請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10465
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 雷立芬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Yu Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林姵妤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:31:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:31:41Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 台中菸葉廠,1978。「菸葉堆機烤菸機試烤及推廣經過」,台菸。第13卷,第8期。
2. 行政院衛生署國民健康局,2007。中華民國癌症登計年度報告。台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局。 3. 台灣菸酒公司,2000。縮減省產菸葉種菸面積說帖。台北:台灣菸酒公司。 4. 李家銘、葉春淵、洪榮耀,2007。「香菸及檳榔課稅效果之研究」,台灣公共衛生雜誌。26卷,1期,17-25。 5. 林壽春,1972。「本省烤菸用油種類與其經濟效益探討」,台菸。第9卷,第7期。 6. 姚誠,1998。「花蓮地區黃色種菸草變遷史初探」,發表於東台灣社會與文化的區域研究研討會。花蓮:東華大學。11月。 7. 徐茂炫、謝啟瑞(1999),「菸需、菸稅與反菸:實證文獻回顧與臺灣個案」,人文及社會科學集刊。11卷,3期,301-334。 8. 葉春淵、李家銘、陳昇鴻、黃琮琪,2005。「菸品健康福利捐對香菸消費量及產業之影響」,農業經濟半年刊。78期,105-149。 9. 葉春淵、邱城英、李家銘、黃玟儀、洪榮耀,2009。「香菸課稅效果之研究—門檻迴歸模型之運用」,台灣公共衛生雜誌。28卷,4期,289-299。 10. 傅祖壇、劉錦添、簡錦漢、賴文龍,2001。「健康風險認知與香菸消費行為-台灣的實證研究」,經濟論文期刊。29卷,1期,91-118。 11. 楊家俊,1956。『台灣菸酒公賣事業』。台北:商業周報社。 12. 溫啟邦,2003。國人吸菸與健康研究。行政院衛生署國民健康局。 BHP-92-Anti-Tobacco-E206。財團法人國家衛生研究院。 13. 溫彩芹,1975。「台灣菸草起源考」,台菸。第13卷,第4期。 14. 楊逸農,1970。「台灣菸葉發展之史的研究」,文藝復興。第1卷,第8期。 15. 稅所重雄,1931。「台灣菸草的沿革」,專賣通信。10卷,10號,36-38。 16. 鍾兆生,2006。『菸草房子《美濃菸樓的田野紀錄》』。台北:日創社。 17. Akaike H., 1974. “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 19: 716-723. 18. Atkinson, A. B., and J. L. Skegg, 1973. “Anti-Smoking Publicity and the Demand for Tobacco in the U.K.” Manchester School. Vol. 41, No.3:265-82. 19. Becker, G. S., Grossman M., and Murphy K. M., 1994. “An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addition.” American Economic Review. 84( 3):396-418. 20. Becker, G. S., and K. M. Murphy, 1988. “A Theory of Rational Addiction.” Journal of Political Economy. 96(4):675-700. 21. Brown, D., and L. F. Schrader, 1990, “Cholesterol Information and Shell Eggs Consumption,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72:548-555. 22. Chaloupka, F.,1991. ”Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking.” The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 99, No.4:722-742. 23. Chaloupka, F., and H. Saffer,1999. ”The Effect of Tobacco Advertising Bans on Tobacco Consumption.” National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY 10016, USA. 24. Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller., 1981. “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root,” Econometrica. 49: 1057-1072. 25. Engle, R.F., and C.W.J. Granger, 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction Representation, Estimation and Test.”Journal of the Econometric Society. Vol. 55, No. 2:251-273. 26. Granger, C., and P. Newbold, 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics. 2:111-120. 27. Hamilton, J.L., 1972,“The Demand for Cigarettes: Advertising, the Health Scare, and the Cigarette Advertising Ban.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 54 : 401-11. 28. Hsieh, C., L. Yen, J. Liu, and C. Lin, 1996. “Smoking, Health Knowledge, and Antismoking Campaigns An Empirical Study in Taiwan.” The Journal of Health Economics. Vol.15, No.1:87-104. 29. Hsieh, C., T. Hu, and C. Lin, 1999.”The Demand for Cigarettes in Taiwan: Domestic Versus Imported Cigarettes.” Journal of Contemporary Economic Policy. Vol. 17, No.2, 223-234. 30. Iwasaki, N., C. H. Tremblay, and V. J. Tremblay., 2006. “Advertising Restrictions and Cigarette smoking: Evidence from Myopic and Rational Addiction Models.” Contemporary Economics Policy.Vol.24, Issue.3:270-381. 31. Johansen, S. 1988. “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, 12:231-54. 32. Lin H. S., C. P. Wen, C. C. Hou, S.T. Chu, and W. S. Chung, 2002. “Research on Tobacco Litigation in Taiwan,” in Chi-pang Wen(eds), Collection of Research Papers on Tobacco or Health in Taiwan 2002, pp. 68-90, Taiwan, Division of Health Policy Research, National Health Research Institutes. 33. Keeler, E., T. Hu, G. Barnett, and G. Manning, 1993. “ Taxation, Regulation, and Addiction: A Demand Function for Cigarettes Based on Time-Series Evidence.” Journal of Health Economics. Vol. 12, No.1:1-18. 34. Phillips, P. C. B. and P. Perron(1988), “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression.” Biometrika, Vol. 75, No. 2:335-346. 35. Saffer, H., 1999. “Tobacco Advertising: Economic Theory and International Evidence.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No. W6958.. 36. Said, S.E. and D. A. Dickey , 1984. “Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Model of Unknown Order”, Biometrika, Vol. 71, No.3: 599-607. 37. Schneider, L., B. Klein, and K. M. Murphy. , 1981. “Governmental Regulation of Cigarette Health Information.” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.24,No.3: 575-612. 38. Shafey, O., Dolwick. S., and Guindon. G. E, 2003. “Tobacco Control Country Profiles 2003.” American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. 39. Zellner, A., 1962. 'An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.' Journal of the American Statistical Association. 57:348-368. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10465 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣為因應歐美國家要求我國菸品市場開放,在1987年開放國內菸品市場並且結束菸酒專賣制度。雖然國內菸草種植面積開始逐年下降,消費量卻呈現增加趨勢。由於吸菸不但對人體具有很大危害,每年治療因吸菸所導致疾病之健保醫療支出,亦為全民健保的沉重負擔。因此,政府為有效降低國人吸菸率,1997年開始實施菸害防制法、2002年推行菸酒新稅制,加徵菸品健康福利捐。
本研究利用1971年至2009年之紙菸消費量及零售價格等時間序列資料,並考量台灣紙菸開放進口、菸盒警示標語、菸害防制法、吸菸健康風險訊息,以及菸品健康福利捐等因素,建構台灣紙菸需求模型,全面性的探討渠等對國人菸品需求的影響,以提供菸品管理政策後續修正之參卓。 實證結果指出,在1971年至2009年,國產紙菸及進口紙菸之價格彈性分別為-0.88及-0.47,所得彈性則分別為0.06及0.18;國產紙菸對進口紙菸之交叉彈性為0.40,進口紙菸對國產紙菸之交叉彈性為0.63。此外,吸菸健康風險訊息、菸盒警告標語,以及菸品健康福利捐、對國內紙菸需求具有負面影響,菸品開放進口對國產紙菸消費具負面影響,但對進口紙菸消費具正面影響。最後,菸害防制法對國產紙菸需求具負面影響,但對進口菸品需求的影響並不明顯。 政府以抑制吸菸率為目標之菸害防制法等措施,雖具有抑制紙菸消費的效果;然而,抑菸政策對於進口紙菸的影響效果卻不如國產紙菸顯著,推測原因可能為,進口紙菸的類型較為多樣化,且部分高價進口紙菸予人較高級的質感,故在價格彈性及替代性上,較不如國產紙菸般易受影響。此外,與先進國家相比,我國紙菸價格仍有漲價空間,基於本研究結果,以價制量為有效之政策方法,故政府應繼續提高菸品健康福利捐之稅賦,並將菸品健康福利捐,改為從價計稅,以增加對進口紙菸銷售量的影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In order to response the requests from western countries, Taiwan Government continually practiced import liberation of foreign cigarettes and terminated tobaccos and wines monopoly in 1987. Furthermore, smoking not only increases the risk of getting disease but also augments the cost of medical treatment of national health insurance. In order to lower the smoking rate and subsidize the National Health Insurance, Taiwan Government continually carried out the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act in 1997,change of the Tobacco and Alcohol Tax Law in 2002, and the Tobacco Health and Welfare Tax.
This paper aims to analysis the comprehensive influence Tobacco Hazards Prevention and of Tobacco Health and Welfare Tax on demand for cigarette in Taiwan. Annual time series data through 1971 to 2009 from Taiwan tare used to estimate the demand for cigarettes, in consideration of the import liberation of foreign cigarettes, of anti-smoking campaigns on cigarette case, of the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act, of smoking-related health information, and of the Tobacco Health and Welfare Tax. Moreover, this paper hopes to provide government with suggestion about the amendment of cigarette management policy. The results indicate that the price elasticities for domestic and imported cigarettes are -0.88and -0.47, respectively. The income elasticities are 0.06 for domestic and 0.18 for imported cigarettes and the cross-price elasticities are 0.40 for domestic and 0.63 for imported cigarettes through 1971 to 2009. Besides, the spread of cigarette health information, anti-smoking campaigns on cigarette case, and the Tobacco Health and Welfare Tax have had a significantly negative effect on domestic and imported cigarette consumption. In addition, opening the markets to imported cigarettes has had a significantly negative effect on domestic cigarette consumption, but had a significantly positive effect on imported cigarette consumption. Finally, Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act has a significantly negative effect on domestic cigarette consumption, but had an insignificantly effect on imported cigarette consumption. Although Taiwan cigarette management policies are significant, their effects on domestic cigarettes are more significant than on imported cigarettes. We presume that imported cigarettes have a variety of categories, and some of them have high qualities. Therefore, imported cigarettes’ absolute value of price elasticity and income elasticity are smaller than domestic cigarettes’. Furthermore, the prices of cigarettes in Taiwan are still too low and raising the prices is an effective method for reducing the consumption on cigarette. For these reasons, in order to increase the influence on consumption of imported cigarettes, Taiwan Government should increase the amount of the Tobacco Health and Welfare Tax, and transform it from unit tax into ad valorem tax. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:31:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97627016-1.pdf: 1034096 bytes, checksum: 46e7f8f730dcdbe85786ea62a26c1a1c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 II
摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目次 V 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 9 第一節 研究背景與動機 9 第二節 研究目的 11 第二章 台灣菸品產業概況 13 第一節 菸草種植歷史 13 第二節 拒菸運動與菸品管理政策 18 第三節 菸品市場供需現況 24 第三章 文獻回顧 34 第一節 菸品上癮性理論 34 第二節 菸品行銷的限制與健康風險訊息對菸品消費的影響 36 第四章 紙菸市場需求估計與資料處理 39 第一節 吸菸健康風險資訊 39 第二節 紙菸需求之近似無關聯迴歸 43 第三節 資料來源與初步檢定 46 第五章 實證結果與分析 51 第一節 迴歸模型之檢定 51 第二節 近似無關迴歸估計結果 53 第三節 各類型彈性值之估計結果 57 第六章 結論 59 參考文獻 61 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣紙菸市場需求與管理政策之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Research on Cigarette Demand and Regulation Policy of Cigarette | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭震坤,劉鋼 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 紙菸管理政策,菸害防制法,菸品健康福利捐,紙菸需求, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cigarette management policy,the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act,the Tobacco Health and Welfare Tax,cigarette demand, | en |
dc.relation.page | 63 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。