請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/103534完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃名鉞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Yueh Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林伯儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Bo-Ru Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-18T16:47:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-19 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-08-18 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-08-03 00:00:00 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] H. C. Anton. Width of clavicular cortex in osteoporosis. British Medical Journal, 1(5641):409–411, 1969. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5641.409.
[2] Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. AAMI TIR34971:2023 application of ISO 14971 to machine learning in artificial intelligence — guide, 2023. [3] Axial Medical Printing Limited. Axial3D Insight 510(k) summary (K250369), 2025. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K250369. [4] Beijing Infervision Healthcare Medical Technology Co., Ltd. InferOperate Suite 510(k) summary (K250237), 2025. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K250237. [5] A. N. Bhagoji, S. Chakraborty, P. Mittal, and S. Calo. Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 634–643. PMLR, 2019. [6] P. Blanchard, E. M. El Mhamdi, R. Guerraoui, and J. Stainer. Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NeurIPS 2017), pages 119–129, Long Beach, CA, 2017. Curran Associates. [7] K. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth. Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pages 1175–1191, Dallas, TX, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3133956.3133982. [8] Brightheart. BrightHeart View Classifier 510(k) summary (K251456), 2025. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K251456. [9] J. Chang, B. R. Lin, T. H. Wang, and C. M. Chen. Deep learning model for pleural effusion detection via active learning and pseudo-labeling: a multisite study. BMC Medical Imaging, 24(1):92, 2024. doi:10.1186/s12880-024-01260-1. [10] C. J. Clopper and E. S. Pearson. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26(4):404–413, 1934. doi:10.1093/biomet/26.4.404. [11] E. R. DeLong, D. M. DeLong, and D. L. Clarke-Pearson. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44(3):837–845, 1988. doi:10.2307/2531595. [12] J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 248–255, Miami, FL, USA, 2009. IEEE. [13] C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Proceedings of the Third Theory of Cryptography Conference (TCC), volume 3876 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 265–284. Springer, 2006. [14] K. Engelke, J. E. Adams, G. Armbrecht, P. Augat, C. E. Bogado, M. L. Bouxsein, D. Felsenberg, M. Ito, S. Prevrhal, D. B. Hans, and E. M. Lewiecki. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: The 2007 ISCD official positions. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 11(1):123–162, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010. [15] European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR), 2016. [16] European Union. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 annex i — general safety and performance requirements, 2017. [17] European Union. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the european parliament and of the council of 5 april 2017 on medical devices, amending directive 2001/83/EC, regulation (EC) no 178/2002 and regulation (EC) no 1223/2009 and repealing council directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC, 2017. [18] European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the european parliament and of the council of 13 june 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act), 2024. [19] Ever Fortune.AI Co., Ltd. EFAI ChestSuite XR Pleural Effusion Assessment System 510(k) summary (K222076), 2022. [20] D. Feller-Kopman and R. Light. Pleural disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 378:740–751, 2018. [21] J. Fu, J. Liu, H. Tian, Y. Li, Y. Bao, Z. Fang, and H. Lu. Dual attention network for scene segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3146–3154, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019. IEEE. [22] C. Gentry. Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 169–178, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2009. ACM. [23] C. Guo, G. Pleiss, Y. Sun, and K. Q. Weinberger. On calibration of modern neural networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1321–1330. PMLR, 2017. [24] B. Hariharan, P. Arbel\'aez, R. Girshick, and J. Malik. Hypercolumns for object segmentation and fine-grained localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 447–456, Boston, MA, USA, 2015. IEEE. [25] J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 7132–7141, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018. IEEE. [26] H.-Y. Huang, Y.-H. Huang, C.-H. Lin, W.-T. Tao, W.-C. Liao, S. Yu, H.-C. Mo, W. Feng, Y.-T. Hsu, J.-C. Wang, and K.-H. Ko. AI-assisted chest radiograph interpretation enhances diagnostic confidence and standardizes diagnostic accuracy across radiologists: A multi-reader study. Clinical Imaging, 130:110694, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110694. [27] M. Humbert, G. Kovacs, M. M. Hoeper, et al. 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. European Respiratory Journal, 61:2200879, 2023. [28] IDx, LLC. De novo classification request for IDx-DR (decision summary for DEN180001), 2018. [29] Imagen Technologies, Inc. De Novo Classification Request for OsteoDetect (DEN180005): Decision Summary, 2018. [30] International Council for Harmonisation. Statistical principles for clinical trials. ICH Harmonised Guideline, 1998. ICH E9; Step 4 adopted 5 February 1998. [31] International Council for Harmonisation. ICH e17 general principles for planning and design of multiregional clinical trials. ICH Harmonised Guideline, 2017. ICH E17; Step 4 adopted 16 November 2017. [32] International Council for Harmonisation. Estimands and sensitivity analysis (ICH E9(R1) addendum). ICH Harmonised Guideline, 2019. ICH E9(R1); Step 4 adopted 20 November 2019. [33] International Council for Harmonisation. Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R3), 2025. [34] International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62304:2006/AMD 1:2015 medical device software — software life cycle processes, 2015. [35] International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62366-1:2015 medical devices — part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices, 2015. [36] International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 82304-1:2016 health software — part 1: General requirements for product safety, 2016. [37] International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Software as a medical device (SaMD): Key definitions, 2013. [38] International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Software as a medical device (SaMD): Clinical evaluation, 2017. [39] International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: Guiding principles, 2025. [40] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13485:2016 medical devices — quality management systems — requirements for regulatory purposes, 2016. [41] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14971:2019 medical devices — application of risk management to medical devices, 2019. [42] International Organization for Standardization. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — good clinical practice, 2020. Withdrawn historical edition; superseded by ISO 14155:2026 (4th ed.). [43] International Organization for Standardization. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — good clinical practice, 2026. [44] International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 23894:2023 information technology — artificial intelligence — guidance on risk management, 2023. [45] International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 information technology — artificial intelligence — management system, 2023. [46] International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2019 ISCD official positions — adult, 2019. https://iscd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2019-Official-Positions-Adult-1.pdf. [47] International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2023 ISCD official positions — adult. Position Development Conference outcome document, 2023. Updated in 2023; supersedes the 2019 Adult Official Positions. https://iscd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2023-ISCD-Adult-Positions.pdf. [48] M. Jang, M. Kim, S. J. Bae, S. H. Lee, J. M. Koh, and N. Kim. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using chest radiographs with deep learning: Development and external validation with a cohort dataset. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 37(2):369–377, 2022. doi:10.1002/jbmr.4477. [49] P. Kairouz, H. B. McMahan, B. Avent, A. Bellet, M. Bennis, A. N. Bhagoji, K. Bonawitz, Z. Charles, G. Cormode, R. Cummings, et al. Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2):1–210, 2021. [50] J. A. Kanis and WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Synopsis of a WHO report. Osteoporosis International, 4(6):368–381, 1994. doi:10.1007/BF01622200. [51] M. Kim, J. Y. Wang, W. Lu, H. Jiang, S. Stojadinovic, Z. Wardak, T. Dan, R. Timmerman, L. Wang, C. Chuang, G. Szalkowski, L. Liu, E. Pollom, E. Rahimy, S. Soltys, M. Chen, and X. Gu. Where does auto-segmentation for brain metastases radiosurgery stand today? Bioengineering, 11(5):454, 2024. [52] J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1):159–174, 1977. [53] T. Li, A. K. Sahu, A. Talwalkar, and V. Smith. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3):50–60, 2020. [54] T. Li, A. K. Sahu, M. Zaheer, M. Sanjabi, A. Talwalkar, and V. Smith. Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems (MLSys), volume 2, pages 429–450, 2020. [55] B. R. Lin, M.-Y. Huang, W.-C. Sun, P.-W. Wu, P. Chang, E. Tu, and W.-C. Hung. Federated learning for privacy-preserving opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density using chest radiographs: A multi-center independent validation study. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia, 2026. Article in press; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2026.06.001. [56] B.-R. Lin, W.-C. Sun, E. Tu, and Taiwan Medical Imaging Co., Ltd. Causal contribution node analysis system applied to horizontal federated learning (CCNA), 2026. [57] B.-R. Lin, W.-C. Sun, Y.-C. Tu, and Taiwan Medical Imaging Co., Ltd. Feedback-driven causal contribution node and explainable pathway analysis system (FD-CCNA), 2026. [58] N. U. Lin, E. Q. Lee, H. Aoyama, I. J. Barani, D. P. Barboriak, B. G. Baumert, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. The Lancet Oncology, 16(6):e270–e278, 2015. [59] T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Doll\'ar. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 2980–2988, Venice, Italy, 2017. IEEE. [60] C. M. Liu, E. S. C. Shih, J. Y. Chen, C. H. Huang, I. C. Wu, P. F. Chen, S. Higa, N. Yagi, Y. F. Hu, M. J. Hwang, and S. A. Chen. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram improves the diagnosis and prediction of mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension. JACC: Asia, 2(3):258–270, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.02.008. [61] G. Liu, M. Peacock, O. Eilam, G. Dorulla, E. Braunstein, and C. C. Johnston. Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporosis International, 7(6):564–569, 1997. doi:10.1007/BF02652563. [62] Z. Liu, H. Mao, C.-Y. Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie. A ConvNet for the 2020s. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 11976–11986, 2022. [63] I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter. SGDR: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), pages 1–16, Toulon, France, 2017. ICLR. [64] I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019. [65] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. Ag\"uera y Arcas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), volume 54 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1273–1282, 2017. [66] National Electrical Manufacturers Association. DICOM PS3.3: Information object definitions, 2024. https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part03.html. [67] N. A. Obuchowski. ROC analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184(2):364–372, 2005. [68] N. A. Obuchowski and D. K. McClish. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices. Statistics in Medicine, 16(13):1529–1542, 1997. [69] E. S. Orwoll, S. K. Oviatt, and T. Mann. The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 70(4):1202–1207, 1990. [70] A. Paszke, A. Chaurasia, S. Kim, and E. Culurciello. ENet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation, 2016. arXiv:1606.02147, https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.02147. [71] A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, et al. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 32, pages 8024–8035, Vancouver, Canada, 2019. Curran Associates, Inc. [72] J. Y. Reginster, T. Hamasaki, S. Fujiwara, M. Alokail, and M. Hiligsmann. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic osteoporosis screening using artificial-intelligence assisted chest radiographs in Japan. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia, 11(4):127–136, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.afos.2025.10.003. [73] J. B. Reitsma, A. W. S. Rutjes, K. S. Khan, A. Coomarasamy, and P. M. Bossuyt. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(8):797–806, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.005. [74] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 28, pages 91–99, 2015. [75] N. Rieke, J. Hancox, W. Li, F. Milletari, H. R. Roth, S. Albarqouni, S. Bakas, M. N. Galtier, B. A. Landman, K. Maier-Hein, et al. The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3(1):119, 2020. [76] J. T. Schousboe, K. E. Wilson, and D. P. Kiel. Detection of abdominal aortic calcification with lateral spine imaging using DXA. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 9(3):302–308, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.007. [77] R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 618–626, Venice, Italy, 2017. IEEE. [78] L. S. Shapley. A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II, volume 28 of Annals of Mathematics Studies, pages 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1953. [79] M. J. Sheller, B. Edwards, G. A. Reina, J. Martin, S. Pati, A. Kotrotsou, M. Milchenko, W. Xu, D. Marcus, R. R. Colen, and S. Bakas. Federated learning in medicine: Facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10(1):12598, 2020. [80] C. H. Sudre, W. Li, T. Vercauteren, S. Ourselin, and M. J. Cardoso. Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations. In Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support (DLMIA), volume 10553, pages 240–248, Qu\'ebec City, QC, Canada, 2017. Springer. [81] L. Sweeney. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(5):557–570, 2002. doi:10.1142/S0218488502001648. [82] Taiwan Medical Imaging Co., Ltd. TAIMedImg DeepMets 510(k) summary (K250427), 2025. [83] T. Tango. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. Statistics in Medicine, 17(8):891–908, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0258%2819980430%2917%3A8%3C891%3A%3AAID-SIM780%3E3.0.CO%3B2-B. [84] Therapixel. MammoScreen BD 510(k) summary (K243685), 2025. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K243685. [85] M. N. Tsao, D. Rades, A. Wirth, S. S. Lo, B. L. Danielson, A. Vichare, C. Hahn, and E. L. Chang. International practice survey on the management of brain metastases: Third international consensus workshop on palliative radiotherapy and symptom control. Clinical Oncology, 24(6):e81–e92, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2012.03.008. [86] U.S. Congress. Health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 (HIPAA), Pub. L. No. 104-191, 1996. [87] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance regarding methods for de-identification of protected health information in accordance with the HIPAA privacy rule, 2012. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/de-identification/index.html. [88] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of federal regulations, title 21, part 11 — electronic records; electronic signatures, 1997. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-11. [89] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: General/specific intended use, 1998. [90] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Determination of intended use for 510(k) devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2002. Dec. 2002; status: Final. [91] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. General principles of software validation. FDA Guidance Document, 2002. Jan. 2002; status: Final. [92] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cybersecurity for networked medical devices containing off-the-shelf (OTS) software. FDA Guidance Document, 2005. Jan. 2005; status: Final. [93] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for the content of premarket submissions for software contained in medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2005. May 2005; status: Superseded. [94] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Establishment and operation of clinical trial data monitoring committees. FDA Guidance Document, 2006. Mar. 2006; status: Final. [95] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Significant risk and nonsignificant risk medical device studies. FDA Guidance Document, 2006. Jan. 2006; status: Final. [96] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Statistical guidance on reporting results from studies evaluating diagnostic tests. FDA Guidance Document, 2007. Mar. 2007; status: Final. [97] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for the use of bayesian statistics in medical device clinical trials. FDA Guidance Document, 2010. Feb. 2010; status: Final. [98] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Electronic source data in clinical investigations. FDA Guidance Document, 2013. Sep. 2013; status: Final. [99] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Financial disclosure by clinical investigators. FDA Guidance Document, 2013. Feb. 2013; status: Final. [100] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Investigational device exemptions (IDEs) for early feasibility medical device clinical studies, including certain first in human (FIH) studies, 2013. [101] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical device classification product codes. FDA Guidance Document, 2013. Apr. 2013; status: Final. [102] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The 510(k) program: Evaluating substantial equivalence in premarket notifications [510(k)], 2014. [103] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Types of communication during the review of medical device submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2014. Apr. 2014; status: Final. [104] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2016. Feb. 2016; status: Final. [105] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Collection of race and ethnicity data in clinical trials. FDA Guidance Document, 2016. Oct. 2016; status: Final. [106] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. List of highest priority devices for human factors review. FDA Guidance Document, 2016. Feb. 2016; status: Superseded. [107] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Non-inferiority clinical trials to establish effectiveness. FDA Guidance Document, 2016. Nov. 2016; status: Final. [108] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Postmarket management of cybersecurity in medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2016. Dec. 2016; status: Final. [109] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Use of electronic informed consent: Q&A. FDA Guidance Document, 2016. Dec. 2016; status: Final. [110] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Deciding when to submit a 510(k) for a software change to an existing device. FDA Guidance Document, 2017. Oct. 2017; status: Final. [111] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Evaluation and reporting of age-, race-, and ethnicity-specific data in medical device clinical studies. FDA Guidance Document, 2017. Sep. 2017; status: Final. [112] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Software as a medical device (SaMD): Clinical evaluation. FDA Guidance Document, 2017. Dec. 2017; status: Withdrawn. [113] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Acceptance of clinical data to support medical device applications and submissions: FAQ. FDA Guidance Document, 2018. Feb. 2018; status: Final. [114] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Appropriate use of voluntary consensus standards in premarket submissions for medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2018. Sep. 2018; status: Final. [115] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Benefit-risk factors to consider when determining substantial equivalence in 510(k) with different technological characteristics. FDA Guidance Document, 2018. Sep. 2018; status: Final. [116] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Breakthrough devices program. FDA Guidance Document, 2018. Dec. 2018; status: Final. [117] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Content of premarket submissions for management of cybersecurity in medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2018. Oct. 2018; status: Draft. [118] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Surrogate endpoint resources for drug and biologic development, 2018. [119] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Use of electronic health record data in clinical investigations. FDA Guidance Document, 2018. Jul. 2018; status: Final. [120] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Adaptive designs for clinical trials of drugs and biologics. FDA Guidance Document, 2019. Nov. 2019; status: Final. [121] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Changes to existing medical software policies resulting from section 3060 of the 21st century cures act. FDA Guidance Document, 2019. Sep. 2019; status: Final. [122] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Developing a software precertification program: A working model — total product life cycle approach, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/119722/download. [123] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The least burdensome provisions: Concept and principles. FDA Guidance Document, 2019. Feb. 2019; status: Final. [124] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Recommended content and format of non-clinical bench performance testing information in premarket submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2019. Dec. 2019; status: Final. [125] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The special 510(k) program. FDA Guidance Document, 2019. Sep. 2019; status: Final. [126] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. eCopy program for medical device submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2020. Apr. 2020; status: Superseded. [127] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Providing regulatory submissions for medical devices in electronic format: Submissions under section 745a(b). FDA Guidance Document, 2020. Jul. 2020; status: Final. [128] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) software as a medical device (SaMD) action plan, 2021. [129] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Clinical decision support software, 2022. [130] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Clinical performance assessment: Considerations for computer-assisted detection (CADe) devices applied to radiology images and radiology device data in premarket notification (510(k)) submissions, 2022. [131] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Computer-assisted detection devices applied to radiology images and radiology device data. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Sep. 2022; status: Final. [132] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Content of human factors information in medical device marketing submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Dec. 2022; status: Final. [133] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Developing and responding to deficiencies in accordance with the least burdensome provisions. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Oct. 2022; status: Final. [134] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Display devices for diagnostic radiology. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Sep. 2022; status: Final. [135] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA and industry actions on 510(k) submissions: Effect on FDA review clock and goals. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Oct. 2022; status: Final. [136] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, section 524B — ensuring cybersecurity of devices, 2022. [137] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Multiple endpoints in clinical trials. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Oct. 2022; status: Final. [138] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Refuse to accept policy for 510(k)s. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Apr. 2022; status: Final. [139] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Select updates for the breakthrough devices program guidance. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Oct. 2022; status: Superseded. [140] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Technical performance assessment of quantitative imaging in radiological device premarket submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Jun. 2022; status: Final. [141] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. User fees and refunds for premarket notification submissions (510(k)s). FDA Guidance Document, 2022. Oct. 2022; status: Final. [142] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Best practices for selecting a predicate device to support a premarket notification [510(k)] submission. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Sep. 2023; status: Draft. [143] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Content of premarket submissions for device software functions. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Jun. 2023; status: Final. [144] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cybersecurity in medical devices: Refuse to accept policy for cyber devices under section 524B. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Mar. 2023; status: Final. [145] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Electronic submission template for medical device 510(k) submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Oct. 2023; status: Final. [146] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Fostering medical device improvement: FDA activities and engagement with the voluntary improvement program. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Sep. 2023; status: Final. [147] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Off-the-shelf software use in medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Aug. 2023; status: Final. [148] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Recommendations for the use of clinical data in premarket notification [510(k)] submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2023. Sep. 2023; status: Draft. [149] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR 312.85 — phase 4 studies, 2024. Postmarketing (Phase 4) studies. [150] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) third party review program and third party emergency use authorization (EUA) review. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Nov. 20, 2024; status: Final (supersedes the Mar. 2020 Third Party Review Program guidance). [151] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Acceptable media for electronic product user manuals. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Aug. 2024; status: Final. [152] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of federal regulations, title 21, part 820 — quality system regulation, 2024. [153] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of federal regulations, title 21, part 860 — medical device classification procedures, 2024. [154] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Collection of race and ethnicity data in clinical trials and clinical studies for FDA-Regulated medical products. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Jan. 2024; status: Draft. [155] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Electronic systems, electronic records, and electronic signatures in clinical investigations: Q&A. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Oct. 2024; status: Final. [156] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Predetermined change control plans for medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Aug. 2024; status: Draft. [157] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Quality management system regulation (QMSR); final rule, 2024. [158] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Select updates for the medical device user fee small business qualification guidance. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Feb. 2024; status: Superseded. [159] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Select updates for the premarket cybersecurity guidance: Section 524B of the FD&C act. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Mar. 2024; status: Draft (select updates); superseded — incorporated into the 2026-02 final Cybersecurity QMS guidance. [160] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Use of data monitoring committees in clinical trials. FDA Guidance Document, 2024. Feb. 2024; status: Draft. [161] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) premarket notification database. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm, 2025. Accessed: 2026-05-03. [162] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Artificial intelligence-enabled device software functions: Lifecycle management and marketing submission recommendations. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Jan. 2025; status: Draft. [163] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Computer software assurance for production and quality management system software. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Final guidance issued 2026-02-03 (supersedes 2025-09-24). [164] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cybersecurity in medical devices: Quality management system considerations and content of premarket submissions. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Final guidance issued 2026-02-03 (supersedes 2025-06-27). [165] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Evaluation of sex-specific data in medical device clinical studies. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Final guidance issued 2025-03. [166] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, section 201(h), 2025. [167] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, section 513(i) — substantial equivalence, 2025. [168] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Investigational device exemptions (IDE), 2025. [169] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Investigational new drug application (IND), 2025. [170] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Marketing submission recommendations for a predetermined change control plan for artificial intelligence-enabled device software functions, 2025. Final guidance issued August 18, 2025; originally issued December 4, 2024. [171] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical device user fee small business qualification and determination. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Jul. 31, 2025; status: Final (supersedes the Aug. 2018 guidance). [172] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices; radiology devices; classification of the radiological computer-assisted detection and diagnosis software. Final Order, Federal Register, FR Doc. 2025-10789, 2025. Jun. 13, 2025; codifies the classification of radiological CADe/CADx software as Class II (special controls) under 21 CFR 892.2090. The classification was applicable from May 24, 2018 (De Novo, Imagen Technologies OsteoDetect, received Feb. 5, 2018). [173] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Requests for feedback and meetings for medical device submissions: The Q-submission program. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Final guidance, May 2025; supersedes the June 2, 2023 version. Docket FDA-2018-D-1774. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/requests-feedback-and-meetings-medical-device-submissions-q-submission-program. [174] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Supplements and other changes to an approved application (NDA), 2025. [175] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medical devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2025. Dec. 18, 2025; status: Final (supersedes the Aug. 2017 guidance). [176] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Clinical decision support software. FDA Guidance Document, 2026. Revised final guidance issued Jan. 6, 2026 and re-issued Jan. 29, 2026; supersedes the Sep. 28, 2022 version. Docket FDA-2017-D-6569. [177] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of federal regulations, title 21, part 807, subpart E — premarket notification procedures. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (current), 2026. 807.81–807.97, including 807.92 (content and format of a 510(k) summary). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-807/subpart-E. [178] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of federal regulations, title 21, part 820 — quality management system regulation (QMSR). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (current), 2026. Effective 2026-02-02; incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference ( 820.7). Design and development requirements are at 820.10(c); 820.20–820.30 are [Reserved]. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-820. [179] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. General wellness: Policy for low-risk devices. FDA Guidance Document, 2026. Updated Jan. 6, 2026; status: Final. [180] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: Guiding principles, 2021. [181] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Predetermined change control plans for machine learning-enabled medical devices: Guiding principles, 2023. [182] K. Varma, Y. Zhou, N. Baracaldo, and A. Anwar. LEGATO: A layerwisE gradient aggregaTiOn algorithm for mitigating Byzantine attacks in federated learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 14th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pages 272–277. IEEE, 2021. arXiv:2107.12490, doi:10.1109/CLOUD53861.2021.00040. [183] Vysioneer Inc. VBrain 510(k) summary (K203235), 2021. [184] Y. Wang, Y. Hu, S. Chen, H. Deng, Z. Wen, Y. He, H. Zhang, P. Zhou, and H. Pang. Improved automatic segmentation of brain metastasis gross tumor volume in computed tomography images for radiotherapy: A position attention module for U-Net architecture. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 14(7):4475–4489, 2024. [185] S. K. Warfield, K. H. Zou, and W. M. Wells. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): An algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(7):903–921, 2004. doi:10.1109/TMI.2004.828354. [186] World Health Organization Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series 843, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1994. [187] S. Xie, R. Girshick, P. Doll\'ar, Z. Tu, and K. He. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5987–5995, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017. IEEE. [188] W. J. Youden. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1):32–35, 1950. [189] B. Yurdakul. Statistical Properties of Population Stability Index. PhD thesis, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, 2018. ScholarWorks at WMU, Dissertations Paper 3208, https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3208/. [190] Zebra Medical Vision Ltd. HealthCXR 510(k) summary (K192320), 2019. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K192320. [191] J. R. Zech, M. A. Badgeley, M. Liu, A. B. Costa, J. J. Titano, and E. K. Oermann. Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: A cross-sectional study. PLOS Medicine, 15(11):e1002683, 2018. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002683. [192] Y. Zhao, M. Li, L. Lai, N. Suda, D. Civin, and V. Chandra. Federated learning with non-IID data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582, 2018. [193] 立法院. 個人資料保護法 (Personal Data Protection Act), 2015. [194] 立法院. 醫療器材管理法, 2021. [195] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材來源流向資料建立及管理辦法. 全國法規資料庫 (法規代碼 L0030118),衛授食字第1101602299號令, 2021. 2021.04.20 訂定發布,2021.05.01 施行. [196] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材優良臨床試驗管理辦法, 2021. [197] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材嚴重不良事件通報辦法. 全國法規資料庫 (法規代碼 L0030124),依醫療器材管理法第48條第3項訂定, 2021. 2021.04.28 訂定發布,2021.05.01 施行. [198] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材回收處理辦法. 全國法規資料庫 (法規代碼 L0030126),依醫療器材管理法第58條第3項訂定, 2021. 2021.04.28 訂定發布,2021.05.01 施行. [199] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材安全監視管理辦法. 全國法規資料庫 (法規代碼 L0030125),依醫療器材管理法第47條第3項訂定, 2021. 2021.04.28 訂定發布,2021.05.01 施行. [200] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材許可證核發與登錄及年度申報準則. 全國法規資料庫 (法規代碼 L0030128),衛授食字第1101603144號令, 2021. 2021.04.29 訂定發布,2021.05.01 施行. [201] 衛生福利部. 醫療器材分類分級管理辦法, 2023. [202] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材軟體確效指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2017. 發布/修訂:2017.12. [203] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 採用電子病歷資料進行臨床研究指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2020. 發布/修訂:2020.11. [204] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材人因可用性工程評估指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2020. 發布/修訂:2020.04. [205] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧機器學習技術之醫療器材軟體查驗登記技術指引, 2021. [206] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧/機器學習技術之電腦輔助偵測(CADe)及電腦輔助診斷(CADx)醫療器材查驗登記技術指引, 2021. [207] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧/機器學習技術之醫療器材軟體查驗登記送件常見問答集. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [208] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 應執行安全監視之醫療器材品項. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [209] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 智慧科技醫療器材查驗登記常見問答集. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [210] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 適用於製造業者之醫療器材網路安全指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [211] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材中文說明書編寫原則. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [212] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材品質管理系統準則. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.04. [213] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材安全性與功效性基本規範及技術文件摘要指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [214] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材臨床試驗文件技術性評估申請須知及醫療器材臨床試驗計畫案申請須知. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [215] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材臨床試驗計畫案申請須知. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [216] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材軟體上市後變更申請之管理指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.12. [217] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材軟體製造業者品質管理系統指導文件, 2021. [218] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材軟體製造業者符合醫療器材品質管理系統準則 (QMS) 問答集. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.12. [219] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材類似品判定流程及函詢申請說明. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2021. 發布/修訂:2021.05. [220] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 無顯著風險之人工智慧機器學習技術醫療器材軟體臨床試驗態樣說明及示例, 2022. [221] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 真實世界數據與證據輔助醫療器材決策管理參考文件. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2022. 發布/修訂:2022.04. [222] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 行動醫療科技醫療器材上市前審查網路安全問答集. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2022. 發布/修訂:2022.03. [223] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫用軟體分類分級參考指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2022. 發布/修訂:2022.09. [224] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材嚴重不良事件通報表填寫指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2022. 發布/修訂:2022.12. [225] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材許可證(``EFAI ChestSuite XR pleural effusion assessment system''), 2022. [226] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材軟體上市後變更申請常見問答集. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2022. 發布/修訂:2022.03. [227] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 電腦輔助分流與通知(CADt)醫療器材查驗登記技術指引, 2022. [228] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧/機器學習技術之電腦輔助偵測(CADe)及電腦輔助診斷(CADx)醫療器材查驗登記技術指引 (修正版), 2023. [229] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 得以電子化說明書取代中文說明書之醫療器材品項及其標籤或包裝應加註事項. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2023. 發布/修訂:2023.03. [230] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材上市後監督規範. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2023. 發布/修訂:2023.09. [231] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材標籤應刊載單一識別碼規定(衛授食字第 1121600286 號公告). 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2023. 發布/修訂:2023.02. [232] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材臨床試驗性別差異指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2023. 發布/修訂:2023.02. [233] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧機器學習技術之醫療器材軟體預定變更控制計畫申請要點暨撰寫說明問答集, 2024. [234] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 國產人工智慧/機器學習技術之醫療器材專案諮詢輔導要點. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2024. 發布/修訂:2024.04. [235] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 應用人工智慧/機器學習技術之醫療器材軟體預定變更控制計畫(Predetermined Change Control Plans, PCCP)申請要點暨撰寫說明指引, 2024. [236] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材臨床試驗應用電腦化系統及電子數據管理指引. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2024. 發布/修訂:2024.12. [237] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧/機器學習技術之電腦輔助偵測(CADe)及電腦輔助診斷(CADx)醫療器材查驗登記技術指引 (修正版), 2025. [238] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧/機器學習技術之醫療器材獨立性能評估常見問答集. 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2025. 發布/修訂:2025.08. [239] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧/機器學習技術醫療器材查驗登記之諮詢輔導問答集(114.08.07 公告版). 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署技術指引, 2025. 發布/修訂:2025.08. [240] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材許可證資料庫 (TFDA Medical Device Product Information Query). https://lmspiq.fda.gov.tw/web/, 2025. Accessed: 2026-05-03. [241] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材許可證(``台灣醫學影像'' 骨質密度異常篩檢系統 / TAIMedImg osteopredict), 2025. [242] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 醫療器材軟體許可證(``台灣醫學影像'' 肺高壓偵測系統 / TAIMedImg PHDS), 2025. [243] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. 人工智慧醫療器材優良機器學習實務:發展與管理原則, 2026. [244] 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心. 確認性臨床試驗資料缺失之指導原則. 藥品臨床試驗統計指導原則, 2019. 發布/修訂:2019.11. [245] 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心. 臨床試驗調整設計之統計指導原則. 藥品臨床試驗統計指導原則, 2022. 發布/修訂:2022.10. [246] 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心. 確認性臨床試驗次群體研究之指導原則. 藥品臨床試驗統計指導原則, 2023. 發布/修訂:2023.11. [247] 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心. 臨床試驗多重指標之統計指導原則(第二版). 藥品臨床試驗統計指導原則, 2023. 發布/修訂:2023.09. [248] 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心. 以不劣性臨床試驗確立藥品有效性之指導原則. 藥品臨床試驗統計指導原則, 2024. 發布/修訂:2024.11. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/103534 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人工智慧(AI)於醫學影像、訊號與多模態資料上的學術成果,迄今已累積大量演算法創新。然而,將這些演算法轉化為可被臨床醫師實際採用、且通過主管機關審查的「醫療器材軟體」(Software as a Medical Device, SaMD),仍是一條少被系統性論述的「轉譯科學」路徑。本博士論文以此為核心命題,提出一個涵蓋完整 SaMD 生命週期的十三步驟框架,並以四項已取得上市許可之案例評估其適用性與操作一致性:從預期用途定義、風險管理(ISO 14971)、軟體生命週期管理(IEC 62304)、品質管理系統(ISO 13485)、演算法開發、分析性驗證、臨床試驗,一路延伸至法規送審與審查應答,終至學術發表、專利布局與成果推廣;並進一步將框架延伸至上市後監控與預定變更控制計畫(Predetermined Change Control Plan, PCCP)等全生命週期治理層面。
為避免流於純方法論鋪陳,本論文以四項已於本人博士學程期間成功通過 FDA 510(k) 或 TFDA 上市核准之 SaMD 產品為實證案例:(1)EFAI ChestSuite XR Pleural Effusion Assessment System(胸腔 X 光肋膜積水檢測,US FDA 510(k) K222076 & TFDA 衛部醫器製字第 007764 號)——以主動學習(Active Learning)與偽標籤(pseudo-labeling)僅需標註 16% 訓練影像即達成與完整監督相近之訓練準確度(95% vs.\ 97%),並建立跨國多讀者共識決標準作業程序(Standard Operating Procedure, SOP);(2)DeepMets(核磁共振影像腦轉移瘤分割,US FDA 510(k) K250427)——導入 confidence-score 取聯集搭配裁決者(adjudicator)之新型共識 Ground Truth(GT)流程,並以多中心資料(含美國 16 個 sites)證實泛化能力;(3)PHDS(心電圖(Electrocardiogram, ECG)肺動脈高壓偵測,TFDA 衛部醫器製字第 008156 號)——以預先設定之經胸壁心臟超音波(Transthoracic Echocardiography, TTE)估計收縮期肺動脈壓(sPAP > 50 mmHg)作為研究參考標準,取代主觀讀者判讀,並在 N = 10,085 之大規模跨中心、時序獨立驗證集上,將敏感度提升至 83.1%——相較文獻報告之醫師 ECG 目視判讀敏感度(約 34.1%,非同一 cohort、非配對)約為 2.4 倍;(4)OsteoPredict(胸腔 X 光骨質密度異常篩檢工具,TFDA 衛部醫器製字第 008579 號)——以跨機構聯邦式學習架構在 5,943 組胸腔 X 光(Chest X-ray, CXR)/雙能量 X 光骨密度檢查(Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, DXA)配對上完成訓練,並於第 173 個訓練週期 (epoch) 完成模型鎖定,外部驗證集(N = 3,007)之接收者操作特徵曲線下面積(Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, AUROC)達 0.9421(全世代;預先設定之 40–79 歲主力篩檢目標族群為 0.932)。另規劃涵蓋預定再訓練情境之 PCCP,惟尚未獲核准。 本論文之原創性貢獻體現於五個層面,與第 1.7 節論文貢獻聲明及第 5.5 節總結一致:框架層級——提出並以實證佐證之 13 步驟 SaMD 全生命週期轉譯模型,將醫療 AI 轉譯形式化為可追溯之系統性工程問題,而非孤立之模型優化;方法學層級——針對跨異質性資料模態之不同轉譯瓶頸匹配適當之機器學習策略(主動學習、聯邦式學習、影像與結構化臨床變項之多模態融合——以 OsteoPredict 為代表案例);驗證策略層級——建立以法規決策為導向之驗證方法學,包含於可行處以量測為基礎錨定參考標準、於直接量測不可得時建立結構化國際多讀者共識流程、預先訂定之允收標準與次群組分析計畫、以及大規模、多中心、跨國、時序獨立之驗證設計;轉譯與法規層級——主導 FDA 重大缺陷清單之科學應答(DeepMets:以資料異質性與匹配方法學差異成功解釋戴斯相似係數(Dice Similarity Coefficient, DSC)落差)、TFDA 共病症失效邊界之主動揭露(PHDS:將混淆效應寫入 Intended Use)、並以聯邦式學習貢獻節點分析方法申請兩項中華民國發明專利,將法規攻防重構為轉譯科學之一部分;生命週期治理層級——透過所規劃之 PCCP 封閉迴路、效能漂移監控設計與聯邦式治理機制,將框架延伸至上市後之持續監督,使醫療 AI 於全產品生命週期(TPLC)接受證據導向之治理。 總結而言,本論文以四項實際取證之 SaMD 產品為實證基礎,提供一個從概念發想至臨床落地之「醫療 AI 轉譯科學實證藍圖」(An Evidence-based Blueprint for Medical AI Translation;其跨團隊、前瞻情境之外部可重複性仍待後續研究驗證),補足過去學術文獻側重演算法創新、卻對法規轉譯過程鮮少深入論述之缺口。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to medical imaging, signals, and multimodal data has produced extensive algorithmic innovation, yet translating these algorithms into clinically adopted, regulatorily authorized Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) is rarely articulated in a systematic way. This dissertation proposes a thirteen-step framework spanning the full SaMD lifecycle — from Intended Use definition, risk management (ISO 14971), software lifecycle management (IEC 62304) and quality management system (ISO 13485), through algorithm development, analytical validation and clinical trial, to regulatory submission and academic and patent translation — and assesses it across four authorized cases, extending it to post-market surveillance and Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCP) as a lifecycle-governance layer.
Four SaMD products authorized during the author's doctoral program ground the framework. EFAI ChestSuite XR Pleural Effusion Assessment System (chest X-ray pleural effusion detection; US FDA 510(k) K222076; TFDA 衛部醫器製字第 007764 號) used Active Learning with pseudo-labeling to reach training accuracy comparable to full supervision (95% vs.\ 97%) while annotating only 16% of the training images, and established a formal standard operating procedure for international multi-reader consensus ground truth. DeepMets (magnetic resonance imaging brain-metastasis segmentation; US FDA 510(k) K250427) introduced a confidence-score union with adjudicator consensus ground truth and generalized across 16 US sites. PHDS (electrocardiogram (ECG)-based pulmonary hypertension detection; TFDA 衛部醫器製字第 008156 號) adopted a pre-specified transthoracic echocardiography-derived estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (> 50 mmHg) as the study reference standard in place of subjective reader adjudication, achieving 83.1% sensitivity on a cross-site, temporally independent cohort (N = 10,085). OsteoPredict (chest X-ray bone-density screening; TFDA 衛部醫器製字第 008579 號) applied inter-institutional Federated Learning to 5,943 paired chest X-ray / dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry cases, reaching an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9421 externally (N = 3,007). A PCCP covering predefined retraining scenarios is planned but has not yet been authorized. The original contributions span five dimensions, consistent with Sections 1.7 and 5.5: framework-level — a 13-step full-lifecycle model formalizing SaMD translation as a traceable systems-engineering problem rather than isolated model optimization; methodological — matching machine-learning strategies (Active Learning, Federated Learning, multimodal fusion) to specific translational bottlenecks; validation-strategy — a regulatory decision-oriented methodology using measurement-based reference standards where available and structured multi-reader consensus where they are not, with pre-specified acceptance criteria, subgroup plans, and cross-site, temporally independent designs; translational and regulatory — leading the scientific response to an FDA Major Deficiency Letter, disclosing comorbidity failure boundaries to TFDA, and filing two Taiwanese invention patent applications on Federated Learning contribution-node analysis; and lifecycle governance — extending the framework into post-market oversight via PCCP-driven closed loops, drift monitoring, and federated governance across the Total Product Life Cycle (TPLC). In summary, this dissertation offers an evidence-based blueprint for medical AI translation from concept to clinical deployment, grounded in four authorized SaMD products — its cross-team, prospective external reproducibility remaining to be validated — thereby addressing a literature gap that emphasizes algorithmic innovation while under-documenting regulatory translation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-08-18T16:47:36Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-08-18T16:47:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Doctoral Dissertation Acceptance Certificate i
Acknowledgement iii 中文摘要 v Abstract ix Statement of Prior Publication xiii Author Contribution Statement xvii Table of Contents xxiii List of Figures xxxiii List of Tables xxxv Denotation xxxvii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Medical Artificial Intelligence 2 1.2 The Full Development Lifecycle of Medical Artificial Intelligence 6 1.3 Product Case Studies in Medical Artificial Intelligence 15 1.4 A Systematic Framework for Identifying Clinical Needs 20 1.5 Literature Review and Research Gaps 27 1.5.1 Research Questions and Thesis Claims 28 1.6 Intended Use 31 1.7 Statement of Contributions 36 Chapter 2 Research Framework and Methodology 41 2.1 Core Methodology: Quality Management System and Design Controls 43 2.2 Risk Management and Regulatory Pathway Assessment 45 2.2.1 Safety and Effectiveness: Clinical Validation and Technical Assessment of AI Medical Devices 46 2.2.1.1 Diagnostic Performance Metrics: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Threshold Trade-offs 47 2.2.1.2 ROC Curve Analysis and the Clinical Meaning of AUROC 47 2.2.1.3 Prevalence Effects and Predictive Values 48 2.2.1.4 MRMC Study (Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study): A Principal Study Design for Reader–AI Interaction 48 2.2.1.5 Cybersecurity: From Privacy Protection to Patient Safety 48 2.2.1.6 Usability Engineering: Application of IEC 62366-1 to AI 49 2.2.1.7 Explainability (XAI) and User Trust 49 2.2.2 Risk Management: Integrating ISO 14971 with AI-Specific Risks 50 2.2.2.1 ISO 14971: The Core International Standard for Medical-Device Risk Management 50 2.2.2.2 AI-Specific Risk Management Methodology 51 2.2.2.3 Other Risks 52 2.2.2.4 Comprehensive Risk Control Measures Based on ISO 14971 53 2.2.2.5 Residual Risk and Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) 54 2.2.3 Quality and Regulations: Global Regulatory Harmonization and Local Requirements 55 2.2.3.1 A Structural Transition in Quality System Regulation: From QSR to QMSR 55 2.2.3.2 ISO/IEC 42001: A New Benchmark for AI Management Systems 56 2.2.3.3 Addressing the EU AI Act 57 2.2.3.4 Software Life-Cycle Standards: IEC 62304 and IEC 82304-1 57 2.2.3.5 In-Depth Analysis of Jurisdiction-Specific Regulations: TFDA, FDA, and EU MDR 58 2.2.3.6 Integrated Analysis and Strategic Recommendations 61 2.2.4 Taiwan's Medical Device Conformity Pathways 62 2.2.5 US Medical Device Conformity Pathways 68 2.2.5.1 Predicate Device (US FDA 510(k)) vs Similar Device (Taiwan TFDA): A Side-by-Side Comparison 72 2.3 Regulatory Engineering of MLOps and SaMD Design Controls 75 2.3.1 Conflict and Reconciliation between Agile Development and Rigorous Regulation 75 2.3.2 Mapping Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) onto Design Controls 76 2.3.3 The Decomposition Principle: Steps Delineated by Traceable Documents 77 2.3.4 Positioning the Proposed 13-Step Framework Relative to Existing Standards 82 2.3.5 From CI/CD to the Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP): A Compliant Pathway 85 2.4 Compliant Data Acquisition and Governance Protocols 86 2.4.1 Federated Learning as a Privacy-Preserving Regulatory Solution 89 2.4.1.1 Medical Data Silos and the Regulatory Bottleneck of Centralized Learning 89 2.4.1.2 ``Data Stays, Models Move'': Engineering the Data Minimization Principle 89 2.4.1.3 Handling System Heterogeneity and Algorithm Governance 90 2.4.1.4 Strengthening Cybersecurity Defenses and Future Regulatory Outlook 91 2.5 Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) and Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) 92 2.5.1 A Structural Transition in AI/ML Software Regulation and the Regulatory Impasse 92 2.5.2 Core Architecture and Regulatory Authority of PCCP 92 2.5.3 Real-World PCCP Case Analysis 93 2.5.4 The Dynamic Closed-Loop Governance Mechanism of PCCP and PMS 94 2.6 Chapter Summary 96 Chapter 3 Model Development and Analytical Validation 97 3.1 Dataset Construction: Clinical Problem Definition and Feature Engineering 99 3.1.1 Clinical Problem Formulation and Target Population 99 3.1.2 Label Correctness and Regulatory Justification of Features 101 3.2 Dataset Construction: Establishing a Traceable and Regulatorily Defensible Reference Standard 103 3.2.1 Biomarker-Anchored Reference Standards 103 3.2.2 Discordance Resolution Mechanism 105 3.2.3 Annotation Traceability and Configuration Management 106 3.3 Algorithm Architecture Selection and Software Design Outputs 108 3.3.1 2D Image Feature Extraction and Active-Learning Architecture (EFAI ChestSuite XR Pleural Effusion Assessment System and TAIMedImg OsteoPredict) 108 3.3.2 Pseudo-3D (2.5D) Precision Segmentation Architecture (TAIMedImg DeepMets) 113 3.3.3 1D Physiological Signal Temporal Waveform Learning (TAIMedImg PHDS) 117 3.3.4 Algorithm Locking and Versioning 118 3.4 Federated Learning Architecture and Cross-Center Federated Validation Methodology 119 3.4.1 Client–Server Architecture for Federated Learning 119 3.4.2 Core Algorithm: Federated Averaging (FedAvg) and Mathematical Derivation 120 3.4.3 Real-World Systemic Challenges: Non-IID Data and Weight Divergence 121 3.4.4 Federated Validation: Two-Stage Validation and Generalization Assessment 122 3.5 Node Governance and Fault Tolerance in Federated Learning 124 3.5.1 Automated Data Integrity Verification at Edge Nodes 124 3.5.2 System Resilience and Automated Monitoring Metrics 125 3.5.3 Dynamic Fallback and Aggregation Strategy Switching 126 3.6 Analytical Validation Results 128 3.6.1 EFAI ChestSuite XR Pleural Effusion Assessment System (Pleural Effusion Project) 129 3.6.1.1 Training-Cohort Composition and Internal Verification Results 129 3.6.1.2 Ground-Truth Construction (GT Design Principles for the External Pivotal Cohort) 130 3.6.1.3 Pre-specified Acceptance Criteria and Endpoint Definitions 131 3.6.1.4 Methodological Contribution and Discussion 132 3.6.2 TAIMedImg DeepMets (Brain Metastasis Segmentation Project) 132 3.6.2.1 Training-Cohort Composition, Multi-Stage DAL Discipline, and Internal Verification 133 3.6.2.2 Ground-Truth Construction (GT Design Principles for the External Pivotal Cohort) 134 3.6.2.3 Pre-specified Acceptance Criteria and Endpoint Definitions 135 3.6.2.4 Methodological Contribution and Discussion 137 3.6.3 TAIMedImg PHDS (Pulmonary Hypertension Screening Project) 138 3.6.3.1 Training-Cohort Composition and Internal Verification Results 139 3.6.3.2 Ground-Truth Construction 140 3.6.3.3 Pre-specified Acceptance Criteria and Endpoint Definitions 141 3.6.3.4 Methodological Contribution and Discussion 142 3.6.4 TAIMedImg OsteoPredict (Osteoporosis Screening Project) 143 3.6.4.1 Training-Cohort Composition, Federated-Learning Discipline, and Internal Verification Results 143 3.6.4.2 Ground-Truth Construction 145 3.6.4.3 Pre-specified Acceptance Criteria and Endpoint Definitions 147 3.6.4.4 Methodological Contribution and Discussion 149 3.7 Chapter Conclusion 154 Chapter 4 Clinical Validation 157 4.1 Clinical Trial Design 159 4.1.1 TAIMedImg DeepMets Clinical Trial Design 161 4.1.2 TAIMedImg PHDS Clinical Trial Design 166 4.1.3 TAIMedImg OsteoPredict Clinical Trial Design 171 4.2 Statistical Analysis and Acceptance Criteria 175 4.2.1 TAIMedImg DeepMets Statistical Analysis and Acceptance Criteria 176 4.2.2 TAIMedImg PHDS Statistical Analysis and Acceptance Criteria 184 4.2.3 TAIMedImg OsteoPredict Statistical Analysis and Acceptance Criteria 187 4.3 Trial Execution and Data Analysis 191 4.3.1 TAIMedImg DeepMets (Multinational Validation Results) 191 4.3.2 TAIMedImg PHDS (Large-Scale Validation Results) 199 4.3.3 TAIMedImg OsteoPredict (Multimodal Validation Results) 203 4.3.4 EFAI ChestSuite XR Pleural Effusion Assessment System (Academic Validation Results) 215 4.4 Chapter Summary 221 Chapter 5 Translation of Outcomes and Conclusion 223 5.1 Regulatory Practice: QMS, DHF Authoring, and Review Defense 224 5.2 Academic Publication and Patent Portfolio 236 5.3 Post-Market Model Drift Monitoring 239 5.3.1 Necessity of Post-Deployment Monitoring 239 5.3.2 Core Components of the Monitoring Architecture 240 5.3.3 Drift Indicators and Re-training Trigger Conditions 243 5.3.4 Change-Control Workflow (PCCP-aligned Workflow) 244 5.3.5 TAIMedImg OsteoPredict Evidence Pipeline Plan 246 5.3.6 Advanced Federated Learning Mechanisms (Future Outlook) 248 5.3.7 Mapping to Existing SaMD Governance Frameworks 250 5.3.8 Limitations and Future Work 251 5.4 Limitations of This Dissertation 253 5.5 Summary: Original Contributions of This Dissertation 257 References 261 Appendix A — Regulatory Landscape, Applicable Guidances, and Four-Product Clearance Summary 293 A.1 Regulatory-Landscape Overview 293 A.2 TFDA-Applicable Regulations and Guidances 295 A.3 US FDA-Applicable Guidances 300 A.4 Nonsignificant-Risk AI/ML SaMD Clinical-Trial Categories and Applicability to the Four Cases 314 A.5 Regulatory-Clearance Summary for the Four Products 316 Appendix B — Pivotal-Study Design and Methodological Comparison: SaMD vs.\ Drug Trials 319 B.1 Pivotal-Study Design Summary 319 B.2 Methodological Differences Between SaMD and Drug Clinical Trials 319 B.2.1 Regulatory Lineage: Two Independent Tracks 320 B.2.2 Trial Phase Architecture: Phase System vs.\ Feasibility/Pivotal Multi-Stage 322 B.2.3 Intervention Nature and the ``Dose'' Analog 323 B.2.4 Primary Endpoints and Control Group Design 324 B.2.5 Sample-Size Methodology 326 B.2.6 Blinding and Bias-Control Mechanisms 327 B.2.7 Ethics Review and Informed Consent 328 B.2.8 Post-Market Change Control and Surveillance 330 B.2.9 Eight-Dimension Summary Table 332 B.2.10 Conclusion: A Lock–Validate–Monitor Lifecycle Structure Contrasted with the Drug Phase System 333 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 醫療器材軟體 | - |
| dc.subject | 法規科學 | - |
| dc.subject | 分析性驗證 | - |
| dc.subject | 臨床試驗 | - |
| dc.subject | 聯邦式學習 | - |
| dc.subject | 主動學習 | - |
| dc.subject | 預定變更控制計畫 | - |
| dc.subject | 深度學習 | - |
| dc.subject | 醫學影像 | - |
| dc.subject | 心電圖 | - |
| dc.subject | Software as a Medical Device | - |
| dc.subject | Regulatory Science | - |
| dc.subject | Analytical Validation | - |
| dc.subject | Clinical Trial | - |
| dc.subject | Federated Learning | - |
| dc.subject | Active Learning | - |
| dc.subject | Predetermined Change Control Plan | - |
| dc.subject | Deep Learning | - |
| dc.subject | Medical Imaging | - |
| dc.subject | Electrocardiogram | - |
| dc.title | 從演算法到醫療器材:應用於醫療數據之醫療器材軟體全生命週期開發與法規科學實踐 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From Algorithm to Medical Device: The Full Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Lifecycle Development and Regulatory Science Practice for Medical Data | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 沈俊嚴 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Chun-Yen Shen | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林太家;楊鈞澔;蔡孟宗;吳秀美 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tai-Chia Lin;Chun-Hao Yang;Meng-Tsung Tsai;Hisu-Mei Wu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 醫療器材軟體; 法規科學; 分析性驗證; 臨床試驗; 聯邦式學習; 主動學習; 預定變更控制計畫; 深度學習; 醫學影像; 心電圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Software as a Medical Device; Regulatory Science; Analytical Validation; Clinical Trial; Federated Learning; Active Learning; Predetermined Change Control Plan; Deep Learning; Medical Imaging; Electrocardiogram | en |
| dc.relation.page | 334 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202603053 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-08-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資料科學學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-08-19 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 資料科學學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-2.pdf | 14.89 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
