Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 農業經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10445
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor徐世勳
dc.contributor.authorJen-Yiu Leeen
dc.contributor.author李任右zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T21:30:06Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-20
dc.date.available2021-05-20T21:30:06Z-
dc.date.copyright2010-08-20
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-08-18
dc.identifier.citation吳忠吉、葉日崧、游坤敏、林國雄、薛琦,1980。「我國主要工業產品有效保護水準之研究」,『社會科學論叢』。28,1-40。
梁國樹,1972。「有效保護關稅之理論與測定」,『社會科學論叢』。21,291-316。
財政部關政司、財政部關稅總局,2008。『2007關務年報』。台北:財政部關政司、財政部關稅總局
Anderson, J.E., 1970. “General Equilibrium and the Effective Rate of Protection,” The Journal of Political Economy. 78(4): 717-724.
Anderson, J.E., 1994. “The Theory of Protection,” In Surveys of International Trade. Edited by D. Greenaway and L.A. Winters. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.
Anderson, J.E. and P.J. Neary, 1996. “A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy,” Review of Economic Studies. 63(1): 107-125.
Anderson, J.E., 1998. “Effective protection redux,” Journal of International Economics. 44(1): 21-44.
Balassa, B.A., 1965. “Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation,” The Journal of Political Economy, 73(6): 573-594.
Balassa, B.A. and Associates, 1982. Development strategies in semi-industrial economies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Basevi, G., 1966. “The United States Tariff Structure: Estimates of Effective Rates of Protection of United States Industries and Industrial Labor,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, (48)2: 147-160.
Corden, W.M., 1966. “The Structure of a Tariff System and the Effective Protective Rate,” The Journal of Political Economy, 74(3): 221-237.
Corden, W.M., 1969. “Effective Protective Rates in the General Equilibrium Model: A Geometric Approach,” Oxford Economic Papers, 21(2): 135-141.
Corden, W.M., 1971. “The Substitution Problem in the Theory of Effective Protection,” Journal of International Economics. 1(1): 37-57.
Davis, G.A., 1998. “The Substitution Problem in the Theory of Effective Protection,” Review of International Economics. 6(2): 307-320.
Deardoff, A.V. and R.M. Stern, 1986. The Michigan Model of World Production and Trade: Theory and Applications. MIT Press.
Deardoff, A.V. and R.M. Stern, 1991. Computational Analysis of Global Trading Arrangements. University of Michigan Press.
Devarajan, S. and C. Sussangkarn, 1992. “Effective Rates of Protection When Domestic and Foreign Goods Are Imperfect Substitutes: The Case of Thailand,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 74(4): 701-711.
Dixit, A., 1985. “Tax Policy In Open Economies,” In Handbook of Public Economics. Edited by A.J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Ethier, W., 1972. “Input Substitution and the Concept of the Effective Rate of Protection,” Journal of Political Economy. 80(1): 34.
Ethier, W., 1977. “The Theory of Effective Protection in General Equilibrium: Effective-Rate Analogues of Nominal Rates,” The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique. 10(2): 233-245.
Evans, D., 1970. “A Programming Model of Trade and Production,” In Studies in International Economics. Edited by I. A. McDougall and R. H. Snape. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Greenaway, D.and C. Milner, 1993. Trade And Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: A Manual of Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press.
Grubel, H.G. and P.J. Lloyd, 1971. “Factor Substitution and Effective Tariff Rates,” The Review of Economic Studies. 38(1): 95-103.
Guisinger, S., 1970. “The Characteristics of Protected Industries in Pakistan,” In Effective Tariff Protection. Edited by H.J. Grubel and H.G. Johnson. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies and GATT.
Guisinger, S. and D. Schydlowsky, 1970. “The Empirical Relationship between Nominal and Effective Rates of Protection,” In Effective Tariff Protection. Edited by H.J. Grubel and H.G. Johnson. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies and GATT.
Hwang, H. and C.H. Peng, 2009. “Effective Rates of Protection and Foreign Direct Investment,” Academia Economic Papers. 37(4): 525-555.
Hertel, T.W., Ed., 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Holden, M., 2001. “Effective Protection Revisited: How Useful a Policy Tool for South Africa?” South African Journal of Economics. 69(4): 659-673.
Holden, M., 2005. “Trade Liberalisation in South Africa Once Again,” South African Journal of Economics. 73(4): 776-784.
Holden, M. and P. Holden, 1978. “Effective Tariff Protection and Resource Allocation: A Non-Parametric Approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 60(2): 294-300.
Jones, R.W., 1975. “Income Distribution and Effective Protection in a Multicommodity Trade Model,” Journal of Economic Theory. 11(1): 1-15.
Kohler, W., 1991. “Income Distribution and Labor Market Effects of Austrian Pre- and post-Tokyo-round Tariff Protection,” European Economic Review. 35(1): 139-154.
Laird, S., 1997. “Quantifying Commercial Policies,” In Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook. Edited by J. Francois and K. Reinert. Cambridge University Press.
Leith, J.C., 1968. “Substitution and Supply Elasticities in Calculating the Effective Protective Rate,” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 82(4): 587-601.
Lindland, J., 1997. “The Impact of the Uruguay Round on Tariff Escalation in Agricultural Products,” Food Policy. 22(6): 487-500.
Melo, J.D. and S. Robinson, 1980. “The impact of trade policies on income distribution in a planning model for Colombia,” Journal of Policy Modeling. 2(1): 81-100.
Melo, J.D. and S. Robinson, 1981. “Trade policy and Resource Allocation in the Presence of Product Differentiation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics. 63(2): 169-177.
Milner, C., 1992. “Second-Best Rates of Effective Protection with Imperfect Substitution,” Journal of Economic Studies. 19(1): 3-13.
Pearson, K.R., 1991. “Solving Nonlinear Economic Models Accurately via a Linear Representation,” Impact Project Working Paper No. IP-55.
Staelin, C.P.,1976. “A General-Equilibrium Model of Tariffs in a Noncompetitive Economy,” Journal of International Economics. 6(1): 39-63.
Taylor, L. and S.L. Black,1974. “Practical General Equilibrium Estimation of Resource Pulls Under Trade Liberalization,” Journal of International Economics. 4(1): 37-58.
Vousden, N., 1990. The Economics of Trade Protection. Cambridge University Press.
Yagci, F., 1984, Protection and Incentives in Turkish Manufacturing: An Evaluation of Policies and Their Impact in 1981. World Bank Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10445-
dc.description.abstract台灣於2002年1月1日成為世界貿易組織(WTO)會員後,須逐步消除貿易障礙,此將導致生產結構與貿易型態的調整,而帶動生產要素需求的改變,進而影響附加價值的變動。本文由以特定要素理論為基礎,並考慮短期內,資本不易在產業間自由移動的特性,採用全球貿易分析(Global Trade Analysis Project,簡稱GTAP)模型,分別進行台灣與其主要貿易對手-中國、美國、歐盟和日本之關稅減讓政策模擬,以測定貿易自由化對台灣與對其主要貿易對手有效保護水準之影響,並探討重要產業部門之有效保護率,同時比較其名目保護率和有效保護率。
本文透過「名目進口關稅稅率」、「傳統有效保護率」及「一般均衡之有效保護率」等三種不同的保護指標加以分析比較。為了避免所計算之「傳統有效保護率」及「一般均衡之有效保護率」有兩極化的誤差,特別考慮了非貿易中間投入的影響。
實證結果顯示,在名目上台灣與中國均重視的產品部門有「汽車及其零件」及「飲料及菸草製品」。而實質上台灣對於「汽車及其零件」之保護水準高於中國甚多,而台灣對「飲料及菸草製品」實質上之保護程度卻遠低於中國。
美國在名目關稅稅率上,高於10%之產品有「糖」、「酪乳製品」及「皮革製品」,而台灣只有「糖」和美國一樣是高度保護的。
歐盟在名目關稅稅率上,高於10%之產品有「糖」、「加工米」、「稻米」及「屠體肉」,其「一般均衡之有效保護率」亦呈現高度保護的狀況,即使名目關稅稅率不高甚至是0的部門,其一般均衡之有效保護率仍為正,顯示即使名目關稅降得再低,仍有利於該國部分產業之特定要素。
日本的農業關稅結構和台灣相當類似,皆對部分農產品,課以相當高的名目關稅稅率,因此其一般均衡之有效保護率也相當高。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTaiwan has become a member of the World Trade Organization since January 1, 2002. It has to eliminate trade barrier gradually. This will lead to the adjustment on the production structure and trade patterns. It also leads to a change on the demand of production factors. These will have a further impact on the change of the value added. Based on the specific factors theory and considering the immobility of the capital among industrial sectors in short run, this study will apply the Global Trade Analysis Project model to simulate the policies of the tariff reduction in Taiwan and its major trading partners such as China, U.S., EU, and Japan, to measure the impact on the effective protection rate of the trade liberalization in Taiwan and its main trade partners, and to examine the effective protection rate for the important industrial sectors at the same time to compare its nominal protection rate and effective protection rate.
This study use three different protection rates such as nominal tariff rate, traditional effective rate of protection, and effective rate of protection in general equilibrium to analyze the comparison. To avoid extreme bias on the calculation of the traditional effective rate of protection, and effective rate of protection in general equilibrium, it has considered the impacts of the nontraded intermediate inputs particularly.
The empirical results indicated that the highly protected sectors for Taiwan and China are the motor vehicles and parts, and the beverages and tobacco products on the nominal term. But the effective rate of protection on the motor vehicles and parts in Taiwan is much higher than that in China while the effective rate of protection on the beverages and tobacco products in Taiwan is not as high as that in China.
For the U.S., sugar, dairy products, and leather products have nominal tariff rate of more than 10%. But the effective rates of protection in general equilibrium term on sugar, dairy products, meat of cattle, sheep, goats, and horse, and leather products are higher than other sectors.
For the EU, the product sectors on the nominal tariff rate more than 10% are sugar, processed rice, paddy rice, and meat of cattle, sheep, goats, and hors. It is also shown that even if the nominal tariff rate is very low, it still has advantageous to protect the industry with very high effective tariff .
Agricultural tariff structure in Japan is quite similar with Taiwan. With a quite high of the nominal tariff rate on the partial agricultural products in both countries, therefore, Japan also has a quite high effective rate of protection in general equilibrium.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:30:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R95627014-1.pdf: 3863764 bytes, checksum: c2845ec20ca158d20d427a4f1254858c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘 要 i
英文摘要 iii
表 目 錄 vi
圖 目 錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程與章節安排 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 有效保護衡量之替代問題 5
第二節 有效保護之衡量與所得分配問題 9
第三節 一般均衡之有效保護 11
第四節 有效保護之應用 14
第三章 模型介紹與資料處理步驟 19
第一節 特定要素模型 20
第二節 GTAP 模型的架構 28
第三節 資料處理步驟 50
第四章 實證結果分析 53
第一節 部門加總介紹 53
第二節 台灣名目進口關稅稅率之結果分析 54
第三節 台灣傳統有效保護率之結果分析 56
第四節 各國一般均衡下之有效保護率之分析比較 59
第五章 結論 69
第一節 本文結論 69
第二節 未來研究方向 70
參 考 文 獻 71
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣與其主要貿易對手國間有效保護水準之測定zh_TW
dc.titleA Measure on the Effective Rate of Protection in Taiwan and Its Major Trading Partnersen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張靜貞,李篤華
dc.subject.keyword特定要素理論,非貿易中間投入,全球貿易分析,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSpecific Factors Theory,Nontraded Intermediate Input,Global Trade Analysis Project,en
dc.relation.page73
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2010-08-19
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept農業經濟學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:農業經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf3.77 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved