請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10206
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 丁宗蘇(Tzung-Su Ding) | |
dc.contributor.author | Da-Li Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林大利 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:10:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-12 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:10:00Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-03-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-02-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ambuel, B. and Temple, S. A. 1983. Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forest. Ecology, 64: 1057 –1068.
Andren, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71: 355 –366. Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology, 9: 95 —99. Balmford, A., Bennun, L., Brink B. T., Cooper, D., Cote, I. M., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Dudley, N., Dutton, I., Green, R. E., Gregory, R. D., Harrison, J., Kennedy, E. T., Kremen, C., Leader-Williams, N., Lovejoy, T. E., Mace, G., May, R., Mayaux, P., Morling, P., Phillips, J., Redford, K., Ricketts, T. H., Rodriguez, J. P., Sanjayan, M., Schei, P. J., van Jaarsveld, A. S. and Walther, B. A. 2005. The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science, 307: 212 —213. Bender, D. J., Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L. 2003. Evaluation of patch isolation metrics for predicting animal movements in binary landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 18: 17 –39. Bennett, A. F., Hinsely, S. A., Bellamy, P. E., Swetnam, R. D. and Mac Nally, R. 2004. Do regional gradients in land-use influence richness, composition and turnover of bird assemblages in small woods? Biological Conservation, 119: 191 –206. Bennett, A. F., Radford, J. Q. and Haslem, A. 2006. Properties of land mosaic: Implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biological Conservation, 133: 250 –264. Block, W. M. and Brennan, L. A. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Current Ornithology, 11: 35 –91. Boecklen, W. J. 1986. Effects of habitat heterogeneity on species-area relationship of forest birds. Journal of Biogeography, 13: 59 —68. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist, 124: 255 –279. Butler, R. G. 1980. Population size, social behavior, and dispersal in house mice: a quantitative investigation. Animal Behaviour, 28: 78 –85. Carey, A. B., Kershner J., Biswell B., and de Toledo, L. D. 1999. Ecological scale and forest development: squirrels, dietary fungi, and vascular plants in managed and unmanaged forests. Wildlife Monographs, 142: 1 –71. Carlson A. and Hartman G. 2001. Tropical forest fragmentation and nest predation – an experimental study in an Eastern Arc montane forest, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10: 1077 –1085. Chasko, G. G. and Gates, J. E. 1982. Avian habitat suitability along a transmission-line corridor in an oak-hickory forest region. Wildlife Monographs, 82: 1 –41. Chen, C. C. and Hsieh, F. 2002. Composition and foraging behavior of mixed-species flocks led by the Grey-cheecked Fulvetta in Fushan Experimental Forest, Taiwan. Ibis, 144: 317 –330. Chen, J., Franklin, J. F. and Spies, T. A. 1992. Vegetation response to edge environments in old growth douglas-fir forest. Ecological Application, 2: 387 –396. Chen, J., Saunders, C. S., Crow, T. R., Naiman, R. J. and Brosofske, K. D. Mroz, G. D., Brookshire, B. L. and Franklin, J. F. 1999. Microclimate in forest ecosystem and landscape ecology. BioScience, 49: 288 –297. Chou, L. S., Chen, C. C. and Loh, S. 1998. Diet analysis of the Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (Alccipe morrisonia) at Fushan Experimental Forest in Taiwan. Acta Zoologica Taiwanica, 9: 59 –66. Clements, F. E. 1907. Plant Physiology and Ecology. Henry Holt and Company, New York, USA. Cody, M. L. 1985. Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, New York, USA. Collinge, S. K. and Palmer, T. M. 2002. The influences of patch shape and boundary contrast on insect response to fragmentation in California grassland. Landscape Ecology, 17: 647 –656. Collinge, S. L. 1996. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36: 59 –77. Collinge, S. L. 2009. Ecology of Fragmented Landscapes. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA. Cornor, E. F. and McCoy, E. D. 1979. Statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. American Naturalist, 133: 791 –833.Debinski, D. M. and Holt, R. D. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology, 14: 342 –355. Debinski, D. M. and Holt, R. D. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology, 14: 342 –355. Deeming, D. C. 2002. Avian Incubation: Behavior, Environment, and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. Deppe, J. L. and Rotenberry, J. T. 2008. Scale-dependent habitat use by fall migratory birds: vegetation structure, floristics, and geography. Ecological Monographs, 78: 461 –487. Dirzo, R. and Raven, P. H. 2003. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annual Review of Environmental and Resources, 28: 137 –167. Donovan, T. M., Jones, P. W. Annand, E. M. and Thompson F. R. 1997. Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology, 78: 2064 –2075. Donovan, T. M., Thompson, F. R., Faaborg, J. and Probst, J. R. 1995. Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks. Conservation Biology, 9: 1380 –1395. ESRI. 2006. ArcGIS 9.2. Environmental System Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA. Evans, K. L., Newson, S. E. and Gaston, K. J. 2009. Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis, 151: 19 –39. Fagan, W. F., Cantrell, R. S. and Cosner, C. 1999. How habitat edges change species interactions. American Naturalist, 153: 156 – 182. Fahrig, L. 2002. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecological Applications, 12: 346 –353. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34: 487 –515. Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaic: the Ecology of Landscape and Regions. Cambridge University Press, UK. Forstmeier, W. and Weiss, I. 2004. Adaptive plasticity in nest-site selection in response to changing predation risk. Oikos, 104: 487 –499. Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds, Ι. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica, 19: 16 –36. Gates, J. E. and Gysel, L. W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotone. Ecology, 59: 871 –883. Gleason, H. A. 1922. On the relation between species and area. Ecology, 3: 158 –162. Gotelli, N .J. 1995. A Primer of Ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Hall, G. A. 1964. Breeding bird census – why and how. Audubon Firld Notes, 18: 413 –416. Halpern, C. B., and Spies, T. A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications, 5: 913 –934. Hanski, I. and Gaggiotti, O. E. 2004. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, USA. Hansen, A. J., Spies, T. A., Swanson, F. J. and Ohmann. J. L. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests: lessons from natural forests. BioScience, 41: 382 —392. Harris, L. D. 1988. Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conservation Biology, 12: 465 –469. Hayes, J. P., Probst J. R. and Rakstad, D. 1986. Effect of mating status and time of a day on Kirtland’s Warbler song rates. The Condor, 88: 386 –388. Haynes, K. J., Dillemuth, F. P., Anderson, B. J., Hakes, A. S., Jackson, H. B., Jackson, S. E. and Cronin, J. T. 2006. Landscape context outweighs local habitat quality in its effects on herbivore dispersal and distribution. Oecologia, 151: 431 –441. Henning, B. M. and Remsburg, A. J. 2009. Lakeshore vegetation effects avian and anuran populations. The American Midland Naturalist, 161: 123 –133. Herrando, S. and Brotons, L. 2002. Forest bird diversity in Mediterranean areas affected by wildfires: a multi-scale approach. Ecography, 25: 161 –172. Hilden, O. 1965. Habitat selection in birds: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 2: 53 –75. Hilty, J. A., Lidicker, Jr. W. Z. and Merenlender, A. M. 2006. Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation. Island Press, Washington D. C., USA. Holmes, R. T., and Robinson, S. K. 1981. Tree species preferences of foraging insectivorous birds in a northern hardwoods forest. Oecologia, 48: 31 –35. Hunter, M. L. Jr. 1999. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Hutto, R. L. 1985. Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds. In Habitat Selection in Birds, edited by Cody, M. L. Academic Press, New York, USA. Jasson, G. and Angelstam, P. 1999. Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the Long-tailed Tit (Aegithalos caudatus) in a boreal landscape. Landscape Ecology, 14: 283 –290. Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61: 65 –71. Johnson, R. G. and Temple, S. A. 1990 Nest predation and brood parasitism of tallgrass prairie birds. Journal of Wildlife Management, 54: 106 –111. Johnston, V. R. 1947. Breeding birds of forests edge in Illinois. The Condor, 49: 45 –53. Jones, J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. The Auk, 118: 557 –562. Kallimanis, A. S., Mazaris, A. D., Tzanopoulos, J., Halley, J. M., Pantis, J. D. and Sgardelis, S. P. 2008. How does habitat diversity affect the species-area relationship? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17: 532 –538. Keller, L. F. and Waller, D. M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17: 230 –241. Konishi, M., Emlen, S. T., Ricklefs, R. E. and Wingfield, J. C. 1989. Contributions of bird species to biology. Science, 246: 465 –472. Kurki, S., Nikula, A., Helle, P. and Linden, H. 2000. Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology, 81: 1985 –1997. Lack, D. 1933. Habitat selection in birds with special reference to the effects of afforestation on the Breckland avifauna. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2: 239 –262. Lande, R. 1987. Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territory populations. American Naturalist, 130: 624 –635. Laurance, W. F. and Yensen, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation, 55: 77 –92. Law, B., and Chidel, M. 2002. Tracks and riparian zones facilitate the use of Australian regrowth forest by insectivorous bats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39: 605 –617. Law, B. S. and Dickman, C, R. 1998. The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7: 323 –333. Lay, D. W. 1938. How valuable are woodland clearing to birdlife? Wilson Bulletin, 50: 254 –256. Lee, P. Y. and Rotenberry, J. T. 2005. Relationships between bird species and tree species assemblages in forested habitats of eastern North America. Journal of Biogeography, 32: 1139 –1150. Lee, P. F., Shen, S. F. Ding, T. S., Chiou, C. R. and Yuan, H. W. 2005. Habitat Selection of the cooperative breeding Taiwan Yuhina (Yuhina brunneiceps) in a fragmented forest habitat. Zoological Studies, 44: 497 –504. Leopold, A. 1933. Game Management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, USA Lindenmayer, D. B., Knight, E. J., Crane, M. J., Montague-Drake, R., Michael, D. R. and MacGregor, C. I. 2010. What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biological Conservation, 143: 289 –301. Lord, J. M. and Norton, D. A. 1990. Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 4: 197 –202. Lovejoy, T. E., Bierregaard, R. O., Rylands, A. B., Malcolm, J. R., Quintela, C. E., Harper, L. H., Brown, Jr. K. S., Powell, A. H., Powell, G. V. N., Schubart, H. O. R. and Hays, M. B. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity, edit by Soule, M. E., 257 –285. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. MacArthur, R. H. and MacArthur, J. W. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42: 594 –598. MacArthur, R. H. and Pianka, E. R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100: 603 –609. MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Magura, T., Baldi, A. and Horvath, R. 2008. Breakdown of the species-area relationship in exotic but not in native forest patches. Acta Oecologia, 33: 272 –279. Margules, C. R. and Pressey, R. L. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405: 243 –253. Martin, T. E. 1998. Habitat and area effects on forest bird s assemblages: is nest predation an influence? Ecology, 9: 74 –84. Martin, T. E., Martin, P. R., Olson, C. R. N, Heidnger, B. J. and Fontaine, J. J. 2000. Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science, 287: 1482 –1485. Matlack, G. R. 1994. Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge – trends in space and successional time. Journal of Ecology, 82: 113 –123. McCollin, D. 1998. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography, 21: 247 –260. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-351. Meffe, G. K. and Carrol, C. R. 1997. Principles of Conservation Biology, 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Mills, L. S. 1995. Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants. Conservation Biology, 9: 395 –402. Morrison, M. L., Marcot, B. G. and Mannan, R. W. 2006. Wildlife-Habitat Relationships: Concepts and Applications, 3rd edition. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Muller, J., Stadler, J. and Brandl, R. 2010. Composition versus physiognomy of vegetation as predictors of bird assemblages: the role of lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114: 490 –495. Murica, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implication for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 58 –62. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th edition. IRWIN, Chicago, USA. Paillet, Y., Berges, L., Hjalten, J., Odor, P., Avon, C., Bernhardt-Romermann, M., Bijlsma, R. J., De Bruyn, L., Fuhr, M., Grandin, U., Kanka, R., Lundin, L., Luque, S., Magura, T., Matesanz, S., Meszaros, I., Sebastia, M. T., Schmidt, W., Standovar, T., Tothmeresz, B., Uotila, A., Valladares, F., Vellak, K. and Virtanen, R. 2010. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation Biology, 24: 101 –112. Paton, P. W. 1994. The effect of edge on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence? Conservation Biology, 8: 17 –26. Peak, R. G. 2007. Forest edges negatively affect Golden-cheeked Warbler nest survival. The Condor, 109: 628 –637. Ponsero A. and Joly, P. 1998. Clutch size, egg survival and migration distance in the agile frog (Rana dalmatina) in a floodplain. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 142: 343 –352. Rands, M. R. W. 1986. The survival of gamebird (Galliformes) chicks in relation to pesticide use in cereal fields. Ibis, 128: 57 –64. Ricklefs, R. E. 1979. Ecology. Chiron Press, Concord, Massachusetts, USA. Ries, L., Fletcher, R. J., Battin, J. and Sisk, T. D. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics, 35: 491 –522. Robbins, C. S. 1970. Recommendations for an international standard for a mapping method in bird census work. Audubon Filed Notes, 24: 723 –726. Robinson, S. K., and Holmes, R. T. 1982. Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology, 63: 1918 –1931. Robinson, S. K., and Holmes, R. T. 1984. Effects of plant species and foliage structure on the foraging behavior of forest birds. The Auk, 101: 672 –684. Rodewald, A. D. and Yahner, R. H. 2001. Influence of landscape composition on avian community structure and associated mechanisms. Ecology, 82: 3493 –3504. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Rotenberry, J. T. 1985. The role of habitat in avian community composition: physiognomy or floristic? Oecologia, 67: 213 –217. Santos, T., Telleria, J. L. and Carbonell, R. 2002. Bird conservation in fragmented Mediterranean forests of Spain: effects of geographical location, habitat and landscape degradation. Biological Conservation, 105: 113 –125. Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. and Margules, C. R. 1991. Biological consequence of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology, 5: 18 –32. Schmiegelow F. K. A. and Monkkonen, M. 2002. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecological Applications, 12: 375 –389. Schoener, T. W. 1969. Optimal size and specialization in constant and fluctuating environments: an energy-time approach. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology, 22: 103 –114. Schooley, R. L. 1994. Auunal variation in habitat selection – patterns concealed by pooled data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 58: 367 –374. Severinghaus, L. L., Ding, T. S., Fang, W. H., Lin, W. H. Tsai, M. C. and Yen, C. W. 2010a. The Avifauna of Taiwan Vol. 1. Council of Agriculture Executive Yuan Forestry Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan. Severinghaus, L. L., Ding, T. S., Fang, W. H., Lin, W. H. Tsai, M. C. and Yen, C. W. 2010b. The Avifauna of Taiwan Vol. 3. Council of Agriculture Executive Yuan Forestry Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan. Spies, T. A. 1998. Forest structure: a key to the ecosystem. Northwest Science, 72: 34 –39. SPSS. 2007. SPSS Advance Statistics 17.0. Self-Propelled Semi-Submersible, Chicago, USA. Steffan-Dewenter, I. and Tscharntke, T. 1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia, 121: 432 –440. Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press. New Jersey, USA. Svardson, G. 1949. Competition and habitat selection in birds. Oikos, 1: 157 –174. SYSTAT. 2007. SYSTAT 12 Statistics. SYSTAT Software Inc. San Jose, California, USA. Terborgh, J. 1977. Bird species-diversity on an Andean elevation gradient. Ecology, 58: 1007 –1019. Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. and Nowak, M. A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371: 65 –66. Tischendorf, L. 2001. Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecology, 16: 235 –254. Turner, I. M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 200 –209. van den Berg, L. J. L., Bullock, J. M., Clarke, R. T., Langston, R. H. W. and Rose, R. J. 2001. Territory selection by the Dartford Warbler (Sylvia undata) in Dorset, England: the role of vegetation type, habitat fragmentation and population size. Biological Conservation, 101: 217 –228. Vargas-Contreras, J. A., Medellin, R. A., Escalona-Segura, G. and Interian-Sosa, L. 2009. Vegetation complexity and bat-plant dispersal in Calakmul, Mexico. Journal of Natural History, 43: 219 –243. Venier, L. and Fahrig, L. 1996. Habitat availability cause the species abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos, 76: 564 –570. Waston, H. C. 1835. Remarks on the Geographical Distribution of British Plants: Chiefly in Connection with Latitude, Elevation, and Climate. Nabu Press, London, UK. Waston, J. E. M., Whittaker, R. J. and Dawson, T. P. 2004. Avifaunal responses to habitat fragmentation in the threatened littoral forests of south-eastern Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography, 31: 1791 –1807. Werner, E. E. and Hall, D. J. 1979. Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology, 60: 256 –264. Werner, E. E., Gilliam, D. J. and Mittelbach, G. G. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology, 64: 1540 –1548. Whittaker, R. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monograph, 30: 279 –338. Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan, New York, USA. Wiens, J. A. 1969. An approach to the study of ecological relationship among grassland birds. Ornithological Monographs, 8: 1 –93. Wiens, J. A. 1989. The Ecology of Bird Communities: volume 1. Foundations and Patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Wiens, J. A. 1995. Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. In Mosaic Landscape and Ecological Process, 1-26. edit by Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. Springer, London, UK. Wiens, J. A., and Rotenberry, J. T. 1981. Habitat associations and community structure of birds in shrubsteppe environments. Ecological Monographs, 51: 21 –41. Wilcove, D. S. 1985. Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology, 66: 1211 –1214. Wilcove, D. S., McLellan, C. H. and Dobson, A. P. 1986. Habitat fragmentation in temperate zone. In Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity, edit by Soule, M. E., 237 –256. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Wilcox, B.A. 1980. Insular ecology and conservation. In Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-ecological Perspective, edit by Soule, M. E. and Wilcox, B. A., 95 –117. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, USA. Wilson, F. M. and Comet, T. A. 1996. Bird communities of northern forests: ecological correlates of diversity and abundance in the understory. The Condor, 98: 350 –362. Wilson, P. J. and Provan, J. 2003. Effect of habitat fragmentation on levels and patterns of genetic diversity in natural populations of the peat moss Polytrichum commune. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B, 270: 881 –886. Yahner, R. H. 1988. Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conservation Biology, 2: 333 –339. Yahner, R. H. 1991. Avian nesting ecology in small even-aged aspen stands. Journal of Wildlife Management, 55: 155 –159. Yen, C. W. 1990. An ecological study of the Timaliinae (Muscicapidae) of Taiwan. Bulletin of National Museum and Natural Science, 2: 281 – 289. Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D. and Boulinier, T. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 446 –453. Yuan, H. W., Liu, M. and Shen, S. F. 2004. Joint nesting in Taiwan Yuhinas: a rare passerine case. The Condor, 106: 862 –872. Zipkin, E. F., DeWam, A. and Royle, J. A. 2009. Impacts of forest fragmentation on species richness: a hierarchical approach to community modeling. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46: 815 –822. Zurita, G. A., Rey, N., Varela, D. M., Villagra, M. and Bellocq, M. I. 2006. Conversion of the Atlantic Forest into native and exotic tree plantations: effects on bird communities from the local and regional perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management, 235: 164 –173. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10206 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 棲地破碎化對生物多樣性的效應對所有的物種並不一致,且不易釐清。若研究只在廣(地景)尺度下檢視群聚組成,則細微的反應容易被忽略。因此,在細(區塊)尺度下探討個體層級的反應亦相當重要。在群聚的層級,於破碎環境中的區塊之間檢驗地景結構(區塊面積、形狀複雜度、相鄰區塊、棲地類型)與植群結構(垂直枝葉結構、植群組成)對鳥種豐富度的效應與交互作用。在個體層級,則分別檢驗不同物種、繁殖狀態(在地繁殖者、鄰地繁殖者、冬候鳥種)、以及生態同功群(食蟲者、雜食者)鳥類的棲地偏好。最後則比較不同繁殖狀態的鳥類在不同棲地類型的區塊中是否具邊緣效應。研究地(國立臺灣大學梅峰山地實驗農場)區分成286個區塊及六種棲地類型(建築、耕地、天然林、果園、人工林、水池)。2005年到2007年的三個繁殖季中,所有被觀察到的鳥類個體(66種、1,1740個紀錄點)的位置皆記錄於地圖上,所有區塊的植群結構則在2007年測量。
在群聚層級,棲地類型和植群結構對鳥種豐富度的影響大於區塊面積。在建築、耕地、人工林及水池,該區塊與天然林和人工林區塊的相鄰長度為維持鳥種豐富度的重要因子。在果園、天然林與人工林中,植群結構則為維持更高的鳥種豐富度的重要因子。在個體層級,大多數的鳥種偏好天然林與人工林,但是仍然有些鳥種偏好非森林的棲地。不同物種、繁殖狀態以及生態同功群的鳥類個體,對垂直枝葉結構與植群組成的偏好皆不盡相同。在地繁殖者的紀錄點密度顯著的高於鄰地繁殖者與冬候鳥種。在建築與耕地中,任何繁殖狀態的鳥類個體紀錄點密度沒有顯著的邊緣效應。然而,在地繁殖者在果園、天然林與人工林中,與冬候鳥種在天然林中,邊緣距離帶的紀錄點密度顯著地高於內部。這些結果暗示地景結構、垂直枝葉結構與植群組成的多樣度是在破碎環境中維持高生物多樣性的重要因子。破碎的區塊可以依面積和植群結構分類。植群結構單純的區塊(無論面積大或小),首要是增加其植群結構的複雜度。植群結構複雜的大區塊對於吸引鳥類個體與維持高鳥種豐富度而言是較好的狀態,但是無法吸引某些偏好非森林棲地的鳥種。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity are not universal to all species and are difficult to be clarified. If only examining community composition at broader (landscape) scale, it will be easy to neglect some delicate responses. It is important to conduct research on individual level and at finer (patch) scale. This study was aimed to examine the effects and interactions of the attributes of landscape structure (patch area, shape complexity, neighboring patches, and habitat type) and vegetation structure (vertical foliage structure, and floristic composition) to bird species richness among patches in a fragmented environment. On individual level, the habitat preferences of different bird species, reproductive statuses (local breeders, neighboring breeders, and wintering species), and ecological guilds (insectivores and omnivores) among diverse landscape components were also examined. Finally, edge effects to different bird reproductive statuses in different habitat types were compared. The study site, Meifeng Highlands Experimental Farm of National Taiwan University, was classified into 286 patches and six habitat types (buildings, fields, native forests, orchards, plantations, and ponds). The locations of all observed bird individuals (66 species, 11,740 registration spots) were mapped during three breeding seasons from 2005 to 2007. The vegetation structures of the 286 patches were measured in 2007.
On community level, the effects of habitat types and vegetation structure on bird species richness were stronger than patch area. For patches of buildings, fields, plantations and ponds, the length of adjacent native forests and plantations were the important factors to sustain bird species richness; in orchards, native forests and plantations, vegetation structure were the important factors to sustain higher bird species richness. On individual level, most species preferred native forests and plantations, but there were still some species preferred non-forest habitats. Different species, reproductive statuses, and ecological guilds preferred different situations of vertical foliage structure and floristic composition. The registration spot densities of local breeders were significantly higher than neighboring breeders and wintering species. In buildings and fields, the registration spot densities of different reproductive statuses did not show significant edge effects. However, the registration spot densities of edge buffer zones were significantly higher than the interior ones in orchards, native forests, and plantations for local breeders, and in native forests for wintering species. These results suggested that diversity of landscape structure, vertical foliage structure, and floristic composition were important factors to sustain higher biodiversity in fragmented environments. Fragmented patches can be classified by area and vegetation structure. For patches with simple vegetation structure (no matter large or small), it is important to increase the complexity of vegetation structure. Large patches with complex vegetation structure are the best to attract bird individuals and sustain high bird species richness, but invalid to some species which prefer non-forest habitats. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:10:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97625002-1.pdf: 3031997 bytes, checksum: 001ae0f32abaacfcec589a3dc6356713 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 v Abstract vii Table of Contents 1 List of Tables 3 List of Figures 7 List of Appendixes 8 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2 Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Bird Specie Richness 5 Abstract 5 摘要 7 Introduction 8 Methods 14 Results 21 Discussion 24 Tables 30 Figures 33 CHAPTER 3 Habitat Preferences of Bird Individuals in Fragmented Landscape 42 Abstract 42 摘要 44 Introduction 45 Methods 50 Results 52 Discussion 55 Tables 61 Figures 69 CHAPTER 4 Edge Effects on Different Bird Reproductive Statuses in Fragmented Landscape 71 Abstract 71 摘要 73 Introduction 74 Methods 78 Results 80 Discussion 83 Figures 87 CHAPTER 5 Conclusion 93 Literature Cited 95 Appendixes 107 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 破碎地景中鳥類群聚組成及棲地偏好 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Avian Community Composition and Habitat Preferences in Fragmented Landscape | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 袁孝維(Hsiao-Wei Yuan) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 夏禹九(Yue-Joe Hsia),李培芬(Pei-Fen Lee),許富雄(Fu-Hsiung Hsu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鳥種豐富度,邊緣效應,棲地破碎化,棲地偏好,臺灣,植群結構, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | bird species richness,edge effects,habitat fragmentation,habitat preferences,Taiwan,vegetation structure, | en |
dc.relation.page | 109 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-02-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 2.96 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。