remaining 59 patients’ person reliabilities were between 0.80 ~ 0.90. (3) The order of item difficulty parameters from UE / LE subscale between previous study and this study was modestly / moderately correlated,with Spearman's rho equaled to -0.31 and 0.48 respectively. (4) The latent trait scores from UE / LE subscale estimated by previous parameters and this study’s was highly / moderately correlated,with Pearson's r equaled to 0.96 and 0.62 respectively. Conclusions: With regard to UE subscale, although the outcome of the unidimensionality was inconsistent, and the order of item difficulty parameters was modestly correlated, the latent trait scores estimated by previous parameters and this study’s was highly correlated. On the contrary, LE subscale had more consistent outcome of the unidimensionality as well as moderately correlated order of item difficulty parameters, but the latent trait scores estimated by previous parameters and this study’s was just moderately correlated. The difference between analysis results and expectation was probably related to sample properties. But the limitation was that it’s still difficult to identify which parameter was better since the comparison was only between two studies. It’s suggested to revalidate the psychometric properties of STREAM with Rasch Analysis and clarify the problems in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-12T09:33:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R03429005-1.pdf: 1519190 bytes, checksum: 74f3328d26c3a8ed8c2acfb32a640602 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝…………………….…………………………………………….. i
中文摘要…………………….………………………………………... ii 英文摘要…………………….……………………………………….. iv 圖目錄…………………….………………………………………… viii 表目錄…………………….………………………………………….. ix 第一章 前言……………….……………………………………… 1 第一節 腦中風與其動作功能損傷………………………….……….. 1 第二節 中風患者動作功能評量之重要性………………..….……….. 4 第三節 簡介羅序分析…………………………………..…………... 12 第四節 常用於中風患者之動作功能評估量表優缺點分析……………. 20 第五節 中風復健動作評估量表動作次量表羅序分析結果之不足........... 26 第二章 研究方法………….……………………………………… 28 第一節 研究對象….……………………...………………..…….… 28 第二節 研究工具….……………………...………………..…….… 29 第三節 研究步驟….……………………...………………..………. 29 第四節 資料分析….……………………...………………..………. 30 第三章 結果……………….……………………………………….. 34 第四章 討論……………….……………………………………….. 37 第五章 結論……………….……………………………………….. 44 參考文獻…………………….……………………………………… 45 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 使用羅序分析交叉檢驗中風復健動作評估量表上肢/下肢動作次量表之心理計量特性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Cross-validation of the psychometric properties of Upper-Limb / Lower-Limb Movements subscales of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) with Rasch Analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 吳建德 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃小玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 中風復健動作評估量表,羅序分析,心理計量特性,動作功能評估量表, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM),Rasch analysis,psychometric properties,movement assessment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 73 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801611 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf | 1.48 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。