請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10428
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張育森 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yi Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃瀞頤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:28:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:28:45Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 李哖. 1987. 花卉之無土栽培. 花卉生產改進研討會專集. p.18-26.
李哖. 1988. 育苗介質與施肥. 園藝種苗產銷技術研討會專集. 種苗改良繁殖場編印. p.188-202. 林冠成、張志鵬. 2001. 聚丙烯酸的添加對椰纖無土栽培之影響. 華岡紡織期刊. 8:446-451. 郭宏遠. 1997. 天門冬屬四種觀葉植物種子發芽、幼苗生育與蔓綠絨潮汐灌溉之研究. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 臺北. 郭坤峰. 1994. 聖誕紅與天竺葵之養水分管理對根圈環境及淋洗問題之研究. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 臺北. 黃光亮、黃達雄. 1988. 國內盆栽植物栽培介質及利用. 花卉生產體系及栽培介質研討會專集. p.29-41. 黃敏展. 2002. 亞熱帶花卉學總論. 國立中興大學園藝系. 臺中. Abdelmagid, H.M. and M.A. Tabatabai. 1982. Decomposition of acrylamide in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 11:701-704. Agaba, H., L.J.B. Orikiriza, J.F.O. Esegu, J. Obua, J.D. Kabasa, and A. Hüttermann. 2010. Effects of hydrogel amendment to different soils on plant available water and survival of trees under drought conditions. Clean Soil Air Water 38:328-335. Akhter, J., K. Mahmood, K.A. Malik, A. Mardan, M. Ahmad, and M.M. Iqbal. 2004. Effect of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ. 50:463-469. Al-Harbi, A.R., A.M. Al-Omran, A.A. Shalaby, and M.I. Choudhary. 1999. Efficacy of a hydrophilic polymer declines with time in greenhouse experiments. HortScience 34:223-224. Apostol, K.G., D.F. Jacobs, and R.K. Dumroese. 2009. Root desiccation and drought stress responses of bareroot Quercus rubra seedlings treated with a hydrophilic polymer root dip. Plant Soil 315:229-240. Arbona, V., D.J. Iglesias, J. Jacas, E. Primo-Millo, M. Talon, and A. Gomez-Cadenas. 2005. Hydrogel substrate amendment alleviates drought effects on young citrus plants. Plant Soil 270:73-82. Austin, M.E. and K. Bondari. 1992. Hydrogel as a field medium amendment for blueberry plants. HortScience 27:973-974. Baasiri, M, J. Ryan, M. Mucheik, and S.N. Harik. 1986. Soil application of a hydrophilic conditioner in relation to moisture, irrigation frequency and crop growth. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 17:573-589. Bearce, B.C. and R.W. McCollum. 1977. A comparison of peatlite and noncomposted hardwood-bark mixes for use in pot and bedding-plant production and the effects of a new hydrogel soil amendment on their performance. Flor. Rev. 161:21-23. Boatright, J.L., D.E. Balint, W.A. Mackay, and J.M. Zajicek. 1997. Incorporation of a hydrophilic polymer into annual landscape beds. J. Environ. Hort. 15:37-40. Brady, N.C. and R.R. Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13th ed. Person Education, NJ, USA. p.162-164. Brown, L., M.M. Rhead, K.C.C. Bancroft, and N. Allen. 1980. Model studies of the degradation of acrylamide monomer. Water Res. 14:775-778. Burdett, A.N. 1990. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can. J. Res. 20:415-427. deBoodt, M. and O. Verdonck. 1972. The physical properties of the substrates in horticulture. Acta Hort. 26:37-44. Dehgan, B., T.H. Yeager, and F.C. Almira. 1994. Photinia and Podocarpus growth response to a hydrophilic polymer-amended medium. HortScience 29:641-644. del Amor, F.M., G. Ortuňo, M.D. Gómez, F. Vicente, and A.J. García. 2007. Yield and fruit quality response of sweet pepper plants cultivated in environmentally friendly substrates. Acta Hort. 761:527-531. Dole, J.M. and H.F. Wilkins. 2005. Floriculture-Principles and Species. 2nd ed. Upper Shaddle River, N.J., USA. Drzal, M.S., W.C. Fonteno, and D.K. Cassel. 1999. Pore fraction analysis: a new tool for substrate testing. Acta Hort. 481:43-54. Ferrazza, J. 1974. Grower evaluates soil amendment. Flor. Rev. 155:69-70. Fonteno, W.C. and T.E. Bilderback. 1993. Impact of hydrogel on physical properties of coarse-structured horticultural substrates. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. 118:217-222. Fonteno, W.C., D.K. Cassel, and R.A. Larson. 1981. Physical properties of three container media and their effect on poinsettia growth. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:736-741. Frantz, J.M., J.C. Locke, D.S. Pitchay, and C.R. Krause. 2005. Actual performance versus theoretical advantages of polyacrylamide hydrogel throughout bedding plant production. HortScience 40:2040-2046. Gehring, J.M. and A.J. III Lewis. 1980. Effect of hydrogel on wilting and moisture stress of bedding plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105:511-513. Ghebru, M.G., E.S. du Toit, and J.M. Steyn. 2007. Water and nutrient retention by Aquasoil and Stockosorb polymers. South African J. of Plant Soil 24:32-36. Gu, S., L.H. Fuchigami, S.H. Guak, and C. Shin. 1996. Effects of short-term water stress, hydrophilic polymer amendment, and antitranspirant on stomatal status, transpiration, water loss, and growth in ‘Better Boy’ tomato plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:831-837. Haase, D.L. and R. Rose. 1993. Soil moisture stress induces transplant shock in stored and unstored 2+0 Douglas-fir seedlings of varying root volume. For. Sci. 39:275-294. Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester, F.T. Jr. Davies, and R.L. Geneve. 2002. Hartmann and Kester’s plant propagation: principles and practices. 7th ed. Prentice Hall Intl., N. J., USA. Hayashi, T., H. Nishimura, K. Sakano, and Y. Tani. 1994. Microbial degradation of poly(sodium acrylate). Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 58:444-446. Heiskanen, J. 1995. Water status of sphagnum peat and a peat-perlite mixture in containers subjected to irrigation regimes. HortScience 30:281-284. Henderson, J.C. and D.L. Hensley. 1985. Ammonium and nitrate retention by a hydrophilic gel. HortScience 20:667-668. Henderson, J.C., F.T. Jr. Davies, and H.B. Pemberton. 1991. Landscape rose response to low moisture levels and a hydrophilic gel. Scientia Hort. 46:129-135. Idso, S.B., R.J. Reginato, D.C. Reicosky, and J.L. Hatfield. 1981. Determining soil-induced plant water potential depressions in alfalfa by means of infrared thermometry. Agron. J. 78:826-830. International panel on climate change. 2007. Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Jhurry, D. 1997. Agricultural polymers. Food Agr. Res. Council, Réduit, Mauritius. p.109-113. Johnson, M.S. 1984. Effect of soluble salts on water absorption by gel-forming soil conditioners. J. Sci. Food Agr. 35:1063-1066. Kay-Shoemake, J.L., M.E. Watwood, R.D. Lentz, and R.E. Sojka. 1998a. Polyacrylamide as an organic nitrogen source for soil microorganisms with potential effects on inorganic soil nitrogen in agricultural soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30:1045-1052. Kay-Shoemake, J.L., M.E. Watwood, R.E. Sojka, and R.D. Lentz. 1998b. Polyacrylamide as a substrate for microbial amidase in culture and soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30:1647-1654. Kay-shoemake, J.L., M.E. Watwood., L. Kilpatrick, and K. Harris. 2000. Exchangeable ammonium and nitrate from different nitrogen fertilizer preparations in polyacrylamide-treated and untreated agricultural soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31:245-248. Keever, G.J., G.S. Cobb, J.C. Stephenson, and W.J. Foster. 1989. Effect of hydrophilic polymer amendment on growth of container grown landscape plants. J. Environ. Hort. 7:52-56. Kuchenbuch, R., N. Claasen, and A. Jungk. 1986. Potassium availability in relation to soil moisture. II. Calculations by means of a mathematical simulation model. Plant Soil 95:233-243. Lande, S.S., S.J. Bosch, and P.H. Howard. 1979. Degradation and leaching of acrylamide in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 8:133-137. Larcher, W. 1995. Stress due to extreme temperatures, Physiological Plant Ecology. p340-354. Madakadze, I.C., K.A. Stewart, R.M. Madakadze, P.R. Peterson, B.E. Coulman, and D.L. Smith. 1999. Field evaluation of the chlorophyll meter to predict yield and nitrogen concentration of switchgrass. J. Plant Nutr. 22:1001-1010. McCollister, D.D., C.L. Hake, S.E. Sadek, and V.K. Rowe. 1965. Toxicologic investigations of polyacrylamides. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 7:639-651 Mikkelsen, R.L. 1994. Using hydrophilic polymers to control nutrient release. Fert. Res. 38:53-59. Miller, N. 1981. Bogs, bales, and BTU’S: A primer on peat. Horticulture 49:38-45. Minami, K., S.C.S. Bueno, S.F. Blat, and F.L. Cuquel. 2003. Efficiency of a soil conditioner on strawberry. Acta Hort. 607:169-173. Molitor, H.D. 1990. The European perspective with emphasis on subirrigation and recirculation of water and nutrients. Acta Hort. 272:165-173. Morvant, J.K., J.M. Dole and E. Allen. 1997. Irrigation systems alter distribution of roots, soluble salts, nitrogen, and pH in the root medium. HortTechnology 7:156-160. Nadler, A. 1993. Negatively charged PAM efficacy as a soil conditioner as affected by the presence of roots. Soil Sci. 156:79-85. Nelson, P.V. 2003. Greenhouse operation and management. Prentice Hall Intl., N. J., USA. Pery, R.S.M., O. Marfà, and L. Serrano. 1995. The effect of a hydrophilic polymer on plant water status and survival of transplanted pine seedlings. HortTechnology 5:141-143. Richardson, A.D., S.P. Duigan, and G.P. Berlyn. 2002. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol. 153:185-194. Saab, I.M., R.E. Sharp, J. Pritchard, and G.S. Voetberg. 1990. Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 93:1329-1336. Seybold, C.A. 1994. Polyacrylamide review: soil conditioning and environmental fate. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25:2171-2185. Sharp, R.E., W.K. Silk, and T.C. Hsiao. 1988. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials. I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol. 87:50-57. Still, S.M. 1976. Growth of ‘Sunny Mandalay’ chrysanthemums in hardwood-bark- amended media as affected by insolubilized poly (ethylene oxide). HortScience 11: 483-484. Taiz, T. and E. Zeiger. 2006. Plant Physiology. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates, MA, USA. Taylor, K.C. and R.G. Halfacre. 1986. The effect of hydrophilic polymer on media water retention and nutrient availability to Ligustrum lucidum. HortScience 21:1159-1161. Wallace, A. and G.A. Wallace. 1986. Effects of soil conditioners on emergence and growth of tomato, cotton, and lettuce seedlings. Soil Sci. 141:313-316. Wang, Y.T. 1989. Medium and hydrogel affect production and wilting of tropical ornamental plants. HortScience 24:941-944. Wang, Y.T. and C.A. Boogher. 1987. Effect of a medium-incorporated hydrogel on plant growth and water use of two foliage species. J. Environ. Hort. 5:125-127. Wang, Y.T. and L.L. Gregg. 1990. Hydrophilic polymers – Their response to soil amendments and effect on properties of a soilless potting mix. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115:943-948. Whittle, J. 1987. Physical and chemical properties of peat. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 36:284-287. Yadava, U.L. 1986. A rapid and nondestructive method to determine chlorophyll in intact leaves. HortScience 21:1449-1450. Zohuriaan-Mehr, M.J. and K. Kabiri. 2008. Superabsorbent polymer materials: a review. Iranian Polymer J. 17:451-477. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10428 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 作物栽培過程中,經常面臨缺水的逆境;如何減少農業用水以充分利用水資源,是現今所需面對的重要課題。當花壇植物種植於較小的盆器中時,對水分逆境較為敏感。由於以保水劑種植作物可降低灌溉用水量、增加苗木移植成活率及促進植物生長與開花,因此本研究擬探討保水劑種類與施用劑量對花壇植物生長及育苗之影響,以期能對花壇植物之生長及抗乾旱逆境有所幫助。
馬纓丹 (Lantana camara) 以三種保水劑Alcosorb® (AS)、TerraCottem® (TC) 及Taisap DC-386A (TS) 分別混合添加6或12 g•L-1於砂質壤土 (田土) 及泥炭苔:真珠石 (3號):蛭石 (3號) = 2:1:1 (體積比) (泥炭苔混合介質) 中栽植,結果顯示:無論於田土或泥炭苔混合介質中添加何種廠牌之保水劑,皆能增加其介質含水量及EC值,且降低介質硬度。栽培介質添加保水劑皆能減輕乾旱逆境對馬纓丹植株生長之不良影響,尤以田土為栽培介質時,添加12 g•L-1保水劑AS或添加6及12 g•L-1 TS者之表現較佳;而以泥炭苔混合介質種植時,添加12 g•L-1保水劑Alcosorb®者之表現較佳。 夏蓳‘小丑酒紅’ (Torenia fournieri ‘Clown Burgundy’) 以三種保水劑AS、TC及TS分別添加6或12 g•L-1於泥炭苔混合介質中栽植,結果顯示:以添加12 g•L-1 TC與6 g•L-1 AS較能減輕乾旱逆境對植株生長之不良影響。另以保水劑AS分別混合添加3、6、9及12 g•L-1於泥炭苔混合介質中栽植,以添加3 g•L-1保水劑者之株高、幅寬及抗乾旱逆境之綜合表現較佳。 非洲鳳仙花‘音樂’ (Impatiens wallerana ‘Accent’)、四季秋海棠‘超級奧運粉紅’ (Begonia semperflorens-cultorum ‘Super Olympia Pink’) 及香蓳菜 (Viola cornuta) 以3 g•L-1保水劑AS混合添加 (Mix-AS) 及底部添加 (Bottom-AS) 於泥炭苔混合介質中,並栽植於日夜溫30/25 ℃及20/15 ℃環境下,結果顯示:添加保水劑AS對非洲鳳仙花‘音樂’於兩日夜溫下之抗乾旱逆境較無助益,而四季秋海棠‘超級奧運 粉紅’與香蓳菜皆以涼溫下混合添加保水劑AS之生長表現較佳。又黃金金露華 (Duranta repens ‘Golden Leaves’) 以9 g•L-1保水劑AS混合添加於田土及泥炭苔混合介質中栽植,結果顯示:田土添加保水劑有促進黃金金露華植株生長之效果,且以夏季使用較為有效。而以泥炭苔混合介質種植黃金金露華時,未因添加保水劑而有促進植株生長之效果,尤以冬季種植時,添加保水劑處理之植株生長表現反而略遜於對照組。綜合上述,植物於適當生長環境下生長較快、需水量也較大,於該種環境下以介質混合添加保水劑對植株抗乾旱逆境較為有效。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Reducing water usage in order to make full use of water resources is an important issue for growers today. Bedding plants are usually grown in small containers that are easily susceptible to water stress. Hydrogel amendments had been reported to be effective on reducing irrigation requirements, increasing transplanting survival rate, and improving plant growth and flowering. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hydrogel amendments on plant growth and water use of bedding plants.
Three hydrogels, Alcosorb® (AS), TerraCottem® (TC), and Taisap DC-386A (TS), were incorporated in the growing media of Lantana camara grown under water deficit environment. Substrate incorporated with these three hydrogels had increased water content and electrical conductivity, and reduced hardness. Hydrogel treatments could reduce drought stress of plants grown under water deficit environment. Especially sandy loam treated with 12 g•L-1 AS, 6 or 12 g•L-1 TS had better plant growth. Peat based substrate [2 peatmoss: 1 perlite: 1 vermiculite (by volume)] treated with 12 g•L-1 AS had better plant growth. Torenia fournieri ‘Clown Burgundy’ plants grown with peat based substrate incorporated with 12 g•L-1 TC and 6 g•L-1 AS had better plant growth under water deficit condition. In addition, Alcosorb® at rate of 0, 3, 6, 9, or 12 g•L-1 was tested for the production of Torenia fournieri ‘Clown Burgundy’ in 9-cm pot with peat based medium. Overall plant growth and drought tolerance was better when 3 g•L-1 AS was incorporated in the substrate. Impatiens wallerana ‘Accent’, Begonia semperflorens-cultorum ‘Super Olympia Pink’, and Viola cornuta were grown in peat based substrate mixed with 3 g•L-1 AS (Mix-AS) or with 3 g•L-1 AS placed under substrate (Bottom-AS) under day/night temperatures of 30/25 and 20/15 oC. Hydrogel treatments had no effect on improving drought tolerance of Impatiens wallerana ‘Accent’. Whereas Mix-AS treatment had better plant growth of Begonia semperflorens-cultorum ‘Super Olympia Pink’ and Viola cornuta under 20/15 oC. Duranta repens ‘Golden Leaves’ was grown with sandy loam and peat based substrate both mixed with 9 g•L-1 AS. Hydrogel treatment resulted in better plant growth when plants were grown with sandy loam substrate, especially during summer. However, no significant effect were recorded when plants were grown with peat based substrate. Moreover, plant growth of hydrogel treatment was reduced compared to control plants. Consequently, growth rate and water requirement were greater when plants were grown under suitable conditions, therefore hydrogel treatments had significant effect on improving drought tolerance of plants. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:28:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96628139-1.pdf: 1661330 bytes, checksum: 603ad3f17c25b4936a4bcd8eae372c16 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 (Acknowledgement) I
摘要 II Abstract IV 目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 IX 第一章 前言 1 第二章 前人研究 3 一、栽培介質 3 二、栽培介質之特性 3 (一) 物理特性: 3 (二) 化學性質: 4 三、常用栽培介質之簡介 5 二、保水劑 7 (一) 定義 7 (二) 主要成分 7 (三) 保水劑之吸水特性 7 (四) 保水劑於植物栽培上之應用 8 (五) 保水劑之安全性 9 第三章 栽培介質添加不同保水劑對馬纓丹抗乾旱逆境之影響 11 摘要 (Abstract) 11 一、前言 (Introduction) 12 二、材料與方法 (Materials and Methods) 12 (一) 試驗一 砂質壤土添加土壤保水劑對馬纓丹生長品質之影響 12 (二) 試驗二 不同栽培介質添加土壤保水劑對馬纓丹生長品質之影響 13 (三) 調查項目 14 (四) 統計分析 15 三、結果 (Result) 15 四、討論 (Discussion) 20 第四章 保水劑種類與劑量對夏蓳‘小丑酒紅’生長之影響 39 摘要 (Abstract) 39 一、前言 (Introduction) 40 二、材料與方法 (Materials and Methods) 40 試驗一 泥炭苔混合介質添加保水劑對介質物理性質之影響 40 試驗二 土壤保水劑對夏蓳生長之影響 42 試驗三 土壤保水劑Alcosorb®對夏蓳育苗品質之影響 42 (二) 調查項目 43 (三) 統計分析 43 三、結果 (Result) 44 四、討論 (Discussion) 49 第五章 不同保水劑施用方式對花壇植物種植於不同溫度下之影響 73 摘要 (Abstract) 73 一、前言 (Introduction) 74 二、材料與方法 (Materials and Methods) 74 (一) 試驗一 不同溫度下保水劑對草花盆苗生產之影響 74 (二) 試驗二 不同季節下田土添加保水劑對黃金金露華苗木生長之影響 75 (三) 調查項目 75 (四) 統計分析 76 三、結果 (Result) 76 四、討論 (Discussion) 78 參考文獻 (References) 91 附錄 (Appendix) 97 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 土壤介質添加保水劑對花壇植物生育及水分利用之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Medium-incorporated Hydrogels on Plant Growth and Water Use of Bedding Plants | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃光亮,沈榮壽,張祖亮 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 保水劑,缺水逆境,介質含水量, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | hydroge,water stress,medium water content, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。