請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10377完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭榮和 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sung-Ching Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林松慶 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:24:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:24:45Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] “Climate Change 2007 : Synthesis Report,” P. 36, IPCC, November 2007
[2] Siemens' NEMA copper-rotor motorhttp://www.drives.co.uk/fullstory.asp?id=1957 [3] 徐子庭，'電動車31kW內置磁石永磁同步馬達設計研究，'國立台灣大學機械工程研究所 碩士論文，中華民國99年3月 [4] J. Corbett, “Design for Economic Manufacture,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 35/1, 1986 [5] Bendsoe, M. P., and Kikuchi, N., “Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 71, pp. 197-224., 1988 [6] Bendsφn, M. P., Rodrigues, H. C., “Integrated Topology and Boundary Shape Optimization of 2D Solid,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 87, pp. 15-34., 1991 [7] Mlejnek, H. P., “Some Aspects of Genesis of Structures,” Structural Optimization, Vol. 5, pp. 64-69., 1992 [8] John Farris and Winston A. Knight, “Design for Manufacture: Expert Processing Sequence Selection for Early Product Design,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 41/1, 1992 [9] Y. M. Xie, and G. P Steven, “A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 49, No. 5, PP. 885–896., 1993 [10] Karl Ulrich, David Sartorius, Scott Pearson and Mark Jakiela, “Including the Value of Time in Design-for-Manufacturing Decision Making,” MANAGEMENT SCIENCE/VO. 39, NO. 4, April 1993 [11] C. C. Chan, J. Z. Jiang, G. H. Chen, and X. Y. Wang, “A novel high power density permanent magnet variable-speed motor, “IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 8, pp.297- 303, 1993 [12] R. J. Yang, and C. H. Chuang, “Optimal Topology Design Using Linear Programming,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 265-275., 1994 [13] Geoffrey Boothroyd, “Product design for manufacture and assembly,” Computer-Aided Design Volume 26, 1994 [14] Y. M. Xie and G. P. Steve, “Evolutionary structural optimization for dynamic problems,” Computer and Structure Vol.58, No. 6, pp.1067-1073, 1996 [15] A. V. Kumar and D. C. Gossard, “Synthesis of Optimal Shape and Topology of Structures,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 118, pp. 68-74., 1996 [16] Torben Lenau, “The Missing Element in Design for Manufacture,” Annals of the ClRP Vol. 45/1, 1996 [17] C. C. CHAN, J. Z. JIANG, W. XIA and K. T. CHAU, “A novel wide speed range permanent magnet brushless DC motor drive for electric vehicles,” int. j. electronics, 1996, vol. 80, no. 2, pp.235-248 [18] Y. M. Xie and G. P. Steven, “Evolutionary Structural Optimization,” Springer, 1997 [19] Chu D. Nha, Y.M. Xie, A. Hira, G.P. Steven, “On various aspects of evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraint,” Finite Element in Analysis and Design 24, pp.197-212, 1997 [20] Georg Thierauf, Jianbo Cai, “Parallel evolution strategy for solving structural optimization,” Engineering Structure, Vol. 19, No. 4, PP.318-324, 1997 [21] Chu D. Nha, Y.M. Xie, G.P. Steven, “An Evolutionary Structural Optimization Method for Sizing problems with discrete design variables,” Computer and Structure 68, pp.419-431, 1998 [22] Yeh-Liang Hsu, Chuan-Tang Chen, Min-Sho Hsu, 'Interpreting Results from Topology Optimization Using Density Contours,' 中國機械工程學會第十五屆全國學術研討會論文集, pp. 855-860., 1998 [23] Qing Li, G.P. Steven, O.M. Querin, Y.M. Xie, “Evolutionary Shape Optimization for Stress Minimization,” Mechanics Research Communications, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp.657-664, 1999 [24] M. Beckers, “Topology Optimization Using a Dual Method With Discrete Variable,” Structural Optimization, Vol. 17, pp. 14-24., 1999 [25] O.M. Querin, G.P. Steven, Y.M. Xie, “Evolutionary structural optimization using an additive algorithm,” Finite Element in Analysis and Design 34, pp.291-308, 2000 [26] O.M. Querin, V. Young, G.P. Steven, Y.M. Xie, ”Computational efficiency and validation of bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization,” Computer Method Application Engineering 189, pp.559-573, 2000 [27] T. Ohnishi and N. Takahashi, Fellow, IEEE, “Optimal Design of Efficient IPM Motor Using Finite Element Method,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 36, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2000 [28] C.C. Hwang, J.J. Chang, “Design and analysis of a high power density and high efficiency permanent magnet DC motor,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 209, PP.234-236, 2000 [29] K. Sakai, T. Hattori, N. Takahashi, M. Arata, T. Tajima, “High Efficiency and High Performance Motor for Energy Saving in Systems” IEEE, 2001 [30] Tsai-C. Kuo, Samuel H. Huang, Hong-C. Zhang, “Design for manufacture and design for 'X': concepts, applications, and perspectives,” Computer & Industrial Engineering 41, PP.241-260, 2001 [31] Martin O’Driscoll, “Design for manufacture,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 122 PP.318–321, 2002 [32] Nikolaos D. Lagaros, Manolis Papadrakakis, George Kokossalakis, “Structural optimization using evolutionary algorithm,” Computer and Structure 80, pp.571-589, 2002 [33] Kab-Jae Lee, Sol Kim, Seong-Yeop Lim and Ju Lee, “Bridge design of interior permanent magnet motor for hybrid electric vehicle,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 19, pp.601–606, 2004 [34] “Evaluation of 2004 Toyota Prius Hybrid Electric Drive System,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2004 [35] “FRACTIONAL-SLOT SURFACE MOUNTED PM MOTORS WITH CONCENTRATED WINDINGS FOR HEV TRACTION DRIVES,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2005 [36] LEILA PARSA, “PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF PERMANENT MAGNET AC MOTORS,” Ph.D. Thesis, 2005 [37] “Evaluation of 2005 Honda Accord Hybrid Electric Drive System,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2006 [38] T. Ishigami et al., “Manufacturing technology for continuous high-density coils for brushless motors,” Precision Engineering 31, pp.260–268, 2007 [39] “EVALUATION OF THE 2008 LEXUS LS 600H HYBRID SYNERGY DRIVE SYSTEM,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2008 [40] “HVH250 Series Electric Motors,” Remy International, Inc., 2009 [41] 林宗輝、馬光華，“The Rising and Growing Design-For-Manufacture (DFM),” 聯華電子公司，中央研發部-邏輯製程開發 [42] Paul Barrow, “可製造性設計 – 促進生產力的強大工具，” 華爾萊科技公司 [43] 張智凱，”系統化複材三明治車體結構設計及最佳化方法，” 國立台灣大學機械工程學系 博士論文，中華民國96年7月 [44] S. Y. Hu and J. H. Cheng, 'Development of an Object-oriented Optimization Software for Industrial Utilization,' Proceedings of the 4th Conference of OPTDES, Japan, 2004 [45] 小栗富士雄、小栗達男，”機械設計圖表便覽-增定三版，”中華民國82年 [46] Bill Frank (Multek Applications Engineer), “Design for Manufacture,” MULTEK presentation | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10377 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 因著全球暖化、能源危機的威脅，進入了電動車輛蓬勃發展的新時代，對於車用動力馬達性能要求逐漸提高，其中功率重量密度與功率體積密度為關鍵的重要指標。以傳統的馬達結構設計流程方法進行馬達結構設計，不僅僅在功率密度目標上常無法有效達成，也因為結構設計的結果在可製造性上產生問題，導致整個流程不斷產生設計迴圈，使設計工作的效率低落。
因此本研究針對傳統馬達結構設計流程方法進行問題探討與分析，建構了創新的馬達結構設計流程方法，以整合演化式結構最佳化(ESO)方法與基於功率體積密度之馬達結構材料設置、馬達結構材料分佈最佳化、馬達機構分件與材料配置幾何匹配、基於功率重量密度之分件重量配置與初步結構設計，為一演化式馬達結構最佳化(EMSO)設計流程方法，搭配在結構細部設計中考慮馬達可製造性設計，使得此創新的馬達結構設計流程方法，可以有效的達成功率密度目標，並使結構設計結果具備可製造性。 實務應用在FORMOSUN先進動力研究中心所開發的電動車輛平台Green Jumper之動力馬達結構設計上，不僅較傳統設計流程所設計的馬達提升25.6%功率重量密度，與10%功率體積密度之性能，更使得結構設計的結果通過可製造性判定，並且整個流程完全沒有任何設計迴圈之產生，可以說是極為有效地提升設計工作的效率，解決了傳統馬達結構設計流程之問題。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Because of global warming and energy shortage crisis, it is entering the electric vehicle vigorous development new time. So the performance requirements for vehicle motor gradually increase, and the power weight and volume density is key and important indicator. The motor structure traditional design method not only makes the power density cannot effectively be reached, but also have problems in manufacture. It causes the entire flow to produce unceasingly design circle, and makes the project work efficiency to be low.
Therefore this research carries on the question discussion and the analysis in the traditional motor structural design method. This research also constructs the innovation motor structural design method, include Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO), establishment of motor structural material based on of power volume density, the motor structural material distribution optimization, motor mechanism design with the material disposition geometry match, and the weight disposition and preliminary structural design based on the power weight density. The integration of these processes is named Evolutionary Motor Structural Optimization (EMSO). EMSO can effectively achieve the power density goal, and makes the structural design result has the manufacturability. The practice application in motor structural design of electric vehicle platform, Green Jumper, which the FORMOSUN advanced power research center developed, not only promote 25.6% power weight density and 10% power volume density, compared to traditional design method, but also make the structural design result passed the manufacturability determination. And the entire flow does not have any design circle. This research result can promote the project work efficiency, and solve problems in the traditional motor structural design flow. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:24:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95522515-1.pdf: 17324540 bytes, checksum: b528e1f2fc426b29c0b8bb7dd6a02721 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ................................................4
中文摘要 ................................................5 Abstract ................................................6 目錄 ................................................7 圖目錄 ...............................................11 表目錄 ...............................................14 第一章 緒論 ......................................15 1-1. 研究背景 ......................................15 1-1-a. 現今馬達應用發展 .............................15 1-1-b. 電動車輛發展對於動力馬達結構設計需求的影響 ..17 1-2. 研究動機 .......................................19 1-2-a. 馬達基本構造說明 ..............................19 1-2-b. 以電磁材料與結構材料分類馬達構造 ............20 1-2-c. 馬達結構材料各部分之作用 .....................20 1-2-d. 傳統馬達結構設計流程說明 .....................22 1-2-e. 傳統馬達結構設計流程所造成的問題 ............25 1-3. 研究目的 .......................................27 1-3-a. 建立創新的馬達結構設計流程與方法 ............27 1-3-b. 電動車輛之動力馬達實務應用 .....................28 1-4. 論文架構 .......................................35 第二章 文獻回顧與探討 ..............................37 2-1. 文獻回顧主題分類與年份表 .....................37 2-2. 車用動力馬達功率密度發展 .....................41 2-3. 馬達功率密度提升方法 ..............................42 2-4. 結構設計最佳化方法 ..............................42 2-5. 可製造性設計方法 ..............................43 2-6. 文獻回顧探討與總結 ..............................44 第三章 創新馬達結構設計流程 .....................46 3-1. 傳統馬達結構設計流程步驟問題分析 ............46 3-2. 建構基於功率密度目標與可製造性之馬達結構設計流程 ...49 3-2-a. 馬達結構設計步驟修正 ..............................49 3-2-b. 馬達製程設計步驟修正 ..............................50 3-2-c. 整合修正之步驟為創新馬達結構設計流程 ............52 第四章 演化式馬達結構最佳化設計 .....................55 4-1. 演化式馬達結構最佳化(EMSO)設計流程 ............55 4-1-a. EMSO設計流程步驟說明 .....................55 4-1-b. 演化式結構最佳化(ESO)計算理論說明 ............58 4-1-c. 分析軟體介紹說明 ..............................59 4-2. 演化式馬達結構最佳化設計實務應用 ............62 4-2-a. 基於功率體積密度的初始結構材料設置 ............62 4-2-b. 馬達結構負載與邊界條件設置 .....................64 4-2-c. 演化式馬達結構材料分佈最佳化分析 ............72 4-2-d. 以分佈最佳化分析結果進行機構分件設計 ............78 4-2-e. 機構分件設計與材料分佈最佳化結果幾何匹配 ...78 4-2-f. 基於功率重量密度的重量最佳化配置與初步結構設計 ...80 4-2-g. 馬達各機構分件細部設計 .....................81 4-2-h. 演化式馬達結構最佳化設計與過去傳統設計結果之比較..83 第五章 馬達可製造性設計 ..............................85 5-1. 可製造性設計方法說明 ..............................85 5-2. 本研究採用之馬達製造方法介紹 .....................87 5-3. 針對製造方法建構製程設計限制與參數資料庫 ............89 5-4. Green Jumper動力馬達細部設計與可製造性判定 ...95 5-5. Green Jumper動力馬達可製造性設計結果 ............99 第六章 本研究應用成果比較與討論 ....................101 6-1. 實際應用成果比較 .............................101 6-2. 比較結果討論 ......................................102 第七章 結論與未來方向 .............................107 7-1. 研究結論 ......................................107 7-2. 未來研究方向建議 .............................109 參考文獻.................................................110 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 基於功率密度目標與可製造性之馬達結構設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Motor structure design based on power density target and manufacturability | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳文方,羅應照 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 馬達功率密度,創新馬達結構設計流程方法,演化式馬達結構最佳化,可製造性設計, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | motor power density,the innovation motor structural design method,evolutionary motor structural optimization (EMSO),design manufacturability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 113 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf | 16.92 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。